İletişim dersleri alan birinci sınıf mühendislik öğrencilerinin sosyal etkileşime dayalı öğrenme stillerindeki değişiklikler

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 3, 121 - 128, 01.12.2013

Tanju Deveci

Öz

Bu çalışma, Birleşik Arap Emirlikleri'ndeki Petroleum Institute'te İletişim derslerinin, mühendislik öğrencilerinin sosyal etkileşime dayalı öğrenme stillerini kullanımları üzerindeki etkisini belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmaya, 2012-2013 akademik yılında toplam 62 birinci sınıf öğrencisi katılmıştır. Kantitatif veriler, Grasha-Reichmann Öğrenci Öğrenme Stilleri Ölçeği (Grasha-Reichmann Student Learning Style Scales, GRSLSS) kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Ön ve son test sonuçlarını incelemek üzere eşleştirilmiş örnek t-testi ve Wilcoxon testi kullanılmıştır. Kalitatif verileri toplamak amacıyla, onayları alınan 10 katılımcıyla yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme gerçekleştirilmiştir. Sonuçlar, katılımcıların 'işbirlikçi', 'katılımcı' ve 'sakıngan' stil puanlarının arttığını, 'rekabetçi' ve 'bağımlı' stil puanlarının ise azaldığını göstermiştir. Bu değişikliklerin bazılarının öğrencilerin sürekli olarak ekip çalışmalarında bulunduklarından, bazılarının ise eğitim aldıkları ortamın çok kültürlü özelliğinden kaynaklanmış olabileceği değerlendirilmiştir. Mühendislerin ihtiyaç duydukları sosyal becerileri daha fazla edinebilmeleri için mühendislik öğrencilerinin, daha aktif öğrenme stillerini kullanmalarını sağlayan ekip çalışması etkinliklerine daha fazla yer verilmesi gerekliliği ileri sürülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Değişiklik, GRSLSS, mühendislik eğitimi, öğrenme stilleri.

Adaptation of Social Interaction Learning Styles by Freshman Engineering Students in Communication Courses

Öz

This study aimed to determine the effects of communication courses on engineering students use of social interaction learning styles at the Petroleum Institute, the UAE. A total of 62 freshman students participated in the study during 2012-2013 academic year. The quantitative data were collected using the Grasha-Reichmann Student Learning Style Scales (GRSLSS). A paired sample t-test and the Wilcoxon test were used to investigate the pre-test and post-test results. Semi-structured interviews were also held with 10 of the consenting participants to gather qualitative data. The results indicated that the participants adapted some of their learning styles reflected by increased scores for collaborative, participant and avoidant styles and by decreased scores for competitive and dependent styles. Some of these changes were attributed to the participants engagement in constant teamwork as well as multi-cultural aspects of the learning context. It is suggested that engineering students be exposed to more teamwork activities, which involve more active learning styles in order to be better equipped with soft-skills that engineers require.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Adaption, GRSLSS, engineering education, learning styles.

Kaynakça

• ABET (2013). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Baltimore, MD: Engineering Accreditation Commission. Accessed through ocess/Accreditation_Documents/Current/eac-criteria-2012- 2013.pdf> on 07.01.2013.
• Borges, N. J., and Parmelee, D. X. (2011). Changes in personality and learning styles for first year medical students. Medical Science Educator, 21(3), 200-202.
• Budakoglu. I., Demirli, E., and Babadogan, C. (2012). Learning styles of term 1 medical students in Turkish and English departments of med- ical faculty. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3271-3274.
• Burnham, J. W., and Coates, M. (2007). Personalizing learning: Transforming education for every child. London: Continuum.
• Cartney, P. (2000). Adult learning styles: Implications for practice teach- ing in social work. Social Work Education, 19(6), 609-626
• Chan, I. C. Y., and Lam, S. (2008). Effects of competition on students’ self- efficacy in vicarious learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 95-108.
• Diaz, D. P., and Cartnal, R. B. (1999). Students’ learning styles in two classes: Online distance learning and equivalent on-campus. College Teaching, 47(4), 130-135.
• Grasha, A. F. (2006). Teaching with style: A practical guide to enhancing learn- ing by understanding teaching and learning styles. San Bernardino: Alliance Publishers.
• Johnson, D., Johnson, R., and Smith, K. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works? Change, 30(4), 26-35.
• Kanske, C. A., Brewster, L. T., and Fanjoy, R. O. (2003). A longitudinal study of the learning styles of college aviation students. International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies, 3(1), 79-89.
• Keefe, J. W. (1974). Learning style: An overview. In J. W. Keefe (Ed.), Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs (pp. 1-17). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
• Kumar, P., Kumar, A., and Smart, K. (2004). Assessing the impact of instructional methods and information technology on student learning styles. Journal of Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 1, 533-544.
• Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., and Simon, R. (2002). University students’ per- ceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 27-52.
• Mays, N., and Pope, C. (1995). Rigour and qualitative research. British Medical Journal, 311, 109-112.
• Meeuwsen, H. J., King, G. A., and Pederson, R. (2005). Effects of coop- erative learning strategy on undergraduate kinesiology students’ learning styles. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 101, 525-530.
• Novak, S., Shah, S., Wilson, J.P., Lawson, K.A., and Salzman, R.D. (2006). Pharmacy students’ learning styles before and after a prob- lem-based learning experience. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 70, Article 74.
• Reid, J. M. (1987). The Learning style preferences of ESL students, TESOL Quarterly, 21(1), 87-111.
• Riechmann, S. W., and Grasha, A. F. (1974). A rational approach to developing and assessing the construct validity of a student learning style scales instrument. The Journal of Psychology, 87(2), 213-223.
• Yang, J. F. (2008). Learning styles and perceived educational quality in e- learning. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 6(1), 63-77.
• Zelazek, J. R. (1986). Learning styles, gender, and life cycle stage: Relationships with respect to graduate students. Manoa, HI: University of Hawaii. (Retrieved from ERIC database, ED276371)