The Transformation of Intimate Relationships Among University Youth: The Case of Sakarya University

Year 2025, Issue: 71, 239 - 257, 27.06.2025

Özgür Kaya , Mehmet Tayfun Amman

https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2024-1561854

Abstract

This study aims to explore the dynamics of premarital intimate relationships among undergraduate students at Sakarya University, which represents a postmodern melting pot at the intersection of agricultural traditional and industrial modern societal characteristics. This positioning makes the university a microcosm of Turkish society, with its diverse student body offering an ideal sample to demonstrate secularizing trends and cultural aspects such as individualization, the culture industry, and extensive narcissism, all of which emerge under global influences. The survey was conducted with 740 participants using stratified random sampling under a quantitative research methodology, as this approach enhances representativeness and ensures more precise comparisons across subgroups, thereby improving the reliability and generalizability of the findings. Accordingly, a confidence interval of 90% and an error margin of 0.3 were ensured in the survey. The selected data include variables such as the students’ levels of religiosity, the types of education (faculties), ideological predispositions, urbanization, and the duration and frequency of their current relationships, as these factors are anticipated to best reflect secularization trends. Thus, several findings reveal some remarkable consequences. For instance, the lower the level of religiosity among young people, the more they tend to be flexible and relaxed in their premarital intimate approaches. Students brought up in urban cities have more intimate experiences in the premarital stage than their counterparts from rural areas. Those who give priority to material demands in terms of ideological predispositions are more prone to engage in premarital sexual activities than those who give preference to spiritual and moral requirements. As a result, this research can be considered a contribution to the debates on modernity in the Turkish context of intimate relationships and family studies.

Keywords

Secularization, Individualization, Urbanization, Intimacy, University Students

References

• Adorno, T., & Horkheimer, M. (2007). Dialectic of enlightenment. Stanford University Press. google scholar
• Amman, M. T. (2010). Türkiye’de ailenin açık ve örtülü sekülerleşmesinin sosyolojik analizi. In M. F. Bayraktar (Ed.), Aile ve eğitim (pp. 41– 70). Ensar Neşriyat. google scholar
• Armutçu, E. (2007). Türkiye cinselliğini konuşuyor. Doğan Kitap. google scholar
• Bauman, Z. (2003). Liquid love: On the frailty of human bonds. Polity Press. google scholar
• Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. SAGE Publications. google scholar
• Berger, P. L. (1990). The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. Anchor Books. google scholar
• Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (2015). Modernite, çoğulculuk ve anlam krizi (M. D. Dereli, Trans.). Heretik Yayıncılık. google scholar
• Bourgois, P. (2003). In search of respect: Selling crack in El Barrio. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
• Bruce, S. (2002). God is dead: Secularization in the West. Blackwell. google scholar
• Castells, M. (1977). The urban question: A Marxist approach (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Edward Arnold. google scholar
• Ceyhan, M. Ş. (2005). Üniversite gençliğinin cinselliğe bakış açısı [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Ankara Üniversitesi. google scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson. Çapçıoğlu, İ. (2018). Sekülerleşen toplumda bireyselleşen aile. Turkish Studies, 13(2), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.13343 Efe, E. (2013). Üniversite öğrencilerinin eş seçme eğilimleri [Unpublished master's thesis]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi. google scholar
• Ertit, V. (2018). God is dying in Turkey as well: Application of secularization theory to a non-Christian society. Open Theology, 4, 192–211. https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2018-0014 google scholar
• Ertit, V. (2019). Sekülerleşme teorisi. Liberte Yayınları. google scholar
• Garnham, N. (2007). Culture industries. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology (pp. 942–945). Blackwell Publishing. google scholar
• Glaeser, E. L. (2011). Triumph of the city: How our best inventions make us smarter, stronger, healthier, and happier. Penguin Press. google scholar
• Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford University Press. google scholar
• Göle, N. (2019). Modern mahrem: Medeniyet ve örtünme. Metis Yayınları. google scholar
• Gürbilek, N. (2001). Vitrinde yaşamak: 1980’lerin kültürel iklimi. Metis Yayınları. google scholar
• Harvey, D. (2016). Kent deneyimi (E. Soğancılar, Trans.). Sel Yayıncılık. google scholar
• Hillman, N. (2021). Sex and relationships among students: Summary report (HEPI Policy Note 30). Higher Education Policy Institute. google scholar
• Illouz, E. (2012). Why love hurts: A sociological explanation. Polity Press. google scholar
• Illouz, E. (2024). Romantik ütopyayı tüketmek: Aşk ve kapitalizmin kültürel çelişkileri (G. Boztepe, Trans.). Livera Yayınevi. google scholar
• Kahraman, H. B. (2010). Cinsellik, görsellik, pornografi. Agora Kitaplığı. google scholar
• Kaya, F., Serin, Ö., & Genç, A. (2007). Eğitim fakültesi birinci sınıf öğrencilerinin cinsel yaşamlarına ilişkin yaklaşımlarının belirlenmesi. TSK Koruyucu Hekimlik Bülteni, 6(6), 441–448. google scholar
• Kaya, İ. (2006). Sosyal teori ve geç modernlikler: Türk deneyimi. İmge Kitabevi. google scholar
• Kaya, Ö. (2024). Üniversite gençliğinde romantik ilişkilerin dönüşümü [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Sakarya Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. google scholar
• Kaymakcan, R. (2021). Gençlerin dine bakışı ve okullarda din-değerler öğretimi. Dem Yayınları. google scholar
• Kellner, D., & Best, S. (2011). Postmodern teori (M. Küçük, Trans.). Ayrıntı Yayınları. google scholar
• Kelly, M. G. E. (2022). Normal now: Individualism as conformity. Polity Press. google scholar
• Keyes, R. (2004). The post-truth era: Dishonesty and deception in contemporary life. St. Martin’s Griffin. google scholar
• Klinenberg, E. (2013). Going solo: The extraordinary rise and surprising appeal of living alone. Penguin Books. google scholar
• Kozanoğlu, C. (1999). Cilalı imaj devri: 1980’lerden 90’lara Türkiye ve starları. İletişim Yayınları. google scholar
• Lasch, C. (1991). The culture of narcissism: American life in an age of diminishing expectations. W. W. Norton & Company. google scholar
• Luckmann, T. (2023). The invisible religion: The problem of religion in modern society (T. Kaden & B. Schnettler, Eds.). Routledge. google scholar
• Marcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Beacon Press. google scholar
• Mardin, Ş. (2017). Türkiye’de toplum ve siyaset (M. Türköne & T. Önder, Eds.). İletişim Yayınları. google scholar
• McIntyre, L. (2018). Post-truth. MIT Press. google scholar
• Niedzviecki, H. (2006). Hello, I'm special: How individuality became the new conformity. City Lights Publishers. google scholar
• Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2014). Global views on morality. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2014/04/15/global-morality/ google scholar
• Rea, L. M., & Parker, R. A. (2014). Designing and conducting survey research. Jossey–Bass. google scholar
• Roy, O. (2024). The crisis of culture: Identity politics and the empire of norms. Hurst Publishers. google scholar
• Saraçoğlu, G. V., Erdem, İ., Doğan, S., & Tokuç, B. (2014). Youth sexual health: Sexual knowledge, attitudes, and behavior among students google scholar
• at a university in Turkey. Noro Psikiyatri Arşivi, 51(3), 222–228. https://doi.org/10.4274/npa.y6768 google scholar
• Schreck, C. J., & Hirschi, T. (2009). Social control theory. In 21st century criminology: A reference handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 305–311). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412971997.n35 google scholar
• Sennett, R. (1977). The fall of public man. Penguin Books. google scholar
• Simmel, G. (2015). Metropol ve zihinsel yaşam (S. Gürses, Trans.). In C. Harrison & P. Wood (Eds.), Sanat ve kuram: 1900–2000 değişen fikirler antolojisi (pp. 157–161). Küre Yayınları. google scholar
• Sözcü. (2025, Şubat 14). 14 Şubat haritasında şaşırtan sonuç: Türkiye’de çok eşliliğe sıcak bakanların sayısı artıyor. https://www.sozcu. com.tr/14-subat-haritasinda-sasirtan-sonuc-turkiye-de-cok-eslilige-sicak-bakanlarin-sayisi-artiyor-p138597 google scholar
• Taylor, C. (2003). The ethics of authenticity. Harvard University Press. google scholar
• Taylor, C. (2019). Seküler çağ (D. Körpe, Trans.). Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları. google scholar
• Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. (2022). İstatistiklerle aile. https://data.tuik.gov.tr google scholar
• Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2013). The narcissism epidemic: Living in the age of entitlement. Atria Books. google scholar
• Widmer, E. D., Treas, J., & Newcomb, R. (1998). Attitudes toward nonmarital sex in 24 countries. The Journal of Sex Research, 35(4), 349–358. google scholar
• Wilson, B. R. (2016). Religion in secular society: Fifty years on (S. Bruce, Ed.). Oxford University Press. google scholar
• Yıldız, R., & Yıldırım, E. (2023). Türkiye’de cinsiyet algısı araştırması. Nobel Yayınları. google scholar