Short-Term and Topographic Variations in Ecological Site Description of a Semi-Arid Mountain Rangeland

Year 2022, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 68 - 74, 30.12.2022

Onur İleri

https://doi.org/10.51801/turkjrfs.1213268

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Deficiencies in the rangeland assessment methods prompted researchers to seek new methodologies. Rangeland Ecological Site Description (RESD), is a method suggested to produce information about the sustainability of the ecological services of the rangelands. Improvability for various ecologies is an advantage of the method. In this study, the short-term variation and the effect of the topographical differences on the RESD method were determined. Suggested ecological indicators were scored at the 60 different locations (20 north, 20 south, 20 summits) of the Bozdağ Rangeland for two years (2019-2020), and the ecological indicator scores were compared using non-parametric tests. Results showed that the RESD did not change in two years but it was lower at the south face considering the north face and summit. The RESD class of the south faces was “fair”, while they were “good” for north faces and summit positions. Variations in slope gradient, light exposure, and grazing practices might be responsible for this difference. RESD method provides wider information about the ecological services of the rangelands. However, this method should be improved to give information that could be used in short-term rangeland management plans, including grazing capacity.

Keywords

Ecological site, ecological indicators, rangeland assessment, topography

Thanks

Many thanks to Prof. Dr. Ali KOÇ and Prof. Dr. H. İbrahim ERKOVAN for their valuable contributions. Special thanks to Dr. Yasin ALTAY for the support in statistical analyses.

References

• Adams, D.C., Short, R.E., Pfister, J.A., Peterson, K.R. and Hudson, D.B. 1995. New concepts for assessment of rangeland condition. Journal of Range Management, 48(3): 271-282.
• Altın, M., Gökkuş, A. and Koç, A. 2011. Çayır Mera Yönetimi, Cilt I (Genel İlkeler), Tarım ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı, TÜGEM, Çayır Mera Yem Bitkileri ve Havza Geliştirme Daire Başkanlığı, Ankara, 376 s. (In Turkish).
• Altın, M., Gökkuş, A. and Koç, A. 2021. Çayır Mera Islahı (2. Baskı). Palme Yayınevi, 359s. (In Turkish).
• Aoyama, L., Bartolome, J.W. and Hallett, L.M. 2020. Incorporating diversity measures into Ecological Site Descriptions to manage biodiversity on heterogeneous landscapes. Rangelands, 42(4): 93-105.
• Bestelmeyer, B.T. and Brown, J.R. 2010. An introduction to the special issue on ecological sites. Rangelands, 32(6): 3-4.
• Biswas, A. 2019. Joint multifractal analysis for three variables: Characterizing the effect of topography and soil texture on soil water storage. Geoderma, 334: 15-23.
• Briske, D.D., Fuhlendorf, S.D. and Smeins, F.E. 2005. State-and-transition models, thresholds, and rangeland health: a synthesis of ecological concepts and perspectives. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 58(1): 1-10.
• Clements, F.E. 1916. Plant Succession. Carnegie Inst. Washington, D.C., Pub.242.
• DiTomaso, J.M., Masters, R.A. and Peterson, V.F. 2010. Rangeland invasive plant management. Rangelands, 32(1): 43-47.
• Erkovan, Ş., Güllap, M.K., Erkovan, H.İ. and Koç, A. 2016. Rangeland health and ecological site classification of the rangeland with grazed different type animals. Journal of Field Crops Central Research Institute, 25 (Special issue-2): 174-178. (In Turkish)
• Fox, D.M. and Bryan, R.B. 2000. The relationship of soil loss by interrill erosion to slope gradient. Catena, 38(3): 211-222.
• Fuss, C.B., Driscoll, C.T., Groffman, P.M., Campbell, J.L., Christenson, L.M., Fahey, T.J., Fisk, M.J., Mitchell, M.J., Templer, P.H., Duran, J. and Morse, J.L. 2016. Nitrate and dissolved organic carbon mobilization in response to soil freezing variability. Biogeochemistry, 131(1): 35-47.
• Garnick, S., Barboza, P.S. and Walker, J.W. 2018. Assessment of animal-based methods used for estimating and monitoring rangeland herbivore diet composition. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 71(4): 449-457.
• Gökkuş, A. 2020. A review on the factors causing deterioration of rangelands in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Range and Forage Science, 1(1): 28-34.
• Güllap, M.K., Severoğlu, S., Erkovan, Ş., Koç, A. and Erkovan, H.İ. 2020. Ecological site description and rangeland health classification of the Kop and Palandoken Mountain Rangeland. Atatürk University Journal of Agricultural Faculty, 51(2): 145-150. (In Turkish)
• Holechek, J.L., Pieper, R.D. and Herbel, C.H., 2011. Range Management: Principles and Practicies, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 444p.
• Huggett, R.J. 1998. Soil chronosequences, soil development, and soil evolution: a critical review. Catena, 32(3-4): 155-172.
• Kamrani, K., Arzani, H., Javadi, S.A. and Nejad, R.A. 2019. Rangeland condition and the appropriate rangeland management methods. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 26(4): 524-531.
• Koç, A., Gökkuş, A. and Serin, Y. 1994. Türkiye’de çayır-meraların durumu ve erozyon yönünden önemi. Ekoloji ve Çevre Dergisi, 13, 36-41. (In Turkish)
• Koç, A. 1995. Topografya ile toprak nem ve sıcaklığının mera bitki örtülerinin bazı özelliklerine etkileri (Doctoral Thesis), Atatürk University, Science Institute, Erzurum, 181 p. (In Turkish).
• Koç, A., Erkovan, H.İ. and Schacht, W. 2013. Ecological site description and rangeland health criteria for rangelands (In Turkish). Proc. X National Field Crop Congress, September 10.13, Konya, Turkey, III: 188-195.
• Moeslund, J.E., Arge, L., Bøcher, P.K., Dalgaard, T. and Svenning, J.C. 2013. Topography as a driver of local terrestrial vascular plant diversity patterns. Nordic Journal of Botany, 31(2): 129-144.
• Oztas, T., Koc, A. and Comakli, B. 2003. Changes in vegetation and soil properties along a slope on overgrazed and eroded rangelands. Journal of Arid Environments, 55(1): 93-100.
• Pyke, D.A., Herrick, J.E., Shaver, P. and Pellant, M. 2003. Rangeland health attributes and indicators for qualitative assessment. Journal of Range Management, 55: 584–597.
• Stephenson, M.B., Schacht, W.H., Volesky, J.D., Eskridge, K.M., Mousel, E.M. and Bauer, D. 2013. Grazing method effect on topographical vegetation characteristics and livestock performance in the Nebraska Sandhills. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 66(5): 561-569.
• Sürmen, M. and Kara, E. 2018. Aydın ili ekolojik koşullarında farklı eğimlerdeki mera vejetasyonlarının verim ve kalite özellikleri. Derim, 35(1): 67-72. https://doi.org/10.16882/derim.2018.343428
• Ünal, E., Mermer, A. and Yildiz, H. 2014. Assessment of rangeland vegetation condition from time series NDVI data. Journal of Field Crops Central Research Institute, 23(1): 14-21.
• USDI/USDA. 1994. Rangeland reform ‘9-l. Draft environmental impact statement. U.S. Dep. Int..
• Williams, C.J., Pierson, F.B., Spaeth, K.E., Brown, J.R., Al-Hamdan, O.Z., Weltz, M.A., Nearing, M.A., Herrick, J.E., Boll, J., Robichaud, P.R., Goodrich, D.C., Heilman, P. Guertin, D.P., Hernandez, M., Wei, H., Hardegree, S.P., Strand, E.K., Bates, J.D., Metz, L.J. and Nichols, M.H. 2016. Incorporating hydrologic data and ecohydrologic relationships into ecological site descriptions. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 69(1): 4-19.
• Zar, J.H. 2013. Biostatistical Analysis. Pearson.