Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Effectivenes of retrograd intrarenal surgery at stones of calix diverticulum

Year 2017, Volume: 12 Issue: 3, 26 - 28, 01.10.2017

Abstract

Aim: A great obstacle for developing a
certain treatment protocol that KD (calix
diverticulum) stones occurance is rare. It is
aimed that 15 patients with KD and its Stones
dilated by doing RIRS and ablating calyx collum laser are presented with its literature in
last one year in our clinic.
Material and Method: Data about 15
patients by doing RIRS or finding KD during RIRS between April 2015 and April 2016
scanned retrospectively.
Findings: Average size of Stones was 11.2
mm. Average age of patients was 52.5 yeras and
body mass index of patients was 26.5. Average
operation time was 42.3 min. It is determined
that complete stoneless achieved in 9 patients
when evaluated in 6.th week. The rate of stoneless in one session is 60 % and it is compatible
with literatüre
Results: In parallel with improvement in
techonology, the developments in minimal
invasive methods have affected KD treatment
protocols. Basically, in treatment RIRS stone
extracted and diverticulum rim dilated. There
is a need for prospective multiple center studies as to determine the suitable KD treatment
protocols and to compare its advantages.

References

  • 1. Rayer P. Traits des maladies des reins 3. Paris: Baillere, 1841, pp 541.
  • 2. Gross AJ, Herrmann TR. Management of stones in calyceal diverticulum. Curr Opin Urol 2007;17:136-140
  • 3. Michel W, Funke PJ, Tunn UW, Senge T: Pyelocalyceal diverticula. Int Urol Nephrol 1985;17: 225-30.
  • 4. Leveillee RJ, Bird VG: Treatment of Caliceal Diverticula and Infundibular Stenosis; in Smith AD, Badlani G, Bagley D, Clayman RV, Jordan GH, Kavoussi LR, Lingeman JE, Preminger GE,Segura JW (eds): Smith’s Textbook of Endourology 2006;171-186.
  • 5. Wulfsohn MA. Pyelocaliceal diverticula. J Urol 1980;123:1-8.
  • 6. Dretler SP. A new useful endoscopic classification of calyceal diverticula [Abstract 843]. 88th Congress AUA, San Antonio, 1993.
  • 7. Middleton, A. W., Jr. and Pfister, R. C.: Stone-containing pyelocaliceal diverticulum: embryogenic, anatomic, radiologic and clinical characteristics. J Urol 1974; 111: 2-6.
  • 8. Auge BK, Munver R, Kourambas J, Newman GE, Preminger GM. Endoscopic management of symptomatic caliceal diverticula: A retrospective comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and ureteroscopy. J Endourol 2002;16:557- 563.
  • 9. Sejiny M, Al-Qahtani S, Elhaous A, Molimard B, Traxer O. Efficacy of flexible ureterorenoscopy with holmium laser in the management of stone-bearing caliceal diverticula. J Endourol 2010;24:961-7.

Kaliks divertikülü taşlarında retrograd intrarenal cerrahinin etkinliği

Year 2017, Volume: 12 Issue: 3, 26 - 28, 01.10.2017

Abstract

Amaç: KD(Kalisiel Divertikül) taşlarının
nadir görülmesi belli bir tedavi protokolü oluşturulmasının önündeki en büyük engeli teşkil
etmektedir. Kliniğimizde son bir yıl içinde KD
ve taşları nedeni ile RIRS yapılıp kaliks boynu
laser ablasyonu ile dilate edilen 15 hastayı literatür eşliğinde sunmayı amaçladık
Gereç ve Yöntem: Nisan 2015 ve Nisan
2016 tarihleri arasında KD nedeni ile RIRS
yapılan veya RIRS esnasında KD tespit edilen
15 hastanın verileri retrospektif olarak tarandı
Bulgular: Ortalama taş boyutu 11,2
mm’idi. Hastaların yaş ortalaması 52,5 yıl,
body mass indeks ortalaması; 26,5 idi. Ortalama işlem süresi 42,3 dk idi. 6. haftada yapılan
değerlendirmede 9 hastada komplet taşsızlık
sağlandığı tespit edildi.Tek seansta taşsızlık
oranı %60 olup literatür ile bağdaşmaktadır.
Sonuç: Teknolojide ki gelişmelere paralel
olarak minimal invaziv yöntemlerde gelişmeler KD tedavi protokollerini etkilemiştir.Tedavide RIRS’ da esas, taşın ekstrakte edilmesi ve
divertül ağzının genişletilmesidir. KD uygun
tedavinin belirlenebilmesi ve üstünlüklerinin kıyaslanabilmesi açısından prospektif çok
merkezli çalışmalara ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır.

References

  • 1. Rayer P. Traits des maladies des reins 3. Paris: Baillere, 1841, pp 541.
  • 2. Gross AJ, Herrmann TR. Management of stones in calyceal diverticulum. Curr Opin Urol 2007;17:136-140
  • 3. Michel W, Funke PJ, Tunn UW, Senge T: Pyelocalyceal diverticula. Int Urol Nephrol 1985;17: 225-30.
  • 4. Leveillee RJ, Bird VG: Treatment of Caliceal Diverticula and Infundibular Stenosis; in Smith AD, Badlani G, Bagley D, Clayman RV, Jordan GH, Kavoussi LR, Lingeman JE, Preminger GE,Segura JW (eds): Smith’s Textbook of Endourology 2006;171-186.
  • 5. Wulfsohn MA. Pyelocaliceal diverticula. J Urol 1980;123:1-8.
  • 6. Dretler SP. A new useful endoscopic classification of calyceal diverticula [Abstract 843]. 88th Congress AUA, San Antonio, 1993.
  • 7. Middleton, A. W., Jr. and Pfister, R. C.: Stone-containing pyelocaliceal diverticulum: embryogenic, anatomic, radiologic and clinical characteristics. J Urol 1974; 111: 2-6.
  • 8. Auge BK, Munver R, Kourambas J, Newman GE, Preminger GM. Endoscopic management of symptomatic caliceal diverticula: A retrospective comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and ureteroscopy. J Endourol 2002;16:557- 563.
  • 9. Sejiny M, Al-Qahtani S, Elhaous A, Molimard B, Traxer O. Efficacy of flexible ureterorenoscopy with holmium laser in the management of stone-bearing caliceal diverticula. J Endourol 2010;24:961-7.
There are 9 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Surgery
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

İbrahim Karabulut This is me

Ali Haydar Yılmaz

Mahmut Koç This is me

Erdem Koç This is me

Fevzi Bedir This is me

Şaban Oğuz Demirdöğen This is me

Publication Date October 1, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 12 Issue: 3

Cite

Vancouver Karabulut İ, Yılmaz AH, Koç M, Koç E, Bedir F, Demirdöğen ŞO. Effectivenes of retrograd intrarenal surgery at stones of calix diverticulum. New J Urol. 2017;12(3):26-8.