Öğretmen Adaylarının Çevre Etiği Farkındalıkları ve Sürdürülebilir Çevreye Yönelik Tutumlarının İncelenmesi

Year 2024, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 704 - 726, 29.04.2024

Birsen Berfu Akaydın Aslı Eşme

https://doi.org/10.34056/aujef.1288972

Abstract

Öğretmenlerin lisans eğitiminde belirtilen içeriğe ulaşma durumlarını ortaya koymak amacıyla öğretmen adaylarının çevre etiği farkındalıkları ve sürdürülebilir çevre tutumlarının belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmada öğretmen adaylarının çevre etiğine yönelik farkındalıklarının sürdürülebilir çevreye yönelik tutumu yordama gücünü belirlemek için ilişkisel araştırma deseni kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemini 2021-2022 eğitim-öğretim yılı bahar döneminde Marmara Bölgesinde yer alan bir eğitim fakültesinde eğitim gören 312 öğretmen adayı oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada, kişisel bilgi formu, 23 maddeden oluşan “Çevre Etiği Farkındalık Ölçeği” ve 27 maddenin yer aldığı “Sürdürülebilir Çevre Tutum Ölçeği” veri toplama aracı olarak kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde araştırmanın amacı ve alt amaçları doğrultusunda betimsel analizlerle birlikte fark, korelasyon ve regresyon analizleri kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda çevre etiği farkındalıklarının çok yüksek, sürdürülebilir çevre tutumlarının yüksek düzeyde olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Öğretmen adaylarının çevre etiği farkındalıkları cinsiyete göre kadın öğretmen adayları lehine anlamlı düzeyde farklılaştığı, sürdürülebilir çevre tutumlarının ise farklılaşmadığı belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, öğretmen adaylarının çevre etiği farkındalıkları ve sürdürülebilir çevre tutumlarının eğitim alınan öğretmenlik alanı, sınıf düzeyi, çevre ve etik dersi alma durumları, çevre kuruluşları ile ilişki durumuna göre anlamlı düzeyde farklılaşmadığı ortaya çıkmıştır. Öğretmen adaylarının çevre etiği farkındalıkları ve sürdürülebilir çevre tutumları arasında düşük düzeyde pozitif yönlü anlamlı bir ilişkinin olduğu, çevre etiği farkındalığının sürdürülebilir çevreye yönelik tutumu düşük derecede yordadığı belirlenmiştir.

Keywords

Çevre etiği farkındalığı, sürdürülebilir çevre, öğretmen adayı, tutum

Investigation of Pre-service Teachers' Environmental Ethics Awareness and Attitudes towards Sustainable Environment

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the environmental ethics awareness and sustainable environmental attitudes of pre-service teachers to reveal the teachers’ access to the content specified in undergraduate education. In the study, the correlational research design was used to determine the extent to which pre-service teachers’ environmental ethics awareness predicts their sustainable environmental attitudes. The sample of the study was comprised of 312 pre-service teachers attending a Faculty of Education in the Marmara Region in the spring term of the 2021-2022 academic year. In the study, a personal information form, the “Environmental Ethics Awareness Scale” consisting of 23 items, and the “Sustainable Environmental Attitude Scale” consisting of 27 items were used as data collection tools. In the analysis of the collected data, difference, correlation, and regression analyses were used together with descriptive analyses in line with the purpose and sub-purposes of the study. As a result of the study, it was revealed that the pre-service teachers’ environmental ethics awareness was very high, and sustainable environmental attitudes were high. The environmental ethics awareness of the pre-service teachers was found to vary significantly depending on gender in favor of the female pre-service teachers, while their sustainable environmental attitudes were found to not vary significantly depending on gender. In addition, the pre-service teachers’ environmental ethics awareness and sustainable environmental attitudes did not differ significantly depending on the department attended, grade level, taking/having taken environment and ethics courses, and relationship with environmental organizations. It was determined that there is a weak, positive, and significant correlation between the pre-service teachers’ environmental ethics awareness and sustainable environmental attitudes and that their environmental ethics awareness predicts their sustainable environmental attitudes at a weak level.

Keywords

Environmental ethics awareness, sustainable environment, pre-service teacher, attitude

References

• Akbaş, T. (2007). Research of environmental sensitivity among teacher candidates of science course (Unpublished master’s thesis). Atatürk University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Erzurum.
• Akkoyunlu Ertan, K. (1998). Environmental ethics. Journal of Public Administration, 1(31), 125-139.
• Aksu, Y. (2009). The determination of the science and technology and primary school teachers attitudes towards environmental issues (Sample of Burdur province). (Unpublished master’s thesis). Süleyman Demirel University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Isparta.
• Alım, M. (2006). Environment and environmental education in primary school in Turkey within the process of the membership of European Union. Kastamonu Education Journal, 14(2), 599-616.
• Alkış, S. (2009). Geography education for a sustainable world. İstanbul: Aktif Publishing.
• Altın, M., & Akcanca, N. (2023). Students' self-efficacy regarding environmental education and the relationship between their perceptions of environmental ethics awareness and their ecological citizenship. Gazi Journal of Educational Science, 9(2), 179-197. https://dx.doi.org/10.30855/gjes.2023.09.02.003
• Aydın, F., & Ünaldı, Ü. E. (2013). Geography teacher candidates’ attitudes towards sustainable environment. Kalem International Journal of Education and Human Sciences, 3(1), 11-42.
• Aydoğan, A. (2010). The ideas of social studies teachers on teaching about the improvements of sustainable development issues (Unpublished master’s thesis). Niğde University Graduate School of Social Sciences, Niğde.
• Bozdemir, H., & Faiz, M. (2018). Ecocentric, antropocentric and antipathetic attitudes of teacher candidates towards the environment. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 8(1), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.330546
• Bozkurt, O., & Cansüngü Koray, Ö. (2002). Primary school students’ misconceptions about greenhouse effect in environment education. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 23, 67-73.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Data analysis book for social sciences. Ankara: Pegem Academy.
• Deniş, H., & Genç, H. (2007). Comparison of attitudes of primary teacher education students who have taken and have not taken environment science lesson towards environment and achievements in environment science lesson. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 8(13), 20-26.
• Des Jardins, J. R. (2006). Environmental ethics. (1st edition). R. Keleş (Trans.). Ankara: İmge.
• Erol, G. H., & Gezer, K. (2006). Prospective of elementary school teachers’ attitudes toward environment and environmental problems. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 1(1), 65-77.
• Ertan, B. (2004). Environmental ethics approaches and Türkiye in the 2000’s. Journal of Management Sciences, 2(1), 93-108.
• Ewen, B. M. C., Clément, P., Gericke, N. M., Nyberg, E., Hagman, M., & Landström, J. (2015). Female and male teachers' pro-environmental behaviour, conceptions and attitudes towards nature and the environment do not differ: Ecofeminism put to the test. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 16(1), 1- 25.
• Fernández‐Manzanal, R., Rodríguez‐Barreiro, L., & Carrasquer, J. (2007). Evaluation of environmental attitudes: Analysis and results of a scale applied to university students. Science Education, 91, 988-1009.
• Kahyaoğlu, M., & Özgen, N. (2012). An investigation of pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards environmental problems in terms of several variables. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 5(2), 171-185.
• Karaarslan Semiz, G. (2020). Environmental education in early childhood. In Environmental values and environmental ethics. R. Olgan (Eds.), Ankara: Pegem Academy.
• Karakaya, Ç. (2009). The viewpoints of primary education last grade students about the environment according to anthrophocentric and nonanthrophocentric approaches (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ondokuz Mayıs University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Samsun.
• Karasar, N. (2016). Scientific research method (32nd ed.). Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
• Kayaer, M. (2013). Environment and ethical approaches. Journal of Politics, Economics and Management Studies, 1(2), 63-76.
• Kaypak, Ş. (2011). A sustainable environment for a sustainable development in the globalization process. Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University Journal of Social and Economic Research, 13(20), 19-33.
• Keleş, Ö., & Özer, N. (2016). Determination of pre-service science teachers' level of awareness of environmental ethics in relation to different variables. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(14), 7286-7297.
• Kılıç, S. (2008). The emergence, development, and consequences of environmental ethics. Ankara: Orion Publishing.
• Koçulu, A. (2018). An examination of the relationship between pre-service science teachers’ awareness about sustainable development and attitudes and behaviours toward environmental issues (Unpublished master’s thesis). Akdeniz University Institute of Educational Sciences, Antalya.
• Kortenkamp, K. V., & Moore, F. C. (2001). Ecocentrism and anthropocentrism: Moral reasoning about ecological commons dilemmas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 261-272.
• Kumar, P. N. S., & Rani, T. S. (2018). A study on environmental competencies of teacher trainees. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 5(4), 293- 298
• Mahmutoğlu, A. (2009). Ethical approach to the environmental problems in the rural areas (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ankara University, Graduate School of Social Sciences, Ankara.
• Moseley, C., Reinke, K., & Bootout, V. (2002). The effect of teaching outdoor environmental education on preservice teacher attitudes toward self- efficacy and outcome expectancy. Journal of Environmental Education, 34 (1), 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960209603476
• Muşlu Kaygısız, G. (2020). Examination of the objectives in preschool education and primary science education curriculum in terms of environmental education. International Journal of Early Childhood Education Studies, 5(1), 29-47.
• Nagra, V. (2010). Environmental education awareness among school teachers. The Environmentalist, 30(2), 153-162.
• Ramsey, I. (1981). The effects of environmental action and environmental case study instruction on the overt environmental behavior of eighth-grade students. Journal of Environmental Education, 13(1), 24-30.
• Olli, E., Grendstad, G., & Wollebaek, D. (2001). Correlates of environmental behaviours: Bringing back social social context. Environment and Behavior, 33,181-208.
• Öcal, T. (2013). Determination of the attitudes of prospective social studies teachers towards environmental problems. Marmara Geographical Review. 27, 333-352.
• Özer, N. (2015). Determination of pre-service science teachers' level of awareness of environmental ethics (Unpublished master’s thesis). Aksaray University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Aksaray.
• Özer, N., & Keleş, Ö. (2016). Environmental ethics awareness scale development study. The Journal of Science Teaching, 4(1), 47-64.
• UNESCO. (2005). Guidelines and recommendations for reorienting teacher education to address sustainability. Paris: Division for the Promotion of Quality Education, UNESCO.
• Saka, M., Sürmeli, H., & Öztuna, A. (2009). Which attitudes preservice teachers’ have towards environmental ethics, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 2475–2479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.437
• Sülün, Y., & Sülün, S. (2006). Environmental science. M. Aydoğdu, K. Gezer (Eds.), Ankara: Anı Publishing.
• Şama, E. (2003). Teacher candidates’ attitudes toward environmental problems. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 23(2), 99-110.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
• Tanrıverdi, B. (2009). Analyzing primary school curriculum in terms of sustainable environmental education. Education and Science, 34(151), 89–103.
• Tekiroğlu, A., & Hayır Kanat, M. (2021). The relationship between environmental ethics awareness and sustainable environmental attitude. Ulakbilge Journal of Social Sciences, 59, 630–645. http://doi.org/10.7816/ulakbilge-09-59-11.
• Thomas, I., & Nicita, J. (2002). Sustainability education and Australian Universities. Environmental Education Research, 8(4), 475-492. http://doi.org/10.1080/1350462022000026845
• Thompson, S. C. G., & Barton, M. A. (1994). Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14(2), 149-157.
• Topaloğlu, M. (2014). A survey of reflections of science teacher candidates’ attitudes towards environmental issues on their quality of life (Unpublished master’s thesis). Eskişehir Osmangazi University Institute of Education, Eskişehir.
• Wongchantra P., Boujai, P., Sata, W., & Neungchalem, P. (2008). A development of environmental education teaching process by using ethics infusion for undergraduate students. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 5(9), 941-944.
• World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Yapıcı, M. (2003). Sustainable development and education. Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 223-229.
• Yavetz, B., Goldman, P., &Pe’er, S. (2014). How do preservice teachers perceive ‘environment’ and its relevance to their area of teaching? Environmental Education Research 20(3): 354–371. https://doi.org/10.10 80/13504622.2013.803038
• Yıldız, Ş. (2011). Conceptual understanding and attitudes of teachers, prospective teachers and students towards sustainable environment (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Dokuz Eylül University Institute of Education, İzmir.
• Yücel Işıldar, G. (2012). Introduction to environmental ethics. In Vromans, K., Paslack, R., Yücel Işıldar, G., G. Vrind, R. & Simon, J. W. (Eds.), In Environmental ethics. An introduciton and learning guide. (p.1-31). England: Routledge.