COVİD-19 pandemisinin Türkiye’deki üroloji asistanlığındaki etkisi

Abstract

Amaç: Hayatın her alanını etkisi altına alan Covid-19 pandemisi, akademik ve sağlık hizmetlerini de derinden etkilemiştir. Daha önce pandeminin Türkiye’deki üroloji asistanlarının akademik ve sağlık hizmetleri üzerindeki etkilerine ilişkin herhangi bir değerlendirme yapılmamıştır. Biz çalışmamızda bunu değerlendirmeyi amaçladık.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Anket dört ana başlıkta (eğitim ve araştırma faaliyetleri, sağlık hizmetlerinde çalışma koşulları, sosyal-psikolojik etkiler ve kişisel sağlık) toplam 31 sorudan oluşmakta ve Temmuz-Ağustos 2020 tarihleri ​​arasında gerçekleştirilmiştir. Türkiye’de 89 üroloji eğitim merkezi olup, bunların 76’sı (%85,4; 38 üniversite ve 38 devlet hastanesi) anketi doldurmuş ve geri dönmüştür.
Bulgular: Asistanların ortalama haftalık eğitim saatleri azaldı (2,43±2,46 saatten 1,3±1,8 saate; p=0,00) ve 67 merkez (%88,15) web seminerleri ve video konferans gibi yeni teknolojileri kullandı.
Haftalık araştırma faaliyetlerine ayrılan süre de pandemi sırasında azaldı (2,15±2,54 saatten 1,8±1,93 saate; p<0.001). Üniversite hastaneleri araştırma faaliyetlerini artırırken (%9,9) devlet hastanelerinde ise azaldı (%44). Haftalık ortalama poliklinik saati 86.23±86.54’ten 37.22±19.88’e (p<0.001) geriledi ve devlet hastanelerinde (%63.61) üniversite hastanelerine (%42.41) göre daha yüksekti (p<0.05). Pandemi öncesi döneme göre haftalık ameliyat sayısında önemli bir azalma gözlendi (40.7±24.25’ten 14,3±16.44’e; p<0.001). Ayrıca 74 merkez (%97,36) acil ürolojik vakaları uygulamaya devam ettiğini, 41 merkez (%53,9) toplam çalışma saatlerinin azaldığını, 72 merkez (%94,7) ise üroloji dışı alanlarda Covid poliklinikleri veya hizmetleri gibi çalıştığını bildirdi.
Asistanlar için 10 merkez (%13.15) çocuk bakımı, 55’i (%72.36) konaklama, 18’i (%23.68) ulaşım sağladı fakat 33 merkez (%43.42) kişisel koruyucu donanımdan yoksundu. 26 merkez (%34.21) komorbiditesi olan çalışanlarına izin verdi. Asistanlar 57 merkezde (%75) yeterli cerrahi vaka olmamasından, 73 merkezde (%96.05) Kovid-19’un ailesine bulaşmasından ve 34 merkezde (%44.73) ailelerini korumak için evlerinden taşınmış olmasından endişe duyuyorlardı. Ayrıca 25 merkezde (%32.89) asistan izole edilmiş, 54 merkezde (%71.85) hastalık sorgusu (şüphe) nedeniyle sürüntü alınmıştır. Asistanlara 14 merkezde (%18.42) Kovid-19 teşhisi konuldu.
Sonuç: Bu araştırma, Covid-19 pandemisinin yaşamın tüm alanlarını etkilediği gibi üroloji asistanlarının akademik (eğitim ve araştırma), sosyal ve psikolojik yaşamlarında da ciddi olumsuzluklara neden olduğunu göstermiştir.

Keywords

• Covid-19
• asistanlık
• pandemi
• üroloji eğitimi
• cerrahi eğitim
• COVID-19
• residency
• pandemic
• urology training
• surgical training

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on urology residency in Turkey: a nationwide survey

Abstract

Objective: The Covid-19 pandemic, which affects all areas of life, has also deeply affected academic and health services. There has previously been no assessment of the effects of the pandemic on academic and health services of urology residents in Turkey, for this purpose, a survey was conducted.
Material and Methods: The survey consisted of a total of 31 questions under four main topics (education and research activities, working conditions in health services, social-psychological effects, and personal health) and was carried out between July-August 2020. The survey was 89 urology training centers in Turkey, among them 76 (85.4%; 38 university and 38 state hospitals) completed and returned the questionnaire.
Results: The average weekly education hours decreased (2.43±2.46 hours to 1.3±1.8 hours; p=.00) and 67 centers (88.15%) used new technologies such as webinars and videoconferencing.
The time devoted to weekly research activities also decreased during the pandemic (2.15±2.54 hours to 1.8±1.93 hours; p<0.001). However, university hospitals increased their research activities (9.9%), while state hospitals decreased (44%). The average weekly outpatient clinic hours decreased from 86.23±86.54 to 37.22±19.88 (p<0.001) and the regression was higher in state hospitals (63.61%) compared to university hospitals (42.41%) (p <0.05). A significant decrease was observed in the number of operations per week compared to the pre-pandemic period (from 40.7±24.25 to 14.3±16.44; p<0.001). In addition, 74 centers (97.36%) reported that they continued to perform emergency urological cases and 41 centers (53.9%) reported that the total working hours decreased, but 72 centers (94.7%) reported that they were employed in non-urology areas such as Covid outpatient clinics or services.
For the residents, 10 centers (13.15%) provided childcare, 55 centers (72.36%) provided accommodation, and 18 centers (23.68%) provided transportation, but 33 centers (43.42%) lacked protective personal equipment and 26 centers (34.21%) gave leave to employees with comorbidity. Residents were concerned about not having enough surgical cases in 57 centers (75%), the transmission of Covid-19 to their family in 73 centers (96.05%), and in 34 centers (44.73%), they had moved away from their homes to protect their families. Furthermore, residents were isolated in 25 centers (32.89%) and swabs were taken in 54 centers (71.85%) due to the query (doubt, suspicion) of illness. Residents were diagnosed with Covid-19 in 14 centers (18.42%).
Conclusion: This survey has shown that as the Covid-19 pandemic affects all areas of life, it also causes serious negatives in the academic (educational and research), social, and psychological lives of urology residents.

Keywords

• COVID-19
• residency
• pandemic
• urology training
• surgical training

References

1. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, et al. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med 2020;382:727-33. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017.
2. World Health Organization (WHO). Coronavirus disease (COVID-2019) situation reports. Available from URL: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports.
3. Turkish ministry of health. Covid-19 sitution reports. Available from URL: https://covid19.saglik.gov.tr/.
4. Desouky E. Impact of COVID-19 on Urologists: Learning on the Go. Eur Urol Focus. 2020 Sep 15;6(5):1132-1134. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.04.008.
5. Heldwein FL, Loeb S, Wroclawski ML, Sridhar AN, Carneiro A, Lima FS, Teoh JY. A Systematic Review on Guidelines and Recommendations for Urology Standard of Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Eur Urol Focus. 2020 Sep 15;6(5):1070-1085. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.05.020.
6. Pang KH, Carrion DM, Rivas JG, Mantica G, Mattigk A, Pradere B, Esperto F; European Society of Residents in Urology. The Impact of COVID-19 on European Health Care and Urology Trainees. Eur Urol. 2020 Jul;78(1):6-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.04.042.
7. Rosen GH, Murray KS, Greene KL, Pruthi RS, Richstone L, Mirza M. Effect of COVID-19 on Urology Residency Training: A Nationwide Survey of Program Directors by the Society of Academic Urologists. J Urol. 2020 Nov;204(5):1039-1045. DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001155. 
8. Dubin JM, Wyant WA, Balaji NC, Ong WL, Kettache RH, Haffaf M, Zouari S, Santillan D, Autrán Gómez AM, Sadeghi-Nejad H, Loeb S, Borin JF, Gomez Rivas J, Grummet J, Ramasamy R, Teoh JYC. Telemedicine Usage Among Urologists During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Study. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 5;22(11):e21875. DOI: 10.2196/21875.

9. Fero KE, Weinberger JM, Lerman S, Bergman J. Perceived Impact of Urologic Surgery Training Program Modifications due to COVID-19 in the United States. Urology. 2020 Sep;143:62-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.05.051.
10. Khusid JA, Weinstein CS, Becerra AZ, Kashani M, Robins DJ, Fink LE, Smith MT Jr, Weiss JP. Well-being and education of urology residents during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of an American National Survey. Int J Clin Pract. 2020 Sep;74(9):e13559. DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.13559.
11. Ipekci T, Asfuroglu A, Yildiz A, Dincer M, Yuruk E, Bozlu M, Kadioglu A. How Did The COVID-19 Pandemic Affect Urology Publications? Grand J Urol 2022, DOI: 10.5505/GJU.2022. 36035.
12. Esperto F, Prata F, Civitella A, Pang KH, Marchioni M, Tuzzolo P, Scarpa RM, Papalia R. Implementation and strategies to ensure adequate coordination within a Urology Department during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int Braz J Urol. 2020 Jul;46(suppl.1):170-180. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.S122.
13. Hughes T, Ho HC, Shariat SF, Somani BK. Where do urologists stand in the era of novel coronavirus-2019 disease. Curr Opin Urol. 2020 Jul;30(4):610-616. DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000786.
14. Teoh JY, Ong WLK, Gonzalez-Padilla D, Castellani D, Dubin JM, Esperto F, Campi R, Gudaru K, Talwar R, Okhunov Z, Ng CF, Jain N, Gauhar V, Wong MC, Wroclawski ML, Tanidir Y, Rivas JG, Tiong HY, Loeb S; UroSoMe Working Group. A Global Survey on the Impact of COVID-19 on Urological Services. Eur Urol. 2020 Aug;78(2):265-275. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.025.
15. Autrán-Gómez AM, Tobia I, Molina RC, Covarrubias FR, Benzing F, Maruccia S, Reis LO, Lay RR, De la Reza MT, Torres FS, Porras AH, Rodríguez A. Exploring Urological Experience in the COVID-19 Outbreak: American Confederation of Urology (CAU) Survey. Int Braz J Urol. 2020 Jul;46(suppl.1):156-164. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.
16. Rajwa P, Przydacz M, Zapała P, Wieckiewicz G, Ryszawy J, Chorągwicki D, Drobot RB, Radziszewski P, Paradysz A, Chłosta PL. How has the COVID-19 pandemic impacted Polish urologists? Results from a national survey. Cent European J Urol. 2020;73(3):252-259. DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2020.0252. 
17. Gomes CM, Favorito LA, Henriques JVT, Canalini AF, Anzolch KMJ, de Carvalho Fernandes R, Bellucci CHS, Silva CS, Wroclawski ML, Pompeo ACL, de Bessa J Jr. Impact of COVID-19 on clinical practice, income, health and lifestyle behavior of Brazilian urologists. Int Braz J Urol. 2020 Nov-Dec;46(6):1042-1071. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.
18. Dedeilia A, Sotiropoulos MG, Hanrahan JG, Janga D, Dedeilias P, Sideris M. Medical and Surgical Education Challenges and Innovations in the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Review. In Vivo. 2020 Jun;34(3 Suppl):1603-1611. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11950. 
19. Davuluri M. Urology Chief Resident Turned Medicine Intern: Experience during the COVID-19 New York City Pandemic. J Urol. 2020 Oct;204(4):638-639. DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001137. 
20. Paesano N, Santomil F, Tobia I. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Ibero-American Urology Residents: Perspective of American Confederation of Urology (CAU). Int Braz J Urol. 2020 Jul;46(suppl.1):165-169. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.S120.
21. Baptista FVD, Aguiar MRA, Moreira JA, Sousa FCB, Plenns GCM, Simao RR, Ruffini VMT, Lin CA, Nunes MDPT. Contributions of residents from multiple specializations in managing the COVID-19 pandemic in the largest public hospital Brazil. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2020;75:e2229. DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2020/e2229. 
22. Chan EP, Stringer L, Wang PZT, Dave S, Campbell JD. The impact of COVID-19 on Canadian urology residents. Can Urol Assoc J. 2020 Jun;14(6):E233-E236. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6713.
23. Gabara A, Visram K, Leveridge M. Early adaptation of urology residency educational programs during COVID-19 clinical and gathering restrictions. Can Urol Assoc J. 2020 Aug;14(8):235-236. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6746.