Socializing IR: Turkish IR Scholars and their Twitter Interactions

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1, 1 - 20, 24.01.2024

Hakan Mehmetcik Eric Lease Morgan Melih Kölük Galip Yüksel

https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.1416584

Cited By: 2

Öz

Online social networking services (Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, etc.) have altered
the way we engage with individuals, groups, and communities by profoundly
changing our everyday information and communication habits on a global scale.
Today, social media has also grown into a massive data repository providing very
detailed information on the opinions, beliefs, and communications of millions of
individuals. Similarly, social media analysis has grown into an essential method
for various fields, including political science and international relations. The
purpose of this study is to undertake a nuanced social media analysis using Twitter
data to contextualize and assess the context, scope, and impact of Turkish IR
scholars’ interactions on Twitter. Within the scope of the paper, network analysis,
topic modeling, descriptive statistics, and regression analysis approaches will
be employed to draw meaningful interpretations about their Twitter interactions.
Our basic premise is that among Turkish IR scholars, there is a collective network
that connects them in terms of interactions, attitudes, and opinions, and that
network may be found by analyzing their Twitter data. This working assumption
is not supported by the findings.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Social Media Analysis, Twitter, Turkish IR, Social Networks, Networks Analysis

Kaynakça

• Abdelhaq, Hamed, Christian Sengstock, and Michael Gertz. “Eventweet: Online Localized Event Detection from Twitter.” Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 6, no. 12 (2013): 1326–29.
• Atefeh, Farzindar, and Wael Khreich. “A Survey of Techniques for Event Detection in Twitter.” Computational Intelligence 31, no. 1 (2015): 132–64.
• Bar-Ilan, Judit, Stefanie Haustein, Isabella Peters, Jason Priem, Hadas Shema, and Jens Terliesner. “Beyond Citations: Scholars’ Visibility on the Social Web.” arXiv, May 25, 2012. http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.5611.
• Bruns, Axel, and Stefan Stieglitz. “Metrics for Understanding Communication on Twitter.” edited by Katrin Weller, Axel Burns, Jean Burgess, Merja Mahrt, and Cornelius Puschmann, 69–82, 2014.
• Chung, Chung Joo, and Han Woo Park. “Web Visibility of Scholars in Media and Communication Journals.” Scientometrics 93, no. 1 (October 1, 2012): 207–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0707-8.
• Fanelli, Daniele, Rodrigo Costas, and John PA Ioannidis. “Meta-Assessment of Bias in Science.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, no. 14 (2017): 3714–19.
• Georgakopoulou, Alex, Stefan Iversen, and Carsten Stage. Quantified Storytelling. Springer, 2020.
• Goonetilleke, Oshini, Timos Sellis, Xiuzhen Zhang, and Saket Sathe. “Twitter Analytics: A Big Data Management Perspective.” ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 16, no. 1 (September 25, 2014): 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/2674026.2674029.
• Gupta, Ravi, and Hugh Brooks. Using Social Media for Global Security. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
• Hu, Xia, and Huan Liu. “Text Analytics in Social Media.” In Mining Text Data, 385–414. Springer, 2012.
• Hürriyet Daily News. “Virtuous Power New Defense Doctrine: Turkish President,” June 4, 2012. http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/virtuous-power-new-defense-doctrine-turkish-president.aspx?pageID=238&nID=17784&NewsCatID=338.
• Jianqiang, Zhao, Gui Xiaolin, and Tian Feng. “A New Method of Identifying Influential Users in the Micro-Blog Networks.” IEEE Access 5 (2017): 3008–15.
• Johnson, Kristen, and Dan Goldwasser. “Identifying Stance by Analyzing Political Discourse on Twitter.” In Proceedings of the First Workshop on NLP and Computational Social Science, 66–75, 2016.
• Kasmani, Mohd Faizal. “A Political Discourse Analysis of the Twitter Posts Of@ Najibrazak Prior to 2018 General Elections.” SEARCH (Malaysia) 11, no. 2 (2019): 129–43.
• Kaur, Amandeep, and Vishal Gupta. “A Survey on Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining Techniques.” Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence 5, no. 4 (2013): 367–71.
• Kreps, Sarah. Social Media and International Relations. Cambridge University Press, 2020.
• Lee, Mi Kyung, Ho Young Yoon, Marc Smith, Hye Jin Park, and Han Woo Park. “Mapping a Twitter Scholarly Communication Network: A Case of the Association of Internet Researchers’ Conference.” Scientometrics 112 (2017): 767–97.
• Li, Ximing, Yue Wang, Ang Zhang, Changchun Li, Jinjin Chi, and Jihong Ouyang. “Filtering out the Noise in Short Text Topic Modeling.” Information Sciences 456 (2018): 83–96. Liu, Bing. “Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining.” Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies 5, no. 1 (2012): 1–167.
• Mac, Ryan, and Kate Conger. “Twitter Says Parts of Its Source Code Were Leaked Online.” The New York Times, March 26, 2023, sec. Technology. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/26/technology/twitter-source-code-leak.html.
• Mehmetcik, H., and E. Salihi. “To Be or Not To Be: Twitter Presence among Turkish Diplomats.” Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta 15, no. 3 (2022): 175–201. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2022-3-84-175-201.
• Mehmetcik, Hakan. “Humanitarian NGOs: Motivations, Challenges and Contributions to Turkish Foreign Policy.” PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs 24, no. 2 (2019): 249–78.
• Mehmetcik, Hakan, Emel Parlar Dal, and Hasan Hakses. “Studying Turkish Foreign Policy: Whither A Community of Research?” Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations under review (2023).
• Mehmetcik, Hakan, and Hakan Hakses. “Turkish IR Journals through a Bibliometric Lens.” All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace 12, no. 1 (2023): 61–84.
• Mehmetci̇k, Hakan, Melih Koluk, and Galip Yuksel. “Perceptions of Türkiye in the US Congress: A Twitter Data Analysis.” Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi Vol. 19, No. 76, 2022, pp. 9–89. DOI: 10.33458/uidergisi.1226450
• Pak, Alexander, and Patrick Paroubek. “Twitter as a Corpus for Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining.” In LREc, 10:1320–26, 2010.
• Pitas, Ioannis. Graph-Based Social Media Analysis. Vol. 39. CRC Press, 2016.
• Priem, Jason, and Kaitlin Light Costello. “How and Why Scholars Cite on Twitter.” Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 47, no. 1 (2010): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504701201.
• Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Foreign Affairs. “Türkiye’s Enterprising and Humanitarian Foreign Policy.” Accessed July 31, 2021. https://www.mfa.gov.tr/synopsis-of-the-turkish-foreign-policy.en.mfa.
• Sasaki, Kentaro, Tomohiro Yoshikawa, and Takeshi Furuhashi. “Twitter-TTM: An Efficient Online Topic Modeling for Twitter Considering Dynamics of User Interests and Topic Trends.” In 2014 Joint 7th International Conference on Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems (SCIS) and 15th International Symposium on Advanced Intelligent Systems (ISIS), 440–45. IEEE, 2014.
• Sloan, Luke, and Anabel Quan-Haase. The SAGE Handbook of Social Media Research Methods. Sage, 2017.
• Suh, Bongwon, Lichan Hong, Peter Pirolli, and Ed H. Chi. “Want to Be Retweeted? Large Scale Analytics on Factors Impacting Retweet in Twitter Network.” In 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing, 177–84. Minneapolis, MN, USA: IEEE, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom.2010.33.
• Takeda, Hirotoshi, Duane Truex, and Michael Cuellar. “Evaluating Scholarly Influence Through Social Network Analysis: The Next Step in Evaluating Scholarly Influence.” Presented at the AMCIS 2010 Proceedings, August 1, 2010. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2010/573.
• thedigitalage. “The Role of Social Media in International Relations.” The Digital Age (blog), October 4, 2017. https://blogs.unsw.edu.au/thedigitalage/blog/2017/10/the-role-of-social-media-in-international-relations/.