Yükseköğretimde Stratejik Girişimcilik Yönelimi: Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analiz

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 10 - 23, 30.04.2022

Özdal Koyuncuoğlu Mahmut Tekin

https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.21.698637

Cited By: 1

Öz

Girişimcilik bilincinin üniversitenin içerisinde yerleşmiş olması, girişimcilik faaliyetlerinin desteklenmesinin ve etkin kaynak yönetiminin sürdürülebilirliğinin sağlanması için önemli bir gerekliliktir. Yöneticilerin, akademisyenlerin ve idari personelin girişimcilik konusunu stratejik bir hedef olarak ele almaları sağlanmalıdır. Böylece üniversitelerde dördüncü kuşak üniversite modeli olan girişimci-yenilikçi araştırma üniversite modeline geçmek üzere girişimciliğinin teşvik ve desteklenmesinin ortam koşulları sağlanmış olacaktır. Dolayısıyla sorulması gereken soru, “Yükseköğretimde etkin kaynak yönetimi bağlamında stratejik girişimcilik yönelimi ne anlama gelmekte?” olmalıdır. Bunun için de “Etkin kaynak yönetimini ve üniversite koşullarını doğrudan etkileyen stratejik yaklaşımlar nelerdir?”, “Üniversite yönetimlerinden beklenen nelerdir?”, “Üniversite yönetimlerinin çabaları nasıl değerlendirilebilir?” gibi sorulara yanıt aramak önemlidir. Bu bağlamda, üniversite yönetimlerinin girişimciliği ne ölçüde içselleştirdiğini ve girişimcilik kültürünün akademik ve idari organizasyona, eğitim programlarına ve idari süreçlere ne kadar yerleştiğini ölçmek ve değerlendirmek için Koyuncuoğlu ve Tekin (2019) tarafından alternatif bir model geliştirilmiştir. Bu çalışma, yükseköğretimde stratejik girişimcilik yönelimi ile ilgili yapılan çalışmaları gözden geçirmeyi ve girişimcilik yönelimi ile stratejik girişimcilik yöneliminin boyutları hakkında mevcut bilgileri ortaya çıkarmayı amaçlamıştır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, Koyuncuoğlu ve Tekin (2019) tarafından geliştirilen stratejik girişimcilik yönelimi modeli tartışılmış, literatürdeki modeller karşılaştırılmış, araştırmacılara ve üniversitelere önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Etkin kaynak yönetimi, karşılaştırmalı analiz, stratejik girişimcilik yönelim modeli, yükseköğretim

Strategic Entrepreneurial Orientation in Higher Education: A Comparative Analysis

Öz

Internalizing entrepreneurial awareness at a university is important to ensure the sustainability of supporting entrepreneurial activities and effective resource management. Managers, academics and administrative staff should address entrepreneurship as a strategic goal so that the environmental conditions of entrepreneurship encouragement and support can be created to upgrade to the fourth generation university model, which is the entrepreneur-innovative research university model. Thus, the question should be “What will be the strategic entrepreneurial orientation in terms of effective resource management in higher education?” It is important to look for answers to questions, such as “What are the strategic approaches that directly affect effective resource management and university conditions?”, “What is expected from university administrations?”, and “How can the efforts of university administrations be evaluated?” An alternative model was developed by Koyuncuoğlu and Tekin (2019) to evaluate the extent to which university administrations internalize entrepreneurship and how much its entrepreneurial culture has been embraced in the academic and administrative organization, educational programs, and administrative processes. This study aims to review the studies on strategic entrepreneurial orientation in higher education and to reveal the existing knowledge about the dimensions of entrepreneurship and strategic entrepreneurial orientation. Therefore, the strategic entrepreneurial orientation model developed by Koyuncuoğlu and Tekin (2019) is discussed, the models in the literature are compared, and some suggestions are made for researchers and universities.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Comparative analysis, effective resource management, higher education, strategic entrepreneurial orientation model

Kaynakça

• Acar, E. (2007). Yarı resmi bir örgütte stratejik planlama uygulaması: Aydın Ticaret Odası örneği. Unpublished master’s thesis, Institute of Social Sciences, Adnan Menderes University, Aydın.
• Altuntaş, G. (2010). Girişimcilik ve stratejik yönetim ilişkisi: Bir stratejik girişimcilik modeli ve İMKB UIusal-100 Endeksi’nde işlem gören işletmeler üzerinde testi. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul University, İstanbul.
• Altuntaş, G. (2014). The relationship between entrepreneurship and strategic management: A new model and test of strategic entrenepreneurship. Research Journal of Business and Management, 1(2), 103–129.
• Barnett, R. (2005). Convergence in higher education: The strange case of entrepreneurialism. Higher Education Management and Policy, 17(3), 43–58.
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
• Barney, J., & Arikan, A. (2001). The resource-based view: Origins and implications. In: M. A. Hitt, R. E. Freeman, & J. S. Harrison (Eds.). The Blackwell handbook of strategic management (pp. 124–188). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Baş, M. (2015). Türkiye’de girişimci üniversitenin oluşturulmasına ilişkin bir model önerisi ve uygulanabilirliğinin değerlendirilmesi. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Institute of Educational Sciences, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep.
• Bernasconi, A. (2005). University entrepreneurship in a developing country: The case of the P. Universidad Catolica de Chile, 1985–2000. Higher Education, 50(2), 247–274.
• Brennan, M. C., Wall, A. P., & McGowan, P. (2005). Academic entepreneurship: Assessing preferences in nascent entepreneurs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12(3), 307–322.
• Choy Er, A., Nawi, N. F. M., Yong Tee, M., Ibrahim, N. I., & Bachok, N. (2019). Entrepreneurial recycling initiatives towards campus sustainability. International Journal of Business and Society, 20(1), 247–259.
• Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities. Paris and Oxford: IAU and Elsevier Science.
• Clark, B. R. (2001). The entrepreneurial university: New foundations for collegiality, autonomy, and achievement. Journal of the Programme on Institutional Management in Higher Education, 13(2), 9–25.
• Cleary, J. (2002). The entrepreneurial university and the learning economy in a regional context. Retrieved from https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/28301229/the-entrepreneurial-university-and-the-learning-economy-in-a- (February 1, 2020).
• Crespo, M., & Dridi, H. (2007). Intensification of university–industry relationships and its impact on academic research. Higher Education, 54(1), 61–84.
• Davies, J. L. (2001). The emergence of entrepreneurial cultures in European universities. Journal of the Programme on Institutional Management in Higher Education, 13(2), 25–44.
• De Zilwa, D. (2005). Using entrepreneurial activities as a means of survival: Investigating the processes used by Australian universities to diversify their revenue streams. Higher Education, 50(3), 387–411.
• Dziechciarz, J. (2011). Performance measurement for entrepreneurial university. International Conference: The Future of Education, June 16–17, 2011, Florence, Italy.
• Eisenhardt, K. M., Brown, S. L., & Neck, H. M. (2000). Competing on the entrepreneurial edge. In G. D. Meyer, & K. A. Heppard (Eds.), Entrepreneurship as strategy: Competing on the entrepreneurial edge (pp. 49–62). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages. Research Policy, 27(8), 823–833.
• Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.
• Gjerding, A. N., Scheunert, K. J., Cameron, S., Taylor, A., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2005). Entrepreneurial university: Myth or reality? Aalborg: ECIU Leadership Programme.
• Grimaldi, R., Kenny, M., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after Bayh-Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1045–1057.
• Guerro-Cano, M. G., Urbano, D., & Kirby, D. (2006). A literature review on entreprenuerial universities: An institutional approach. 3rd Conference of Pre-communications to Congress, Business Economic Department, Autonomous University of Barcelona, June 2006, Barcelona, Spain.
• Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Camp, S. M., & Sexton, D. L. (2001). Strategic entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(Special Issue), 479–491.
• Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., Camp, S. M., & Sexton, D. L. (2001). Integrating entrepreneurship and strategic management action to create firm wealth. The Academy of Management Executive, 15(1), 49–63.
• Ireland, R. D., & Webb, J. W. (2007). Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating competitive advantage through streams of innovation. Business Horizons, 50(1), 49–59.
• Jacob, M., Lundqvist, M., & Hellsmark, H. (2003). Entrepreneurial transformations in the Swedish university system: The case of Chalmers University of Technology. Research Policy, 32(9), 1555–1568.
• Karakaya, A. (2004). Stratejik yönetim sisteminin kriz yönetimine katkısı üzerine bir araştırma. Teknoloji, 7(2), 225–233.
• Karakaya, A., Ay, F. A., & Gürel, S. (2013). Culture and management style interaction in relation to the strategic orientation: A research on municipalities in Black Sea Region. [Article in Turkish] Cumhuriyet Ünversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(37), 75.
• Ketchen, D. J. Jr., Ireland, R. D., & Snow, C. C. (2007). Strategic entrepreneurship, collaborative innovation and wealth creation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(3/4), 371–385.
• Kirby, D. A. (2006). Creating entrepreneurial universities in the UK: Applying entrepreneurship theory to practice. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(5), 599–603.
• Kirby, D. A., Urbano, D., & Guerrero, M. (2011). Making universities more entrepreneurial: Development of a model. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 28(3), 302–316.
• Klofsten, M., & Jones-Evans, D. (2000). Comparing academic entrepreneurship in Europe: The case of Sweden and Ireland. Small Business Economics, 14(4), 299–315.
• Koyuncuoğlu, Ö. (2018). Türkiye’de girişimci ve yenilikçi üniversitelerin gömülü teoriye göre değerlendirmesi ve bir model önerisi. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Institute of Social Sciences, Selçuk University, Konya.
• Koyuncuoğlu, Ö., & Tekin, M. (2019). Evaluation of entrepreneurial and innovative universities in Turkey based on grounded theory and a model proposal. [Article in Turkish] Selçuk Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 41, 16–31.
• Kyrgidou, L. P., & Hughes, M. (2010). Strategic entrepreneurship: Origins, core elements and research directions. European Business Review, 22(1), 43–63.
• Lassen, A. H. (2007). Corporate entrepreneurship: An empirical study of the importance of strategic considerations in the creation of radical innovation. Managing Global Transitions, 5(2), 109–131.
• Luke, B. (2009). Strategic entrepreneurship in New Zealand’s state–owned enterprises: Underlying elements and financial implications. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
• Lukovics, M., & Zuti, B. (2015). New functions of universities in the XXI. century: “Fourth generation” universities. Transition Studies Review, 22(2), 33–48.
• Nelles, J., & Vorley, T. (2009). Constructing an entrepreneurial architecture: An emergent framework for studying the contemporary university beyond the entrepreneurial turn. Innovative Higher Education, 35(3), 161–176.
• Odabaşı, Y. (2006). Değişimin ve dönüşümün aracı olarak girişimci üniversite. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 1(1), 87–104.
• O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Morse, K. P., O’Gorman, C., & Roche, F. (2007). Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience. R&D Management, 37(1), 1–16.
• Özdemir, P. (2016). Girişimci üniversiteler ve Türkiye’de girişimcilik eğitimi. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Institute of Social Sciences, Maltepe University, İstanbul.
• Pinchot III, G. (1985). Intrapreneuring: Why you don’t have to leave the corporation to become an entrepreneur. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
• Ranga, M., Debackere, K., & Von Tunzelmann, G. N. (2003). Entrepreneurial universities and the dynamics of academic knowledge production: A case study of basic vs. applied research in Belgium. Scientometrics, 58(2), 301–320.
• Sarchami, A., & Sarchami, M. (2010). Entrepreneur university and its influence on national economics. 2nd International Conference on Entrepreneurship, October 11–12, 2010, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
• Schmoch, U. (1999). Impact of international patent applications on patent indicators. Research Evaluation, 8(2), 119–131.
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). Theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Sporn, B. (2001). Building adaptive universities: Emerging organisational forms based on experiences of European and US Universitites. Tertiary Education and Management, 7(2), 121–134.
• Stevenson, H., & Gumpert, D. (1985). The heart of entrepreneurship. Harvard Business Review, 63(2), 85–95.
• Tekin, M., Geçkil, T., Koyuncuoğlu, Ö., & Tekin, E. (2018). Entrepreneur-friendly universities index and the development of a model. [Article in Turkish] Selçuk Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 39, 138–150.
• Tekin, M., Koyuncuoğlu, Ö., Geçkil, T., & Baş, D. (2019). Evaluation of entrepreneurial-innovative university conditions and activities from students’ point of view in the context of industry 4.0. In N. M. Durakbasa, & M. G. Gençyılmaz (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium for Production Research, 2019-ISPR, August 28–30, 2019, Vienna, Austria. Cham: Springer Nature Schwitzerland AG 2020, 605–618.
• Todorovic, Z. W., McNaughton, R. B., & Guild, P. (2011). ENTRE-U: An entrepreneurial orientation scale for universities. Technovation, 31(2–3), 128–137.
• Ünal, A., & Çatı, K. (2016). Türkiye’deki üniversitelerin girişimcilik serüveni: Bir gömülü teori araştırması. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 11(1), 84–121.
• Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource?based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.
• Wissema, J. G. (2014). Üçüncü kuşak üniversitelere doğru (2. baskı). İstanbul: Özyeğin Üniversitesi Yayıncılık.
• Yokoyama, K. (2006). Entrepreneurialism in Japanese and UK universities: Governance, management, leadership, and funding. Higher Education, 52(3), 523–555.