sdü vizyoner dergisi Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi 1308-9552 Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi 10.21076/vizyoner.1495969 Health Care Administration Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi Geri Öğretme Yönteminin Hastaların Sağlık Çıktısına Etkisi: Randomize Kontrollü Çalışmalara Dayalı Bir Araştırma The Effect of Teach-Back Method on Patients’ Health Outcomes: A Study Based on Randomized Controlled Trials https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4222-2659 Aydemir İzzet BİNGÖL ÜNİVERSİTESİ 02 28 2025 16 45 20 36 06 04 2024 10 31 2024 Copyright © 2009, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi 2009 Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi

Bu araştırmada, geri öğretme (teach-back) iletişiminin hasta çıktılarına etkisi randomize kontrollü çalışmalar ışığında değerlendirilmiştir. Araştırmada, 31 Aralık 2024 yılına kadar yayımlanmış ve geniş veri tabanları olan PubMed ve Google Scholar taranarak amaçlanan çalışmalara ulaşılmıştır. PRISMA protokolü takip edilerek çalışmalar elde edildi. Çalışmaların kalite değerlendirilmesi araştırmacı ve bağımsız değerlendirici tarafından yapıldı. Randomize araştırmalara yönelik Cochrane Collaboration risk yanlılığı aracı olan RoB 2.0 görseli kullanılarak çalışmaların risk yanlılığı analizi yapıldı. Değerlendirmeye toplam 27 çalışma alındı ve çalışmaların genel risk yanlılık düzeyi düşük bulundu. Çalışmalarda farklı sağlık durumuna sahip olan katılımcılara verilen geri öğretme eğitimi standart bakımla karşılaştırıldı. Çalışmalarda geri öğretme yönteminin, genel olarak, farklı popülasyon ve hastalık olgusuna sahip olan katılımcıların sonuç ölçümlerinde anlamlı bir şekilde etkili olduğu saptanmıştır. Geri öğretme eğitimi hastaların sağlık çıktısı ve öz yeterliliği üzerinde etkili bir iletişim stratejisi olduğu saptandı. Ancak daha uzun takip dönemi ve geniş örnekleme sahip olan çalışmalar üzerinde yöntemin etkililiği değerlendirilebilir.

In the study, the effect of teach-back communication on patient outcomes is evaluated in the light of randomized controlled trials. The targeted studies are accessed through scanning the large databases -PubMed and Google Scholar- from the beginning until December 31, 2024. Studies are obtained following the PRISMA protocol. The quality assessment of the studies included is assessed by both study researcher and an independent evaluator. Risk bias analysis of the studies is carried out using the RoB 2.0 image, the Cochrane Collaboration risk bias tool for randomized trials. A total of 27 studies are included in the evaluation, in which the overall risk bias level of the studies is found to be low. In the included studies, teach-back training given to participants with different health conditions is compared with standard care. Studies, individually, finds that the teach-back method has significantly effective in outcome measurements of participants with different populations and disease cases. Teach-back training is an effective communication strategy on patients' health outcome and self-efficacy. However, the effectiveness of the method could be evaluated on studies with longer follow-up periods and larger samples.

 Hasta Çıktıları Öz Yeterlilik Randomize Kontrollü Çalışmalar Geri Öğretme İletişimi Patient Outcomes Self-Efficacy Randomized Controlled Trial Teach-Back Communication Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2014). AHRQ health literacy universal precautions toolkit. 2nd ed. agency for healthcare research and quality; 2015. https://www.ahrq.gov/health-literacy/improve/precautions/index.html adresinden 14 Şubat 2024 tarihinden alınmıştır. Bahri, N., Saljooghi, S., Noghabi, A. D. ve Moshki, M. (2018). Effectiveness of the teach-back method in improving self-care activities in postmenopausal women. Menopause Review, 17(1), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2018.74896 Boyde, M., Peters, R., New, N., Hwang, R., Ha, T. ve Korczyk, D. (2018). Self-care educational intervention to reduce hospitalisations in heart failure: A randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 17(2), 178-185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474515117727740 Caplin, M. ve Saunders T. (2015). Utilizing teach-back to reinforce patient education: A stepby-step approach. Orthopaedic Nursing, 34, 365-368. https://doi.org/10.1097/NOR.0000000000000197 Cheng, G. Z., Chen, A., Xin, Y. ve Ni, Q. Q. (2023). Using the teach‑back method to improve postpartum maternal‑infant health among women with limited maternal health literacy: A randomized controlled study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 23,13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05302-w Dang, Y., Patel-Shori, N., Barros, M. ve Yu, D. (2020). Good literacy to enhance response in diabetes mellitus (GLITTER-DM). Innovations in Pharmacy, 11(3), 2-10. https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v11i3.2406 Dastoom, M., Elahi, N., Baraz, S. ve Latifi, S. M. (2016). The effects of group education with the teach-back method on hospital readmission rates of heart failure patients. Jundishapur Journal of Chronic Disease Care, 5(1), e30377. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8897881 Dinh, H. T. T., Bonner, A., Ramsbotham, J. ve Clark, R. (2019). Cluster randomized controlled trial testing the effectiveness of a self-management intervention using the teach-back method for people with heart failure. Nursing & Health Sciences, 21, 436-444. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12616 Dünya Sağlık Örgütü. (2022). Health literacy development for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases: Case studies from WHO national health literacy demonstration projects. World Health Organization. https://apps.who. int/iris/handle/10665/364206 adresinden 14 Şubat 2024 tarihinden alınmıştır. Ghiasvand, F., Riazi, H., Hajian, S., Kazemi, E. ve Firoozi, A. (2017). The effect of a self-care program based on the teach back method on the postpartum quality of life. Electronic Physician Journal, 9(4), 4180-4189. https://doi.org/10.19082/4180 Ghorbani, B., Jackson, A., Noorchenarboo, M., Mandegar, M. H., Sharifi, F., Mirmoghtadaie, Z. ve Bahramnezhad, F. (2021). Comparing the effects of gamification and teach-back training methods on adherence to a therapeutic regimen in patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Randomized clinical trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(12), e22557. https://doi.org/10.2196/22557 Griffey, R. T., Shin, N., Jones, S., Aginam, N., Gross, M. ve Kinsella, Y. (2015). The impact of teach-back on comprehension of discharge instructions and satisfaction among emergency patients with limited health literacy: A randomized, controlled study. Journal of Community Health, 8(1),10-21. https://doi.org/10.1179/1753807615Y.0000000001 Howie-Esquivel, J., Bibbins-Domingo, K., Clark, R., Evangelista, L. ve Dracup, K. A. (2014). Culturally appropriate educational intervention can improve self-care in hispanic patients with heart failure: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Cardiology Research, (3-4), 91-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/cr346w Imanipour, M., Molazem, Z., Rakhshan, M., Fallahi, M. J. ve Sadaf, A. M. A. (2022). The effect of teach-back method education on the control of asthma and family care pressure of patients in Iran. Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria, 40(1), e04. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v40n1e04 Jaras, M., Mansoorian, M. R., Noghabi, A. D. ve Nezami, H. (2020). Comparison of effectiveness self-care returns two methods of focus group discussions and teach-back on lifestyle of pregnant women. Internal Medicine Today, 26(1), 94-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.32598/hms.26.1.2761 Kandula, N. R., Malli, T., Zei, C. P., Larsen, E. ve Baker, D. W. (2011). Literacy and retention of information after a multimedia diabetes education program and teach-back. Journal of Health Communication, 16, 89-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2011.604382 Li, C. N., Carlos C. A. J., Faridi M., Espinola, J. A., Hayes, B. D., Porter, S. ve Cohen, E., Samuels-Kalow, M. (2020). Medication education for dosing safety (MEDS): A randomized controlled trial. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 76(5), 637-645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.07.007 Lloyd, J., Thomas, L., Powell-Davies, G., Osten, R. ve Harris, M. (2018). Health literacy: cancer prevention strategies for early adults. Public Health Research and Practice, 28(2), 2821809 Marks, L., O'Sullivan, L., Pytel, K. ve Parkosewich, J. A. (2022). Using a teach-back intervention significantly improves knowledge, perceptions, and satisfaction of patients with Nurses’ discharge medication education. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 19, 458-466. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12612 Martin, B. A, Chui, M. A., Thorpe, J. M., Mott, D. A. ve Kreling, D. H. (2010). Development of a scale to measure pharmacists' self-efficacy in performing medication therapy management services. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 6, 155-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2010.05.001 Moadab, N. H., Elahi, N., Moradbeygi, K., Mahboubi, M., Latifi, S. M. ve Elhami, S. (2015). The comparison between effectiveness of teach-back method and accompany person on anxiety in women undergo cesarean section, Journal of Medical Science., 9(3), 43-48. https://doi.org/10.3923/rjmsci.2015.43.48 Mollazadeh, F. ve Hemmati M. M. (2018). The effect of teach-back training on self management in kidney transplant recipients: A clinical trial. International Journal of Community Based Nursing & Midwifery, 6(2),146-155. Moreria, L. (2018). OECD health working paper no. 107. Health literacy for people centred care. Where do OECD countries stand?. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/18152015 Nakayama, K., Osaka, W., Togari, T., Ishikawa, H., Yonekura, Y., Sekido, A. ve Matsumoto, M. (2015). Comprehensive health literacy in Japan is lower than in Europe: A validated Japanese-language assessment of health literacy. BMC Public Health, 15, 505. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1835-x Nas, M.A., Cayi, Y. ve Bilen, A. (2020). The impact of teach-back educational method on diabetes knowledge level and clinical parameters in type 2 diabetes patients undergoing insulin therapy. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 75(4), e13921. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.13921 Negarandeha, R., Mahmoodib, H., Noktehdanb, H., Heshmatc, R. ve Shakibazadehd, E. (2013). Teach back and pictorial image educational strategies on knowledge about diabetes and medication/dietary adherence among low health literate patients with type 2 diabetes. Primary Care Diabetes, 7, 111-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2012.11.001 Nutbeam, D. (2008). The evolving concept of health literacy. Social Science & Medicine, 67, 2072-2078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.050 Oh, E. G., Lee, J. Y., Lee, H. J. ve Oh, S. (2023). Effects of discharge education using teach-back methods in patientswith heart failure: A randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 140, 104453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104453 Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt. P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P. ve Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 Poursamad, A., Karimi, Z. ve Mousavi M. S. (2022). Comparison of the effect of teach-back method and video clip training on the sense of coherence of mothers with children suffering from asthma. Journal of Climate Change Society, 3(3), 111-117. https://doi.org/10.52547/jccs.3.3.111 Sağlık Bakanlığı. (2018). Türkiye sağlık okuryazarlığı ve ilişkili faktörleri araştırması. https:// sggm.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/39699/0/soya-rapor-1pdf.pdf adresinden 1 Ocak 2024 tarihinde alınmıştır. Satehi, S. B., Zandi, M., Derakhshan, H. B., Nasiri, M. ve Tahmasbi, T. (2021). Investigating and comparing the effect of teach-back and multimedia teaching methods on self-care in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Clinicial Diabetes. 39(2), 146-152. https://doi.org/10.2337/cd20-0010 Seely, K. D., Higgs, J. A. ve Nigh, A. (2022). Utilizing the “teach-back” method to improve surgical informed consent and shared decision-making: A review. Patient Safety in Surgery, 16, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-022-00322-z Schillinger, D., Piette, J., Grumbach, K., Wang, F., Wilson, C., Daher, C., Leong-Grotz, K., Castro, C. ve Bindman A. B. (2003). Closing the loop: Physician communication with diabetic patients who have low health literacy. Archives of Internal Medicine, 163(1), 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.163.1.83 Sharifiana, P., Khalilib, A. ve Shamsizadehc, M. (2023). Effects of physical activity by the teachback educational method on the physical ability and quality of life in hemodialysis patients: A clinical trial. Frontiers of Nursing, 10(2), 223-231. https://doi.org/10.2478/fon-2023-0027 Shen, D., Degree, B. ve Huang, W. (2023). The impact of Teach-back method on preoperative anxiety and surgical cooperation in elderly patients undergoing outpatient ophthalmology surgery: A randomized clinical trial. Medicine, 102, 8(e32931). https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032931 Sterne, J. A. C., Savović J. ve Page M. J., Elbers, R. G., Blencowe, N. S., Boutron, I., Cates, C. J., Cheng, H. Y., Corbett, M. S., Eldridge, S. M., Emberson, J. R., Hernán, M. A., Hopewell, S., Hróbjartsson, A., Junqueira, D. R., Jüni, P., Kirkham, J. J., Lasserson, T., Li, T., McAleenan, A., Reeves, B. C., Shepperd, S., Shrier, I., Stewart, L. A., Tilling, K., White, I. R., Whiting, P. F. ve Higgins, J. P. T. (2019). RoB 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. British Medical Journal, 366, l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898 Sudore, R. L. ve Schillinger, D. (2009). Interventions to improve care for patients with limited health literacy. Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management, 16, 20-29. Sørensen, K., Pelikan, J.M., Röthlin, F., Ganahl, K., Slonska, Z., Doyle, G., Fullam, J., Kondilis, B., Agrafiotis, D., Uiters, E., Falcon, M., Mensing, M., Tchamov, K., van den Broucke, S. ve Brand, H. (2015). Health literacy in Europe: Comparative results of the European health literacy survey (HLS-EU). European Journal of Public Health, 25(6), 1053-1058. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv043 Tran, S., Bennett, G., Richmond, J., Nguyen, T., Ryan, M., Hong, T., Howell, J., Demediuk, B., Desmond, P., Bell, S. ve Thompson, A. (2019). ‘Teach-back’ is a simple communication tool that improves disease knowledge in people with chronic hepatitis B-a pilot randomized controlled study. BMC Public Health., 19, 1355. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7658-4 Uçtu, A. K. ve Özerdoğan, N. (2020). Emzirme eğitiminde öğrendiğini anlat (teach-back) yönteminin kullanımı. Journal of Nursology., 23(1), 162-168. https://doi.org/10.17049/ataunihem.548173 Uçtu, A. K. ve Özerdoğan, N. (2023). Effect of teach-back method on breastfeeding success: A single blind randomized controlled study. Health Care for Women International, 44(3), 14-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2021.2021915 Wang, J., Hu, H., Sun, J., Zhang, Q., Chen, Z., Wang, Q., Zhu, M., Yao, J., Yuan, H. ve Zhang, X. (2023). The effectiveness of health education based on the 5Ts for teach‑back on oral nutritional supplements compliance of post‑discharge patients after surgery for gastric cancer: A randomized controlled trial. Supportive Care in Cancer., 31, 157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-07581-1 Ye, Q., Yang, Y., Yao, M., Yang, Y. ve Lin T. (2022). Effects of teach‑back health education (TBHE) based on WeChat mini‑programs in preventing falls at home for urban older adults in China: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatrics, 611. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03297-9 Zabolypour, S., Alishapour, M., Behnammoghadam, M., Larki, R. A. ve Zolad, M. A. (2020). Comparison of the effects of teach-back and motivational interviewing on the adherence to medical regimen in patients with hypertension. Patient Preference and Adherence, 14, 401-410. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S231716