Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

PVDF Electrospun Nanofiber Membranes for Microfiltration: The Effect of Pore Size and Thickness on Membrane Performance

Yıl 2019, Sayı: 16, 247 - 255, 31.08.2019

Çiğdem Akduman

https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.556748
Cited By: 3

Öz

Microfiltration membranes are needed in waste water treatment, water purification and concentration processes. To separate microorganisms and suspended particles from process liquid, a contaminated fluid, especially water, is passed through a porous membrane. Electrospun nanofiber membranes could be used for this aim with their nanoscale fibers, small pore size, low weight and high permeability. The main purpose of this study is to show the relationship between the average fiber diameter and thickness of the PVDF nanofiber membrane and the pore size and liquid filtration efficiency. PVDF is a widely used polymer in water treatment processes. It is highly non-reactive thermoplastic fluoropolymer with outstanding physical and chemical properties. In this study, 16, 14 and 12% (w/v) PVDF nanofibers were produced electrospinning method to achieve three different mean diameter. 15 min, 30 min, 60 min, 3h and 5h of production periods were used for producing various thicknesses. According to pore size measurements, the differences in mean flow pore size (MFP) of 16PVDF and 14PVDF nanofiber membranes were not distinct. However, due to thin nanofiber diameter (278.58 nm) and high amount of nanofibers, the biggest pore size (FBP) of 12PVDF-5h was the smallest. There was also a significant difference between 12PVDF-5h and 12PVDF-3h, and FBP of these two membranes were smaller than the other three 12PVDF nanofiber membranes. Liquid filtration property of produced electrospun PVDF nanofibers was evaluated by turbidity rejection of a kaolin solution. In correlation with the pore size results, it was seen that best turbidity rejection % was belonging to 12PVDF-5h and worst was belonging to 16PVDF-15min nanofiber membranes. Nevertheless, all of the produced electrospun PVDF nanofiber membranes can be effectively used to remove contaminants from waste water at a relatively low cost.


Anahtar Kelimeler

Nanofibers Liquid Filtration Pore Size Turbidity

Teşekkür

Author would like to thank HYFIBER-Abalıoğlu Teknoloji for the support given.

Kaynakça

  • ASTM International. (2014). ASTM F316-03 - Standard Test Methods for Pore Size Characteristics of Membrane Filters by Bubble Point and Mean Flow Pore Test. Astm, 03(Reapproved 2011), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1520/F0316-03R11.2
  • Bae, J., Baek, I., & Choi, H. (2016). Mechanically enhanced PES electrospun nanofiber membranes (ENMs) for microfiltration: The effects of ENM properties on membrane performance. Water Research, 105, 406–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.09.020
  • Bae, J., Baek, I., & Choi, H. (2017a). Efficacy of piezoelectric electrospun nanofiber membrane for water treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal, 307, 670–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.125
  • Bae, J., Baek, I., & Choi, H. (2017b). Efficacy of piezoelectric electrospun nanofiber membrane for water treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal, 307, 670–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.125
  • Baker, R. W. (2004). Membrane Technology and Applications. (C. Baker, Richard W. (Membrane Technology and Research, Inc. Menlo Park, Ed.). John Wiley & Sons Ltd,. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470020393
  • Cheng, S., Xiao, Y.-X., Zhao, L.-Y., Zhu, L.-T., Li, R.-L., & Zhu, G.-C. (2017). Fabrication and Characterization of Electrospun Nanofibrous Composite Membrane for Air Filtration. Journal of Fiber Bioengineering and Informatics, 10(4), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.3993/jfbim00272
  • Choi, S. S., Lee, Y. S., Joo, C. W., Lee, S. G., Park, J. K., & Han, K. S. (2004). Electrospun PVDF nanofiber web as polymer electrolyte or separator. Electrochimica Acta, 50(2–3 SPEC. ISS.), 339–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2004.03.057
  • Cui, Z., Drioli, E., & Moo, Y. (2014). Progress in Polymer Science Recent progress in fluoropolymers for membranes. Progress in Polymer Science, 39(1), 164–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.07.008
  • Eichhorn, S. J., & Sampson, W. W. (2005). Statistical geometry of pores and statistics of porous nanofibrous assemblies. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2(4), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2005.0039
  • EMD Millipore Corporation. (2015). Amicon ® Stirred Cells.
  • Garain, S., Jana, S., Sinha, T. K., & Mandal, D. (2016). Design of In Situ Poled Ce 3+ -Doped Electrospun PVDF/Graphene Composite Nanofibers for Fabrication of Nanopressure Sensor and Ultrasensitive Acoustic Nanogenerator. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 8(7), 4532–4540. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b11356
  • Huang, L., Arena, J. T., & McCutcheon, J. R. (2016). Surface modified PVDF nanofiber supported thin film composite membranes for forward osmosis. Journal of Membrane Science, 499, 352–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEMSCI.2015.10.030
  • Hutten, I. M., & Wadsworth, L. (2007). Handbook of nonwoven filter media. Handbook of Nonwoven Filter Media. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-85617-441-1.X5015-X
  • Isoyama, R., Taie, M., Kageyama, T., Miura, M., Maeda, A., Mori, A., & Lee, S. S. (2017). A feasibility study on the simultaneous sensing of turbidity and chlorophyll a concentration using a simple optical measurement method. Micromachines, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/mi8040112
  • Jang, W., Yun, J., Jeon, K., & Byun, H. (2015). PVdF/graphene oxide hybrid membranes via electrospinning for water treatment applications. RSC Advances, 5(58), 46711–46717. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra04439a
  • Kynar, K., & Pvdf, F. (2014). Performance Characteristics & Data.
  • Letizia, M., & Chiara, F. (2018). Filtering Media by Electrospinning. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78163-1
  • Li, H.-Y., & Liu, Y.-L. (2014). Nafion-functionalized electrospun poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) nanofibers for high performance proton exchange membranes in fuel cells. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2(11), 3783–3793. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3TA14264G
  • Liu, F., Hashim, N. A., Liu, Y., Abed, M. R. M., & Li, K. (2011). Progress in the production and modification of PVDF membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 375(1–2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.03.014
  • Liu, Y., Wang, R., Ma, H., Hsiao, B. S., & Chu, B. (2013). High-flux microfiltration filters based on electrospun polyvinylalcohol nanofibrous membranes. Polymer, 54(2), 548–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2012.11.064
  • Mandal, D., Yoon, S., & Kim, K. J. (2011). Origin of Piezoelectricity in an Electrospun Poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) Nanofiber Web-Based Nanogenerator and Nano-Pressure Sensor. Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 32(11), 831–837. https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.201100040
  • Renuga Gopal, Satinderpal Kaur, Zuwei Ma, Casey Chan, Seeram Ramakrishna, T. M. (2006). Electrospun nanofibrous filtration membrane. Journal of Membrane Science, 281, 581–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.04.026
  • Ryu, Y. J., Kim, H. Y., Lee, K. H., Park, H. C., & Lee, D. R. (2003). Transport properties of electrospun nylon 6 nonwoven mats. European Polymer Journal, 39(9), 1883–1889. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-3057(03)00096-X
  • Yeow, M. L., Liu, Y. T., & Li, K. (2004). Morphological study of poly(vinylidene fluoride) asymmetric membranes: Effects of the solvent, additive, and dope temperature. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 92(3), 1782–1789. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.20141

Mikrofiltrasyon için elektrolif çekim yöntemi ile üretilmiş PVDF nanolifli membranlar: Gözenek boyutu ve kalınlığının membran performansına etkisi

Yıl 2019, Sayı: 16, 247 - 255, 31.08.2019

Çiğdem Akduman

https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.556748
Cited By: 3

Öz



Atık su arıtma, su saflaştırma ve konsantrasyon artırma işlemlerinde mikrofiltrasyon membranlarına ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Mikroorganizmaları ve askıda bulunan parçacıkları işlem sıvısından ayırmak için, kontamine sıvı, özellikle su, gözenekli bir membrandan geçirilir. Bu amaçla, elektrolif çekim yöntemi ile üretilmiş nanolifli membranların nano boyuttaki lifleri, küçük gözenek boyutları, düşük ağırlık ve yüksek geçirgenlik ile kullanılabilirler. Bu çalışmanın esas amacı ortalama lif çapı, PVDF nanolifli membranların kalınlıkları ve gözenek boyutlarının sıvı filtrasyon verimlilikleri arasındaki ilişkiyi göstermektir. PVDF atık su arıtma proseslerinde yaygın olarak kullanılan bir polimerdir. Fiziksel ve kimyasal özellikleri ile dikkat çeken reaktif olmayan termoplastik floropolimerdir. Bu çalışmada,% 16, 14 ve 12 (w/v) PVDF nanolifler, üç farklı lif çapı elde etmek için elektrolif çekim yöntemi üretilmiştir. Çeşitli kalınlıkların elde edilmesi amacı ile 15 dakika, 30 dakika, 60 dakika, 3 saat ve 5 saat üretim süreleri kullanılmıştır. Gözeneklilik ölçüm sonuçlarına göre, ortalama 16PVDF ve 14PVDF nanolifli membranlarının gözenek boyutları arasındaki büyük bir fark yoktur. Ancak, ince nanolif çapı (278.58 nm) ve fazla miktardaki nanolif nedeni ile, 12PVDF-5h nanolifli membranların en büyük gözeneklilikleri (FBP) en küçük olmuştur. Ayrıca 12PVDF-5h ve 12PVDF-3h arasında anlamlı bir farklılık gözlenmiştir ve bu iki membrana ait FBP boyutu diğer üç PVDF nanolifli membrandan daha küçük olmuştur. Üretilen PVDF nanoliflerin sıvı filtrasyon özellikleri, hazırlanan kaolin çözeltisinin bulanıklığının giderilmesi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Gözenek boyutları da göz önünde bulundurulduğunda, en iyi bulanıklık giderilme %’sinin 12PVDF-5h'e, en kötü bulanıklık giderilmesinin ise 16PVDF-15min nanolifli membranlara ait olduğu görülmüştür. Bununla birlikte, üretilen PVDF nanolifli membranların tümü, nispeten daha düşük bir maliyetle atık sudan kirleticilerin giderilmesi amacı ile etkili bir şekilde kullanılabilecek filtrasyon performansına sahiptir.




Anahtar Kelimeler

Nanolifler Sıvı Filtrasyon Gözenek Boyutu Bulanıklık

Kaynakça

  • ASTM International. (2014). ASTM F316-03 - Standard Test Methods for Pore Size Characteristics of Membrane Filters by Bubble Point and Mean Flow Pore Test. Astm, 03(Reapproved 2011), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1520/F0316-03R11.2
  • Bae, J., Baek, I., & Choi, H. (2016). Mechanically enhanced PES electrospun nanofiber membranes (ENMs) for microfiltration: The effects of ENM properties on membrane performance. Water Research, 105, 406–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.09.020
  • Bae, J., Baek, I., & Choi, H. (2017a). Efficacy of piezoelectric electrospun nanofiber membrane for water treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal, 307, 670–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.125
  • Bae, J., Baek, I., & Choi, H. (2017b). Efficacy of piezoelectric electrospun nanofiber membrane for water treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal, 307, 670–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.125
  • Baker, R. W. (2004). Membrane Technology and Applications. (C. Baker, Richard W. (Membrane Technology and Research, Inc. Menlo Park, Ed.). John Wiley & Sons Ltd,. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470020393
  • Cheng, S., Xiao, Y.-X., Zhao, L.-Y., Zhu, L.-T., Li, R.-L., & Zhu, G.-C. (2017). Fabrication and Characterization of Electrospun Nanofibrous Composite Membrane for Air Filtration. Journal of Fiber Bioengineering and Informatics, 10(4), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.3993/jfbim00272
  • Choi, S. S., Lee, Y. S., Joo, C. W., Lee, S. G., Park, J. K., & Han, K. S. (2004). Electrospun PVDF nanofiber web as polymer electrolyte or separator. Electrochimica Acta, 50(2–3 SPEC. ISS.), 339–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2004.03.057
  • Cui, Z., Drioli, E., & Moo, Y. (2014). Progress in Polymer Science Recent progress in fluoropolymers for membranes. Progress in Polymer Science, 39(1), 164–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.07.008
  • Eichhorn, S. J., & Sampson, W. W. (2005). Statistical geometry of pores and statistics of porous nanofibrous assemblies. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2(4), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2005.0039
  • EMD Millipore Corporation. (2015). Amicon ® Stirred Cells.
  • Garain, S., Jana, S., Sinha, T. K., & Mandal, D. (2016). Design of In Situ Poled Ce 3+ -Doped Electrospun PVDF/Graphene Composite Nanofibers for Fabrication of Nanopressure Sensor and Ultrasensitive Acoustic Nanogenerator. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 8(7), 4532–4540. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b11356
  • Huang, L., Arena, J. T., & McCutcheon, J. R. (2016). Surface modified PVDF nanofiber supported thin film composite membranes for forward osmosis. Journal of Membrane Science, 499, 352–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEMSCI.2015.10.030
  • Hutten, I. M., & Wadsworth, L. (2007). Handbook of nonwoven filter media. Handbook of Nonwoven Filter Media. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-85617-441-1.X5015-X
  • Isoyama, R., Taie, M., Kageyama, T., Miura, M., Maeda, A., Mori, A., & Lee, S. S. (2017). A feasibility study on the simultaneous sensing of turbidity and chlorophyll a concentration using a simple optical measurement method. Micromachines, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/mi8040112
  • Jang, W., Yun, J., Jeon, K., & Byun, H. (2015). PVdF/graphene oxide hybrid membranes via electrospinning for water treatment applications. RSC Advances, 5(58), 46711–46717. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra04439a
  • Kynar, K., & Pvdf, F. (2014). Performance Characteristics & Data.
  • Letizia, M., & Chiara, F. (2018). Filtering Media by Electrospinning. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78163-1
  • Li, H.-Y., & Liu, Y.-L. (2014). Nafion-functionalized electrospun poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) nanofibers for high performance proton exchange membranes in fuel cells. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2(11), 3783–3793. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3TA14264G
  • Liu, F., Hashim, N. A., Liu, Y., Abed, M. R. M., & Li, K. (2011). Progress in the production and modification of PVDF membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 375(1–2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.03.014
  • Liu, Y., Wang, R., Ma, H., Hsiao, B. S., & Chu, B. (2013). High-flux microfiltration filters based on electrospun polyvinylalcohol nanofibrous membranes. Polymer, 54(2), 548–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2012.11.064
  • Mandal, D., Yoon, S., & Kim, K. J. (2011). Origin of Piezoelectricity in an Electrospun Poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) Nanofiber Web-Based Nanogenerator and Nano-Pressure Sensor. Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 32(11), 831–837. https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.201100040
  • Renuga Gopal, Satinderpal Kaur, Zuwei Ma, Casey Chan, Seeram Ramakrishna, T. M. (2006). Electrospun nanofibrous filtration membrane. Journal of Membrane Science, 281, 581–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.04.026
  • Ryu, Y. J., Kim, H. Y., Lee, K. H., Park, H. C., & Lee, D. R. (2003). Transport properties of electrospun nylon 6 nonwoven mats. European Polymer Journal, 39(9), 1883–1889. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-3057(03)00096-X
  • Yeow, M. L., Liu, Y. T., & Li, K. (2004). Morphological study of poly(vinylidene fluoride) asymmetric membranes: Effects of the solvent, additive, and dope temperature. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 92(3), 1782–1789. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.20141
Toplam 24 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Mühendislik
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Çiğdem Akduman 0000-0002-6379-6697

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Ağustos 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019 Sayı: 16

Kaynak Göster

APA Akduman, Ç. (2019). PVDF Electrospun Nanofiber Membranes for Microfiltration: The Effect of Pore Size and Thickness on Membrane Performance. Avrupa Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi(16), 247-255. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.556748

Cited By

Structural and sound absorption properties of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and recycled polyethylene terephthalate (r-PET) nanofibers
The Journal of The Textile Institute
https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2024.2352181
Emerging advances of composite membranes for seawater pre-treatment: a review
Water Science & Technology
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2023.220
A PVDF electrospun antifibrotic composite for use as a glaucoma drainage implant
Materials Science and Engineering: C
Andrea Klapstova
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111637
 Kapak Resmi İndir