Türkiye'de Çevre Dostu Davranışların Belirleyicileri: Çevresel Bilgi, İklim Değişikliği Şüpheciliği ve Sosyo-Demografik Faktörlerin Rolü

Year 2025, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 1128 - 1146, 25.05.2025

Özcan Özkan

https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.1539905

Abstract

Bu çalışma, Türkiye'deki çevre dostu davranışların (Pro-Environmental Behaviours - PEBs) belirleyicilerini, 2010 yılında gerçekleştirilen Life in Transition Survey II (LITS II) verilerini kullanarak incelemektedir. Özellikle, bu çalışma, PEB belirleyicilerini Türkiye genelini temsil eden ulusal düzeyde bir örneklemle analiz eden ilk çalışma olup, belirli bölgeler veya gruplar yerine tüm ülke genelinde bu davranışların kapsamlı bir şekilde anlaşılmasını sağlamaktadır. Lojistik regresyon tahmin tekniği kullanılarak yapılan analiz, yaş, cinsiyet, çocuk sahibi olma ve istihdam durumu gibi geleneksel sosyo-demografik faktörlerin PEB üzerinde sınırlı bir etkisinin olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Buna karşılık, çevresel bilgi düzeyi ve iklim değişikliği konusundaki endişeler önemli belirleyiciler olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Çevre bilinci yüksek olan bireyler, çevresel zararı azaltacak davranışlarda bulunma eğilimindedir; bu da eğitim ve farkındalık kampanyalarının kritik rolünü vurgulamaktadır. Ancak, etkileşim etkileri, daha yüksek eğitim seviyesinin çevresel bilgi ile birlikte PEB'leri genellikle artırdığı, ancak iklim değişikliği şüpheciliğinin bu olumlu ilişkiyi zayıflatabileceğini göstermektedir. Sonuçlar, Türkiye'de çevre dostu davranışları teşvik etmek için eğitim, kamu farkındalığı ve politika önlemlerini birleştiren kapsamlı bir stratejinin gerekli olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu bulgular, Türkiye’nin ekonomik gelişimini çevresel sürdürülebilirlik ilkeleriyle uyumlu hale getirmeyi amaçlayan politika yapıcılar için önemli iç görüler sunmakta ve daha etkili ulusal çevre politikalarının tasarlanmasını desteklemektedir.

Keywords

Çevre Dostu Davranışlar, Çevresel Bilgi, İklim Değişikliği Şüpheciliği, Çevresel Sürdürülebilirlik

Determinants of Pro-Environmental Behaviours in Türkiye: The Role of Environmental Knowledge, Climate Change Scepticism, and Socio-Demographic Factors

Abstract

This study investigates the determinants of pro-environmental behaviours (PEBs) in Türkiye, utilizing data from the 2010 wave of the Life in Transition Survey II (LITS II). Notably, this study is the first to analyse PEB determinants using a nationally representative sample of Türkiye, rather than focusing on specific regions or groups, thereby offering a comprehensive understanding of these behaviours across the country. Employing a logistic regression estimation technique, the analysis reveals that traditional socio-demographic indicators including age, gender, having children, and employment status exert limited influence on PEBs. In contrast, environmental knowledge and concern about climate change are identified as significant determinants. Individuals with higher levels of environmental awareness demonstrate a greater propensity to engage in behaviours that mitigate environmental harm, underscoring the critical role of educational and awareness campaigns. Interaction effects suggest that while higher education and environmental awareness usually encourage pro-environmental behaviours (PEBs), this positive link might be weakened by skepticism about climate change. The results indicate that a comprehensive strategy, combining education, public awareness, and policy measures, is crucial for promoting PEBs in Türkiye. These findings provide important insights for policymakers aiming to align Türkiye’s economic development with the principles of environmental sustainability, thereby supporting the design of more effective national environmental policies.

Keywords

Pro-Environmental Behaviours, Environmental Knowledge, Climate Change Scepticism, Environmental Sustainability

References

• Adao, B., Narajabad, B. & Temzelides, T. (2024). Renewable technology adoption costs and economic growth. Energy Economics, 129, 107255.
• Ágoston, C., Balázs, B., Mónus, F. & Varga, A. (2024). Age differences and profiles in pro-environmental behavior and eco-emotions. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 48(2), 132-144.
• Ahmad, M., Muslija, A. & Satrovic, E. (2021). Does economic prosperity lead to environmental sustainability in developing economies? Environmental Kuznets Curve Theory. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(18), 22588-22601.
• Ahmat Zainuri, N., Abd-Rahman, N., Halim, L., Chan, M. Y. & Mohd Bazari, N. N. (2022). Measuring pro-environmental behavior triggered by environmental values. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), 16013.
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
• Alvarado, R. & Toledo, E. (2017). Environmental degradation and economic growth: Evidence for a developing country. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 19, 1205-1218.
• Amoah, A. & Addoah, T. (2021). Does environmental knowledge drive pro-environmental behaviour in developing countries? Evidence from households in Ghana. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(2), 2719-2738.
• Ateş, H. (2020). Merging theory of planned behavior and value identity personal norm model to explain pro-environmental behaviors. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 24, 169-180.
• Aydin, M., Sogut, Y. & Erdem, A. (2024). The role of environmental technologies, institutional quality, and globalization on environmental sustainability in European Union countries: New evidence from advanced panel data estimations. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(7), 10460-10472.
• Begum, R. A., Siwar, C., Pereira, J. J. & Jaafar, A. H. (2009). Attitude and behavioral factors in waste management in the construction industry of Malaysia. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 53(6), 321-328.
• Bülbül, H., Büyükkeklik, A., Topal, A. & Özoğlu, B. (2020). The relationship between environmental awareness, environmental behaviors, and carbon footprint in Turkish households. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(20), 25009-25028.
• Çevre, Şehircilik ve İklim Değişikliği Bakanlığı. (2021). Türkiye’nin Paris iklim anlaşması taahhüdü ve uygulama süreci. Ankara: Çevre, Şehircilik ve İklim Değişikliği Bakanlığı Yayınları. https://csb.gov.tr
• Clayton, S., Devine-Wright, P., Stern, P. C., Whitmarsh, L., Carrico, A., Steg, L., ... & Bonnes, M. (2015). Psychological research and global climate change. Nature Climate Change, 5(7), 640-646.
• Coelho, F., Pereira, M. C., Cruz, L., Simões, P. & Barata, E. (2017). Affect and the adoption of pro-environmental behaviour: A structural model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 54, 127-138.
• Composto, J. W., Constantino, S. M. & Weber, E. U. (2023). Predictors and consequences of pro-environmental behavior at work. Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology, 4, 100107.
• Cramer, J. S. (2003). The origins and development of the logit model. Logit Models from Economics and Other Fields, 2003, 1-19.
• Cramer, J. S. (2007). Robustness of logit analysis: Unobserved heterogeneity and mis‐specified disturbances. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(4), 545-555.
• Demaris, A. (1992). Logit modeling: Practical applications (Vol. 86). Sage.
• Dietz, T., Gardner, G. T., Gilligan, J., Stern, P. C. & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2009). Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(44), 18452-18456.
• Dreijerink, L., Handgraaf, M. & Antonides, G. (2022). The impact of personal motivation on perceived effort and performance of pro-environmental behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 977471.
• Eriksson, L., Garvill, J. & Nordlund, A. M. (2008). Acceptability of single and combined transport policy measures: The importance of environmental and policy specific beliefs. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(8), 1117-1128.
• European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. (2011). Life in transition survey II: A survey of people's experiences and attitudes. London: EBRD. Retrieved from https://www.ebrd.com/what-we-do/economic-research-and-data/data/lits.html
• European Commission. (2022). The European Green Deal. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/clima/eu-action/european-green-deal_en
• Ganie, A. U. H., Khah, A. M. & Ahmad, M. (2024). Investigating the agriculture-induced environmental kuznets curve hypothesis in south asian economies. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences.
• Gill, A. R., Viswanathan, K. K. & Hassan, S. (2018). The environmental kuznets curve (EKC) and the environmental problem of the day. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 1636-1642.
• Haldorai, K., Kim, W. G., Mussina, K. & Li, J. J. (2024). From personal convictions to collective action: Predicting employees’ pro-environmental behaviors in public and private spheres. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 122, 103864.
• Hamzah, M. I. & Tanwir, N. S. (2021). Do pro-environmental factors lead to purchase intention of hybrid vehicles? The moderating effects of environmental knowledge. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123643.
• Hernández-Alemán, A., Cruz-Pérez, N. & Santamarta, J. C. (2024). The average direct, indirect and total effects of environmental concern on pro-environmental behavior. Land, 13(8), 1229.
• Inskeep, B. D. & Attari, S. Z. (2014). The water short list: The most effective actions US households can take to curb water use. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 56(4), 4-15.
• Juvan, E. & Dolnicar, S. (2017). Drivers of pro-environmental tourist behaviours are not universal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166, 879-890.
• Kennedy, E. H. & Kmec, J. (2018). Reinterpreting the gender gap in household pro-environmental behaviour. Environmental Sociology, 4(3), 299-310.
• Kurisu, K. & Kurisu, K. (2015). What are pro-environmental behaviors (PEBs)?. Springer Japan.
• Larson, L. R., Stedman, R. C., Cooper, C. B. & Decker, D. J. (2015). Understanding the multi-dimensional structure of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 112-124.
• Legault, L., Bird, S. & Heintzelman, M. D. (2024). Pro-environmental, prosocial, pro-self, or does it depend? A more nuanced understanding of the motivations underlying residential solar panel adoption. Energy Research & Social Science, 111, 103481.
• Li, D., Zhao, L., Ma, S., Shao, S. & Zhang, L. (2019). What influences an individual’s pro-environmental behavior? A literature review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146, 28-34.
• Li, Y., Wang, B. & Saechang, O. (2022). Is female a more pro-environmental gender? Evidence from China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13), 8002.
• Lobato, N. C. C., Villegas, E. A. & Mansur, M. B. (2015). Management of solid wastes from steelmaking and galvanizing processes: A brief review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 102, 49-57.
• Longhi, S. (2014). Residential energy use and the relevance of changes in household circumstances (No. 2014-22). ISER Working Paper Series.
• Lu, H., Liu, X., Chen, H., Long, R. & Yue, T. (2017). Who contributed to “corporation green” in China? A view of public-and private-sphere pro-environmental behavior among employees. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 120, 166-175.
• Lye, C. T., Ng, T. H. & Law, J. W. (2024). The role of general and specific pro-environmental education in household waste management in Malaysia: Evidence from quantile regression. Environmental Challenges, 15, 100933.
• Meyer, A. (2015). Does education increase pro-environmental behavior? Evidence from Europe. Ecological Economics, 116, 108-121.
• Mikuła, A., Raczkowska, M. & Utzig, M. (2021). Pro-Environmental Behaviour in the European Union countries. Energies, 14(18), 5689.
• Milfont, T. L., Poortinga, W. & Sibley, C. G. (2020). Does Having Children Increase Environmental Concern? Testing Parenthood Effects with Longitudinal Data from the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study. PLoS One, 15(3), e0230361.
• Morren, M. & Grinstein, A. (2016). explaining environmental behavior across borders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 91-106.
• Norton, T. A., Zacher, H., Parker, S. L. & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2017). Bridging the gap between green behavioral intentions and employee green behavior: The role of green psychological climate. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(7), 996-1015.
• Nuţă, F. M., Sharafat, A., Abban, O. J., Khan, I., Irfan, M., Nuţă, A. C., ... & Asghar, M. (2024). The relationship among urbanization, economic growth, renewable energy consumption, and environmental degradation: A comparative view of european and asian emerging economies. Gondwana Research, 128, 325-339.
• Obiagu, A., Ocheje, J., Ofodum, I. & Eze, E. (2024). Fostering environmental personal norms: The role of environmental education in Nigerian pre-service teachers’ environmental knowledge, pro-environmental beliefs and behaviours. Environmental Education Research, 30(8), 1231-1246.
• Ogiemwonyi, O. (2024). Determinants of green behavior (Revisited): A comparative study. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances, 22, 200214.
• Panarello, D. (2021). Economic insecurity, conservatism, and the crisis of environmentalism: 30 years of evidence. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 73, 100925.
• Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, D., Goldman, D., Hadjichambis, A. C., Parra, G., Lapin, K., Knippels, M. C. & Van Dam, F. (2020). Educating for environmental citizenship in non-formal frameworks for secondary level youth. Conceptualizing Environmental Citizenship for 21st Century Education, 213-235.
• Parth, A. M. (2024). The relationship between work-family policies and pro-environmental behaviour of single mothers as economically disadvantaged group. Environmental Sociology, 1-13.
• Patel, J., Modi, A. & Paul, J. (2017). Pro-environmental behavior and socio-demographic factors in an emerging market. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 189-214.
• Pisano, I. & Lubell, M. (2017). Environmental behavior in cross-national perspective: A multilevel analysis of 30 countries. Environment and Behavior, 49(1), 31-58.
• Pong, V. & Tam, K. P. (2023). Relationship between global identity and pro-environmental behavior and environmental concern: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1033564.
• Purcel, A. A. (2020). New insights into the environmental kuznets curve hypothesis in developing and transition economies: A literature survey. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 22(4), 585-631.
• Ramayah, T., Lee, J. W. C. & Mohamad, O. (2010). Green product purchase intention: Some insights from a developing country. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(12), 1419-1427.
• Rampedi, I. T. & Ifegbesan, A. P. (2022). Understanding the determinants of pro-environmental behavior among south africans: Evidence from a structural equation model. Sustainability, 14(6), 3218.
• Republic of Turkey Ministry of Environment and Urbanization. (2016). National report on climate change adaptation strategy. Ankara: Ministry of Environment and Urbanization.
• Rüttenauer, T. (2023). More talk, no action? The link between exposure to extreme weather events, climate change belief and pro-environmental behaviour. European Societies, 1-25.
• Saracli, S. & Boca, G. D. (2021). Factors influencing students’ environmental behavior for sustainable development. Environmental Engineering & Management Journal (EEMJ), 20(1).
• Scruggs, L. & Benegal, S. (2012). Declining public concern about climate change: Can we blame the great recession?. Global Environmental Change, 22(2), 505-515.
• Smith, M. A. & Kingston, S. (2021). Demographic, attitudinal, and social factors that predict pro-environmental behavior. Sustainability and Climate Change, 14(1), 47-54.
• Steg, L. & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309-317.
• Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424.
• Tam, K. P. & Chan, H. W. (2017). Environmental concern has a weaker association with pro-environmental behavior in some societies than others: A cross-cultural psychology perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 213-223.
• Tavitiyaman, P., Zhang, X. & Chan, H. M. (2024). Impact of environmental awareness and knowledge on purchase intention of an eco-friendly hotel: Mediating role of habits and attitudes. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights.
• Tezel, E., Ugural, M. & Giritli, H. (2018). Pro-environmental behavior of university students: Influence of cultural differences. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(4), 43-43.
• Thomas, G. O., Fisher, R., Whitmarsh, L., Milfont, T. L. & Poortinga, W. (2018). The impact of parenthood on environmental attitudes and behaviour: A longitudinal investigation of the legacy hypothesis. Population and Environment, 39, 261-276.
• Udall, A. M., de Groot, J. I., de Jong, S. B. & Shankar, A. (2020). How do i see myself? A systematic review of identities in pro‐environmental behaviour research. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 19(2), 108-141.
• United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2015). The Paris Agreement. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement
• United Nations. (2023). Sustainable development goals. Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/goals
• Vicente-Molina, M. A., Fernández-Sainz, A. & Izagirre-Olaizola, J. (2018). Does gender make a difference in pro-environmental behavior? The case of the basque country university students. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 89-98.
• Wang, Q., Wang, X., Li, R. & Jiang, X. (2024). Reinvestigating the environmental kuznets curve (EKC) of carbon emissions and ecological footprint in 147 countries: A matter of trade protectionism. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-17.
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press.
• Worldometers. (2024). Türkiye population. https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/Türkiye-population/ (August 21, 2024)
• Wullenkord, M. C. & Reese, G. (2021). Avoidance, rationalization, and denial: Defensive self-protection in the face of climate change negatively predicts pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 77, 101683.
• Wut, T. M., Ng, P., Kan, H. K. M. & Fong, C. S. (2021). Does gender matter? Attitude towards waste charging policy and pro-environmental behaviours. Social Responsibility Journal, 17(8), 1100-1115.
• Yamashita, R. & An, B. (2024). Runners’ pro-environmental behavior: The role of place attachment and environmental concern. Journal of Global Sport Management, 9(1), 230-247.
• Yang, Y., Zhu, Y., Wang, X. & Li, Y. (2022). The perception of environmental information disclosure on rural residents’ pro-environmental behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13), 7851.
• Yu, P. L., Ab Ghafar, N., Adam, M. & Goh, H. C. (2022). Understanding the human dimensions of recycling and source separation practices at the household level: An evidence in Perak, Malaysia. Sustainability, 14(13), 8023.
• Zhang, G., Wang, L. & Meng, H. (2024). Environmental knowledge level and consumer behavior regarding green fashion: A moderated mediation model. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 36(4), 977-992.
• Zhu, Y., Wang, Y. & Liu, Z. (2021). How does social interaction affect pro-environmental behaviors in China? The mediation role of conformity. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 690361.