Time-lapse ground penetrating radar (GPR) imaging of used engine oil contamination

Year 2024, Volume: 173 Issue: 173, 175 - 188, 26.04.2024

Hafiz Mohammed Nazifi Ertan Pekşen Ertuğrul Gürbüz Levent Gülen

https://doi.org/10.19111/bulletinofmre.1282076

Abstract

Time-Lapse Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) was employed to study used engine oil (UEO) contamination of sandy environment in laboratory setting. GPR is a near-surface geophysical method that uses electromagnetic field to provide image of the dielectric properties of earth materials to detect structures and changes in material properties within the subsurface. This research aimed to detect, monitor and map the migration of UEO contaminant in sand. The results of this study revealed that the migration of the UEO contamination in homogeneously laid sand is non-uniform. UEO plumes were identified as high amplitude signals with enhanced reflectivity. There was a progressive decrease in GPR signal amplitudes (reflection reduction) within the contaminated area of the tank with time. This decrease of GPR signal amplitudes was interpreted as caused by the evaporation of some portion of the UEO in the vadose zone as a result of temperature increase in time and also due to the occurrence of UEO biodegradation. The time-lapse GPR proved to be an effective technique for detecting, monitoring, and mapping UEO migration within sand tank in laboratory setting.

Keywords

Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), Used Engine Oil (UEO), Contamination, Light Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid (LNAPL), Environmental Geophysics.

Ethical Statement

The authors are grateful to the Scientific and Technical Research Council of Türkiye [TÜBİTAK (Project No: 119Y193)] and the Research Fund of Sakarya University [BAPK (Project No: 2019- 7-25-37)] for supporting this study. The authors are grateful to the Sakarya University Research, Development and Application Center (SARGEM) for providing laboratory space for this experiment. We thank the personnel of the TÜPRAŞ İzmit Refinery Laboratories for the determination of physical and chemical properties of the UEO that we used in this study. We thank Prof. Dr. Halim MUTLU for editorial handling and anonymous reviewers for constructive suggestions which improved the manuscript. Contributions to the study: Hafiz MOHAMMED NAZIFI contributed to the study conception and design and he was supervised by Prof. Dr. Levent GÜLEN. Data acquisitions were performed by Hafiz MOHAMMED NAZIFI, Ertuğrul GÜRBÜZ and Ertan PEKŞEN. Data analysis and interpretation were performed by Hafiz MOHAMMED NAZIFI and supervised by Levent GÜLEN and Ertan PEKŞEN. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Hafiz MOHAMMED NAZIFI and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Supporting Institution

The authors are grateful to the Scientific and Technical Research Council of Türkiye [TÜBİTAK (Project No: 119Y193)] and the Research Fund of Sakarya University [BAPK (Project No: 2019- 7-25-37)] for supporting this study.

Project Number

TÜBİTAK (Project No: 119Y193)-BAPK (Project No: 2019- 7-25-37)

Thanks

The authors are grateful to the Scientific and Technical Research Council of Türkiye [TÜBİTAK (Project No: 119Y193)] and the Research Fund of Sakarya University [BAPK (Project No: 2019- 7-25-37)] for supporting this study. The authors are grateful to the Sakarya University Research, Development and Application Center (SARGEM) for providing laboratory space for this experiment. We thank the personnel of the TÜPRAŞ İzmit Refinery Laboratories for the determination of physical and chemical properties of the UEO that we used in this study. We thank Prof. Dr. Halim MUTLU for editorial handling and anonymous reviewers for constructive suggestions which improved the manuscript. Contributions to the study: Hafiz MOHAMMED NAZIFI contributed to the study conception and design and he was supervised by Prof. Dr. Levent GÜLEN. Data acquisitions were performed by Hafiz MOHAMMED NAZIFI, Ertuğrul GÜRBÜZ and Ertan PEKŞEN. Data analysis and interpretation were performed by Hafiz MOHAMMED NAZIFI and supervised by Levent GÜLEN and Ertan PEKŞEN. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Hafiz MOHAMMED NAZIFI and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

• Abioye, O. P., Agamuthu, P., Abdul Aziz, A. R. 2012. Biodegradation of used motor oil in soil using organic waste amendments. Biotechnology Research International, 2012, 8.
• Ameen, N. N., Klueglein, N., Appel, E., Petrovský, E., Kappler,A., Leven, C. 2014. Effect ofhydrocarbon- contaminated fluctuating groundwater on magnetic properties of shallow sediments. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 58(3), 442-460.
• Arato, A., Wehrer, M., Biró, B., Godio, A. 2014. Integration of geophysical, geochemical and microbiological data for a comprehensive small-scale characterization of an aged LNAPL-contaminated site. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 21(15), 8948-8963.
• Atekwana, E. A., Atekwana, E. A. 2010. Geophysical signatures of microbial activity at hydrocarbon contaminated sites: a review. Surveys in Geophysics, 31(2), 247-283.
• Atekwana, E. A., Sauck, W. A., Abdel Aal, G. Z., Werkema Jr, D. D. 2002. Geophysical investigation of vadose zone conductivity anomalies at a hydrocarbon contaminated site: A implications for the assessment of intrinsic bioremediation. Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics, 7(3), 103-110.
• Atlas, R. 1975. Effects of temperature and crude oil composition on petroleum Biodegradation. Applied Microbiology, 30, 396–403.
• ATSDR. 1997. Toxicological profile for used mineral-base crankcase oil.
• Azimi, R., Vaezihir, A., Lenhard, R. J., Hassanizadeh, S. M. 2020. Evaluation of LNAPL behavior in water table inter-fluctuate zone under groundwater drawdown condition. Water, 12(9), 2337.
• Bano, M., Loeffler, O., Girard, J. F. 2009. Ground penetrating radar imaging and time-domain modelling of the infiltration of diesel fuel in a sandbox experiment. comptes rendus Geoscience, 341(10- 11), 846-858.
• Barber, W., Morey, R. 1994. Radar detection of thin layers of hydrocarbon contamination. In Fifth International Conferention on Ground Penetrating Radar (pp. cp-300). European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
• Bermejo, J.L., Sauck, W.A., Atekwana, E.A. 1997. Geophysical discovery of a new LNAPL plume at the former Wurtsmith AFB Oscoda, MI. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation, 17, 131–137.
• Bertolla, L., Porsani, J. L., Soldovieri, F., Catapano, I. 2014. GPR-4D monitoring a controlled LNAPL spill in a masonry tank at USP, Brazil. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 103, 237-244.
• Blume, E., Bischoff, M., Reichert, J.M., Moorman, T., Konopka, A., Turco, R.F. 2002. Surface and subsurface microbial biomass, community structure and metabolic activity as a function of soil depth and season. Applied Soil Ecology. 20 (3), 171–181.
• Bradford, J. H. 2007. Frequency-dependent attenuation analysis of ground-penetrating radar data. Geophysics, 72(3), J7-J16.
• Boumaiza, L., Chesnaux, R., Walter, J., Lenhard, R. J., Hassanizadeh, S. M., Dokou, Z., Alazaiza, M.Y. 2022. Predicting vertical LNAPL distribution in the subsurface under the fluctuating water table effect. Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation, 42(2), 47-58.
• Carey, A. A. 1998. The dielectric constant of lubrication oils. Computational Systems Incorporated.
• Campbell, L.D., Lucius, J.E., Maryla, D.P. 1996. Monitoring of a controlled LNAPL spill using ground penetrating radar. The Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, 511–517.
• Cassidy, N. J. 2007. Evaluating LNAPL contamination using GPR signal attenuation analysis and dielectric property measurements: Practical implications for hydrological studies. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 94(1-2), 49-75.
• Charbeneau, R.J., Weaver, J.W., Lien, B.K., 1995. The Hydrocarbon spill screening model (HSSM) Volume 2: Theoretical Background and Source Codes. USEPA Publication EPA/600/R-94/039b. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
• Daniels, D. J., Gunton, D. J., Scott, H. F. 1988. Introduction to subsurface radar, In IEE Proceedings F, Communications, Radar and Signal Processing 135, 4, 278-320.
• Daniels, J. J., Roberts, R., Vendl, M. 1995. Ground penetrating radar for the detection of liquid contaminants, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 33(1-3), 195-207.
• Davis, J.L., Annan, A.P. 1989. Ground penetrating radar for high resolution mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy. Geophysics Prospect, 37, 531–551.
• de Castro, D. L., Branco, R. M. G. C. 2003. 4-D ground penetrating radar monitoring of a hydrocarbon leakage site in Fortaleza (Brazil) during its remediation process: a case history. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 54(1-2), 127-144.
• DeRyck, S. M., Redman, J. D., Annan, A. P. 1993. Geophysical monitoring of a controlled kerosene spill, In 6th Environmental and Engineering Geophysics Society Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, 5-19, 209.
• Douglas, D. G., Burns, A. A., Rino, C. L., Maresca, J. W. 1992. Study to determine the feasibility of using a ground-penetrating radar for more-effective remediation of subsurface contamination, PB-92- 169382/XAB).
• Ebrahimi, F., Lenhard, R. J., Nakhaei, M., Nassery, H. R. 2019. An approach to optimize the location of LNAPL recovery wells using the concept of a LNAPL specific yield, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(28), 28714-28724.
• El-Fadel, M., Khoury, R. 2001. Strategies for vehicle waste-oil management: a case study. Resources, conservation and recycling, 33(2), 75-91.
• Grumman Jr, D. L., Daniels, J. J. 1995. Experiments on the detection of organic contaminants in the vadose zone. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 1(A), 31-38.
• Hagrey, S. A. 2004. GPR application for mapping toluene infiltration in a heterogeneous sand model. Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics, 9(2), 79-85.
• Kardos, S., Pietriková, A. 2016. Evaluation of motor oil characteristics and degradation factors for possibilities of continuous diagnostics, Acta Electrotechnica et Informatica, 16(2), 20-24.
• Kim, C., Daniels, J. J., Holt, J. J., Guy, E. D. 2000. A physical model experiment of the GPR response over gasoline, In 13th Environmental and Engineering Geophysics Society Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, 200, 303-310 European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers.
• Knight, R. 2001. Ground penetrating radar for environmental applications. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 29(1), 229-255.
• Lago, A. L., Elis, V. R., Borges, W. R., Penner, G. C. 2009. Geophysical investigation using resistivity and GPR methods: a case study of a lubricant oil waste disposal area in the city of Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil. Environmental Geology, 58(2), 407-417.
• Lane, J.W., Day-Lewis, F.D., Casey, C.C. 2006. Geophysical monitoring of a field-scale biostimulation pilot project, Ground Water, 44(3), 430–443.
• Maceiras, R., Alfonsín, V., Morales, F. J. 2017. Recycling of waste engine oil for diesel production. Waste management, 60, 351-356.
• Maxwell, M., Schmock, J. 1995. Detection and mapping of an LNAPL plume using GPR: A case study, in proceedings of the symposium on the application of geophysics to environmental and engineering problems, Environmental and Engineering Geophysics Society, Englewood, Colorado, p.15- 23.
• Mineo, S., Dell’Aera, F.M.L., Rizzotto, M. 2022. Evolution of LNAPL contamination plume in fractured aquifers. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 81(4), 1-14.
• Monier-Williams, M. 1995. Properties of light non aqueous phase liquids and detection using commonly applied shallow sensing geophysical techniques. The Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, 1–13.
• Nazifi, H. M., Gülen, L., Gürbüz, E., Pekşen, E. 2022. Time- lapse electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) monitoring of used engine oil contamination in laboratory setting. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 104531.
• Newell, C. J. 1995. Light nonaqueous phase liquids. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
• Noln, J.J., Harris, C., Cavanaugh, P.O. 1990. Used Oil: Disposal Options, Management Practices, and Potential Liability, third ed. Rockville, MD: Government Institutes.
• Olhoeft, G.R. 1986. Direct detection of hydrocarbon and organic chemicals with ground penetrating radar and complex resistivity, in Proceedings. of the NWWA/API Conference on Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water - Prevention, Detection and Restoration, Dublin, Ohio, 284-305.
• Olhoeft, G. R. 1992. Geophysical detection of hydrocarbons and organic chemical contamination. In 5th Environmental and Engineering Geophysics Society Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. 587-595.
• Osweiler, G., Buck, W., Lloyd, W. 1973. Epidemiology of lead poisoning in cattle - a five-year study in Iowa. Clinical Toxicology, 6(3), 367–376.
• Propst, T.L., Lochmiller, R.L., Qualis, C.W., McBee, K. Jr. 1999. In situ (mesocosm) assessment of immune- toxicity risks to small mammals inhabiting petrochemical waste sites. Chemosphere, 38, 1049– 1067.
• Redman, J.D., DeRyck, S.M., Annan, A.P. 1994. Detection of LNAPL pools with GPR: theoretical modelling and surveys of a controlled spill, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Ground- Penetrating Radar, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada, 1283-1294.
• Sas, B. 1989. Secondary copper deficiency in cattle caused by molybdenum contamination of fodder: A case history. Veterinary and Human Toxicology, 31(1), 29–33.
• Sauck, W.A., Atekwana, E.A., Nash, M.S. 1998. High conductivities associated with an LNAPL plume imaged by integrated geophysical techniques. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 2, 203–212.
• Schillig, P.C., Tsoflias, G.P., Roberts, J.A., Patterson, E.M., Devlin, J.F. 2010. Ground-penetrating radar observations of enhanced biological activity in a sandbox reactor, Journal of Geophysical Research, 115, G00G10.
• Sulba Rao Ch., Chandrashekhar, V. 2014. Detecting oil contamination by ground penetrating radar around an oil storage facility in Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India. Journal of Indian Geophysical Union, 18(4), 448-454.
• Tomlinson, D. W., Rivett, M. O., Wealthall, G. P., Sweeney, R. E. 2017. Understanding complex LNAPL sites: Illustrated handbook of LNAPL transport and fate in the subsurface. Journal of Environmental Management, 204, 748-756.
• US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service PHS, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
• USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) 1993. Use of Airborne, Surface, and Borehole Geophysical Techniques at Contaminated Sites.
• USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) 1996. How to Effectively Recover Free Product at Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites: A Guide for State Regulators.
• USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) 2000. Innovations in Site Characterization: Geophysical Investigation at Hazardous Waste Sites.
• Werkema Jr, D. D., Atekwana, E. A., Endres, A. L., Sauck, W. A., Cassidy, D. P. 2003. Investigating the geoelectrical response of hydrocarbon contamination undergoing biodegradation. Geophysical Research Letters, 30(12).
• Zekri, A. Y., Chaalal, O. 2005. Effect of temperature on biodegradation of crude oil. Energy Sources, 27(1- 2), 233-244.
• Zhou, E., Crawford, R. L. 1995. Effects of oxygen, nitrogen, and temperature on gasoline biodegradation in soil. Biodegradation, 6(2), 127-140.