<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN"
        "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.4/JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article  article-type="other"        dtd-version="1.4">
            <front>

                <journal-meta>
                                                                <journal-id>ui̇i̇i̇d</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                                                                                    <journal-title>Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
                            <issn pub-type="ppub">1307-9832</issn>
                                        <issn pub-type="epub">1307-9859</issn>
                                                                                            <publisher>
                    <publisher-name>Kenan ÇELİK</publisher-name>
                </publisher>
                    </journal-meta>
                <article-meta>
                                        <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18092/ulikidince.353653</article-id>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <title-group>
                                                                                                                        <trans-title-group xml:lang="en">
                                    <trans-title>REGIONAL PORT LOCATION SELECTION BY MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS: AN APPLICATION IN WESTERN BLACK SEA REGION</trans-title>
                                </trans-title-group>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <article-title>ÇOK KRİTERLİ KARAR VERME YÖNTEMLERİYLE BÖLGESEL LİMAN KURULUŞ YERİ SEÇİMİ: BATI KARADENİZ’DE BİR UYGULAMA</article-title>
                                                                                                    </title-group>
            
                                                    <contrib-group content-type="authors">
                                                                        <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Pekkaya</surname>
                                    <given-names>Mehmet</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>BÜLENT ECEVİT ÜNİVERSİTESİ</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                    <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Bucak</surname>
                                    <given-names>Umur</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>BÜLENT ECEVİT ÜNİVERSİTESİ</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                                                </contrib-group>
                        
                                        <pub-date pub-type="pub" iso-8601-date="20180117">
                    <day>01</day>
                    <month>17</month>
                    <year>2018</year>
                </pub-date>
                                                                <fpage>253</fpage>
                                        <lpage>268</lpage>
                        
                        <history>
                                    <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="20171115">
                        <day>11</day>
                        <month>15</month>
                        <year>2017</year>
                    </date>
                                                    <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="20180114">
                        <day>01</day>
                        <month>14</month>
                        <year>2018</year>
                    </date>
                            </history>
                                        <permissions>
                    <copyright-statement>Copyright © 2008, Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi</copyright-statement>
                    <copyright-year>2008</copyright-year>
                    <copyright-holder>Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi</copyright-holder>
                </permissions>
            
                                                                                                <trans-abstract xml:lang="en">
                            <p>As ports are placed at nodal pointsof international goods transfer, ports rise to prominence as commerciallycompeting market that under-taking with other nations for regions / nations. Theaims of the study are to determine priorities of the criteria that effect portlocation selection, to evaluate PROMETHEE method comparatively for applicability in portlocation selection, and to express a perspective for researchers /decisionmakers. In this study, priorities of 4 main criteria and 21 sub criteria aredetermined, and 4 potential port location in Turkey- Western Black Sea regionare sorted via PROMETHEE, TOPSIS, MCGM, VIKOR methods. Sustainability main criteriaand some sub criteria such as transportation costs, economic development leveland export figures, are come into prominence according to results. It has been observed thatAlaplı / Zonguldak according to PROMETHEE, TOPSIS, MCGM methods and Cide /Kastamonu according to VIKOR method can be the most convenient containerterminal in abilities to port facility. It has been decided that PROMETHEE isan advantageous method for this type of ranking-selecting evaluations, whichallows censoring the distances of outliers from critical values and providesalternative functions according to the structure of the series.</p></trans-abstract>
                                                                                                                                    <abstract><p>Limanlar,uluslararası ürün transferinde düğüm noktaları olduğundan, bölgeler /ülkeleriçin ticari anlamda diğer ülkelerle girişilen bir rekabet pazarında ön planaçıkmaktadır. Çalışmanın amacı, liman kuruluş yeri seçimini etkileyenkriterlerin önem derecelerini belirlemek, liman kuruluş yeri seçimi içinPROMETHEE yönteminin uygulanabilirliğini karşılaştırmalı olarak değerlendirmekve araştırmacı /karar vericilere bir bakış açısı sunmaktır. Çalışmada, 4 ana ve21 alt kriterin AHP ile ağırlıkları belirlenmiş, PROMETHEE, TOPSIS, ÇKPM, VIKORile karşılaştırmalı olarak Türkiye-Batı Karadeniz Bölgesi’ndeki alternatif 4liman yeri arasından seçim sıralaması yapılmıştır. Çalışma bulgularına göresürdürülebilirlik ana kriteri ve ulaştırma masrafları, ekonomik gelişme düzeyi,ihracat rakamları gibi alt kriterler ön plana çıkmıştır. PROMETHEE, TOPSIS,ÇKPM yöntemlerine göre Alaplı/Zonguldak’ın ve VIKOR yöntemine göre ise Cide/Kastamonu’nunen uygun konteyner terminaline sahip liman tesisi olabileceği bulunmuştur. Butip seçim sıralamalarında, kritik değerlerin dışındaki uzaklıkları sansürleme imkânıveren ve serilerin yapısına göre alternatif fonksiyonlar sunan PROMETHEE’ninavantajlı bir yöntem olduğuna karar verilmiştir.</p></abstract>
                                                            
            
                                                                                        <kwd-group>
                                                    <kwd>ÇKKV</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  PROMETHEE</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Sektörel Planlama</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Kuruluş Yeri Seçimi</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                            
                                                <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
                                                    <kwd>MCDM</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  PROMETHEE</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Sectoral Planning</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Location Selection</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                                                                                                                                        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <back>
                            <ref-list>
                                    <ref id="ref1">
                        <label>1</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Aliefendioğlu, Y. ve Sağır, N. (2015). Tersane Yatırımları İçin Kuruluş Yeri Seçimi: Yalova-Altınova Tersane Girişimcileri Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi Örneği. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 3, 592-612.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref2">
                        <label>2</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Brans, J.P. ve Vincke, P. (Jun., 1985). A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: (The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making). Management Science, 31(6), 647-656.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref3">
                        <label>3</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Cheng, J. ve Yang, Z. (2017). The Equilibria of Port Investment in a Multi-Port Region in China. Transportation Research Part E, 108, 36-51.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref4">
                        <label>4</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Chou, C. (2009). Integrated Short-Term and Long-Term MCDM Model for Solving Location Selection Problems. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 880-893.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref5">
                        <label>5</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Dağdeviren, M. ve E. Eraslan (2008). PROMETHEE Sıralama Yöntemi İle Tedarikçi Seçimi. Gazi Üniv. Müh. Mim. Fak. Der., 23(1), 69-75.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref6">
                        <label>6</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ding, J. ve Chou, C. (2013). An Evaluation Model of Quantitative and Qualitative Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Location Selection of Transshipment Ports. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/783105.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref7">
                        <label>7</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">DTO (2017). 2016 Deniz Sektör Raporu. İstanbul: DTO Yayınları.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref8">
                        <label>8</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Fagarasan, M. ve Cristea, C. (2015). Logistics Center Location: Selection Using Multicriteria Decision Making. Fascicle of Management and Technological Engineering, 1, 157-162.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref9">
                        <label>9</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">GİB (2017). Arsa ve Arazi Asgari Metrekare Birim Değerleri. Gelir İdaresi Başkanlığı, Erişim Adresi http://www.gib.gov.tr/yardim-ve-kaynaklar/yayinlar/arsa-ve-arazi-asgari-metrekare-birim-degerleri.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref10">
                        <label>10</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hong, L. ve Xiaohua, Z. (2011). Study on Location Selection of Multi-Objective Emergency Logistics Center Based on AHP. Procedia Engineering, 15, 2128 – 2132.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref11">
                        <label>11</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ka, B. (2011). Application of Fuzzy AHP and ELECTRE to China Dry Port Location Selection. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 27 (2), 331-354.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref12">
                        <label>12</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kuruüzüm, A. ve N. Atsan (2001). Analitik Hiyerarşi Yöntemi ve İşletmecilik Alanında Uygulamaları. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, 1, 83-105.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref13">
                        <label>13</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Lösch, A. (1954). The Economics of Location.  Westford, Massachusetts: The Murray Printing Company.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref14">
                        <label>14</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Na, J., Choi, A., Ji, J. ve Zhang, D. (2017). Environmental Efficiency Analysis of Chinese Container Ports with CO2 Emissions: An Inseparable Input-output SBM Model. Journal of Transport Geography, 65: 13-24.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref15">
                        <label>15</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Nguyen, L. C. ve Notteboom, T. (2016). A Multi-Criteria Approach to Dry Port Location in Developing Economies with Application to Vietnam. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 32 (1), 23-32.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref16">
                        <label>16</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Opricovic, S. ve G.-H. Tzeng (2004). Compromise Solution by MCDM Methods: A Comparative Analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156, 445-455.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref17">
                        <label>17</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Park, Y. ve Medda, F. (2015). Hub Status and Indexation of Container Ports. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 31 (2): 253-272.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref18">
                        <label>18</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Pekkaya, M. (2015). Career Preference of University Students: An Application of MCDM Methods. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 249–255.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref19">
                        <label>19</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Pekkaya, M. (2016). Hizmet Kalite Standartları Temelli, Hastanelerin ÇKKV İle Değerlendirilmesi. 17th International Symposium on Econometrics, Operations Research and Statistics (ISEOS 2016), 974-982, Sivas.
Pekkaya, M. ve M. Aktogan (2014). Dizüstü Bilgisayar Seçimi: DEA, TOPSIS ve VIKOR ile Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 10(1), 157-178.
Pekkaya, M. ve S. Başaran (2011). Konaklama İşletmeleri Hizmet Kalitesi Boyutları Önem Derecelerinin AHP ile Belirlenmesi ve İşletmelerin Hizmet Kalitesine Göre TOPSIS ile Sıralanması. Mali Ufuklar,  5(15), 111–136.
Pekkaya, M., F. E. Demir (2016). Determining the Priorities of Criteria in Assessing the Bankruptcy Risk of the Banks via AHP. International Journal of Management Economics and Business, 3. ICAFR Special Issue, 40-45.
Rao, C., Goh, M., Zhao, Y., ve Zheng, J. (2015). Location Selection of City Logistics Centers Under Sustainability. Transportation Research Part D, 36, 29-44.
Saaty, T.L. ve Vargas, L.G. (2006). Decision Making with Analytic Network Process. New York: Springer Publishing.
Sha, M., Zhang, T., Lan, Y., Zhou, X., Qin, T., Yu, D. ve Chen, K. (2017). Scheduling Optimization of Yard Cranes with Minimal Energy Consumption at Container Terminals. Computers &amp; Industrial Engineering, 113: 704-713.
Tibljas, A., Lucic, S., ve Benigar, M. (2005). Location Selection Criteria for the Sea Passenger Terminal in Relation to the Urban Structure of the Town. Promet- Traffic&amp;Transportation, 18 (3), 159-164.
Tomic, V., Marinkovic, D. ve Markovic, D. (2014). The Selection of Logistic Centers Location Using Multi-Criteria Comparison: Case Study of the Balkan Peninsula. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 11 (10), 97-113.
Tongzon, J. (2001). Efficiency Measurement of Selected Australian and Other International Ports Using Data Envelopment Analysis. Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice, 35 (2), 107-122.
TUİK (2017). Bölgesel İstatistikler. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, Erişim adresi https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/bolgeselistatistik/
Wang, B., Xiong, H. ve Jiang, C. (2014). A Multicriteria Decision Making Approach Based on Fuzzy Theory and Credibility Mechanism for Logistics Center Location Selection. The Scientific World Journal, 1-9.
Wang, C. ve Wei, J. (2008). Research on the Dry Port Location of Tianjin Port Based on Analytic Network Process. International Seminar on Business and Information Management, 75-78, Tianjin.
Weber, A. (1929). Theory of the Location of Industries. Chicago, Illinolis: The University of Chicago Press. 
Yang, J. ve Lee, H. (1997). An AHP Decision Model for Facility Location Selection. Facilities, 15 (9/10), 241-254.
Yararlı, K. (2010). Karar verme Yöntemleri. İzmir: Detay Yayıncılık</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                            </ref-list>
                    </back>
    </article>
