Diagnostic efficiency of miR-21 and miR-34a serum levels in malign and benign prostate diseases
Abstract
Materials and Methods: Blood samples were taken from 70 patients (25 benign prostatic hyperplasias, 10 chronic prostatitides, and 35 prostate cancer) who underwent prostate needle biopsy. After obtaining serum under suitable conditions, RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis, and qRT-PCR analysis were performed using Qiagen brand kits on Rotor-Gene® Q (Qiagen, Germany) device. -∆Ct values were calculated using RNU6 as a reference gene for normalization. -∆Ct values were used in all statistical calculations.
Results: It was observed that miR-21 serum levels were upregulated in chronic prostatitis and cancer groups compared to benign prostatic hyperplasia and the difference between the groups was statistically significant (p = 0.021 and p = 0.001, respectively). The specificity and sensitivity of miR-21 and miR-21/miR-34a combination was calculated as 56% and 86%; 84% and 71% in discriminating benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer groups, respectively.
Conclusion: In this study, it has been shown that miR-21 and miR-21/miR-34a combination has diagnostic performance that can be a biomarker candidate in diagnosing prostate cancer. In addition, the presence of a gradual increase in chronic prostatitis and prostate cancer at miR-21 levels compared to benign prostatic hyperplasia suggests that inflammation and cancer transformation processes taking place at the molecular level are also reflected in the circulating microRNA profile.
Keywords
Supporting Institution
Project Number
References
- 1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2018; 68(6): 394-424.
- 2. Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane J, et al. 10-year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2016; 375: 1415-1424.
- 3. Helgstrand JT, Røder MA, Klemann N, et al. Trends in incidence and 5‐year mortality in men with newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer—A population‐based analysis of 2 national cohorts. Cancer. 2018; 124(14): 2931-2938.
- 4. Lowenstein LM, Basourakos SP, Williams MD, et al. Active surveillance for prostate and thyroid cancers: evolution in clinical paradigms and lessons learned. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology. 2019; 16(3): 168-184.
- 5. Aghdam AM, Amiri A, Salarinia R, Masoudifar A, et al. MicroRNAs as diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic biomarkers in prostate cancer. Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression. 2019; 29(2): 127-139.
- 6. Jamaspishvili T, Berman DM, Ross AE, et al. Clinical implications of PTEN loss in prostate cancer. Nature Reviews Urology. 2018; 15(4): 222-234.
- 7. Yang Y, Guo JX, Shao ZQ. miR-21 targets and inhibits tumor suppressor gene PTEN to promote prostate cancer cell proliferation and invasion: An experimental study. Asian Pacific journal of tropical medicine. 2017; 10(1): 87-91.
- 8. Yan X, Tang B, Chen B, Shan Y, Yang H. Replication Study: The microRNA miR-34a inhibits prostate cancer stem cells and metastasis by directly repressing CD44. eLife. 2019; 8: e43511.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Urology
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Gönül Erden
This is me
0000-0002-6735-0326
Türkiye
Musa Ekici
0000-0002-9155-4126
Türkiye
Ahmet Yeşilyurt
This is me
0000-0003-1289-7866
Türkiye
Öner Odabaş
0000-0003-3776-0583
Türkiye
Fatma Uçar
0000-0001-7354-375X
Türkiye
Gülfer Öztürk
This is me
0000-0003-1190-4761
Türkiye
Publication Date
October 22, 2021
Submission Date
January 20, 2021
Acceptance Date
September 8, 2021
Published in Issue
Year 2021 Volume: 16 Number: 3