Development and Performance Evaluation of a Coffee Cherry Size Grading Machine

Abstract

The coffee cherry processing industry traditionally relies on the dry method, involving harvesting, drying, and dehulling. Conventional dehulling machines with fixed drum clearances struggle to handle natural size variations, leading to inefficiencies and increased cherry breakage. To address these challenges, an innovative coffee cherry-size grading machine has been developed, utilizing an inclined oscillating sieve technique powered by a diesel engine through a belt drive. Key components include a feeding hopper, reciprocating grading sieve assembly, support frame, and power transmission system. A comprehensive performance evaluation focused on grading efficiency and capacity, exploring various operational parameters: feed rates (5, 10, 15 kg min-1), sieve angles (7˚, 9˚, 11˚), and speeds (80, 140, 200 rpm). Using a split-split-plot block design for data analysis, the study yielded promising results. Maximum grading efficiency of 88.40% was achieved at 15 kg min-1 feed rate, 8 rpm speed, and 7˚ sieve angle, with a capacity of 137.11 kg h-1 and 4.96% sieve clogging rate. ANOVA revealed significant influences of operational speed and sieve inclination angle on performance parameters. These findings offer valuable insights for optimizing coffee cherry processing, potentially enhancing efficiency and quality in the industry.

Keywords

• Coffee
• Dehulling
• Eccentric
• Grading
• Oscillating sieve
• Machine

References

1. Adem MW (2023). Production, productivity, quality and chemical composition of Ethiopian coffee. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 9. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2023.2196868
2. Adugna BG (2020). Review on coffee production and marketing in Ethiopia. Journal of Marketing and Consumer Research, 10(6): 208-213.
3. Alemnew S (2020). Factor affecting coffee (Coffee Arabica L) quality and grading methods. Journal of Natural Sciences Research, 10(4): 13-20. https://doi.org/10.7176/JNSR/10-4-02
4. Ansar A, Sukmawaty S, Murad M, Muttalib SA, Putra RH and Abdurrahim (2021). Design and performance test of the coffee bean classifier. Processes, 9: 1462. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9081462
5. Chungcharoen T, Limmun W., Chanpaka W and Srisang N (2019). Optimization of sorting efficiency of size grading machine using oscillating sieve with swing along width direction. 3: 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201929304003
6. Bizimungu G, Houêchénéahouansou R, Semassou, C and Dusabumuremyi JC (2022). Physical and mechanical properties of coffee cherries and beans in Africa: Review and the State of arts. Food Science and Technology (United States), 10(3): 55-74. https://doi.org/10.13189/fst.2022.100301
7. CSA (2019). Central Statistical Agency (CSA) (2018) The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia central statistical agency agricultural sample survey. Report on Area and Production of Crops. Statistical Bulletin No. 586. Addis Abeba, Ethiopia.
8. Freitas VV, Borges LLR, Vidigal MCTR, dos Santos MH and Stringheta PC (2024). Coffee: A comprehensive overview of origin, market, and the quality process. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 146(10.1016/j.tifs.2024.104411). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2024.104411

9. Garnayak DK (2008). Moisture-dependent physical properties of jatropha seed (Jatropha curcas L.). Journal of Industrial Crops and Products, 27(1): 123-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2007.09.001
10. Godwill E (2013). An assessment of primary processing of coffee berries by small scale coffee growers for quality and price realization in Arumeru district, Arusha Region.
11. Gofe Balami K, Ketema M, Goshu A and Author C (2024). Ethiopian Coffee Export Performance and Diversification Analysis Full Length Research Paper July. https://doi.org/10.20372/mwu.jessd.2024.1561
12. Karababa E (2006). Physical properties of popcorn kernels. Journal of Food Engineering, 72(1): 100-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.11.028
13. Khurmi RS and Gupta JK (2005). A textbook of machine design. S.I. Units. Eurasis Publishing House (PVT) Limited, New Delhi. (I).
14. Mostafa HMSB (2003). Developing an appropriate system for olive grading. Unpublished M. Sc. Thesis. Faculty of Agriculture, Moshtohor, Zagazig Univ. Benha Branch.
15. Okunola AA, Igbeka JC and Arisoyin AG (2015). Development and evaluation of a cereal cleaner. Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology (JMEST), 2(6): 3159–3199.
16. Tafa W and Olaniyan AM (2023). Design and development of an engine driven onion grading machine. American Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2(2): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajfst.v2i2.1503
17. Umani KC and Markson IE (2020). Development and performance evaluation of a manually operated onions grading machine. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2020.100070
18. Yayock ES and Ishaya J (2020). Development and performance evaluation of a grain grading machine for small and medium scale farmers. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (IOSR-JAVS), 13.