The effect of intracavernosal alprostadil use in erectile dysfunction second line treatment on sexual functions
Abstract
Material and Methods: Twenty-one patients treated due to erectile dysfunction between June 2018-October 2019, taking inadequate response from first-line treatment modalities, were applied intracavernosal alprostadil in second-line treatment and continued it for more than 12 weeks were included in the study, retrospectively. Ages, comorbid diseases, drug usage duration, drug-related side effects, penile Doppler ultrasonography (USG) parameters before application and the erection functions before and 12 weeks after drug use were evaluated with IIEF-15 form for the patients. Intracavernosal alprostadil was started with a dose of 5 μg and was continued with a dose of 10 μg as the result of dose titration.
Results: The mean peak systolic blood flow velocity (PS) value of the patients was 24.4 ±15.1 cm/sec, and the mean end-diastolic flow velocity (ED) value was measured as 4.3±4.5 cm/sec based on the pre-treatment penile Doppler USG.Although the IIEF scores were measured in the 12th week, mean drug usage durations were measured as 21.9±16.6 weeks. Erectile Function Score was 9.2±5.3 before application; it was detected as 20.33±6.2 after the application. Orgasmic Function Score was 3.2±2.5 before application; it was detected as 7.5±2.4 after the application. Sexual Desire Score was 3.72±1.48 before application; it was detected as 8.9±1.4 after the application. Intercourse Satisfaction Score was 3.7±2.8 before application; it was detected as 9.1±2.7 after the application. Overall Satisfaction Score was 4±1.7 before application; it was detected as 8.1±1.7 after the application (All parameters p<0.001).
Conclusion: Intracavernosal alprostadil treatment used in erectile dysfunction second-line treatment is a cost-effective and efficient treatment method with a tolerable side effect profile and provides recovery in sexual parameters that can be measured with IIEF-15 parameters.
Keywords
References
- 1. Shamloul R, Ghanem H. Erectile dysfunction. Lancet. 2013;381(9861):153-65.
- 2. Hatzimouratidis K, Salonia A, Adaikan G, et al. Pharmacotherapy for Erectile Dysfunction: Recommendations From the Fourth International Consultation for Sexual Medicine (ICSM 2015). J Sex Med. 2016;13(4):465-88.
- 3. Yiou R, Ebrahiminia V, Mouracade P, Lingombet O, Abbou C. Sexual quality of life in women partnered with men using intracavernous alprostadil injections after radical prostatectomy. J Sex Med. 2013;10(5):1355-62.
- 4. Eardley I, Donatucci C, Corbin J, et al. Pharmacotherapy for erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2010; 7(1-2):524-40.
- 5. Palmer LS, Valcic M, Melman A, et al. Characterization of cyclic AMP accumulation in cultured human corpus cavernosum smooth muscle cells. J Urol. 1994;152:1308-14. 6. Coombs PG, Heck M, Guhring P, Narus J, Mulhall JP. A review of outcomes of an intracavernosal injection therapy programme. BJU Int. 2012;110(11):1787-91.
- 7. Linet OO, Ogrinc FG. Efficacy and safety of intracavernosal alprostadil in men with erectile dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334(14):873-77.
- 8. Sharlip ID. Evaluation and nonsurgical management of erectile dysfunction. Urol Clin North Am. 1998;25:647–5.
- 9. Porst H, Burnett A, Brock G, et al. SOP conservative (medical and mechanical) treatment of erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med 2013;10:130-71.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Urology
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Hakan Taşkapu
0000-0002-2916-0177
Türkiye
Muzaffer Kılınç
0000-0002-1024-3394
Türkiye
Arif Aydın
0000-0001-8691-090X
Türkiye
Mehmet Balasar
0000-0003-4041-9669
Türkiye
Publication Date
February 23, 2022
Submission Date
May 21, 2021
Acceptance Date
November 22, 2021
Published in Issue
Year 2022 Volume: 17 Number: 1