Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Factors Effective on Farmer Satisfaction for the Forage Crops Supports and the Tendency to Continue Forage Crop Production (TRA-1)

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 36 - 45, 01.07.2024
https://doi.org/10.51801/turkjrfs.1453514

Öz

In this study, a face-to-face survey was conducted with 196 forage crops producers in Erzincan, Erzurum and Bayburt provinces in order to determine the problems and expectations of forage crop producers who benefit from forage crops supports. Descriptive statistical methods and binary logistic regression model were used to analyze the data examined in terms of demographic variables, agricultural characteristics and characteristics related to farm structures. Farmers who benefit from forage crop support are on average 46 years old and 30.6% are high school graduates. 55.1% of the farms carry out plant and animal production together. It was determined that 35.2% of the farmers had non-agricultural income and 17.3% had social security. The average land size of the enterprises is 92 decares. Alfalfa (212,960 da) is grown the most as a forage crop in farms. There are an average of 10 BB and 14 sheep per farm. 60% of the producers state that they are not satisfied with the support, 22.4% state that they grow forage crops for the support, and approximately 59% state that they have to or want to continue forage crops farming despite being dissatisfied. Their satisfaction with the support; Insufficiency of pasture land (5%), high productivity of forage crops (1%), to be livestock farming in farms (1%), low cost of production of forage crops (10%) and sufficient support amount (5%) affect the factors. Factors affecting the tendency to continue forage crops agriculture are; high level of education (5%), lack of migration tendency (1%), lack of alternative products (5%), insufficient pasture areas (1%), lack of experience factors.

Kaynakça

  • Ağırbaş, N. C., Sapmaz, K., & Koç, A. (2017). The effects of agricultural supports on forage crops of cultivation area and amount of production in Eskişehir Province. Atatürk University Journal of the Agricultural Faculty, 48(1), 65-72.
  • Aksu, N., & Dellal, İ. (2016). An Evaluation for Afyonkarahisar province on relationship of feed crops subsidy with bovine livestock activities. YYU Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 26(1), 52-60.
  • Aşkan, E., & Dağdemir, V. (2016). Analysis of the factors affecting the production rates of dairy livestock facilities benefitting from governmental financial supports and incentives: The sample of Erzurum, Erzincan, Bayburt Provinces. The Journal of Agricultural Economics Researches (JAER), 2(1), 1-12.
  • Balabanlı, C., Cirit, Y., Kayacan, S., Bıçakçı, E., & Yüksel, O. (2016). Determination of forage crops producer behaviour in agriculture; Example of Isparta province. Journal of Field Crops Central Research Institute, 25(Special issue-2), 259-264.
  • BUGEM, (2024, January 01). General Directorate of Plant Production https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/BUGEM
  • Cevher, C., Köksal. Ö., & Ceylan, C. (2012). The effect of agricultural supports on forage crop production and sustainability: Kayseri province example. 10th National Agricultural Economics Congress 5-7 Eylül 2012, Konya.
  • Çiçek, A., & Erkan, O. (1996). Research and sampling methods in agricultural economics Gaziosmanpaşa University Faculty of Agriculture Publications, No:12 Lecture Notes Series, No:6.
  • Çeri, S., & Acar, R. (2019). Use of cool climate cereals as green and dry forage in animal feeding. Journal of Bahri Dagdas Crop Research, 8(1), 178-194.
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2021). Multivariate statistics for social sciences: Applications of SPSS and Lisrel. Pegem Akademi Publishing, Ankara. DOI 10.14527/ 9786055885670
  • Erdal, G., Erdal, H., & Gürkan, M. (2013). An evaluation by farmers on applied agricultural supports in Turkey (Case of Kahramanmaras province). International Journal of Social and Economic Sciences, 3 (2): 92 -98. ISSN: 1307-1149, E-ISSN: 2146-0086, www.nobel.gen.tr
  • Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. 2013. Applied logistic regression, Third Edition., Wiley.
  • Karabaş S., & Gürler A. Z. (2012). Predicting of the factors affecting consumer behaviour the choice of organic products by logit regression analysis. Adiyaman University Journal of Social Sciences, 5(10), 129-156.
  • Karadavut, U. Genç, A., Palta, Ç., Çarkacı, D. A., & Kökten, K. (2011). Socio-economic structure of meadow plants producers in konya province and determination of success on affecting factors. Science Journal of Bingöl University, 1(2), 38-50.
  • Kılıç, S. (2015). Binary logistic regression analysis. Journal of Mood Disorders, 5(4), 191-4.
  • Özsağlıcak, S., & Yanar, M. (2021). Feed usage and cattle feeding practices in cattle enterprises in the Eastern Anatolia Region: case of central county of Erzincan province. Journal of Animal Science and Products, (JASP) 4(2): 136-152.
  • Şahin, K., & Yılmaz, İ. H. (2008). A Research on forages cultivation, rangeland usage and socio economical structure of Van Province. The Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Ankara University. 14(4, 414-419. DOI: 10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001060
  • TAGEM, (2022). Final Report of the Workshop on Evaluation of Forage Crops Production, Current Situation and Measures to be Taken within the Scope of Climate Change. 22-23 March 2022 / Ankara.
  • TUIK (2024). Turkish Statistical Institute. Crop production statistics. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=92&locale=tr
  • Tüzüntürk, S. (2007). Entry of econometrics department graduates into working life: An experimental field study. 8th Turkish Econometrics and Statistics Congress, 24-25 May, Malatya.
  • Yavuz, G., & Ceylan, İ. Ç. (2005). A research on determination of effective factors on farmers’ decision making process in forage crops production in Polatlı district. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 11(2), 133-138.
  • Yavuz, T., Kır, H., & Gül, V. (2020). Evaluation of roughage production potential in Turkey: The case of Kırşehir province. Turkish Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(3), 345-352.
  • Yıldırım, İ. Şahin, K., & Şahin, A. (2001). Marketing of live animals and dairy products in the Van region. Türkiye-Netherlands Livestock and Dairy Farming Symposium. 11-12 Haziran, 2001, TEAE, Ankara.
  • Yolcu, H., & Tan, M. (2008). General view to Turkey forage crops cultivation. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 14(3), 303-312.
Yıl 2024, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 36 - 45, 01.07.2024
https://doi.org/10.51801/turkjrfs.1453514

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Ağırbaş, N. C., Sapmaz, K., & Koç, A. (2017). The effects of agricultural supports on forage crops of cultivation area and amount of production in Eskişehir Province. Atatürk University Journal of the Agricultural Faculty, 48(1), 65-72.
  • Aksu, N., & Dellal, İ. (2016). An Evaluation for Afyonkarahisar province on relationship of feed crops subsidy with bovine livestock activities. YYU Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 26(1), 52-60.
  • Aşkan, E., & Dağdemir, V. (2016). Analysis of the factors affecting the production rates of dairy livestock facilities benefitting from governmental financial supports and incentives: The sample of Erzurum, Erzincan, Bayburt Provinces. The Journal of Agricultural Economics Researches (JAER), 2(1), 1-12.
  • Balabanlı, C., Cirit, Y., Kayacan, S., Bıçakçı, E., & Yüksel, O. (2016). Determination of forage crops producer behaviour in agriculture; Example of Isparta province. Journal of Field Crops Central Research Institute, 25(Special issue-2), 259-264.
  • BUGEM, (2024, January 01). General Directorate of Plant Production https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/BUGEM
  • Cevher, C., Köksal. Ö., & Ceylan, C. (2012). The effect of agricultural supports on forage crop production and sustainability: Kayseri province example. 10th National Agricultural Economics Congress 5-7 Eylül 2012, Konya.
  • Çiçek, A., & Erkan, O. (1996). Research and sampling methods in agricultural economics Gaziosmanpaşa University Faculty of Agriculture Publications, No:12 Lecture Notes Series, No:6.
  • Çeri, S., & Acar, R. (2019). Use of cool climate cereals as green and dry forage in animal feeding. Journal of Bahri Dagdas Crop Research, 8(1), 178-194.
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2021). Multivariate statistics for social sciences: Applications of SPSS and Lisrel. Pegem Akademi Publishing, Ankara. DOI 10.14527/ 9786055885670
  • Erdal, G., Erdal, H., & Gürkan, M. (2013). An evaluation by farmers on applied agricultural supports in Turkey (Case of Kahramanmaras province). International Journal of Social and Economic Sciences, 3 (2): 92 -98. ISSN: 1307-1149, E-ISSN: 2146-0086, www.nobel.gen.tr
  • Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. 2013. Applied logistic regression, Third Edition., Wiley.
  • Karabaş S., & Gürler A. Z. (2012). Predicting of the factors affecting consumer behaviour the choice of organic products by logit regression analysis. Adiyaman University Journal of Social Sciences, 5(10), 129-156.
  • Karadavut, U. Genç, A., Palta, Ç., Çarkacı, D. A., & Kökten, K. (2011). Socio-economic structure of meadow plants producers in konya province and determination of success on affecting factors. Science Journal of Bingöl University, 1(2), 38-50.
  • Kılıç, S. (2015). Binary logistic regression analysis. Journal of Mood Disorders, 5(4), 191-4.
  • Özsağlıcak, S., & Yanar, M. (2021). Feed usage and cattle feeding practices in cattle enterprises in the Eastern Anatolia Region: case of central county of Erzincan province. Journal of Animal Science and Products, (JASP) 4(2): 136-152.
  • Şahin, K., & Yılmaz, İ. H. (2008). A Research on forages cultivation, rangeland usage and socio economical structure of Van Province. The Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Ankara University. 14(4, 414-419. DOI: 10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001060
  • TAGEM, (2022). Final Report of the Workshop on Evaluation of Forage Crops Production, Current Situation and Measures to be Taken within the Scope of Climate Change. 22-23 March 2022 / Ankara.
  • TUIK (2024). Turkish Statistical Institute. Crop production statistics. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=92&locale=tr
  • Tüzüntürk, S. (2007). Entry of econometrics department graduates into working life: An experimental field study. 8th Turkish Econometrics and Statistics Congress, 24-25 May, Malatya.
  • Yavuz, G., & Ceylan, İ. Ç. (2005). A research on determination of effective factors on farmers’ decision making process in forage crops production in Polatlı district. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 11(2), 133-138.
  • Yavuz, T., Kır, H., & Gül, V. (2020). Evaluation of roughage production potential in Turkey: The case of Kırşehir province. Turkish Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(3), 345-352.
  • Yıldırım, İ. Şahin, K., & Şahin, A. (2001). Marketing of live animals and dairy products in the Van region. Türkiye-Netherlands Livestock and Dairy Farming Symposium. 11-12 Haziran, 2001, TEAE, Ankara.
  • Yolcu, H., & Tan, M. (2008). General view to Turkey forage crops cultivation. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 14(3), 303-312.
Toplam 23 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Agronomi
Bölüm Research Articles
Yazarlar

Sibel Kadıoğlu 0000-0002-9121-1705

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Temmuz 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi 15 Mart 2024
Kabul Tarihi 30 Nisan 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Kadıoğlu, S. (2024). Factors Effective on Farmer Satisfaction for the Forage Crops Supports and the Tendency to Continue Forage Crop Production (TRA-1). Turkish Journal of Range and Forage Science, 5(1), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.51801/turkjrfs.1453514
AMA Kadıoğlu S. Factors Effective on Farmer Satisfaction for the Forage Crops Supports and the Tendency to Continue Forage Crop Production (TRA-1). Turk.J.R.For.Sci. Temmuz 2024;5(1):36-45. doi:10.51801/turkjrfs.1453514
Chicago Kadıoğlu, Sibel. “Factors Effective on Farmer Satisfaction for the Forage Crops Supports and the Tendency to Continue Forage Crop Production (TRA-1)”. Turkish Journal of Range and Forage Science 5, sy. 1 (Temmuz 2024): 36-45. https://doi.org/10.51801/turkjrfs.1453514.
EndNote Kadıoğlu S (01 Temmuz 2024) Factors Effective on Farmer Satisfaction for the Forage Crops Supports and the Tendency to Continue Forage Crop Production (TRA-1). Turkish Journal of Range and Forage Science 5 1 36–45.
IEEE S. Kadıoğlu, “Factors Effective on Farmer Satisfaction for the Forage Crops Supports and the Tendency to Continue Forage Crop Production (TRA-1)”, Turk.J.R.For.Sci., c. 5, sy. 1, ss. 36–45, 2024, doi: 10.51801/turkjrfs.1453514.
ISNAD Kadıoğlu, Sibel. “Factors Effective on Farmer Satisfaction for the Forage Crops Supports and the Tendency to Continue Forage Crop Production (TRA-1)”. Turkish Journal of Range and Forage Science 5/1 (Temmuz 2024), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.51801/turkjrfs.1453514.
JAMA Kadıoğlu S. Factors Effective on Farmer Satisfaction for the Forage Crops Supports and the Tendency to Continue Forage Crop Production (TRA-1). Turk.J.R.For.Sci. 2024;5:36–45.
MLA Kadıoğlu, Sibel. “Factors Effective on Farmer Satisfaction for the Forage Crops Supports and the Tendency to Continue Forage Crop Production (TRA-1)”. Turkish Journal of Range and Forage Science, c. 5, sy. 1, 2024, ss. 36-45, doi:10.51801/turkjrfs.1453514.
Vancouver Kadıoğlu S. Factors Effective on Farmer Satisfaction for the Forage Crops Supports and the Tendency to Continue Forage Crop Production (TRA-1). Turk.J.R.For.Sci. 2024;5(1):36-45.

     TR_Dizin_logo.png?version=1&modificationDate=1614345672000&api=v2  asos-index.png          logo.png    Crossref_Logo_Stacked_RGB_SMALL.png 1?ui=2&ik=a4058937f1&attid=0.3&permmsgid=msg-f:1749487628794806097&th=18476dbaad413f51&view=fimg&fur=ip&sz=s0-l75-ft&attbid=ANGjdJ9QGll0LXXhrpfkwxITnNQPMSCkjzPYtGlKAQeCi78zqusMPzJmW9Os0HX2VeTA31eRfyXCwOmU97TIQBEjf3rU8o_BbruviQKEDDHIC8oINFfNbOJLDrJPxfs&disp=emb




Turkish Journal of Range and Forage Science is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.