Sağ ve Sol Birleşiyor mu Yoksa Anlamsızlaşıyor mu?: Çağdaş İdeolojik Pozisyonlar Üzerine Bir Tartışma

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 135 - 158, 31.12.2022

Yunus Emre Karaca , Osman Karacan

https://doi.org/10.52736/ubeyad.1211461

Öz

İdeolojilerin tarihi insanlık tarihinin çok eski dönemlerine kadar götürülse de aslında modern zamanların bir olgusudur. Kavram ilk olarak Aydınlanma Çağı'nda filozoflar tarafından sistematik olarak incelenmiştir. 19. yüzyılda siyasi partilerin gelişmesiyle birlikte ideoloji kavramı siyasi partilerle iç içe geçmiştir. Modern çağda siyasi partiler kimliklerini sağ ve sol spektrum üzerinde hizalayarak seçmenlerinin oyunu almaya çalışmaktadır. Bu çalışma, günümüzde “sol” ve “sağ” ifadelerinin anlamsız olup olmadığını değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Hâlâ anlamlıysa, anlamları nelerdir? Çalışma, Comparative Manifesto Project (CMP) verilerini kullanarak Batı ülkelerindeki ideolojik yakınlaşmayı incelemektedir. Araştırma sonuçları, sol ve sağ kavramlarının hala anlam ifade etmesine rağmen zaman içinde aşındığını göstermektedir. Sonuçlar ayrıca sağ ve solun her ülkede aynı anlama gelmediğini de işaret etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İdeoloji, İdeolojinin Sonu, Sol, Sağ, Siyaset

Are Left and Right Converging or Becoming Meaningless?: A Discussion on Contemporary Ideological Positions

Öz

Although the history of ideologies is traced back to the ancient times of human history, it is actually a phenomenon of modern times. The concept was first systematically studied by philosophers in the Age of Enlightenment. With the development of political parties in the 19th century, the concept of ideology was intertwined with political parties. In the modern era, political parties try to get the votes of their voters by aligning their identities on the right and left spectrum. This study aims to evaluate whether or not the expressions “left” and “right” are meaningless today. If they are still meaningful, what are their meanings? The study examines ideological convergence in Western countries using the Comparative Manifesto Project (CMP) data. The research results show that although the concepts of left and right still make sense, they have eroded over time. The results also demonstrate that right and left do not have the same meaning in every country.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ideology, End of Ideology, Left, Right, Politics

Kaynakça

• Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. L. Althusser (Ed.), Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays (pp. 127–187). New York: Monthly Review Press.
• Aron, R. (1968). The End of the Ideological Age?. C. I. Waxman (Ed.), The End of Ideology Debate (pp. 27–48). New York: Simon and Schuster. (Original work published in 1957).
• Ayata, S. and Ayata, A. G. (2007). The Centre-left Parties in Turkey. Turkish Studies, 8(2), 211–232.
• Aydogan, A. and Slapin J. B. (2013). Left-Right Reversed: Parties and Ideology in Modern Turkey. Party Politics, 1–11. DOI: 10.1177/1354068813487280.
• Bobbio, N. (2005). Left and Right: The Significance of a Political Distinction. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Boix, C. (2007). The Emergence of Parties and Party Systems. C. Boix and S.C. Stokes (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics (pp. 499–521). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Caul, M. L. and Gray, M. M. (2009). From Platform Declarations to Policy Outcomes: Changing Party Profiles and Partisan Influence over Policy. R. J. Dalton and M. P. Wattenberg (Eds.), Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies (pp. 208–237). 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Ciddi, S. (2008). The Republican People’s Party and the 2007 Turkish General Elections: Politics of Perpetual Decline?”. Turkish Studies, 9(3), 437–455.
• Converse, P. E. (1964). The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and Discontent (pp. 206–261). New York: Free Press.
• Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
• Fukuyama, F. (1989). The End of History. The National Interest, 16, 3–18.
• Fukuyama, F. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.
• Gauchet, M. (1994). Right and Left. P. Nora (Ed.), Realms of Memory: Rethinking the French Past, Vol: 1, Conflicts and Divisions (pp. 241–299). New York: Columbia Press.
• Hale, W. and Ozbudun, E. (2010). Islamism, Democracy and Liberalism in Turkey: The Case of the AKP. New York: Routledge.
• Hebert, C. (2009). Left and Right Are Meaningless. Retrieved from: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/second-reading/left-and-right-are-meaningless/article781620/ (Accessed: 8 July 2022).
• Heywood, A. (2003). Political Ideologies: An Introduction. 3rd edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Huckshorn, R. J. (1984). Political Parties in America. Monterey/California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
• Jahn, D. (2014). What is Left and Right in Comparative Politics? A Response to Simon Franzmann. Party Politics, 20(2), 297–301.
• Jost, J. T. (2006). The End of the End of Ideology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 651–670.
• Kaya, A. (2004). İdeolojiden İDolojiye Yolculuk: Düşüncebilimden Kimlikbilime. Journal of Doğu-Batı, 1(28), 1–18.
• Kazin, M. (2012). American Dreamers: How the Left Changed a Nation. New York: Vintage Books.
• Knapp, A. and Wright, V. (2006). The Government and Politics of France. 5th edition. London: Routledge.
• Krouwel, A. (1998). The Catch-All Party in Western Europe 1945–1990: A Study in Arrested Development. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit. Retrieved from: http://dare.ubvu.vu.nl/bitstream/handle/1871/13043/4664.pdf?sequence=1 (Accessed: 1 July 2022).
• Krouwel, A. (2003). Otto Kirchheimer and the Catch-All Party. West European Politics, 26(2), 23–40.
• Lipset, S. M. (1960). Political Man. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.
• Lipset, S. M. (1990). Consensus and Conflict: Essays in Political Sociology. 2nd edition. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
• MacIntyre, A. (1971). Against the Self-images of the Age: Essays on Ideology and Philosophy. New York: Schocken Books.
• Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1970). The German Ideology. London: Lawrence and Wishart. (Original work published in 1846).
• Shils, E. A. (1968). The End of Ideology?. C. I. Waxman (Ed.), The End of Ideology Debate (pp. 49–63). New York: Simon and Schuster. (Original work published in 1955).
• Slapin, J. B. and Proksch, S-O. (2008). A Scaling Model for Estimating Time Series Party Positions from Texts. American Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 705–722.
• Taibbi, M. (2005). Right Wing, Left Wing, Chicken Wing. Retrieved from: http://www.alternet.org/story/21354/right_wing%2C_left_wing%2C_chicken_wing (Accessed: 30 June 2022).
• Tavits, M. and Letki, N. (2009). When Left Is Right: Party Ideology and Policy in Post-Communist Europe. The American Political Science Review, 103(4), 555–569.
• Toprakkaya, A. (2007). İdeoloji Kavramının Tarihsel Gelişim Sürecine Kısa Bir Bakış. Erzincan University School of Law Journal, 11(1–2), 163–180.
• Volkens, A. and Klingemann, H. D. (2002). Parties, Ideologies, and Issues: Stability and Change in Fifteen European Party Systems 1945–1998. K. R. Luther and F. Müller-Rommel (Eds.), Political Parties in the New Europe: Political and Analytical Challenges (pp. 143–167). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Ware, A. (1996). Political Parties and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.