Eski Kavramlar, Yeni Muhtevalar: Kent, Sinema ve Yabancı

Yıl 2018, Sayı: 31, 121 - 133, 30.12.2018

Sertaç Timur Demir

https://doi.org/10.17829/turcom.499523

Cited By: 1

Öz

Bu çalışma İstanbul’un gerçek değil; esasında güncellenmiş bir sinematik portresidir. Sinematik İstanbul’un
yabancıları bağlamında, kent imgesini güncellemek için en stratejik, faydalı ve aynı zamanda en zor
adım ekseni merkezlerden, turistik mekânlardan, alışıldık karakterlerden, malum değerlerden ve olağan
olaylardan kenarlara, ikincil mekân ve karakterlere, minimal durumlara, müphem değerlere ve hâlihazırdaki
değişimlere kaydırmaktır. Bu amaçla, detaylarına inmeksizin ama göndermelerine odaklanarak, birer
sosyolojik tanıklık olan beş film analiz edilmiştir: Bir Tutam Baharat (Tassos Boulmetis, 2003), Köprüdekiler
(Aslı Özge, 2009), Kaç Para Kaç (Reha Erdem, 1999), Uzak (Nuri Bilge Ceylan, 2002) ve 11’e 10 Kala (Pelin
Esmer, 2009). Araştırmanın genel çerçevesini oluşturan bu filmler modern İstanbul’un toplumsal ve kentsel
tarihi ve yabancıların değişen dokusunun en kritik kırılma noktalarıdır. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sinema, Yabancı, İstanbul, Kentsel Deneyim, Değişim

Old Concepts, New Contents: The City, Cinema and the Stranger

Öz

This study is a cinematic portrait not of the real, but essentially of the updated İstanbul. In the case of the
strangers of cinematic İstanbul, the most strategic, useful, as well as the most difficult step for updating
the city’s image is to shift the axis from its centres, touristic places, familiar characters, common values
and usual events to its corners, secondary places and characters, minimalist conditions, ambivalent values
and current changes. For this purpose this study analyzes five films as sociological testimonies without
touching upon their details but by focusing on their references: Politiki Kouzina/Bir Tutam Baharat/A
Touch of Spice (Tassos Boulmetis, 2003), Köprüdekiler/Men on the Bridge (Aslı Özge, 2009), Kaç Para Kaç/A
Run for Money (Reha Erdem, 1999), Uzak/Distant (Nuri Bilge Ceylan, 2002), and 11’e 10 Kala/10 to 11
(Pelin Esmer, 2009). These films, which constitute the framework of this research, are breaking points of
modern İstanbul’s social and urban history and of changing form of strangers. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cinema, The Stranger, İstanbul, Urban Experience, Change

Kaynakça

• Bauman, Z. (1990). Thinking sociologically. Oxford and Massachusetts: Basil Blackwell. Bauman, Z. (1991). Modernity and ambivalence. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press. Bauman, Z. (1994). Alone again: Ethics after certainty. London: Demos. Bauman, Z. (1997). Postmodernity and its discontents. Oxford and Cambridge: Polity Press. Bauman, Z. (2002). Society under siege. Cambridge: Polity Press. Bauman, Z. (2003). City of fears, city of hopes. London: Goldsmiths, University of London Press. Castles, S., & Davidson, A. (2000). Citizenship and migration: Globalisation and the politics of belonging. London: Macmillan Press. Demir, K., & Çabuk, S. (2010). Türkiye’de metropoliten kentlerin nüfus gelişimi. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (28), 193-215. Dorman, S., Hammett, D., & Nugent, P. (2007). Making nations, creating strangers: States and citizenship in Africa. Leiden and Boston: Brill. Esen, O. (2011). İstanbul’dan öğrenmek. In Y. Köse (Ed.), İstanbul: İmparatorluk baskentinden megakente (pp. 455-488). İstanbul: Kitap Yayınevi. Isik, S. (2005) Urbanisation and Urbanisation Models in Turkey. Aegean Geographical Journal, (14), 57-71. Karakayali, N. (2006). The uses of the stranger: Circulation, arbitration, secrecy and dirt. Sociological Theory, 24(4), 312-330. Kracauer, S. (2004). From Caligari to Hitler: A psychological history of the German film. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. Kuban, D. (1994). Dünden Bugüne İstanbul Ansiklopedisi 5. Cilt. İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı. Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on cities. Malden & Massachusetts: Blackwell. Levine, D. N. (1977). Simmel at distance: On the history and systematics of the sociology of the stranger. Sociological Focus, 10(1), 15-29. Sennett, R. (1978). The fall of public man. New York: Vintage Books. Simmel, G. (1971). On individuality and social forms. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press. Simmel, G. (1997). The metropolis and mental life. In D. P. Frisby & M. Featherstone (Eds.), Simmel on culture: Selected writings (pp. 174-186). London, Thousand Oaks & New Delhi, Sage Publication. Singer, S. R. (2013, June 6). The struggle for İstanbul. Retrieved from https://www.the-american-interest. com/2013/06/06/the-struggle-for-istanbul/. [Accessed 28 September 2013]. Spykman, N. (2009). The social theory of Georg Simmel. New Brunswick & London: Transaction Publishers.