Subjective Evaluation of Towel Quality Perception According to the Experts' and Non-Experts’ Viewpoint

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 113 - 122, 28.12.2020

Gülşah Susurluk Yüksel İkiz Erkan Turker

https://doi.org/10.47137/uujes.790395

Öz

In this study, subjective evaluation of towel samples with distinctive fiber contents was inspected. The subjective evaluation questionnaire was performed both by experts with professional experience in the towel sector and by non-experts in this sector. The evaluation was conducted by 30 experts (18 males and 12 females) and 30 non-experts (17 males and 13 females). The experts and non-experts were asked this question: “Could you state parameters that define towel quality with the exception of color and pattern?”. Each expert and non-expert had to mention at least 3 parameters. During the evaluation phase, they could visually experienced the color of all towel samples and the information were given about the features like fiber content, yarn count, grammage etc. By touching all samples, towel quality perceptions of the parameters specified for each sample were evaluated subjectively by experts’ and non-experts’ viewpoint.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Towel, Towel Quality Perception,, Subjective Evaluation,, Expert, Non-expert

Destekleyen Kurum

TUBITAK and DENIB

Proje Numarası

1059B191700771

Teşekkür

We would like to thank TUBITAK and DENIB for supporting the project number 1059B191700771.

Kaynakça

• [1] Chang, S. (2010). Olfactory-tactile Interactions and Their Implications for Retailing. PhD Thesis, John Molson School of Business, Montreal.
• [2] Citrin, A. V., Stem, D. E., Spangenberg, E. R., Clark, M. J. (2003). Consumer need for tactile input an internet retailing challenge. Journal of Business Research, 56(1), 915–922.
• [3] Goett, S. (2010). Linking Threads of Experience and Lines of Thought: Everyday Textiles in the Narration of the Self. PhD Thesis, The University of East London, London.
• [4] Grohmann, B., Spangenberg, E. R., Sprott, D. E. (2007). The influence of tactile input on the evaluation of retail product offerings. Journal of Retailing, 83(2), 237–245.
• [5] Kandzhikova, G. D., Germanova-Krasteva, D. S. (2016). Subjective evaluation of terry fabrics handle. The Journal of the Textile Institute, 107(3), 355-363.
• [6] Kergoat, M., Giboreau, A., Nicod, H., Faye, P., Diaz, E., Beetschen, M. A., Meyer, T. (2012). Consumer preference for tactile softness: A question of affect intensity?. Journal of Sensory Studies, 27(4), 232–246.
• [7] Mahar, T. J., Wang, H., Postle, R. (2013). A review of fabric tactile properties and their subjective assessment for next-to-skin knitted fabrics. The Journal of The Textile Institute, 104(6), 572-578.
• [8] McCabe, D. B., Nowlis, S. M. (2003). The effect of examining actual products or product descriptions on consumer preference. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(4), 431–4393.
• [9] Nogueira, C., Cabeco-Silva, M. E., Schacher, L., Adolphe, D. (2009). Textile materials: Tactile describers. Journal of Food Technology, 7(3), 66–70.
• [10] Pan, N. (2007). Quantification and evaluation of human tactile sense towards fabrics. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics, 1(1), 48–60.
• [11] Sular, V., Okur, A.(2007). Sensory evaluation methods for tactile properties of fabrics. Journal of Sensory Studies, 22(1), 1–16.
• [12] Sular, V., Okur, A. (2008). Handle evaluation of men’s suitings produced in Turkey. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 16, 61–68.
• [13] Ikiz, Y., Sato, T., Arık, B., Matsumoto, Y., Sarıkaya, G. (2017). The effects of psychological manners on visual and tactile evaluation of towel preferences of Turkish and Japanese consumers. The Journal of the Textile Institute, 108(7), 1150-1156.
• [14] Ellis, B. C., Garnsworthy, R. K. (1980). A review of techniques for the assessment of hand. Textile Research Journal, 50(4), 231-238.
• [15] Özçelik, G., Süpüren, G., Gülümser, T., Tarakçıoğlu, I. (2008). A study on subjective and objective evaluation of the handle properties of shirt fabric. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 3(68), 56-62.
• [16] Yıldız, E. Z., Özdil, N. (2014). Subjective and objective evaluation of the handle properties of shirt fabric fused with different woven interlining. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, 24(1), 47-55.
• [17] Arık, B., İkiz, Y., Çalışkan, M., Karaibrahimoğlu, K. (2018). Gömleklik kumaşların tuşe özelliklerinin duyusal analiz ve fiziksel test yöntemleriyle belirlenmesi ve aralarındaki ilişkinin değerlendirilmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 24(7), 1262-1271.
• [18] Overvliet, K. E., Karana, E., Soto-Faraco, S. (2016). Perception of naturalness in textiles. Materials and Design, 90, 1192-1199.
• [19] Peck, J., Childers, T. L. (2006). If I touch it I have to have it: Individual and environmental influences on impulse purchasing. Journal of Business Research, 59, 765–769.
• [20] An, S. K., Gam, H. J., Cao, H. (2013). Evaluating thermal and sensorial performance of organic cotton, bamboo-blended, and soybean-blended fabrics. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 31, 157–166.
• [21] Luible, C., Varheenmaa, M., Magnenat-Thalmann, N., Meinander, H. (2007). Subjective fabric evaluation. International Conference on Cyberworlds, 57, 285–291.
• [22] Singh, J. P., Behera, B. K., Matsudaira, M. (2014). Objective evaluation of terry fabric hand. The Journal of the Textile Institute, 105(5), 467–476.
• [23] Slater, K. (1997). Subjective textile testing. The Journal of the Textile Institute, 88(2), 79–91
• [24] Sular, V., Okur, A. (2012). Kumaşların duyusal özelliklerinin belirlenmesinde subjektif değerlendirmenin yeri. Tekstil ve Mühendis, 58, 19–28.
• [25] Sular, V. (2005). Kumaş Tutumunun Ölçülebilir Kumaş Özelliklerinden Tahminlenmesi Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Doktora Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.