“DATAİZM”E KARŞI VERİ GÜVENLİĞİ VE ADALETİ

Yıl 2024, Sayı: 72, 135 - 153, 15.05.2024

Ayşe Yaşar Ümütlü Önder Aytaç Afşar

https://doi.org/10.57083/adaletdergisi.1483346

Öz

Dataizm ve veri adaleti, teknoloji dünyasında birbirine zıt iki paradigma haline gelmiş durumdadır. Dataizm genellikle kişisel verilerin toplanması ve optimizasyonunun aralıksız takibiyle ilişkilendirilir. Veriye dayalı karar vermenin, otomasyonun ve teknolojinin toplumsal ilerlemeye yol açacağı anlayışıyla karakterize edilir. Bu nedenle dataizm savunucuları, verimlilik, kolaylık ve yenilik umuduyla ne kadar çok veri toplanır ve işlenirse hayatlarımızın o kadar iyi olacağını iddia etmektedirler. Fakat veri adaleti anlayışı, ilkesiz bir veri toplayıcılığına kesinlikle tezat bir fikri savunmaktadır. Veri ekosisteminde adalet, eşitlik ve bireysel hakların ve mahremiyetin korunması ilkelerine dayanması gerektiğini vurgulamaktadır. Dolayısıyla veri adaleti savunucuları, veriyle ilgili eşitsizliklerin, algoritmalardaki önyargı ve ayrımcılık potansiyelinin ve bireylerin refahı pahasına gözetim veya kâr amacıyla verilerin kötüye kullanılmasının ciddiyetle dikkate alınması gerektiğini vurgulamaktadırlar. Bu makalede, veri merkezli yaklaşımların etik ve sosyal sonuçlarını irdeleyerek bu iki paradigma arasındaki gerilimi araştırılmıştır. Veriye dayalı verimlilik ile bireysel ve toplumsal hakların korunması arasındaki dengeler hakkında soruları gündeme getirilmiştir. Verilerin hayatımızda giderek daha merkezi bir rol oynadığı bir çağda, vericilik veya veri toplayıcılığa karşı veri adaleti perspektiflerini anlamak ve uzlaştırmak, daha adil ve sorumlu bir veri geleceğini şekillendirmek için hayati önem taşımaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Uluslararası Hukuk, Hukuk Felsefesi, Cyber Hukuk, Veri Adaleti, Dataizm.

Kaynakça

• Adamczyk C L, “Communicating Dataism.” The Review of Communication, vol. 23, no. 1, 2023, pp. 4–20.
• Agnew G, Digital rights management: a librarian's guide to technology and practise, Chandos Pub., 2008.
• Ala-Fossi M ve diğerleri, “Operationalising Communication Rights: The Case of a "digital Welfare State".” Internet Policy Review, vol. 8, no. 1, 2019, p. 1–17.
• Andrew J / Baker M, “The General Data Protection Regulation in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol.168, no.3, 2021, p. 565–578.
• April R, Managing Data in Motion : data Integration Best Practice Techniques and Technologies, 1st edition, Morgan Kaufmann, 2013.
• Avrupa Konseyi Program Ofisi Ankara, Avrupa Birliği ve Avrupa Konseyi, Türkiye'de Dijital Vatandaşlık Eğitimini Destekliyor, Erişim Linki: https://www.coe.int/tr/web/ankara/-/the-european-union-and-the-council-of-europe-supporting-digital-citizenship-education-in-türkiye (Erişim Tarihi:1.11.2023)
• Bearden S, Digital citizenship: a community-based approach, Corwin, 2016.
• Beduschi A, “Digital Identity: Contemporary Challenges for Data Protection, Privacy and Non-Discrimination Rights.” Big Data & Society, vol. 6, no. 2, 2019, p. 205395171985509.
• Bielicki D ve diğerleri, Regulating Artificial Intelligence In Industry, Routledge, 2022 Bispo R ve diğerleri, “How to Increase the Visibility of Statisticians in the Modern World of Dataism?”, Recent Developments in Statistics and Data Science, vol. 398, Springer International Publishing AG, 2022, pp. 1–14.
• Borgman C, Big Data, Little Data, No Data: Scholarship İn The Networked World. The MIT Press, 2015.
• Borisov A / Sayaana D, “Protection of Personal Data in Databases and Computer Programs.” E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 284, 2021, p. 4001.
• Breakstone J ve diğerleri, “Why We Need A New Approach To Teaching Digital Literacy”, Phi Delta Kappan, vol.99, no.6, 2018, pp. 27–32.
• Chander A / Land M, “United Nations General Assembly Resolution on the Right to Privacy in the Digital Age.” International Legal Materials, vol. 53, no. 4, 2014, pp. 727–31.
• Curran M/ Ribble M, “P–20 Model of Digital Citizenship.” New Directions for Student Leadership, vol. 2017, no. 153, 2017, pp. 35–46.
• Cybersecurity Laws and Regulations USA 2023, Erişim Linki: https://iclg.com/practice-areas/cybersecurity-laws-and-regulations/usa , (Erişim Tarihi : 1.11.2023)
• Çanga T M, “Internette Fikir ve Sanat Eserleri Uzerindeki Haklarin Korunmasi”, https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Internette-Fikir-ve-Sanat-Eserleri-Uzerindeki-Haklarin-Korunmasi-Tarik-Mete-CANGA.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 1,11,2023)
• Dencik L ve diğerleri, “Data and Social Justice.” Data Justice, SAGE Publications, Limited, 2022, p. 123.
• Detlor B ve diğerleri, “Community‐Led Digital Literacy Training: Toward A Conceptual Framework”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 73(10), 2022, p. 1387–1400.
• Dijck J V, “Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology”, Surveillance & Society, vol.12 no.2, 2014, p.197–208.
• Elngar A., “Adaptive Internet of Things and Machine Learning Techniques for Managing the Complexity of Intelligent Systems Big Data.” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 202, p. 1–1.
• Emmert S / Dehmer F / Yli-Harja O, “Against Dataism and for Data Sharing of Big Biomedical and Clinical Data with Research Parasites”, Frontiers in Genetics, vol. 7, 2016, p.154–154.
• Eumbunnapong K, “An Intelligent Digital Learning Platform to Enhance Digital Health Literacy”, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, vol. 17, no.4, 2022, pp. 95–111.
• Europen Data Protection Board, Erişim Linki: https://edpb.europa.eu/edpb_en , (Erişim Tarihi : 12.11.2023)
• Farkas J, “Hintz, A., Dencik, L., & Wahl-Jørgensen, K. (2019). Digital citizenship in a datafied society, Cambridge: Polity Press, 193 pp.”, Communications, vol.45, no.4, 2020, p. 503-505.
• González I D, “Human Rights In The Digital Era: Challenges And Opportunities From The United Nations Human Rights System.” Malim : Jurnal Pengajian Umum Asia Tenggara, vol. 22, no. 1, 2021, p. 1–13.
• Green B P, “What is Technology Ethics”, Erişim Lİnki: https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/technology-ethics/, ( Erişim Tarihi: 10.1.2023)
• Grout I, “Towards a Universally Accessible Laboratory for the Teaching and Learning of Electronic and Computer Engineering”, Online Engineering and Society 4.0, Springer International Publishing, 2021, p. 502–513.
• Heeks R / Renken J, “Data Justice For Development”, Information Development, 34(1), 2018, p.90–102.
• Heikkerö T, Ethics in technology : a philosophical study, Lexington Books, 2012.
• Herwati T I / Hatta P, “Exploration of Critical Thinking Skills in Digital Citizenship Course Through Online Learning”, Indonesian Journal of Informatics Education, vol.4, no.1, 2021,pp. 17–23.
• Ina F, “Book Review: Digital Rights Management: A Librarian's Guide to Technology and Practice.” Webology, vol. 5, no. 4, Webology Center, 2008, p. b19.
• Irshad A., Ansari ve diğerleri, Advanced Security Solutions For Multimedia, IOP Publishing. Institute of Physics , 2021.
• Kennedy J B , Cybersecurity and Privacy in Business Transactions, Bureau of National Affairs, 2015.
• Krzysztofek M, Post-Reform Personal Data Protection in the European Union : General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Wolters Kluwer, 2017.
• Lankton N K ve diğerleri, “Technology, Humanness, and Trust: Rethinking Trust in Technology”, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 16, no. 10, 2015, p. 880–918.
• Lee C, ve diğerleri, “A Novel Authentication Scheme for Anonymity and Digital Rights Management Based on Elliptic Curve Cryptography.” International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics, vol. 11, no. 1, 2019, p. 96–117.
• Liu J, “Exploration and Practice of Moral Education Courses in Universities in Big Data Era”, Advances in Multimedia, 2022, p.1–9.
• Loiseau, H, “Michael P. Gallaher, Albert N. Link et Brent R. Rowe Cyber security economic strategies and public policy alternatives”, [Review of Cyber security economic strategies and public policy alternatives], Études Internationales, vol. XL, no.1, 2009, p. 145–147.
• Moyakine E, “Online Anonymity in the Modern Digital Age: Quest for a Legal Right.” Journal of Information Rights, Policy, and Practice, vol. 1, no. 1, 2016.
• Oberdiek H, “Ethics in Technology: A Philosophical Study by Topi Heikkerö (review)” Technology and Culture, vol. 55, no. 4, 2014, p. 995–96.
• Ohlhorst F, Big Data Analytics:Turning Big Data Into Big Money, 1st edition, 2013
• Örtegren A, “Philosophical Underpinnings Of Digital Citizenship Through A Postdigital Lens: Implications For Teacher Educators’ Professional Digital Competence”, Education and Information Technologies, 2023
• Pangrazio L / Sefton-Green J, “Digital Rights, Digital Citizenship and Digital Literacy: What’s the Difference?” Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, vol.10, no.1, 2021, p.15–27. Pavek C / Vaughan M, “Digital Reading Check‐ins: Supporting Independent Digital Reading”, The Reading Teacher, vol. 76, no. 5, 2023, p. 653–57.
• Peters T, “The Deluge of Dataism: A New Post‐Human Religion?”, Dialog : a Journal of Theology, vol. 56 no. 3, 2017, p. 211–213.
• Pounder C / Kosten F, Managing Data Protection, 2nd ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, 1992.
• Regenbrecht H ve diğerleri, “Pervasive Augmented Reality-Technology and Ethics.” IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol. 21, no. 3, 2022, p. 1–8.
• Revina S. N. / Zaharov A. L., The Transformation of Human Rights in the Information Society Connected with the Formulation of the «Rigt to be Forgotten» by the European Court of Justice, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2015.
• Rivoltella P C, Digital literacy: Tools and Methodologies for Information Society, IGI Global, 2008.
• Robson G ve diğerleri, Technology Ethics: A Philosophical İntroduction And Readings, Routledge, 2023
• Rodriguez K, “Comments Submitted to the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression”, https://www.eff.org/files/filenode/unspecialrapporteurfoe2011-final_3.pdf, (1.11.2023)
• Ruppert E ve diğerleri, “Data Politics.” Big Data & Society, vol. 4, no. 2, 2017, p. 205395171771774.
• Santos M R / Gomes M M F, “Lifelong Digital Learning: "Computer Literacy," "Digital Literacy," And "Digital Competence" As Dimensions For Digital Skills.” RGSA : Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, vol. 18, no. 1, 2023, p. e04403.
• Stefania Gnesi ve diğerleri, “My Data, Your Data, Our Data: Managing Privacy Preferences in Multiple Subjects Personal Data”, Privacy Technologies and Policy, Springer International Publishing, 2014, p. 154–71.
• Stewart Waters ve diğerleri, “Cyber Bullying, Social Media, and Character Education: Why It Matters for Middle School Social Studies”, The Clearing House, vol. 93, no.4, 2020, p. 195–204.
• Syversen K, Digital Rights Management: Promises, Problems And Alternative Solutions, Institutt for rettsinformatikk: Unipub, 2005.
• Taylor L, “What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally”, Big Data & Society, vol. 4, no.2, 2017, p.205395171773633.
• Van den Daele W, “The Dynamics of Technology and Moral Standards: A Sociological Assessment of Genetics”, Soziale Welt, vol. 37, no:2-3, 1986, p.149–172.
• Vilbert L / Cifuentes L, “Digital Literacy and Critical Thinking” In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Technology, vol. 1, 2015, p. 215–219.
• Walker R, From Big Data to Big Profits : Success with Data and Analytics, Oxford University Press, 2015.
• Yankovych I, “Problems of Moral Education Technologies and Methods Implementation in Pedagogical Theory and Practice of Poland and Ukraine.” Forum Pedagogiczne, vol. 5, no. 1, 2016, p. 227–233.
• Yar M, “Protecting Children from Internet Pornography? A Critical Assessment of Statutory Age Verification and Its Enforcement in the UK.” Policing : an International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, vol. 43, no. 1, 2020, p. 183–97.
• Yasar K, Network Vulnerability Scanning, https://www.techtarget.com/searchsecurity/definition/vulnerability-scanning, (12.11.2023)
• Youngs G, “Digital World: Connectivity, Creativity and Rights.” Digital World, Routledge, 2013, p. 17–30.
• Yu. K., Yazov ve diğerleri, “Improving An Algorithm For Detection Of Urgent Threats To Security Of Personal Data When They Are Processed In Information Systems Of Personal Data.” Telecommunications & Radio Engineering, vol. 71, no. 5, 2012, p. 455–63.
• Završnik A, “A. Algorithmic Justice: Algorithms And Big Data In Criminal Justice Settings” European Journal of Criminology, vol. 18, no.5, 2021, p.623–642
• ...“Consumer Advocate and Data Network Call for Transparency and Control in Data Sharing”, In Targeted News Service, Targeted News Service, 2021.
• ...“Digital Literacy: Tools and Methodologies for Information Society.” Electronic Library, vol. 27, no. 1, 2009, p. 193–94.
• ...“ERMProtect Adds Digital Games to Cyber Security Awareness Training Platform”, In Information Technology Newsweekly, 2019, p. 248.
• …“Managing Data Protection: 2nd Edition, by Chris Pounder/ Freddie Kosten, 1992 (Butterworth-Heinemann Publishers and Hoskyns Groups, Hardcover),” Computer Law and Security Review: The International Journal of Technology and Practice, vol. 8, no. 5, Elsevier Ltd, 1992, p. 225–225.
• …Counsil of Europe, https://www.coe.int/fi/web/commissioner/-/protecting-children-s-rights-in-the-digital-world-an-ever-growing-challen-1, (1.11.2023)
• …Counsil of Europe, Erişim Linki: https://www.coe.int/en/web/freedom-expression/freedom-of-expression-and-information#:~:text=You%20have%20the%20right%20to,opinions%20and%20expressions%20of%20others, (Erişim Tarihi: 1.11.2023)
• …Counsil of Europe, https://www.coe.int/en/web/freedom-expression/privacy-and-data-protection, (1.11.2023)
• …Declaration on Digital Rights and Principles for the Digital Decade, OJ C 23, Erişim Linki: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.C_.2023.023.01.0001.01.ENG (Erişim Tarihi: 23.01.2023)
• …Security Penetration Testing Services, https://www.digitaldefense.com/solution-overview/test/, (12.11.2023)
• …World Economic Forum, https://www.weforum.org/publications/digital-safety-risk-assessment-in-action-a-framework-and-bank-of-case-studies/, (12.11.2023)