Abstract
References
- Alessio, H. & Messinger, J. (2021). Faculty and student perceptions of academic integrity in technology-assisted learning and testing. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.629220
- Andreou, V., Peters, S., Eggermont, J., Wens, J., & Schoenmakers, B. (2021). Remote versus on-site proctored exam: Comparing student results in a cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-03068-x
- Arnò, S., Galassi, A., Tommasi, M., Saggino, A., & Vittorini, P. (2021). State-of-the-art of commercial proctoring systems and their use in academic online exams. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 19(2), 55-76. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijdet.20210401.oa3
- Aurelia, S., Thanuja, R., Chowdhury, S., & Hu, Y. C. (2023). AI-based online proctoring: a review of the state-of-the-art techniques and open challenges. Multimedia Tools and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-16714-x.
- Balash, D. G., Kim, D., Shaibekova, D., Fainchtein, R. A., Sherr, M., & Aviv, A. J. (2021). Examining the Examiners: Students' Privacy and Security Perceptions of Online Proctoring Services.
Abstract
This study targets to investigate the opinions and perceptions of the online and distance learners regarding to online proctored exams. A qualitative case study was employed to explore views of the participants related to the online proctored exam practice. The data were collected from 69 undergraduate distance learners via an online form. A content analysis approach were employed to analyze the data. As a result of the content analysis three themes namely, satisfaction, dissatisfaction, and exam administration emerged. The findings indicated that while online and distance learners were satisfied with the online proctored exams as they are secure, convenient, accessible, and reliable they also dissatisfied because of the technical problems and surveillance. Furthermore, the results also revealed that the administration of the online proctored exams needs to be reviewed. It is hoped that the findings will pave the way for future applications and research on the design and implementation of online proctored exams. Implications and future research suggestions are discussed.
Keywords
Online proctored exam online and distance learning distance education proctoring online assessment
References
- Alessio, H. & Messinger, J. (2021). Faculty and student perceptions of academic integrity in technology-assisted learning and testing. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.629220
- Andreou, V., Peters, S., Eggermont, J., Wens, J., & Schoenmakers, B. (2021). Remote versus on-site proctored exam: Comparing student results in a cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-03068-x
- Arnò, S., Galassi, A., Tommasi, M., Saggino, A., & Vittorini, P. (2021). State-of-the-art of commercial proctoring systems and their use in academic online exams. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 19(2), 55-76. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijdet.20210401.oa3
- Aurelia, S., Thanuja, R., Chowdhury, S., & Hu, Y. C. (2023). AI-based online proctoring: a review of the state-of-the-art techniques and open challenges. Multimedia Tools and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-16714-x.
- Balash, D. G., Kim, D., Shaibekova, D., Fainchtein, R. A., Sherr, M., & Aviv, A. J. (2021). Examining the Examiners: Students' Privacy and Security Perceptions of Online Proctoring Services.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Computer Based Exam Applications |
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | October 1, 2024 |
| Submission Date | March 26, 2024 |
| Acceptance Date | June 27, 2024 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2024 Volume: 25 Issue: 4 |