Preservice and Inservice Teachers’ Language Ideologies About Non-Spanish-speaking Students and Multilingualism in Chilean Classrooms

Year 2022, Volume: 11 Issue: 1, 83 - 104, 30.04.2022

Gloria Toledo Andrea Lizasoain Karina Cerda

Abstract

This paper describes a study exploring in-service (IS) and pre-service (PS) teachers’ language ideologies about non-Spanish-speaking students’ multilingualism in Chilean classrooms. A survey was answered by 69 IS teachers and 34 PS teachers in the Chilean school system. Both groups were asked about two dimensions: (a) teachers’ knowledge and training in L2 pedagogies and their ideologies about students’ L1 and multilingualism; and (b) immigrant students’ access and integration into Chilean schools. We focused on dimension (a); the results indicate that the teachers from the IS and PS groups do not consider that students’ L1 is an impediment to the acquisition of the target language. They declare that the preservation of the L1 boosts non-Spanish-speaking students’ self-esteem and can help them to acquire new linguistic knowledge. However, the results show a lack of consistent strategies to approach multilingual classes. These results are discussed in the light of the need to train teachers of all disciplines in multilingualism and the demand for public policies to teach Spanish as an additional language in Chilean schools.

Keywords

intercultural education, language ideologies, Spanish as an additional language

Supporting Institution

Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo (ANID)

Project Number

1190254

Thanks

To Proyecto Fondecyt Regular nª1190254, ANID, Chile

References

• Aalto, E., & M. Tarnanen (2015). Approaching pedagogical language knowledge through student teachers: assessment of second language writing. Language and education, 29(5): 400-415. Approach. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
• Bahamondes, R., C. Flores, M. Llopis (2021). Guía metodológica para la comunicación intercultural con personas no hispanohablantes en las comunidades educativas. Retrieved March 1, 2021 from: https://migrantes.mineduc.cl/wp-content/uploads/sites/88/2021/05/GUIA-METODOLOGICA-PARA-LA-COMUNICACION-INTERCULTURAL.pdf.
• Baker, D.P. &, S. Halabi (2014). School Enrollment. In: A.C Michalos (Eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Dordrecht. Retrieved August 1, 2021 from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2599.
• Bhatia, T. & W. Ritchie (Eds.) (2014). The handbook of bilingualism and multilingualism. John Wiley & Sons.
• Bhatia, T. & W. Ritchie (1999). The bilingual child: Some issues and perspectives. In: W. C. Ritchie, T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of Child Language Acquisition, pp. 569-643. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
• Brown, D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Nueva York: Pearson
• Brutt-Griffler, J. (2002). World English: A Study of its Development. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 232p.
• Bunch, G. C. (2013). Pedagogical language knowledge: Preparing mainstream teachers for English learners in the new standards era. Review of research in education, 37(1): 298-341.
• Canagarajah, S. (Ed.). (2017). The Routledge handbook of migration and language. Taylor & Francis.
• Centro Virtual Cervantes (2021). Diccionario de términos clave. Retrieved August 10, 2021 from: https://www.curriculumnacional.cl/portal/Educacion-General/Ingles/.
• Cook, V. 2001. Using the first language in the classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(3): 402-423. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.57.3.402
• Council of Europe. Council for Cultural Co-operation. Education Committee. Modern Languages Division (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
• Creswell, J. (2009). Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. California: Sage.
• Cumming, A. (1986). Some Thoughts on Practice, Policy, Theory, and Research in Language Teaching: A Conversation with HH Stern. TESL Canada Journal, 83-91.
• DEMRE (2020). Oferta Definitiva de Carreras, Vacantes y Ponderaciones, Proceso de Admisión 2021. [online]. Retrieved February 2, 2021 from: https://acceso.mineduc.cl/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Oferta-Definitiva-2021_16_09_20.pdf
• Departamento de Extranjería y Migración (DEM) (2020). Estimación de personas extranjeras residentes habituales en Chile al 31 de diciembre de 2019. Informe técnico: desagregación regional y comunal. Retrieved August 10, 2021 from: https://www.extranjeria.gob.cl/media/2020/06/estimación-población-extranjera-en-chile-2019-regiones-y-comunas-metodología.pdf.
• Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Espinosa M.J., C. Moyano C., J.D Oyarzún y N. Ávila (2020). Justicia lingüística en la escuela chilena: el reconocimiento de la lengua materna como un vehículo para la educación. Debates de Justicia Educacional, 8. Santiago: Centro Justicia Educacional. Retrieved August 10, 2021from: http://centrojusticiaeducacional.cl/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/debates-n8.pdf.
• Farías, M. (1999). Hacia un modelo de las políticas de enseñanza de lenguas extranjeras en Chile. XIII Congreso de la Sociedad Chilena de Lingüística (SOCHIL), 1-10. La Serena. Gkaintartzi, A., Kiliari, A., & Tsokalidou, R. (2015). ‘Invisible’bilingualism–‘invisible’language ideologies: Greek teachers' attitudes towards immigrant pupils' heritage languages. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(1): 60-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.877418
• Farias, M. (2005). Critical language awareness in foreign language learning. Literatura y lingüística, (16), 211-222. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0716-58112005000100012
• Hamel, R. E. (1993). Políticas y planificación del lenguaje: una introducción. Iztapalapa(29): 5-39.
• Hoffman, C. (2001). Toward the description of trilingual competence. International Journal of Bilingualism, 5(1): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069010050010101
• IBM Corporation. (2017). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. [Computer software]. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
• Irvine, J. (2012). Language Ideology. obo in Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199766567-0012
• Kroskrity, P. V. (2016). Language ideologies and language attitudes. obo in Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/OBO/9780199772810-0122 Longman.
• Lyster, R. (2007). Learning and Teaching Languages Through Content. A Counterbalanced
• Mar-Molinero, C. (2000). The Politics of Language in the Spanish-Speaking World. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203443729
• Martin-Jones, M. & K. Jones. (2000). Multilingual literacies. In: M. Martin-Jones, K. Jones (Eds), Multilingual Literacies: Reading and Writing Different Worlds, pp. 1-5. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
• Mineduc (2021ª). Bases curriculares lengua y cultura de los pueblos originarios ancestrales. 1° a 6° año de Educación Básica. Decreto Supremo de Educación N°97/2021. [online]. Retrieved March 1, 2021 from: https://www.curriculumnacional.cl/614/articles-143635_bases.pdf
• Mineduc (2021b). Incorporación de Estudiantes PIE. [online]. Retrieved March 1, 2021 from: https://especial.mineduc.cl/gestion-operacional-pie/documentos-apoyo-ingreso-pie/
• Mineduc (2021c). Currículum nacional: Inglés. Unidad de Currículum y evaluación: Ministerio de Educación de Chile. [online]. Retrieved August 10, 2021 from: https://www.curriculumnacional.cl/portal/Educacion-General/Ingles/.
• Mineduc (2021d). Estándares de la Profesión Docente, Carreras de Pedagogía en Inglés, Educación Básica/Media. [online]. Retrieved August 26, 2021 from: https://estandaresdocentes.mineduc.cl/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/ingles.pdf
• Mineduc (2021e). Estándares de la Profesión Docente, Marco para la Buena Enseñanza. [online]. Retrieved August 26, 2021 from: https://estandaresdocentes.mineduc.cl/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/MBE-2.pdf
• Mora, J. K. (2000). Staying the course in times of change: Preparing teachers for language minority education. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(5): 345-357.
• Nieto, S. 2001. Language, culture, and teaching: Critical perspectives. Routledge.
• Ollerhead, S. (2019). Teaching across semiotic modes with multilingual learners: Translanguaging in an Australian classroom. Language and Education, 33(2): 106-122.
• Rhodes, R. L., S. H Ochoa., S. O. Ortiz (2005). Assessing culturally and linguistically diverse students: A practical guide. Guilford press.
• Richard-Amato, P. (2010). Making it Happen. From Interactive to Participatory Language
• Rinnert, C. & H. Kobayashi (2018). Multicompetence and multilingual writing. In: R. Manchón y O. Matsuda (Eds.), Handbook of Second and Foreign Language Writing, pp.365-385. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
• Romaine, S. (2021). Language Policy and Planning. obo in Linguistics. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199772810-0273
• Rose, D. & J. R. Martin (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. London: Equinox.
• Shulman, L. S. 1986. Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2): 4-14.
• Sologuren, E., M. y N. C. Fadic (2011). La lengua mapuche frente a una política indígena urbana: marco legal, acción pública y planificación idiomática en Chile. Revista UniverSOS, 8: 157-168.
• Teaching: Evolving Theory and Practice. Nueva York: Pearson Longman
• Wang, X. (2015). Understanding Language and Literacy Development. Diverse Learners in the Classroom. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
• Weigle, S. C. (1999). Investigating rater/prompt interactions in writing assessment: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Assessing writing, 6(2): 145-178.
• Woolard, K.A. (2020). Language Ideology. In: J. Stanlaw (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786093.iela0217