Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

ÖRGÜTSEL KONFİGÜRASYON YAKLAŞIMININ STRATEJİK VE YAPISAL OLARAK İNCELENMESİ ÜZERİNE GELİŞTİRİLEN ÖNERMELER

Yıl 2019, Sayı: 23, 191 - 212, 09.04.2019
https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.492085

Öz

Çalışma, örgütsel
konfigürasyon yaklaşımı bağlamında örgütlerin strateji ve yapı bileşenleri
arasında uygun konfigürasyon seçiminin belirlenmesine bağlı olarak çeşitli
önermeler geliştirebilmek amacıyla hazırlanmıştır. Konu hakkında yapılan
literatür incelenmesi sonucunda; strateji ve yapı arasındaki ilişkinin daha
kapsamlı olarak ele alınmasının gerektiği tespit edilmiştir. Bu kapsamda çok
sayıda farklı değişken arasında bir ilişki aramak yerine; strateji ve yapı
arasındaki etkileşimi incelemek ve uygun konfigürasyonların seçilmesiyle
kararlı yapıların elde edilebileceğini göstermek için bir girişimde
bulunulmuştur. Bu bağlamda, çeşitli strateji ve yapı konfigürasyonları arasında
bir sentez yapılarak; ortak konfigürasyonları tanımlamak ve aralarındaki
etkileşimleri incelenmeye çalışmak bu çalışmanın amacına işaret etmektedir. Bu
amacı gerçekleştirebilmek ve “strateji ile yapı bileşenleri arasındaki
ilişkilere ve tercihlere bağlı olarak uygun ortak bir konfigürasyon seçimi
mümkün müdür?” mevcut sorunsalını çözümleyebilmek noktasında çalışmanın
çıktısını, alan yazına bağlı olarak kuramsal çerçevede geliştirilen önermeler
oluşturmaktadır. Bu tür ilişkilerin ortaya çıkarılmasının, ilgili yazına farklı
bakış açıları getireceğine inanılmaktadır. Ayrıca, çalışma, kuramsal ve
bilimsel gerçekçilik temelinde, gözlenmesi zor olan olgular arasında
geliştirilen önermeler ile desteklenmeye yöneliktir.  

Kaynakça

  • Adler, P.S. ve Borys, B. (1996). Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 61-89.Burns, T. ve Stalker, G. (1961). The Management of Innovation (1st ed.). London: Tavistock Publications.Buzzell, R. D., Gale, B. ve Sultan, R. (1975). Market Share: A Key to Profitability. Harvard Business Review, 51(1), 97-106.Chandler, A. (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise (1st ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: MIT Press.Channon, D. (1973). Strategy and Structure in British Enterprise (1st ed.). Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Daft, R. (2015). Örgüt Kuramları ve Tasarımını Anlamak (10. Baskı) (Çev. Ed. Ömür Timurcanday Özmen). Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.Demirhan, K. (2018). Mintzberg’in Örgütsel Yapılandırma Teorisi Bağlamında Türkiye’deki Sivil Toplum Örgütleri Üzerine Bir İncelenme. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 30, 207-222.Dess, G. ve Davis, P. (1984). Porter's Generic Strategies as Determinants of Strategic Group Membership and Organizational Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 467-488.Doty, D H., Glick, W. H. ve Huber, G. P. (1993). Fit, Equifinality, and Organizational Effectiveness: A Test of Two Configurational Theories. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1196-1250.Ferguson, T.D. ve Ketchen, D.J. (1999). Organizational Configurations and Performance: The Role of Statistical Power in Extant Research. Strategic Management Journal, 20(4), 385-402.Galbraith, J.R. (1995). Designing Organizations: An Executive Briefing on Strategy, Structure, and Process (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Galbraith, J.R. (2008). Designing Matrix Organizations That Actually Work: How IBM,Procter & Gamble, and Others Design for Success (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Galbraith, J.R. (2013). Designing Organizations: Strategy, Structure, and Process at the Business Unit and Enterprise Levels (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Hambrick, D. C. (1983a). An Empirical Typology of Mature Industrial Product Environments. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 213-230. Hambrick, D. C. (1983b). High Profit Strategies in Mature Capital Goods Industries: A Contingency Approach. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 687-707.Henderson, B. (1979). Henderson on Corporate Strategy (1st ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Abt Books.Kates, A. ve Galbraith, J.R. (2007). Designing Your Organizations: Using the Star Model to Solve 5 Critical Design Challenges (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.MacMillan, I. C. ve D. Hambrick, D. (1983). Capital Intensity, Market Share Instability and Profits-the Case for Asset Parsimony. Working Paper, 29, Columbia University Strategy Research Center, New York.Meyer, A.D., Tsui, A.S. ve Hinings, C.R. (1993). Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1175-1195.Miles, R. ve Snow, C. (1978). Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process (1st ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Miller, D. (1986). Configurations of Strategy and Structure: Towards a Synthesis. Strategic Management Journal, 7, 233-249.Miller, D. (1987). The Genesis of Configuration. Academy of Management Review, 12(4), 686-701.Miller, D. ve Friesen, P.H. (1978). Archetypes of strategy formulation. Management Science, 24, 921-933.Miller, D. ve Friesen, P.H. (1984). A Longitudinal Study of the Corporate Life Cycle. Management Science, 30(10), 1161-1183.Miller, D. ve Friesen, P.H. (1984a). Porter's Generic Strategies and Performance. Working Paper, McGill University, Montreal.Miller, D. ve Friesen, P.H. (1984b). Organizations: A Quantum View (1st ed.). NJ: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Miller, D. ve Whitney, J. O. (1999). Beyond Strategy: Configuration as a Pillar of Competitive Advantage. Business Horizons, 42(3), 5-17.Mintzberg, H.(1973). Strategy Making in Three Modes. California Management Review, 16, 44- 58.Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations (1st ed.).NJ: Prenctice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs. Mintzberg, H. (1983). Structures in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations (1st ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Morgan, G. (1980). Paradigms, Metaphors, and Puzzle Solving in Organization Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(4), 605-622.Perrow, C. (1971). Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View (2nd ed.). CA: Tavistock Publications.

PROPOSITIONS DEVELOPED ON A STRATEGICAL AND STRUCTURAL INVESTIGATION OF THE ORGANIZATIONAL CONFIGURATION APPROACH

Yıl 2019, Sayı: 23, 191 - 212, 09.04.2019
https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.492085

Öz

The study has
been conducted to develop various propositions depending on the determination
of the appropriate configuration choice between the strategy and structure
components of organizations within the context of the organizational
configuration approach.
As a result of the literature review made regarding the topic; it has
been determined that the relationship between strategy and structure should be
considered more comprehensively. In this context, an attempt has been made to
examine the interaction between strategy and structure and to show that stable
structures can be obtained by selecting appropriate configurations, rather than
searching for a relationship between several different variables. In this
context, by making a synthesis between various strategy and structure
configurations; defining common configurations and trying to examine the
interactions between them indicate the aim of this study. In order to realize
this aim and to be able to analyze the current problem "Is it possible to
choose a suitable common configuration depending on the relationships and
preferences between the strategy and the building components?", the output
of the study constitutes propositions developed according to the literature. It
is believed that revealing such relationships will bring different perspectives
to the related literature. Also, the study is aimed to be supported by the
propositions developed among the cases difficult to observe on the basis of
theoretical and scientific realism.  

Kaynakça

  • Adler, P.S. ve Borys, B. (1996). Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 61-89.Burns, T. ve Stalker, G. (1961). The Management of Innovation (1st ed.). London: Tavistock Publications.Buzzell, R. D., Gale, B. ve Sultan, R. (1975). Market Share: A Key to Profitability. Harvard Business Review, 51(1), 97-106.Chandler, A. (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise (1st ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: MIT Press.Channon, D. (1973). Strategy and Structure in British Enterprise (1st ed.). Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Daft, R. (2015). Örgüt Kuramları ve Tasarımını Anlamak (10. Baskı) (Çev. Ed. Ömür Timurcanday Özmen). Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.Demirhan, K. (2018). Mintzberg’in Örgütsel Yapılandırma Teorisi Bağlamında Türkiye’deki Sivil Toplum Örgütleri Üzerine Bir İncelenme. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 30, 207-222.Dess, G. ve Davis, P. (1984). Porter's Generic Strategies as Determinants of Strategic Group Membership and Organizational Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 467-488.Doty, D H., Glick, W. H. ve Huber, G. P. (1993). Fit, Equifinality, and Organizational Effectiveness: A Test of Two Configurational Theories. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1196-1250.Ferguson, T.D. ve Ketchen, D.J. (1999). Organizational Configurations and Performance: The Role of Statistical Power in Extant Research. Strategic Management Journal, 20(4), 385-402.Galbraith, J.R. (1995). Designing Organizations: An Executive Briefing on Strategy, Structure, and Process (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Galbraith, J.R. (2008). Designing Matrix Organizations That Actually Work: How IBM,Procter & Gamble, and Others Design for Success (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Galbraith, J.R. (2013). Designing Organizations: Strategy, Structure, and Process at the Business Unit and Enterprise Levels (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Hambrick, D. C. (1983a). An Empirical Typology of Mature Industrial Product Environments. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 213-230. Hambrick, D. C. (1983b). High Profit Strategies in Mature Capital Goods Industries: A Contingency Approach. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 687-707.Henderson, B. (1979). Henderson on Corporate Strategy (1st ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Abt Books.Kates, A. ve Galbraith, J.R. (2007). Designing Your Organizations: Using the Star Model to Solve 5 Critical Design Challenges (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.MacMillan, I. C. ve D. Hambrick, D. (1983). Capital Intensity, Market Share Instability and Profits-the Case for Asset Parsimony. Working Paper, 29, Columbia University Strategy Research Center, New York.Meyer, A.D., Tsui, A.S. ve Hinings, C.R. (1993). Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1175-1195.Miles, R. ve Snow, C. (1978). Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process (1st ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Miller, D. (1986). Configurations of Strategy and Structure: Towards a Synthesis. Strategic Management Journal, 7, 233-249.Miller, D. (1987). The Genesis of Configuration. Academy of Management Review, 12(4), 686-701.Miller, D. ve Friesen, P.H. (1978). Archetypes of strategy formulation. Management Science, 24, 921-933.Miller, D. ve Friesen, P.H. (1984). A Longitudinal Study of the Corporate Life Cycle. Management Science, 30(10), 1161-1183.Miller, D. ve Friesen, P.H. (1984a). Porter's Generic Strategies and Performance. Working Paper, McGill University, Montreal.Miller, D. ve Friesen, P.H. (1984b). Organizations: A Quantum View (1st ed.). NJ: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Miller, D. ve Whitney, J. O. (1999). Beyond Strategy: Configuration as a Pillar of Competitive Advantage. Business Horizons, 42(3), 5-17.Mintzberg, H.(1973). Strategy Making in Three Modes. California Management Review, 16, 44- 58.Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations (1st ed.).NJ: Prenctice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs. Mintzberg, H. (1983). Structures in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations (1st ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Morgan, G. (1980). Paradigms, Metaphors, and Puzzle Solving in Organization Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(4), 605-622.Perrow, C. (1971). Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View (2nd ed.). CA: Tavistock Publications.
Toplam 1 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm MAKALELER
Yazarlar

Ahmet İlhan 0000-0003-2857-800X

Recep Yücel

Yayımlanma Tarihi 9 Nisan 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019 Sayı: 23

Kaynak Göster

APA İlhan, A., & Yücel, R. (2019). ÖRGÜTSEL KONFİGÜRASYON YAKLAŞIMININ STRATEJİK VE YAPISAL OLARAK İNCELENMESİ ÜZERİNE GELİŞTİRİLEN ÖNERMELER. Uluslararası İktisadi Ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi(23), 191-212. https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.492085


______________________________________________________

Adres: KTÜ-İİBF. Oda No:213    61080 TRABZON
e-mailuiiidergisi@gmail.com