An Affordable Internet of Things Based Water Level Monitoring System for Alternate Wetting and Drying Irrigation Management in Paddy Cultivation

Abstract

Rice is the staple food for over 3.5 billion people globally. The increasing demand for freshwater and declining resource availability pose serious challenges to paddy production. Alternate Wetting and Drying (AWD) is a proven irrigation technique that can reduce water use, but manual monitoring limits its adoption. This study presents the development and preliminary validation of an affordable IoT-based AWD monitoring prototype designed to automate water level monitoring in paddy fields. The system uses sensor probes connected to a solar-powered, Wi-Fi-enabled microcontroller and transmits real-time water level data to a cloud database accessible through a dedicated Android application, allowing farmers to monitor and manage irrigation remotely. Under controlled test conditions, the system achieved 100% water level classification accuracy across 30 observations (95% CI: 88.6%–100%, Wilson score interval), correctly categorizing all water levels into predefined High, Low, and Very Low statuses. The Very Low class was represented by only two observations, and all results should be interpreted cautiously pending long-term multi-season field validation. The total system cost is USD 42, making it potentially accessible to smallholder farmers. Benefits such as water savings, greenhouse gas emission reduction, and labor reduction are consistent with published AWD literature but were not directly measured in this study and require confirmation through future comparative field trials.

Keywords

• Internet of Things (IoT)
• Alternate Wetting and Drying (AWD)
• Water level monitoring
• Paddy irrigation management
• ESP32-based automation

Thanks

The authors acknowledge the AgroMech Development Initiative (ADI) foundation for providing support for conducting this research.

References

1. Abdullah-Al-Mahbub M, Islam ARMT, Almohamad H, Al Dughairi AA, Al-Mutiry M and Abdo HG (2022). Different forms of solar energy progress: The fast-growing eco-friendly energy source in Bangladesh for a sustainable future. Energies, 15(18): 6790. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15186790.
2. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS). (2024). Bangladesh rice production statistics for FY 2023-2024. http://bbs.portal.gov.bd
3. Bouman BA, Humphreys E, Tuong TP and Barker R (2007). Rice and water. Advances in Agronomy, 92, 187–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(04)92004-4.
4. Chauhan J, Prasad SR, Pal S and Choudhury P (2017). Seed systems and supply chain of rice in India. Journal of Rice Research, 10(1): 9-16.
5. Cheng H, Shu K, Zhu T, Wang L, Liu X, Cai W, Qi Z and Feng S (2022). Effects of alternate wetting and drying irrigation on yield, water and nitrogen use, and greenhouse gas emissions in rice paddy fields. Journal of Cleaner Production, 349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131487.
6. Datta A, Ullah H and Ferdous Z (2017). Water Management in Rice. In: Chauhan, B., Jabran, K., Mahajan, G. (eds) Rice Production Worldwide. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47516-5_11.
7. Dinesh D, Campbell B, Bonilla-Findji O and Richards M (eds) (2017). 10 best bet innovations for adaptation in agriculture: A supplement to the UNFCCC NAP Technical Guidelines. CCAFS Working Paper no. 215. Wageningen, The Netherlands: CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS). www.ccafs.cgiar.org
8. Espressif Systems (2024). Wireless SoCs, Software, Cloud and AIoT Solutions. https://www.espressif.com/sites/default/files/documentation/esp32_datasheet_en.pdf

9. FAO (2024). Statistical Yearbook of World Food and Agriculture 2023. https://openknowledge.fao.org/.
10. Farooq MS, Riaz S, Abid A, Umer T and Zikria YB (2020). Role of IoT Technology in Agriculture: A Systematic Literature Review. Electronics, 9(2), 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9020319
11. Hiremath S, Das M, Sagar S and Banu S (2023). "An Architecture for IoT Server Using Firebase RTDB for Various IoT Projects," 2023 7th International Conference on Design Innovation for 3 Cs Compute Communicate Control (ICDI3C), Karnataka, India, 2023, pp. 179-184, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDI3C61568.2023.00045
12. Hossain MM and Islam MR (2022). Farmers’ participatory alternate wetting and drying ırrigation method reduces greenhouse gas emission and ımproves water productivity and paddy yield in bangladesh. Water, 14(7), 1056. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14071056.
13. Jalindar MK, Praveen Rao V, Ramulu V, Avil Kumar K and Uma Devi M (2019) Effectiveness of field water tube for standardization of Alternate Wetting and Drying (AWD) method of water management in lowland rice (Oryza Sativa L.). Irrig. and Drain., 68: 679–689. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2354
14. Kürschner E, Henschel C, Hildebrandt T, Jülich E, Leineweber M and Paul C (2010). Water saving in rice production–dissemination, adoption and short term impacts of alternate wetting and drying (AWD) in Bangladesh. Humboldt-Universitat Zu Berlin SLE Publication Series, S241. https://edoc.hu-berlin.de/server/api/core/bitstreams/f9c7dc9b-a760-4ee2-b794-edf4c7c5e79c/content
15. Lampayan RM, Rejesus RM, Singleton GR and Bouman BA (2015). Adoption and economics of alternate wetting and drying water management for irrigated lowland rice. Field Crops Research, 170, 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.10.013
16. Latif J, Shakir MZ, Edwards N, Jaszczykowski M, Ramzan N and Edwards V (2022). Review on condition monitoring techniques for water pipelines. Measurement, 193, 110895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.110895
17. Mager T and Torkmani Y (2024). Energy demand of typical IIoT sensors and their supply via energy harvesting. " EASS – Energieautonome Sensorsysteme 2024; 12. GMM-Tagung, Freiburg, Germany, 2024, pp. 76-79.
18. Matloob A, Jabran K, Farooq M, Khaliq A, Aslam F, Abbas T, Ehsanullah Zaman U, Irshad S and Chauhan BS (2022). Water-wise cultivation of basmati rice in Pakistan. In Modern Techniques of Rice Crop Production (pp. 187–229). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4955-4_13.
19. Rutledge K, McDaniel M, Teng S, Hall H, Ramroop T, Sprout E, Hunt J, Boudreau D and Costa H (2024). Copyright © 2024 Food Staple. https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/food-staple
20. Statista (2024). Total rice consumption worldwide from 2008/2009 to 2023/2024. https://www.statista.com/statistics/255977/total-global-rice-consumption/
21. Tuong TP, Bam B and Mortimer M (2005). More rice, less water—Integrated approaches for increasing water productivity in irrigated Rice-Based systems in Asia. Plant Production Science, 8(3): 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1626/pps.8.231.
22. Tzounis A, Katsoulas N, Bartzanas T and Kittas C (2017). Internet of Things in agriculture, recent advances and future challenges. Biosystems Engineering, 164: 31-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.09.007.
23. Van Schendel W (2020). A History of Bangladesh (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Wang C, Fa X, Meng Q, Zhang Y, Wang W, Zhu K, Zhang W, Gu J, Liu L and Zhang J (2024). Comparison of agronomic and physiological characteristics for rice varieties differing in water use efficiency under alternate wetting and drying irrigation. Agronomy, 14(9): 1986. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14091986.