Additional Parameters That May Improve Diagnostic Accuracy in Clinical Staging of Muscle Invasive Bladder Tumors After Transurethral Resection
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to investigate the predictive value of additional parameters that may improve diagnostic accuracy in predicting extravesical tumor invasion in patients with muscle invasive transitional cell carcinoma after transurethral bladder tumor resection (TUR-BT).
Material and Methods: The data of patients with muscle-invasive bladder tumor pathology on TUR-BT and who underwent radical cystectomy between January 2009 and December 2016 due to clinical stage T2 or T3 were evaluated retrospectively. Demographic, pathological and clinical datas were recorded. Patients were divided into two groups after pathological staging following radical cystectomy: 26 patients without extravesical tumor invasion (pT2) and 17 patients with extravesical tumor invasion (pT3).
Results: Of the patients with a median age of 65, 40 (93%) were male and 3 (7%) were female.ECOG score,ASA score, Charlson comorbidity index(CCI), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio(NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio(PLR), monocyte/lymphocyte ratio(MLR), mean platelet volume(MPV),presence of preoperative hydronephrosis, concomitant carcinoma in situ(CIS), lymphovascular invasion(LVI), depth of invasion in muscularis propria>50%, history of previous tumor recurrence were significantly higher in Group II.However, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was significantly lower. In multivariate analysis, hydronephrosis, previous recurrence, presence of LVI, depth of invasion in muscularis propria>50%, eGFR, NLR, PLR and MLR were found to be independent predictors in predicting extravesical invasion. According to ROC analysis, cut-off values for eGFR, MLR, PLR, NLR were 77.73 (AUC:0.805, p=0.001), 0.24 (AUC:0.771, p=0.003), 116 (AUC:0.766, p=0.004), 2.07 (AUC:0.710, p=0.021), respectively.
Conclusion: We think that diagnostic accuracy in clinical staging before radical cystectomy may be improved by using additional parameters other than CT or MRG.
Keywords
Supporting Institution
References
- 1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61: 69-90.
- 2. Kaufman DS, Shipley WU, Feldman AS. Bladder cancer. Lancet. 2009;374: 239-49.
- 3. Witjes JA, Bruins M, Cathomas R, et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: the 2019 Update. In. ISBN 978-94-92671-04-2. EAU Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands. http://uroweb.org/guidelines/compilations-of-all-guidelines/
- 4. Spiess PE, Agarwal N, Bangs R, et al. Bladder cancer, version 5.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2017; 15:1240–67.
- 5. Tritschler S, Mosler C, Tilki D, et al.Interobserver variability limits exact preoperative staging by computed tomography in bladder cancer.Urology 2012;79(6):1317-21.
- 6. Lim CS, Tirumani S, van der Pol CB, et al.Use of Quantitative T2-Weighted and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Texture Features of Bladder Cancer and Extravesical Fat for Local Tumor Staging After Transurethral Resection.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Mar 12:1-10. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20718. [Epub ahead of print].
- 7. Husillos AA, Rodríguez FE, Herranz AF, et al. The need for re-TUR of the bladder in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: risk factors of tumor persistence in re-TUR specimens. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2014;66:233-40.
- 8. Tritschler S, Mosler C, Tilki D, Buchner A, Stief C, Graser A.Interobserver variability limits exact preoperative staging by computed tomography in bladder cancer. Urology 2012;79(6):1317-21.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Urology
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
October 27, 2020
Submission Date
July 8, 2019
Acceptance Date
October 25, 2019
Published in Issue
Year 2020 Volume: 15 Number: 3