ui̇i̇i̇d

Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi

1307-9832 1307-9859

Kenan ÇELİK

10.18092/ulikidince.427485

GELİR DAĞILIMI, DEMOKRASİ, REEL GELİR VE DIŞA AÇIKLIK İLİŞKİSİ: BALKAN ÜLKELERİ İÇİN AMPİRİK BİR UYGULAMA

RELATIONSHIPS of INCOME DISTRIBUTION, DEMOCRACY, REAL INCOME and TRADE OPENNESS: THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM BALKAN STATES

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6662-6175

Acaravcı

Ali

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3491-8234

Erdoğan

Sinan

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4310-550X

Artan

Seyfettin

09 19 2018

73 82 05 27 2018 06 28 2018

2008

Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi

İktisat bilimciler her ne kadar erken dönemdeiktisadi büyüme odaklanmış olsa da, izleyen dönemde yaratılan gelirin bölüşümüde iktisatta öne çıkan çalışma alanı olmuştur. Bu çalışma, Balkan Ülkelerindegelir dağılımı, demokrasi, reel gelir ve dışa açıklık arasındaki nedensellikilişkilerini, yatay-kesit bağımlılığı dikkate alan ikinci nesil panel veriyöntemleri kullanarak 1996-2010 dönemi için araştırmaktadır. Yatay kesitbağımlılık ve eğim katsayıları homojenlik test sonuçlarına göre, model yataykesit bağımlıdır ve hesaplanacak eğim katsayıları heterojendir. Değişkenler arasındaki nedensel ilişkiler,yatay kesit bağımlılığı dikkate alan, ülke bazlı sonuçlar elde etmeye olanaksağlayan ve iki açıklayıcı değişkenin bağımlı değişken üzerindeki etkisini aynıanda test etmeye olanak sağlayan Konya (2006) panel nedensellik modeliyleincelenmiştir. Analiz sonuçları şu şekildeözetlenebilir: Demokrasi, gelir reelgelir ve ticari açıklıktan gelir dağılımına doğru nedensellik ilişkisimevcuttur. Demokrasi ve dışa açıklık, gelir dağılımı üzerinde daha güçlü ortaketkiye sahiptir.

Althougheconomists have focused on economic growth issue in the early period,distribution of income which is created by economic growth has become one ofthe prominent field in economics as well. This study explores the causalrelationships between income distribution, democracy, real income and tradeopenness in Balkan States for 1996-2010 period by using the second generationpanel data methods under cross-sectional dependence. According tocross-sectional dependence and homogeneity tests, model is cross-sectionallydependent and slope coefficients are heterogeneous. Causal relationships between variables have been examinedby using Konya (2006) panel data causality approach which allowscross-sectional dependence and gives possibility to examine two explanatoryvariables’ effects on dependent variable and obtain country-specific results.The results can be summarized as follows: There exist causal relationships from democracy, real income and tradeopenness to income distribution. Democracy and trade openness have more powerful common effects onincome distribution.

Balkan Ülkeleri Gelir Dağılımı Demokrasi Reel Gelir Dışa Açıklık

Balkan States Income Distribution Democracy Real Income Trade Openness

Acemoğlu, D., Naidu, S., Restrepo, P., Robinson J. A., (2013). Democracy, Redistribution and Inequality. http://www.nber.org/papers/w19746.pdf . (Erişim Tarihi: 10.04.2017)

Artan, S., Kalaycı C. (2014). Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde Dışa Açıklık, Demokrasi ve Geliş Dağılımı İlişkisi. Sosyal Güvenlik Dergisi, 4(2): 69-88.Azzoni, C. R. (2001). Economic Growth and Regional Income Inequality in Brazil. The Annals of Regional Science. 35, 133-152.

Bababones, S. J. ve Vonada, D. C. (2009). Trade Globalization and National Income Inequality: Are They Related?. Journal of Sociology, 45(1); 5-30.Barro, R. J. (2000). Inequality and Growth in a Panel of Countries. Journal of Economic Growth, 5: 5-32.

Bollen, K. A.; Jackman R. W. (1985). Political Democracy and the Size Distribution of Income. American Sociological Review, 50(4): 438-457.

Breusch, P. S.; Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, 11(7); 239-253.

Calderon, C. ve Chong, A. (2001). External Sector and Income Inequality in Interdependent Economies Using a Dynamic Panel Data Approach. Economics Letters, 71, 225-231.

Chakrabarti, A. (2000). Does Trade Cause Inequality?. Journal of Economic Development, 25(2); 1-21.

Chong, A. (2001).Inequality, Democracy and Persistence: Is There a Political Kuznets Curve?. (https://publications.iadb.org/bitstream/handle/11319/1905/Inequality%2c%20Democracy%2c%20and%20Persistence%3a%20Is%20There%20a%20Political%20Kuznets%20Curve%3f.pdf?sequence=1) (Erişim Tarihi: 10.4.2017).

Chun Zhu, S. ve Terfler, D. (2005). Trade and Inequality in Developing Countries: A General Equilibrium Analysis. Journal of International Economics, 65, 21-48.Deninger, K.; Squire, L. (1998). New Ways of Looking at Old Issues: Inequality and Growth. Journal of Development Economics, 57: 259-287.

Edwards, S. (1997). Trade Policy, Growth and Income Distribution. The American Economic Review, 87(2); 205-210.

Gradstein, M., Milanovic, B., Ying, Y. (2001). Democracy and Income Inequality. The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, WPS 2561.

Konya, L. (2006). Export and Growth: Granger Causality Analysis on OECD Countries with a Panel Data Approach. Economic Modelling, 23, 978-992.

Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1): 1-28.

Lee, C. S. (2005). Income Inequality, Democracy and Public Sector Size. American Sociological Review, 70: 158-191.

Muller, E. N. (1988). Democracy, Economic Development and Income Inequality. American Sociological Review, 53(1): 50-68.

Pesaran, M. Hasheem; Yamagata, Takashi (2008). Testing Slope Homogenity in Large Panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142, 50-98.

Reuveny, R.; Quan, L. (2003), Economic Openness, Democracy, and Income Inequality: An Empiricial Analysis, Comparative Political Studies, 36: 575-601.

Shen, Y., Yao, Y. (2008). Does Grassroots Democracy Reduce Income Inequality in China?. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 2182-2198.

Shin, I. (2012). Income Inequality and Economic Growth. Economic Modelling, 29, 2049-2057

Solt, F. (2009). The Standardized World Income Inequality Database. Social Science Quarterly, 97(5), 1267-1281.

Szekely, M. ve Sámano, C. (2012). Did Trade Openness Affect Income Distribution in Latin America? Evidence for the Years 1980-2010. UNU World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER), Working Paper No. 2012/03.

Wagle, U. R. (2009). Inclusive Democracy and Economic Inequality in South Asia: Any Discernible Link?. Review of Social Economy, 67(3), 329-357, DOI:10.1080/00346760902908617