Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2017, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 335 - 340, 30.06.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.608

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Bol, E., “Determination of the relationship between soil properties and earthquake damage with the aid of neural networks: a case study in Adapazarı”, Turkey, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci 12: 2965–2975, 2012.
  • Davis, Paul M.; Jakson, David D.; Johnston Malcom J.S.: “Further evidence of localized geomagnetic field changes before the 1974 Thanksgiving Day Earthquake, Hollister, California”, Geophysical Reasearch Letter, Vol. 7, Issue 7 (513-516), 1980.
  • Duma, G. and Ruzhin, Y.: “ Diurnal changes of earthquake activity and geomagnetic Sq-variation”, Natural Hazards and Earth Systems Sciences, 3 (171-177), 2003.
  • Fawzy, D.E. and Arslan, G.; “Development of building damage functions for big earthquakes in Turkey”, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195 (2290-2297), 2015.
  • Friswell, M.I., Penny, Jet, and Gravey, SD, “ A combined gentic and eigensensitivity algorithm for the location of damage in structure”, Computers and Structures, 69: 547-556, 1998.
  • Grünthal, G., (ed.). "European Macroseismic Scale 1998", Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie Volume 15, Luxembourg, 1998
  • Housner, G.W., Bergman, L.A., et al. “Structural control: past, present and future”, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 123 (9): 897-971, 1997.
  • Heaton, J., Encog: “Library of Interchangeable Machine Learning Models for Java and C#”, Journal of Machine Learning Research 16: 1243-1247, 2015.
  • Haykin, S.; “Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation”, Prentice Hall, 1999.
  • Hornik, K.: ”Approximation Capabilities of Multilayer Feedforward Networks, Neural Networks”, 4(2), 251–257, 1991
  • MTA (Mineral Research & Exploration General Directorate) mta.gov.tr.
  • Rikitake T., et al.: “Changes in the Geomagnetic Field Associated with Earthquakes in the Izu Peninsula, Japan”, Journal of geomagnetism and geoelectricity, Vol. 32, 12 (721-739), 1980.
  • Ruzhin, Yuri; Kamogawa Masashi; Novikov, Victor: “Interrelation of geomagnetic storms and earthquakes: Insight from lab experiments and field observations”, 40th COSPAR Scientific Assembly. Held 2-10 August 2014, in Moscow, Russia, Abstract A3.1-68-14
  • Smola, A.J., Schölkopf, B., “A tutorial on support vector regression”, Statistics and Computing 14: 199-222, 2004.
  • Vapnik, V., Chervonenkis, A., “A note on one class of perceptrons, Automation and Remote Control”, 25, 1964.
  • Vapnik, V., Chervonenkis, A., “Theory of Pattern Recognition” [in Russian]. Nauka, Moscow, 1974. (German Translation: Wapnik W. & Tscherwonenkis A., Theorie der Zeichenerkennung, Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1979).
  • Vapnik, V.,”Statistical Learning Theory”, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1998.

ON THE PREDICTION OF STRUCTURAL REACTIONS TO BIG EARTHQUAKES IN TURKEY

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 335 - 340, 30.06.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.608

Öz

The
prediction of structural reactions to big earthquakes is vital in giving
warnings for potential damages early enough to minimize losses of life and
properties. In the current study we describe buildings by fixed construction
and environmental related parameters. Our models are based on real data of
damaged buildings collected after the occurrence of three big earthquakes in
Turkey. We extend our previous work to include the soil type for damaged
buildings. We employ different techniques, namely neural networks (NN) and
support vector machines (SVM) to improve the prediction accuracy. The results
show that support vector machines, and in particular support vector regression
gives better results compared to neural networks. Although we only used
averages of soil type for each region, we observed that adding soil type has
improved accuracy of predictions for building damages. It is to be noted that
these types of predictions are important to ensure the serviceability and
safety of existing structures. Our models are vital for the authorities to make
fast and reliable decisions and can be also used to improve the development of
new constructions codes. 

Kaynakça

  • Bol, E., “Determination of the relationship between soil properties and earthquake damage with the aid of neural networks: a case study in Adapazarı”, Turkey, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci 12: 2965–2975, 2012.
  • Davis, Paul M.; Jakson, David D.; Johnston Malcom J.S.: “Further evidence of localized geomagnetic field changes before the 1974 Thanksgiving Day Earthquake, Hollister, California”, Geophysical Reasearch Letter, Vol. 7, Issue 7 (513-516), 1980.
  • Duma, G. and Ruzhin, Y.: “ Diurnal changes of earthquake activity and geomagnetic Sq-variation”, Natural Hazards and Earth Systems Sciences, 3 (171-177), 2003.
  • Fawzy, D.E. and Arslan, G.; “Development of building damage functions for big earthquakes in Turkey”, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195 (2290-2297), 2015.
  • Friswell, M.I., Penny, Jet, and Gravey, SD, “ A combined gentic and eigensensitivity algorithm for the location of damage in structure”, Computers and Structures, 69: 547-556, 1998.
  • Grünthal, G., (ed.). "European Macroseismic Scale 1998", Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie Volume 15, Luxembourg, 1998
  • Housner, G.W., Bergman, L.A., et al. “Structural control: past, present and future”, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 123 (9): 897-971, 1997.
  • Heaton, J., Encog: “Library of Interchangeable Machine Learning Models for Java and C#”, Journal of Machine Learning Research 16: 1243-1247, 2015.
  • Haykin, S.; “Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation”, Prentice Hall, 1999.
  • Hornik, K.: ”Approximation Capabilities of Multilayer Feedforward Networks, Neural Networks”, 4(2), 251–257, 1991
  • MTA (Mineral Research & Exploration General Directorate) mta.gov.tr.
  • Rikitake T., et al.: “Changes in the Geomagnetic Field Associated with Earthquakes in the Izu Peninsula, Japan”, Journal of geomagnetism and geoelectricity, Vol. 32, 12 (721-739), 1980.
  • Ruzhin, Yuri; Kamogawa Masashi; Novikov, Victor: “Interrelation of geomagnetic storms and earthquakes: Insight from lab experiments and field observations”, 40th COSPAR Scientific Assembly. Held 2-10 August 2014, in Moscow, Russia, Abstract A3.1-68-14
  • Smola, A.J., Schölkopf, B., “A tutorial on support vector regression”, Statistics and Computing 14: 199-222, 2004.
  • Vapnik, V., Chervonenkis, A., “A note on one class of perceptrons, Automation and Remote Control”, 25, 1964.
  • Vapnik, V., Chervonenkis, A., “Theory of Pattern Recognition” [in Russian]. Nauka, Moscow, 1974. (German Translation: Wapnik W. & Tscherwonenkis A., Theorie der Zeichenerkennung, Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1979).
  • Vapnik, V.,”Statistical Learning Theory”, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1998.
Toplam 17 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Guvenc Arslan Bu kişi benim

Diaa Fawzy Bu kişi benim

Coskun Atay Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2017 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Arslan, G., Fawzy, D., & Atay, C. (2017). ON THE PREDICTION OF STRUCTURAL REACTIONS TO BIG EARTHQUAKES IN TURKEY. PressAcademia Procedia, 5(1), 335-340. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.608
AMA Arslan G, Fawzy D, Atay C. ON THE PREDICTION OF STRUCTURAL REACTIONS TO BIG EARTHQUAKES IN TURKEY. PAP. Haziran 2017;5(1):335-340. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.608
Chicago Arslan, Guvenc, Diaa Fawzy, ve Coskun Atay. “ON THE PREDICTION OF STRUCTURAL REACTIONS TO BIG EARTHQUAKES IN TURKEY”. PressAcademia Procedia 5, sy. 1 (Haziran 2017): 335-40. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.608.
EndNote Arslan G, Fawzy D, Atay C (01 Haziran 2017) ON THE PREDICTION OF STRUCTURAL REACTIONS TO BIG EARTHQUAKES IN TURKEY. PressAcademia Procedia 5 1 335–340.
IEEE G. Arslan, D. Fawzy, ve C. Atay, “ON THE PREDICTION OF STRUCTURAL REACTIONS TO BIG EARTHQUAKES IN TURKEY”, PAP, c. 5, sy. 1, ss. 335–340, 2017, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.608.
ISNAD Arslan, Guvenc vd. “ON THE PREDICTION OF STRUCTURAL REACTIONS TO BIG EARTHQUAKES IN TURKEY”. PressAcademia Procedia 5/1 (Haziran 2017), 335-340. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.608.
JAMA Arslan G, Fawzy D, Atay C. ON THE PREDICTION OF STRUCTURAL REACTIONS TO BIG EARTHQUAKES IN TURKEY. PAP. 2017;5:335–340.
MLA Arslan, Guvenc vd. “ON THE PREDICTION OF STRUCTURAL REACTIONS TO BIG EARTHQUAKES IN TURKEY”. PressAcademia Procedia, c. 5, sy. 1, 2017, ss. 335-40, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.608.
Vancouver Arslan G, Fawzy D, Atay C. ON THE PREDICTION OF STRUCTURAL REACTIONS TO BIG EARTHQUAKES IN TURKEY. PAP. 2017;5(1):335-40.

PressAcademia Procedia (PAP) publishes proceedings of conferences, seminars and symposiums. PressAcademia Procedia aims to provide a source for academic researchers, practitioners and policy makers in the area of social and behavioral sciences, and engineering.

PressAcademia Procedia invites academic conferences for publishing their proceedings with a review of editorial board. Since PressAcademia Procedia is an double blind peer-reviewed open-access book, the manuscripts presented in the conferences can easily be reached by numerous researchers. Hence, PressAcademia Procedia increases the value of your conference for your participants. 

PressAcademia Procedia provides an ISBN for each Conference Proceeding Book and a DOI number for each manuscript published in this book.

PressAcademia Procedia is currently indexed by DRJI, J-Gate, International Scientific Indexing, ISRA, Root Indexing, SOBIAD, Scope, EuroPub, Journal Factor Indexing and InfoBase Indexing. 

Please contact to procedia@pressacademia.org for your conference proceedings.