A Novel Hypothesis for Migraine Disease Mechanism: The Creation of a New Attractor Responsible for Migraine Disease Symptoms

Year 2024, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 19 - 25, 31.03.2024

Farnaz Garehdaghi Yashar Sarbaz Elham Baradari

https://doi.org/10.51537/chaos.1345691

Abstract

Migraine Disease (MD) is one of the common primary headaches that can prevent patients from their everyday life. Despite the high prevalence, the pathophysiology of the disease has not been clearly understood yet. Here, the brain is considered as a dynamical system. The Chua’s circuit with a chaotic attractor is the proposed model. This attractor has a one-scroll mode representing a healthy brain and a double-scroll mode representing a migraine sufferer brain. We believe that MD and Chua’s systems have certain behavioral similarities. The boundaries of the attractor are the sensitive brain areas in which any small trigger can start the ictal phase of the migraine. The transition from the inter-ictal phase to the ictal phase in migraine patients occurs due to a decrease in serotonin levels when the brain is within the boundaries of the first attractor. Here, this is the results of the increase of system parameters. In addition, the transition from the ictal phase to the inter-ictal phase in a migraine sufferer brain is caused by a disruption of coordination in the brain’s structures and this lasts for a certain period for every migraine patient. The structures which are the result of the Migraine Generator Network (MGN) and Cortical Spreading Depression (CSD). This explanation may propose newer methods for preventing or curing MD. To better understand MD to control it and shrink the areas involved in this disease, it is better to know the dynamic systems better. It may help prevent the formation of migraine ictal attractor or even make the migraine ictal phase attractor smaller even after it has been formed.

Keywords

Headache, Ictal, Migraine sufferer, Complex Dynamic System, Chaotic Attractor, Chua's System

Thanks

This manuscript was previously made online by biorxiv.org doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.13.516319

References

• Al-Karagholi, M. A.-M., H. Ghanizada, C. A.W. Nielsen, C. Skandarioon, J. Snellman, et al., 2021 Opening of bkca channels causes migraine attacks: a new downstream target for the treatment of migraine. Pain 162: 2512–2520.
• Ashina, S., E. Bentivegna, P. Martelletti, and K. Eikermann-Haerter, 2021 Structural and functional brain changes in migraine. Pain and Therapy 10: 211–223.
• Aslan, Z., 2021 Migraine detection from eeg signals using tunable q-factor wavelet transform and ensemble learning techniques. Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine 44: 1201–1212.
• Bayani, A., S. Jafari, J. Sprott, and B. Hatef, 2018 A chaotic model of migraine headache considering the dynamical transitions of this cyclic disease. Europhysics Letters 123: 10006.
• Bellotti, R., F. De Carlo, M. de Tommaso, and M. Lucente, 2007 Migraine detection through spontaneous eeg analysis. In 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 1834–1837, IEEE.
• Bic, Z., G. G. Blix, H. P. Hopp, F. M. Leslie, and M. J. Schell, 1999 The influence of a low-fat diet on incidence and severity of migraine headaches. Journal of women’s health & gender-based medicine 8: 623–630.
• Chamanzar, A., M. Behrmann, and P. Grover, 2020 Ultra highdensity eeg recording of interictal migraine and controls: Sensory and rest.
• Charles, A., 2013 Migraine: a brain state. Current opinion in neurology 26: 235–239.
• Chua, L. O., 1993 A zoo of strange attractors from the canonical chua’s circuits. volume 35, pp. 916–916.
• Dahlem, M. A., J. Kurths, M. D. Ferrari, K. Aihara, M. Scheffer, et al., 2015 Understanding migraine using dynamic network biomarkers. Cephalalgia 35: 627–630.
• Dahlem, M. A., S. Rode, A. May, N. Fujiwara, Y. Hirata, et al., 2013 Towards dynamical network biomarkers in neuromodulation of episodic migraine. Translational neuroscience 4: 282–294.
• Goadsby, P. J., P. R. Holland, M. Martins-Oliveira, J. Hoffmann, C. Schankin, et al., 2017 Pathophysiology of migraine: a disorder of sensory processing. Physiological reviews .
• Haemmerl, L. and T. Kraya, 2023 Migraine and mitochondrial diseases: Energy deficit in the brain. Schmerz (Berlin, Germany).
• Hargreaves, R. and S. Shepheard, 1999 Pathophysiology of migraine— new insights. Canadian journal of neurological sciences 26: 12–19.
• Hauser, S. and S. A. Josephson, 2010 Harrison’s neurology in clinical medicine. McGraw Hill Professional.
• Hoffmann, J. and A. Charles, 2018 Glutamate and its receptors as therapeutic targets for migraine. Neurotherapeutics 15: 361–370.
• Jindal, K., R. Upadhyay, H. Singh, M. Vijay, A. Sharma, et al., 2018 Migraine disease diagnosis from eeg signals using non-linear feature extraction technique. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research (ICCIC), pp. 1–4, IEEE.
• Lane, R. and P. davies, 2006 Migraine. CRC Press.
• Lipton, R. B. and M. E. Bigal, 2006 Migraine and other Headache Disorders. CRC Press.
• Park, C. G. and M. K. Chu, 2022 Interictal plasma glutamate levels are elevated in individuals with episodic and chronic migraine. Scientific Reports 12: 6921.
• Pietrobon, D. and M. A. Moskowitz, 2013 Pathophysiology of migraine. Annual review of physiology 75: 365–391.
• Ramadan, N. M., 2003 The link between glutamate and migraine. CNS spectrums 8: 446–449.
• Scheffer, M., A. van den Berg, and M. D. Ferrari, 2013 Migraine strikes as neuronal excitability reaches a tipping point. PloS one 8: e72514.
• Stovner, L., K. Hagen, R. Jensen, Z. Katsarava, R. Lipton, et al., 2007 The global burden of headache: a documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide. Cephalalgia 27: 193–210.