Scaffolding Turkish EFL Students’ Grammar Learning Experiences through Output Activities

Year 2023, Volume: 10 Issue: 3, 253 - 270, 04.11.2023

Elmaziye Ozgur Kufi

Abstract

Students in EFL contexts have limited opportunities for using English productively in communicative activities. Based on this concern, the present study initiated the use of output activities in an evening course in Northern Cyprus and aimed to explore whether their use enhances effective use of grammatical structures by learners. To find out whether the use of output activities leads to any significant improvement in the use of grammatical forms, participating students were asked to write two compositions, one before participating in output activities and another one afterwards. Questionnaires were also administered to elicit teachers’ and students’ perceptions related to their grammar teaching and learning experiences respectively. Collected data were analyzed using qualitative and quantitative methodology since the study had an exploratory mixed method research design. Comparison of the analyzed data from learners’ first and second compositions revealed that learners could use grammatical structures more successfully in their second compositions. Likewise, analysis of qualitative and quantitative data collected through questionnaires disclosed positive student and teacher perceptions regarding the use of output activities in the language course. Consequently, based on its positive results, the current study suggests integration of output activities into foreign language teaching practices and curricula for scaffolding students’ grammar learning experiences.

Keywords

Teaching and learning grammar, Input, Output, Productive skills, Speaking and Writing activities

References

• Borg, S. (1998). Teachers' pedagogical systems and grammar teaching: A Qualitative Study, TESOL Quarterly, 32, 9-37. Brown, H. D. (1987). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Burton, G. (2020). Key concepts in ELT: Grammar, ELT Journal, 74(2) doi: 10.1093/elt/ccaa004
• Celce-Murcia, M. (1991). Grammar Pedagogy in Second and Foreign Language Teaching, TESOL Quarterly, 25, 459-480.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. London: RoutledgeFalmer. Cook, G. (1992). Discourse. Oxford: OUP
• Cook, V. (1996). Second Language Learning and Language Teaching. London: Arnold
• Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding Second Language Aquisition. Oxford: OUP
• Ellis, R. (1990). Instructed Second Language Aquisition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
• Ellis, R. (1997). Second Language Aquisition. Oxford: OUP
• Ellis, R. (1998). Teaching and Research: Options in Grammar Teaching, TESOL Quarterly, 32, 39-61
• Hamilton, L. S. (2011). “Testing what has been taught” American Educator, Winter, 47-52
• Hughes, R. and McCarthy, M. (1998). From Sentence to Discourse: Discourse Grammar and English Language Teaching, TESOL Quarterly, 32, 263-287
• Izumi, S. and Bigelow, M. (2000). Does output promote noticing and second language acquisition ?, TESOL Quarterly, 34, 239-278.
• Larsen-Freeman, D. & Anderson, D. (2011). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. Oxford: OUP.
• Lightbown, P. M. & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned. Oxford: OUP. Matsumoto, Y. (2021). “Flexibility and fluidity of grammar: Grammatical constructions in discourse and sociocultural context” Journal of Pragmatics, 172, 105-118.
• Miles, M. and Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative DataAnalysis. London: SAGE Publications.
• Nobuyoshi, J. and Ellis, R. (1993). Focused Communication Tasks and Second Language Acquisition, ELT Journal, 47, 203-210
• Shehadeh, A. (2001). Self- and Other-Initiated Modified output During Task-Based Interaction, TESOL Quarterly, 35, 433-457.