Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Motivasyonunda Yaşam Memnuniyeti ve İletişim Becerilerinin Rolü

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 51 - 60, 30.04.2022

Seyithan Demirdağ

https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.20.707231

Cited By: 1

Öz

Bu çalışmada üniversite öğrencilerinin yaşam memnuniyetleri ile iletişim becerilerinin motivasyonu yordama gücünün incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma örneklemi 603 lisans öğrencisinden oluşmaktadır. Katılımcıların 435’i kadın, 168’i erkek ve yaş ortalamaları ise 20.2’dir. Öğrencilerin genel akademik ortalamaları 4.0 üzerinden 1.87 ile 3.91 arasında değişmektedir. Çalışmadaki veriler üç tane veri toplama aracıyla toplanmıştır. Üniversite öğrencilerinin yaşam memnuniyetleri, iletişim becerileri ve motivasyon düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki ile bağımsız değişkenlerin bağımlı değişkeni yordayıp yordamadığını tespit etmek için çoklu regresyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma bulgularına göre, üniversite öğrencilerinin yaşam memnuniyetleri, iletişim becerileri ve motivasyonları arasında pozitif ve anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu görülmektedir. Motivasyon düzeyi ile en yüksek düzeyde ilişkinin saygı alt boyutunda olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bulgular ayrıca katılımcıların yaşam memnuniyetleri ve iletişim becerilerinin öğrencilerin motivasyonlarındaki varyansı açıklayabildiğini göstermektedir. Motivasyondaki varyansın en yüksek şekilde saygı alt boyutu (%16.6) tarafından açıklanabildiği bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İletişim becerileri, motivasyon, üniversite öğrencileri, yaşam memnuniyeti

Examining Life Satisfaction and Communication Skills of University Students as the Predictors of their Motivation

Öz

This study examines the predictive roles of university students’ life satisfaction and communication skills on their motivation. The participants of this study include 603 undergraduate students. Of the participants, 435 are female, 168 are male, and the mean age is 20.2 years. Students’ GPA averages range from 1.87 to 3.91 on a 4.0 scale. The data were collected through three data collection instruments. A multiple regression analysis was employed to find out the relationships between all of the variables, and examining the predictive roles of independent variables on the dependent variable. The findings show that there is a positive and meaningful relationship between life satisfaction, communication skills, and motivation of university students. The highest correlation was found between motivation and respect, which is a dimension of communication skills. The findings also indicate that the participants’ life satisfaction and communication skills explain the variances of students’ motivation. The highest predictor of motivation among all dimensions is respect, as it explains the variances by 16.6%.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Communication skills, life satisfaction, motivation, university students

Kaynakça

• Aktuğ, G. (2010). Çocuk eğitimevlerinde barındırılan ergenlerin iletişim ve sosyal beceri düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Unpublished master’s thesis, Institute of Educational Sciences, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir.
• Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 11–75.
• Bowden, P. (2000). Delivering organizational excellence by employee values management. Total Quality Management, 11, 4–6.
• Brislin, R., & Yoshida, T. (1994). Intercultural communication training: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Brophy, J. (2012). Motivating students to learn. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Buehl, M. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2005). Motivation and performance differences in students’ domain-specific epistemological belief profiles. American Educational Research Journal, 42(4), 697–726.
• Can Bilgin, H. (2015). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin bilgisayar oyun bağımlılık düzeyleri ile iletişim becerileri arasındaki ilişki. Unpublished master’s thesis, Institute of Educational Sciences, Pamukkale University, Denizli.
• Caplan, S. E. (2005). A social skill account of problematic internet use. Journal of Communication, 55, 721–736.
• Chang, E. C. (1998). Hope, problem-solving ability, and coping in a college student population: Some implications for theory and practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54(7), 953–962.
• Cihangir, Z. (2004). Kişilerarası iletişimde dinleme becerisi. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Clark, M. H., & Schroth, C. A. (2010). Examining relationships between academic motivation and personality among college students. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(1), 19–24.
• Cüceloğlu, D. (2005). İnsan ve davranışı: Psikolojinin temel kavramları (14. basım). İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
• Dalkılıç, M. (2006). Lise öğrencilerinin ana- baba ve ergen ilişkilerinde algıladıkları problem çözme ve iletişim becerilerinin bazı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. Unpublished master’s thesis, Institute of Social Sciences, Ege University, İzmir.
• Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 227–268.
• Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. The Educational Psychologist, 26, 325–346.
• Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.
• Dilmaç, B., & Ekşi, H. (2008). Meslek yüksek okullarında öğrenim gören öğrencilerin yaşam doyumları ve benlik saygılarının incelenmesi. [Article in Turkish] Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20, 279–289.
• Doğan, S., & Koçak, O. (2014). Relationship between school administrators' social communication skills and teachers' motivation. [Article in Turkish] Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 20(2), 191–216.
• Eccles, J. S. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.
• Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In: W. Damon, & N. Eisenberg ((Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., Vol. III, pp. 1017–1095). New York, NY: Wiley.
• Erol, M., & Yıldırım, İ. (2016). The development of higher education life satisfaction scale. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 12(1), 221–243.
• Eryılmaz, A. (2010). The relationship between using of subjective well being increasing strategies and academic motivation in adolescence. [Article in Turkish] Klinik Psikiyatri, 13(2), 77–84.
• Eryılmaz, A., & Ercan, L. (2011). Investigating of the subjective well-being based on gender, age and personality traits. [Article in Turkish] Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 36(4), 139–151.
• Fergusson, J. Y. (2003). A regression analysis of problem-based learning student variables. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA.
• Galand, B., Bentein, K., Bourgeois, E. & Frenay, M. (2003). The impact of a PBL curriculum on students’ motivation and self-regulation. Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction. 10th Biennial Meeting, August 26–30, 2003, Padova, Italy.
• Gilley, A., Gilley, J. W., & McMillan, H. S. (2009). Organizational change: Motivation, communication, and leadership effectiveness. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 21(4), 75–94.
• Gottfried, A. E. (1985). Akademic intrinsic motivation in elementary and junior high school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(6), 631–645.
• Gömleksiz, M. N., & Serhatlıoğlu, B. (2014). Prospective teachers’ perceptions of academic motivation levels. [Article in Turkish] Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 173, 99–128.
• Green, M., & Ellis, P. (1997). Impact of an evidence-based medicine curriculum based on adult learning theory. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 12(12), 742–50.
• Greene, B. A., & Miller, R. B. (1996). Influences on course achievement: Goals, perceived ability, and cognitive engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(2), 181–192.
• Gülnar, B., & Balcı, Ş. (2011). Yeni medya ve kültürleşen toplum. Konya: LiteraTürk Academia.
• Kadakal Dölek, A. (2015). Üniversite öğrencilerinin iletişim becerilerinin farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Unpublished master’s thesis, Institute of Educational Sciences, Atatürk University, Erzurum.
• Kahn, E. B., Ramsey, L. T., Brownson, R. C., Heath, G. W., Howze, E. H., Powell, K. E., ... & Corso, P. (2002). The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity: A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 22(4), 73–107.
• Karagöz, Y., & Kösterelioğlu, İ. (2008). Developing evaluation scale of communication skills with factor analysis. [Article in Turkish] Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21, 81–98.
• Karasar, N. (2010). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Nobel Yayın.
• Karataş, H., & Erden, M. (2012). Bilingual equivalence, validity and reliability of academic motivation scale. [Article in Turkish] E-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 7(4), 983–1003.
• Kelley, C., & Meyers, J. (1995). CCAI cross cultural adaptability ınventory manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems, Inc.
• Knowles, M. S. (1978). The adult learner: A neglected species. Houston, TX: Gulf.
• Komarraju, M. & Karau, S. J. (2005). The relationship between the big five personality traits and academic motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(3), 557–567.
• Korkut, F. (2005). Communication skills training program for adults. [Article in Turkish] Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 28, 143–149.
• Kurtz, S., Silverman, J., & Draper, J. (1998). Teaching and learning communication skills in medicine. Abingdon: Radcliffe Medical Press Ltd.
• Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184–196.
• Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. The School Psychology Review, 31(3), 313–327.
• Miller, R. B., Behrens, J. T., Greene, B. A., & Newman, D. (1993). Goals and perceived ability: Impact on student valuing, self-regulation and persistence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18(1), 2–14.
• Moneta, G. B., & Spada, M. M. (2009). Coping as a mediator of the relationships between trait intrinsic and extrinsic motivation and approaches to studying during academic exam preparation. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(5–6), 664–669.
• Mowles, C. (2008). Values in international development organizations: Negotiating nonnegotiable. Development in Practice, 18(1), 5–16.
• Ning, H. K., & Downing, K. (2010). The impact of supplemental instruction on learning competence and academic performance. Studies in Higher Education, 35(8), 921–939.
• Nonis, S. A., & Wright, D. (2003). Moderating effects of achievement striving and situational optimism on the relationship between ability and performance outcomes of college students. Research in Higher Education, 44(3), 327–346.
• Ogbonna, E., & Harris, L. C. (2000). Leadership style, organizational culture and performance: Empirical evidence from UK companies. Interantional Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(4), 766–788.
• Özdevecioğlu, M., & Doruk, N. Ç. (2009). Organizasyonlarda iş-aile ve aile iş çatışmalarının çalişanlarin iş ve yaşam tatminleri üzerindeki etkisi. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, (33), 69–99.
• Özer, G. (2009). Öz-belirleme kuramı çerçevesinde ihtiyaç doyumu, içsel güdülenme ve bağlanma stillerinin üniversite öğrencilerinin öznel iyi oluşlarına etkileri. Unpublished master’s thesis, Institute of Educational Sciences, Gazi University, Ankara.
• Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(2), 137–152.
• Peklaj, C. & Levpuscek, M. P. (2006). Student motivation and academic success in relation to the quality of individual and collaborative work during a course in educational psychology. 31st Annual ATTE (Association of Teacher Education in Europe) Conference, October 21–25, 2006, PortoroÏ, Slovenia, pp. 148–161.
• Pimparyon, P., Caleer, S. M., Pemba, S., & Roff, S. (2000). Educational environment, student approaches to learning and academic achievement in a Thai nursing School. Medical Teacher, 22(4), 359–364.
• Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
• Ratelle, C. F., Simard, K., & Guay, F. (2013). University students’ subjective well-being: The role of autonomy support from parents, friends, and the romantic partner. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(3), 893–910.
• Reeve, J. & Lee, W. (2018). A neuroscientific perspective on basic psychological needs. Journal of Personality, 87(1), 102–114.
• Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D. T., Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W. H., & Segers, M. (2009). The role of academic motivation in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(6), 1195–1206.
• Sankaran, S. R., & Bui, T. (2001). Impact of learning strategies and motivation on performance: A study in web-based instruction. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 28(3), 191–191.
• Schimmack, U., Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Life-satisfaction is a momentary judgment and a stable personality characteristic: The use of chronically accessible and stable sources. Journal of Personality, 70(3), 345–384.
• Seligman, M. E. (2006). Learned optimism: How to change your mind and your life. New York, NY: Vintage.
• Şantaş, F., Işık, O., & Çilhoroz, Y. (2018). The investigation of the relationship between the perception of work-life quality, job motivation and life satisfaction among nurses. [Article in Turkish] Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 16(1), 64–76.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). SAS for windows workbook for Tabachnick and Fidell using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
• Tiryaki, S. (2015). Sosyal medya ve facebook bağımlılığı. Konya: LiteraTürk Academia.
• Vallerand, R. J., & Bissonnette, R. (1992). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational styles as predictors of behavior: A prospective study. Journal of Personality, 60(3), 599–620.
• VanZile-Tamsen, C., & Livingston. J. A. (1999). The differential impact of motivation on the self-regulated strategy use of high- and low-achieving college students. Journal of College Student Development, 40(1), 54–60.
• Walker, C., Greene, B., & Mansell, R. (2006). Identificat ion with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(1), 1–12.
• Wang, Y. (2006). Internet use among students and its implication for crosscultural adaptation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA.
• Yenilmez, K., & Çemrek, F. (2008). Teaching motivation of the students in secondary teacher training schools in Turkey. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 3(2), 82–88.
• Yerlisu-Lapa, T., Ağyar, E., & Bahadır, Z. (2012). Life satisfaction, leisure motivation, leisure participaton: An analysis on physical education and sport teachers (Kayseri city example). [Article in Turkish] Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(2), 53–59.
• Yıldırım, F. (2015). Fen lisesi ve spor lisesi öğrencilerinin iletişim becerilerinin incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Elazığ.
• Yılmaz, E., & Altınok, V. (2009). Examining the loneliness and the life satisfaction levels of school principals. [Article in Turkish] Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 15(59), 451–470.
• Yun Dai, D. (2001). A comparison of gender differences in academic selfconcept and motivation between high-ability. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 13(1), 22–33.
• Yüksel Şahin, F. (1997). Grupla iletişim becerileri eğitiminin üniversite öğrencilerinin iletişim beceri düzeylerine etkisi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Zhang Y., Dolan S., & Zhou Y. (2009). Management by values a theoretical proposal for strategic human resource management in China. Chinese Management Studies, 3(4), 272–294.