Pedofiliyi Tanımak

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 4, 215 - 222, 24.12.2018

Esra Nihan Bridge Nesrin Duman

https://doi.org/10.31461/ybpd.455350

Cited By: 3

Öz

Çocuklara yönelik erotik sevgi anlamına
gelen Yunanca “pedeiktos” (çocuk) ve “philia” (sevgi) sözcüklerinden gelen
pedofili (Seto, 2002), çocukların cinsel uyarım nesnesi olarak kullanılmasını içerir.
Çoğu kültürde, çocuklar cinsel ilişki hakkında karar vermek için yeterince
olgun olarak kabul edilmezler. Bu bağlamda, çocuk cinsel istismarı sadece
tahammül edilemez olarak görülmekle kalmaz, aynı zamanda pek çok toplumda cezai
yaptırıma da bağlanırr. Pedofili birçok klinisyen için tartışmalı ve hoş
olmayan bir konu olarak kabul edilir; bu nedenle, çoğu klinisyen bu konuda
araştırma yapmaktan kaçınır. Literatürde, pedofili için mutlak ve tutarlı bir
sınıflandırma bulunmamaktadır. Aynı zamanda pedofili tanı kriterlerinin de zaman
içerisinde değiştiği görülmektedir. Psikanalitik, bağlanma ve Ferenczi'nin
travma teorisi gibi farklı teoriler pedofilinin nedenlerine ilişkin bazı
açıklamalar önermesine rağmen, bu konu hakkında tatmin edici bir açıklama
yoktur. Pedofili çok disiplinli bir meseledir ve biyo-psiko-sosyo-yasal bir müdahale
planı gerektirmektedir, Pedofili konusunun ele alınmasında çeşitli
disiplinlerin işbirliği ile araştırma yapması ve konuyu anlaması çok önemli ve
gereklidir. Bu çalışma, farklı perspektiflerden bakılarak pedofiliyi anlama
girişimidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

pedofili, çocuk tacizcisi, sınıflandırma, profil, DSM

Identifying Pedophilia

Öz

Pedophilia, derived from Greek words
philia of pedeiktos meaning erotic love of children (Seto, 2002) includes using
children as a sexual excitement object to reach gratification. In
most cultures children are not deemed as mature enough to make decisions
about sexual intercourse. In this regard, child sexual abuse is
not only intolerable, but is also sanctioned in many societies. Pedophilia is considered a controversial and unpleasant
subject for many clinicians; therefore, most of them avoid conducting research
on this topic. In the literature, there is no absolute and consistent
classification and also diagnostic criteria of pedophile has changed over time.
Although different theories such as psychoanalytic, attachment and Ferenczi’s
trauma theory propose some explanations regarding the reasons for pedophilia,
there is no satisfactory elucidation about this topic. Pedophilia is a multidisciplinary
concern and requires a bio-psycho-socio-legal plan for intervention, it is
crucial to conduct research by collaboration of various disciplines and
understand this subject is important and necessary to address this issue. This
current study is an attempt to understand pedophilia by looking from different
perspectives.

Anahtar Kelimeler

pedophilia, child molesters, classification, profile, DSM

Kaynakça

• American Psychiatric Association. (1952). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-I). Washington, DC: Author.
• American Psychiatric Association. (1968). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-II). Washington, DC: Author.
• American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.; DSM–III.). Washington, DC: Author.
• American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.; DSM–III–R). Washington, DC: Author.
• American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.; DSM–IV). Washington, DC: Author.
• American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev. ; DSM–IV–TR). Washington, DC: Author.
• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, (Fifth Edition; DSM-V). Washington, DC: Author.
• Bahroo, B. A. (2005). Pedophilia, Psychiatric Insights. Family Court Review an Interdisciplinary Journal. 41 (4).
• Blanchard, R., Barbaree, H. E., Bogaert, A. F., Dickey, R., Klassen, P., Kuban, M. E. and Zucker, K. J. (2000). Fraternal birth order and sexual orientation in pedophiles. Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol. 29, No. 5. Doi: 10.1023/A:1001943719964
• Bogaert, A. F., Kuban, M., Blanchard, M. (1997) Pedophilia, sexual orientation, and birth order. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 106:2, 331-335. doi: 10.1037//0021-843X.106.2.331
• Campbell, D. (2014). Doubt in the psychoanalysis of a paedophile. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 95: 441-463. doi: 10.1111/1745-8315.12196
• Fagan, P. J., Wise, T. N., Schmidt, C. W., & Berlin, F. S. (2002). Pedophilia. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 288 (19): 2458-65.
• Frankel, J. (2002). Exploring Ferenczi's concept of identification with the aggressor: Its role in trauma, everyday life, and the therapeutic relationship. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 12:101-139.
• Glasser, M. (1988). Psychodynamic aspects of paedophilia. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 3 (2): 121-135, doi:10.1080/02668738700700111
• Howell, E. F. (2014). Ferenczi’s concept of identification with the aggressor: understanding dissociative structure with interacting victim and abuser self-states. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 74: 48–59.
• Scarfone, D. (2014). The three essays and the meaning of the infantile sexual in psychoanalysis. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, Volume LXXXIII, Number 2: 327-344.
• Seto, M. C. (2002). Pedophilia and sexual offending against children. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
• Seto, M. C. (2010). Child pornography use and internet solicitation in the diagnosis of pedophilia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39: 591–593. DOI 10.1007/s10508-010-9603-6
• Seto, M. C., Cantor, J. M., Blanchard, R. (2006). Child pornography offenses are a valid diagnostic indicator of pedophilia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 115 (3): 610-615. Doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.115.3.610
• Strassberg, D. S., Eastvold, A., Kenney, J. W., & Suchy, Y. (2012). Psychopathy among pedophilic and nonpedophilic child molesters. Child Abuse & Neglect, 36: 379-382. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.09.018
• Turner, D., Rettenberger, M., Lohmann, L., & Eher, R. (2014). Paedophilic sexual interests and psychopathy in child sexual abusers working with children. Child Abuse & Neglect, 38: 326- 335. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.07.019