Investigation of Bullet Damage to Alumina Ceramic at Different Angles

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2, 786 - 793, 14.07.2023

Alemdar Ongun Ömer Resuloğlu

https://doi.org/10.29137/umagd.1286016

Öz

Alumina ceramics are often preferred in the defense industry at affordable costs. In this study, alumina ceramics were made to investigate the damage status after projectile impact. Alumina ceramics, known for their hard structure (1600 HV), first respond to the bullet impact on the front of the armors. After impacting, the ceramic breaks the piercing part of the bullet tip, showing resistance and geometrically mushrooms the bullet tip, allowing the effect to spread over a larger area. In numerical analysis, it was modeled as 7.62x51 mm (M80) bullet and 838 m/sec speed, which was reached in 23.7 meters in accordance with its standards, was taken as reference. As a result of the analyzes, the damage cases in both bullets and ceramics were examined and compared.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Alumina Ceramic, Terminal Ballistic, Impact Angle

Farklı Açılarda Alümina Seramiğe Çarpan Mermi Hasarının İncelenmesi

Öz

Yapılan bu çalışma, savunma sanayinde uygun maliyetiyle sıklıkla tercih edilen alümina seramiklerin, mermi çarpması sonrası hasar durumunu incelemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Alümina seramikler sert (1600 HV) yapıları sebebiyle zırhların ön kısımlarında mermi darbesini ilk olarak karşılayan ve bu darbeyi mermi ucundaki sivri kısmı kırarak, direnç göstererek mermi uç kısmını geometrik olarak mantarlaştırarak, daha geniş bir alana yayması sağlamaktadır. Sayısal analizlerde 7,62x51 mm (M80) mermi olarak modellenerek, standartlarına uygun olarak 23,7 metrede ulaştığı hız olan 838 m/sn hız referans alınmıştır. Yapılan analizlerin sonuçlarında hem mermide hem de seramikte oluşan hasar durumları incelenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Alümina Seramik, Terminal Balistik, Çarpma Açısı

Kaynakça

• Army U., Interior Ballistics of Guns. Engineering Design Handbook: Ballistics Series, United States Army Materiel Command. 1965.
• Candan C., “Kompozit zırh imalat parametrelerinin terminal balistik özellikler üzerine etkileri,” Selçuk Üniversitesi, 2005.
• Carton E. P., Weerheijm J., Ditzhuijzen C., and Tuinman I., “Fragment and particle size distribution of impacted ceramic tiles,” in 28th International Symposium on Ballistics, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 22-26 September 2014, 1254-1265, 2014.
• Crouch I., The science of armour materials. Woodhead Publishing, 2016.
• Holmquist T. J., Templeton D. W., and Bishnoi K. D., “Constitutive modeling of aluminum nitride for large strain, high-strain rate, and high-pressure applications,” Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 211–231, 2001.
• Johnson G. R. and Cook W. H., “Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures,” Eng. Fract. Mech., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 31–48, 1985.
• Kocer C., “Using the Hertzian fracture system to measure crack growth data: A review,” Int. J. Fract., vol. 121, no. 3–4, pp. 111–132, 2003.
• Lamberts A., Geers M. G. D., Dommelen J. A. W., Lange H. C., Huizinga A., and BV P. D. E. A., “Numerical simulation of ballistic impacts on ceramic material,” Eindhoven Univ. Technol., 2007.
• Tasdemirci A. and Hall I. W., “Numerical and experimental studies of damage generation in multi-layer composite materials at high strain rates,” Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 189–204, 2007.
• The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica, T.E.o.E. 2017.
• Wang Y.-F. and Yang Z.-G., “Finite element model of erosive wear on ductile and brittle materials,” Wear, vol. 265, no. 5–6, pp. 871–878, 2008.
• Westerling L. and Lundberg T., “The influence of confinement on the protective capability of ceramic armour at two different velocities,” in 15th Int. Symp. on Ballistics, 1995, pp. 283–290.
• Zack Gable J. W., Hurley J., Chojnicki T., “Physics 001,” Sci. Ballist., 2007.
• Zook J. A., Frank K., and Silsby G. F., “Terminal ballistics test and analysis guidelines for the penetration mechanics branch,” Army Ballistic Research Lab Aberdeen Proving Ground, 1992.