PNL ve açık böbrek taşı cerrahisi sonrası rekürrens

Year 2015, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 16 - 20, 01.01.2015

Mansur Dağgülli Mehmet Mazhar Utangaç Onur Dede Mehmet Nuri Bodakcı Necmettin Penbegül Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar Süleyman Çakmakcı Yaşar Bozkurt

Abstract

Amaç: Nefrolitiazis nedeniyle perkütan nefrolitotripsi PNL veya açık cerrahi geçiren hastalarda taş rekürrens oranını karşılaştırmak.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Ocak 2006-Mayıs 2009 tarihleri arasında cerrahi tedavi uygulanan böbrek taşı tanılı hasta geriye dönük olarak incelendi. Toplam 38 hasta çalışmaya alındı . Grup 1 n:20 hastaya açık cerrahi uygulanırken Grup 2 n:18 hastaya ise PNL uygulandı. Cerrahi sonrası non-opak ve rezidü taşı olan hastalar çalışma dışı bırakıldı. Taş taraması için idrar analizi, radyografi ve non-kontrast bilgisayarlı tomografi yapıldı. Hastaların yaş, cinsiyet, hastanede kalış süresi, preoperatif taş yükü, postoperatif takip süresi ve postoperatif taş yükü kaydedildi.Bulgular: Grup 1 ve grup 2 deki erkek / kadın oranı sırasıyla 11/9 ve 10/8 dir. Yaş ortalaması 1. grupta 41,9 ± 13,58 ve 2. grupta 36,22 ± 14,3 yıl idi. Ameliyat öncesi taş yükü PNL grubunda 329,46 ± 249,66 mm2 iken açık cerrahi grubunda 390,72 ± 200,12 mm² idi. Taş rekürrensi açık cerrahi grubunda sadece % 20 iken PNL grubunda % 61olarak saptandı. Ameliyat sonrası kontrollerde taş yükü Grup 2’de Grup 1’e nazaran anlamlı derecede daha yüksek bulundu p= 0.40 . Sonuç: PNL son zamanlarda böbrek taşı ameliyatları için daha sık kullanılır olmuştur. Taş nüks oranı rezidüel fragmanlar nedeniyle perkütan nefrolitotripsi sonrası artabilir

Keywords

PNL , nüks taş , böbrek taşı , perkütan nefrolitotripsi

Recurrence after PNL and open renal stone surgery

Abstract

Objective: To compare the rate of stone recurrence in patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotripsy PNL or open surgery because of nephrolithiasis. Material and Methods: Between January 2006-May 2009 with diagnosis of nephrolithiasis who underwent surgical treatment were reviewed retrospectively. Totally 38 patients were included to study. Group 1 n: 20 underwent open surgery, while Group 2 n: 18 patients underwent PNL. The patients whom have nonopaque and residual stones after surgery were excluded from the study. By the controls urine analysis, plain radiography and non-contrast computer tomography were performed for screening stones. Patients’ age, gender, duration of hospital stay, preoperative stone burden, postoperative follow-up period and postoperative stone burden were recorded. Results: The ratio of male/female in group 1 and group 2 is 11/9 and 10/8 respectively. The mean age was 41,9±13,58 in group 1 and 36,22±14,3 years in group 2. Preoperative stone burden was 329,46±249,66mm2 in PNL group while 390,72±200,12mm2 in open surgery group. Stone recurrence was detected in 61 % 11/18 of the patients treated with PNL, while only in 20 % 4/20 of the patients in the open surgery group. Postoperative control stone burden was significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 p=0.40 . Conclusion: PNL has been used more frequently for renal stone surgeries recently. The stone recurrence rate may increase after percutaneous nephrolithotripsy due to insignificant residual fragments

Keywords

PNL , Stone recurrence , urolithiasis , percutaneous nephrolithotripsy

References

• Menon M RM: Urinary lithiasis: Etiology, diagnosis, and medical management; in Sounders PCW (ed.: Patrick C. Walsh. Sounders, 2002, vol 8
• C. Türk, T. Knoll, A. Petrik, K. Sarica, A. Skolarikos, M. Straub, C. Seitz. Guidelines on Urolithiasis. Euro- pean Association of Urology 2014. Urolithiasis J Urol 2007;178:2418-34.
• Matlaga BR, Assimos DG. Changing indications of open stone surgery. Urology 2002;59:490-3; discussion 493-4.
• Kane CJ, Bolton DM, Stoller ML. Current indications for open stone surgery in an endourology center. Urology 1995;45:218-21.
• Paik ML, Resnick MI. Is there a role for open stone sur- gery? Urol Clin North Am 2000;27:323-31.
• Shah HN, Kharodawala S, Sodha HS, Khandkar AA, Hegde SS, Bansal MB. The management of renal matrix calculi: A single-centre experience over 5 years. BJU Int 2009;103:810-4.
• Krambeck AE, LeRoy AJ, Patterson DE, Gettman MT. Long-term outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy compared to shock wave lithotripsy and conservative ma- nagement. J Urol 2008;179:2233-7.
• Rowley MW, Faerber GJ, Wolf JS, Jr. The university of mic- higan experience with percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for urinary matrix calculi. Urology 2008;72:61-4.
• Carr LK, J DAH, Jewett MA, Ibanez D, Ryan M, Bombar- dier C. New stone formation: A comparison of extracorpo- real shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolitho- tomy. J Urol 1996;155:1565-7.
• Streem SB. Long-term incidence and risk factors for re- current stones following percutaneous nephrostolitho- tomy or percutaneous nephrostolithotomy/extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for infection related calculi. J Urol 1995;153:584-7.
• Saad F, Faucher R, Mauffette F, Paquin JM, Perreault JP, Valiquette L. Staghorn calculi treated by percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Risk factors for recurrence. Urology 1993;41:141-3.
• Henriksson C, Geterud K, Pettersson S, Zachrisson BF. Stone recurrences in kidneys made stone-free by percuta- neous extraction. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1993;27:151-3.
• Parmar MS. Kidney stones. BMJ 2004;328:1420-4.
• Uribarri J, Oh MS, Carroll HJ. The first kidney stone. Ann Intern Med 1989;111:1006-9.
• Kosar A, Sarica K, Aydos K, Kupeli S, Turkolmez K, Gogus O. Comparative study of long-term stone recurrence after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and open stone sur- gery for kidney stones. Int J Urol 1999;6:125-9.
• Zilberman DE, Preminger GM. Long-term results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Does prophylactic me- dical stone management make a difference? J Endourol 2009;23:1773-6.
• Soylemez H, Altunoluk B, Onem K, Oğuz F. Minimally pa- inful retrieval of ureteral stent by using ureteroscopy J Clin Exp Inves 2010;1: 7-11.
• Assimos DG, Wrenn JJ, Harrison LH, et al. A comparison of anatrophic nephrolithotomy and percutaneous nephro- lithotomy with and without extracorporeal shock wave lit- hotripsy for management of patients with staghorn calculi. J Urol 1991;145:710-4.
• Osman Y, El-Tabey N, Refai H, et al. Detection of resi- dual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Role of nonenhanced spiral computerized tomography. J Urol 2008;179:198-200; discussion 200.
• Skolarikos A, Papatsoris AG. Diagnosis and management of postpercutaneous nephrolithotomy residual stone frag- ments. J Endourol 2009;23:1751-55.
• Al-Kohlany KM, Shokeir AA, Mosbah A, et al. Treatment of complete staghorn stones: A prospective randomized comparison of open surgery versus percutaneous nephro- lithotomy. J Urol 2005;173:469-73.