Ürün Karmaşıklığı ve İhracat Rekabetçiliği: Türkiye Örneği

Year 2025, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 785 - 810, 25.05.2025

Mert Can Duman , Ayşen Sivrikaya

https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.1552394

Abstract

Bu çalışma, ürün karmaşıklığı, reel efektif döviz kuru, yurtdışı talebi, genel rekabet gücü ve kurumsal kalite gibi çeşitli unsurlara odaklanarak ihracat rekabetçiliğinin belirleyicilerini araştırmaktadır. Bu amaçla, Genelleştirilmiş Momentler Yöntemi (GMM) tekniği 1996-2021 dönemi için Türkiye ekonomisi verilerine uygulanmaktadır. Elde edilen bulgular, ürün karmaşıklığının Türkiye’nin ihracat rekabetçiliği üzerinde anlamlı ve olumsuz bir etkiye sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu bulgu yüksek karmaşıklıktaki ürünlerin Türkiye’nin ihracat rekabet gücünde zorluklar oluşturduğuna işaret etmektedir. Bununla birlikte, döviz kuru dalgalanmalarının istatistiki olarak anlamsız bir etkiye sahip olduğu bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır. Ayrıca, yurtdışı talep ile GCI’nin ihracat performansına anlamlı ve olumlu etki ettiği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Bu çalışmanın bulgularına dayanarak birçok politika önerisi geliştirilebilir. Bunların arasında maliyet etkin üretimin desteklenmesi ve beceri geliştirme ve teknoloji odaklı endüstrilere geçiş yoluyla karmaşık ürünlerde rekabetçilik gücünün artırılması yer almaktadır. Ayrıca, döviz kuru istikrarını korumak ve inovasyona, altyapıya ve makroekonomik istikrara odaklanmanın ihracat rekabetçiliğini artırmadaki önemi ortaya konmaktadır.

Keywords

Uluslararası Ticaret, İhracat Rekabetçiliği, Ürün Karmaşıklığı, Sofistikasyon, Türkiye Ekonomisi

Product Complexity and Export Competitiveness: Evidence from Türkiye

Abstract

This study investigates the determinants of export competitiveness by focusing on various factors, including product complexity, real effective exchange rate (REER), foreign demand, overall competitiveness, and institutional quality. Using the Turkish economy as a case study from 1996 to 2021, we employ the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) technique to analyze these factors. The findings show that product complexity has a significant and negative effect on Türkiye's export competitiveness, suggesting that high-complexity products pose challenges in Türkiye’s export competitiveness. Moreover, exchange rate fluctuations are found to have an insignificant impact. Economic growth in major export destinations and overall competitiveness have positive and significant impacts on export performance. This study provides several policy implications, including enhancing export competitiveness in complex products through cost-effective production, skill development, and a shift toward technology-driven industries. Furthermore, maintaining macroeconomic stability and focusing on innovation and infrastructure are crucial for boosting export competitiveness.

Keywords

International Trade, Export Competitiveness, Product Complexity, Sophistication, Turkish Economy

Ethical Statement

The authors declare that ethical rules are followed in all preparation processes of this study. In the case of a contrary situation, Fiscaeconomia has no responsibility, and all responsibility belongs to the study's authors.

References

• Abdouli, M. & Hammami, S. (2017). The impact of FDI inflows and environmental quality on economic growth: An empirical study for the MENA countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 8(1), 254-278.
• Abudureheman, M., Jiang, Q., Dong, X., & Dong, C. (2022). CO2 emissions in China: Does the energy rebound matter? Energies, 15(12), 42-79.
• Adriana, G. & Anca, D. (2009). Globalisation and export competitiveness: a theoretical approach. Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Science Series, 18(1), 318-324.
• Ahmed, M. (2010). Trade competitiveness and growth in the MENA region. The Arab World Competitiveness Review, 23-26.
• Ailenei, D., & Mosora, L.-C. (2011). Economics of sustainable development: Competitiveness and economic growth. Theoretical and Applied Economics, XVIII(2(555)), 5-12.
• Akdeniz, G. & Kantar, A. (2022). Analysis of honey export potential and competitiveness of Türkiye. Bee Studies, 14(2), 55-61.
• Akkemik, A. (2011). Customs union and competitiveness of Turkish exports in the EU market: A dynamic shift-share analysis. Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, 3(2), 247-274.
• Altay Topçu, B. & Sümerli Sarıgül, S. (2015). Comparative advantage and the product mapping of exporting sectors in Turkey. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi (18), 330-348.
• Amar, M. B. & Hamdi, M. T. (2012). Global competitiveness and economic growth: Empirical verification for African Countries. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(6), 125-131.
• Amir, M. (2000). Trade liberalisation and Malaysian export competitiveness: Prospects, problems and policy implication. Conference on International Trade Education and Research. Melbourne.
• Antimiani, A. & Henke, R. (2007). Old and new partners: Similarity and competition in the EU foreign agri-food trade. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavic, 4(3), 129-138.
• Arellano, M. & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equations get access arrow. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.
• Aslanoğlu, E., Erdoğan, O. & Deniz, P. (2021). Export sophistication and its impact on growth: Case study for MENA countries. Marmara University Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 43(2), 285-301.
• Aydın, M. & Tetik, M. (2024). The impact of technology transfer on sesame export competitiveness: Insights from Turkey and Uzbekistan. Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 24(1), 87-96.
• Balabanis, G. & Katsikea, E. (2003). Being an entrepreneurial exporter: does it pay?. International Business Review, 12(2), 233-252.
• Balassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalization and revealed comparative advantage. The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 33, 99-123.
• Bashimov, G. (2017). MINT ülkelerinde ihracatın açıklanmış karşılaştırmalı üstünlükler perspektifinden analizi: Tarım ve gıda ürünleri örneği. Giresun Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 3(6), 235-253.
• Bayar, G. (2022). Turkey's sectoral exports: A competitiveness approach. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 27(2), 2268-2289.
• Bruneckiene, J. & Paltanaviciene, D. (2012). Measurement of export competitiveness of the Baltic states by composite index. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 23(1), 50-62.
• Cadogan, J., Diamantopoulos, A. & Siguaw, J. (2002). Export market-oriented activities: Their antecedents and performance consequences. Journal of International Business Studies, (33), 615–626.
• CBRT (2024). Weighted average interest rates applied to loans opened by banks.
• Çetin, M. & Yılmaz, G. (2017). Organic agriculture practice in Turkey as a value chain creating model of agricultural production. 2nd World Conference on Technology, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. İstanbul: Press Academia.
• Chinn, M. D. (2006). A Primer on real effective exchange rates: Determinants, overvaluation, trade flows and competitive devaluation. Open Economies Review, (17), 115-143.
• Dalum, B., Laursen, K. & Villumsen, G. (1998). Structural change in OECD export specialisation patterns: de-specialisation and 'stickiness'. International Review of Applied Economics, 12(3), 423-443.
• Donges, J. B., Krieger-Boden, C., Langhammer, R., Schatz, K.-W. & Thoroe, C. (1982). The second enlargement of the European Community: adjustment requirements and challenges for policy reform. Mohr, Tübingen: Kieler Studien, No. 171.
• Duman, M. C. (2024). Türk sanayiinde ihracat rekabetçiliği kalıpları. Efil Journal of Economic Research, 7(1), 118-130.
• Erkan, B. & Sarıçoban, K. (2014). Comparative analysis of the competitiveness in the export of science-based goods regarding Turkey and the EU+13 countries. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 5, 8(1), 117-130.
• Erkan, B. & Yıldırımcı, E. (2015). Economic complexity and export competitiveness: The case of Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (195), 524-533.
• Erlat, G. & Ekmen Özçelik, S. (2009). Export smilarity and competiteveness: The case of Turkey in the EU markets . EconAnadolu International Conference in Economics. Eskişehir.
• Esterhuizen, D. & Van Rooyen, C. J. (2006). An inquiry into factors impacting on the competitiveness of the South African wine industry. Agrekon, 45(4), 467-485.
• Esteves, P. S. & Rua, A. (2015). Is there a role for domestic demand pressure on export performance?. Empirical Economics, (49), 1173–1189.
• Felipe, J., Kumar, U., Abdon, A. & Bacate, M. (2012). Product complexity and economic development. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23(1), 36-68.
• Ferrarini, B. & Scaramozzino, P. (2016). Production complexity, adaptability and economic growth. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, (37), 52–61.
• Fetscherin, M., Alon, I. & Johnson, J. P. (2010). Assessing the export competitiveness of Chinese industries. Asian Business & Management, 9(3), 401–424.
• Fetscherin, M., Alon, I., Johnson, J. P. & Pillania, R. K. (2012). Export competitiveness patterns in Indian industries. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 22(3), 188-206.
• Finger, J. & Kreinin, M. (1979). A measure of 'export similarity' and its possible uses. Economic Journal, 89(356), 905-912.
• Fischer, C. (2010). Food quality and product export performance: An empirical investigation of the EU situation. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 22:3-4, 210-233.
• Gardiner, B., Martin, R., & Tyler, P. (2012). Competitiveness, productivity and economic growth across the European regions. Regional Competitiveness (s. 55-77). içinde Routledge.
• Gaulier, G., & Zignago, S. (2010). BACI: International trade database at the product-level. The 1994-2007 version. CEPII Working Paper (2010-23).
• Growth Lab at the Harvard Kennedy School (2019). Growth projections and complexity rankings, V2 [Data set]. https://doi.org/10.7910/dvn/xtaqmc
• Güneri, B. & Yalta, A. (2020). Does economic complexity reduce output volatility in developing countries?. Bulletin of Economic Research, 73(3), 411-431.
• Guzman, M., Ocampo, J. & Stiglitz, J. (2018). Real exchange rate policies for economic development. World Development(110), 51-62.
• Hämäläinen, T. J. (2003). National competitiveness and economic growth. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Hartmann, D., Guevara, M., Jara-Figueroa, C., Aristaran, M. & Hidalgo, C. (2017). Linking economic complexity, institutions, and income inequality. World Development (93), 75-93.
• Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C. A., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., Simoes A. & Yildirim, M.A. (2014). The atlas of economic complexity: mapping paths to prosperity, MIT Press.
• Hidalgo, C. & Hausmann, R. (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(26), 10570–10575.
• Hidalgo, C. (2023). The policy implications of economic complexity. Research Policy, 52(9).
• Hong Kong Monetary Authority. (2023). Does Mainland China's competitiveness in exports benefit from its large domestic market?
• Hooy, C.-W., Law, S.-H. & Chan, T.-H. (2015). The impact of the Renminbi real exchange rate on ASEAN disaggregated exports to China. Economic Modelling, (47), 253-259.
• Huggins, R., Izushi, H., Prokop, D. & Thompson, P. (2014). Regional competitiveness, economic growth and stages of development. Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci: časopis za ekonomsku teoriju i praksu, 32(2), 255-283.
• Hüseyni, İ., İnan, S., Çelik, A. K. & İşleyen, Ş. (2024). A comparison of economic complexity in Türkiye and OECD countries: New data based on industrial products . Kybernetes.
• Jabkowski, D. & Kupsik, W. (2024). Competitiveness of the Turkish agri-food sector in trade with the European Union. Annals of the Polish Association of Agricultural and Agribusiness Economists, XXVI(1), 99-111.
• Kathuria, L. M. (2018). Comparative advantages in clothing exports: India faces threat from competing nations. Competitiveness Review, 28(5), 518-540.
• Kaufmann, D. & Kraay, A. (2023). Worldwide governance indicators, 2023 Update.
• Kavacık, M. (2023). What did Türkiye do in terms of export competitiveness after 2000?. Traders International Trade Academic Journal, 6(2), 119-149.
• Kılıçarslan, Z. (2021). Comparative analysis of the competitiveness in the steel sector: The case of top 10 steel-producing countries. Erciyes University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, (60), 755-773.
• Korez-Vide, R. & Tominc, P. (2016). Competitiveness, entrepreneurship and economic growth. P. Trąpczyński, Ł. Puślecki & M. Jarosiński, Competitiveness of CEE economies and businesses. Springer, Cham.
• Lafay, G. (1992). The measurement of revealed comparative advantages . International Trade Modelling, 209-234.
• Lages, L. F., Silva, G. & Styles, C. (2009). Relationship capabilities, quality, and innovation as determinants of export performance. Journal of International Marketing, 17(4), 47-70.
• Mayer, T. & Steingress, W. (2020). Estimating the effect of exchange rate changes on total exports. Journal of International Money and Finance(106).
• Mealy, P., Farmer, J. D. & Teytelboym, A. (2019). Interpreting economic complexity. Science Advances, 5(1).
• Mewes, L. & Broekel, T. (2022). Technological complexity and economic growth of regions. Research Policy, 51(8), 1-12.
• Michalopoulos, C. & Tarr, D. (2004). Are customs unions economically sensible in the commonwealth of independent states. World Bank.
• Muratoğlu, G. & Muratoğlu, Y. (2016). Determinants of export competitiveness: Evidence from OECD manufacturing. Journal of Economics and Political Economy, 3(1), 111-118.
• Nyeadi, J., Atiga, O. & Atogenzoya, C. (2014). The impact of exchange rate movement on export: Empirical evidence from Ghana. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 4(3), 41-48.
• O'Cass, A. & Julian, C. (2003). Examining firm and environmental influences on export marketing mix strategy and export performance of Australian exporters. European Journal of Marketing, (37), 366–384.
• Özdemir, Y. & Koç Aytekin, G. (2016). Avrupa Birliği (AB) gümrük birliği'nin Türkiye ekonomisine etkileri. Ufuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(9), , 45-59.
• Özözen, S. & Polat, M. A. (2023). Türkiye's international competitiveness and export performance in the textile sector: Comparative analysis with the world's top textile exporter countries. Journal of Management and Economics Research, 21(4), 171-193.
• Öztürk, F. & Topcu, Y. (2024). The effect of economic freedom on export sophistication in OECD countries. Fiscaoeconomia, 8(1), 126-148.
• Paul, J. & Dhiman, R. (2021). Three decades of export competitiveness literature: Systematic review, synthesis and future research agenda. International Marketing Review, 38(5), 1082-1111.
• Petrariu, I. R., Bumbac, R. & Ciobanu, R. (2013). Innovation: A path to competitiveness and economic growth The case of CEE countries. Theoretical and Applied Economics, XX(5(582)), 15-26.
• Pilinkiene, V. (2016). Trade openness, economic growth and competitiveness. The case of the Central and Eastern European countries /. Inžinerinė Ekonomik, ( 27(2)), 185-194.
• Rahmouni, O. (2018). Exports concentration and resilience to adverse shocks: empirical evidence from Africa. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, VI(10), 1-14.
• Riberio, A., Carvalho, V. & Santos, P. (2016). Export-led growth in the EU: Where and what to export? The International Trade Journal, 319-344.
• Rose, G. & Shoham, A. (2002). Export performance and market orientation: establishing an empirical link. Journal of Business Research, 55(3), 217-225.
• Saboniene, A. (2009). Lithuanian export competitiveness: Comparison with other Baltic states. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 2(62).
• Şahin, D. (2016). Analysis of foreign trade structure of Turkiye’s furniture industry. Journal of Life Economics, 3(3), 7-26.
• Serin, Z. V. & Civan, A. (2008). Revealed Comparative Advantage and Competitiveness: A Case Study for Turkey towards the EU Competitiveness of Turkish Fruit and Vegetable Sectors in EU Market. Journal of Economic and Social Research, 10(2), 25-41.
• Sivrikaya, A. (2022). The direct rebound effects of energy efficiency improvement projects and barriers and drivers of energy efficiency in Turkish industry sector.
• Sousa, C., Martinez-Lopez, F. & Coelho, F. (2008). The determinants of export performance: A review of the research in the literature between 1998 and 2005. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(4), 343-374.
• State Planinng Organization. (1978). Fourth five-year development plan 1985-1989. Ankara.
• State Planning Organization. (1984). Fifth five-year development plan 1985-1989. Organization, State Planning, Ankara.
• State Planning Organization. (2000). Eighth five-year development plan 2001-2005. Ankara.
• Sweidan, O. (2013). The effect of exchange rate on exports and imports: The case of Jordan. The International Trade Journal, 27(2), 156-172.
• Thorbecke, W., Chen, C. & Salike, N. (2021). The relationship between product complexity and exchange rate elasticities: Evidence from the People’s Republic of China’s manufacturing industries. Asian Development Review, (38), 189-212.
• Tomizawa, A., Zhao, L., Bassellier, G. & Ahlstrom, D. (2020). Economic growth, innovation, institutions, and the Great Enrichment. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, (37), 7-31.
• TURKSTAT. (2024). Foreign trade statistics, industrial production statistics, research and development activities survey.
• UN COMTRADE. (2015). Trade database. http://comtrade.un.org/
• UNCTAD. (2017). SITC rev.3 products, by technological categories (Lall (2000)). https://unctadstat.unctad.org/EN/Classifications/DimSitcRev3Products_Ldc_Hierarchy.pdf
• UNCTAD. (2024). International merchandise trade database.
• Ünlü, F. & Yıldız, R. (2019). Türkiye’de dış ticaretin teknolojik yapısının fasıl bazlı yoğunlaşma analizleri ile belirlenmesi. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(17), 7-26.
• Weldemicael, E. O. (2012). Determinants of export sophistication. The University of Melbourne, 27.
• Wilson, P. (2000). The export competitiveness of dynamic Asian economies 1983-1995. Journal of Economic Studies, 27(6), 541-565.
• World Economic Forum. The global competitiveness report.
• Xu, B. (2010). The sophistication of exports: Is China special?. China Economic Review, (21), 482–493.
• Yalta, A. & Sivrikaya, A. (2018). Is China’s current account surplus persistent? Implications for global imbalances. The Chinese Economy, (51), 534-547 .
• Yıldız, A. (2022). Uluslararası pazarlarda rekabet stratejileri ve türkiye’nin sebze ürünleri pazarında karşılaştırmalı rekabet gücü analizi: 2002-2020 dönemi. T. Benli (Ed.), Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler Araştırmaları (103-132). İstanbul: HiperYayın.