Boreout Syndrome in Managers: A Qualitative Study on Antecedents-Consequences and Solution Suggestions

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1, 61 - 87, 25.03.2024

Filiz Demir

https://doi.org/10.18074/ckuiibfd.1339245

Öz

The aim of the research is to reveal the antecedents and consequences of boreout syndrome in managers and to develop solution suggestions. In this context, qualitative research was designed and feelings and thoughts of individuals working as managers in Karaman were consulted. The data obtained from the interviews was examined with content and descriptive techniques and analyzed with the Maxqda software. As a result, additional antecedents and consequences different from those found in the literature were identified for the factors leading to boreout syndrome in managers. Antecedents were identified as seeing the same faces all the time, working at a desk/indoors, technical disruptions, environmental pressure, and virtuality while consequences were identified as daydreaming or planning. Finally, a model was developed based on the findings, some theoretical and practical contributions were presented, and recommendations were made.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Boreout Syndrome, Managers, Antecedents, Consequences

Yöneticilerde Boreout Sendromu: Öncül-Ardıl ve Çözüm Önerilerine Yönelik Nitel bir Araştırma

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı boreout sendromunun öncül ve ardıllarının yöneticiler özelinde ortaya konularak çözüm önerilerinin geliştirilmesidir. Bu kapsamda nitel bir araştırma tasarlanarak Karaman’da yöneticilik görevinde bulunan bireylerin boreout sendromuna yönelik duygu ve düşüncelerine başvurulmuştur. Mülakatlardan elde edilen veriler içerik analizi ve betimsel analiz tekniği ile incelenerek Maxqda programıyla analiz edilmiştir. Analizler sonucunda yöneticilerde boreout sendromuna yol açan etmenlere, literatürde bulunandan farklı ek öncül ve ardıllar saptanmıştır. Saptanan öncüller sürekli aynı yüzleri görme, masa başı/kapalı alanda çalışma, teknik aksaklıklar, çevre baskısı ve sanallık; ardıllar ise hayal kurma/planlama olarak belirlenmiştir. Son olarak araştırmanın ortaya koyduklarıyla bir model geliştirilmiş, birtakım teorik ve pratik katkılar sunulmuş ve öneriler geliştirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Boreout Sendromu, Yöneticiler, Öncüller, Ardıllar

Kaynakça

• Abubakar, A. M. (2019). Using hybrid SEM – artificial intelligence: approach to examine the nexus between boreout, generation, career, life and job satisfaction. Personnel Review, 49(1), 67-86.
• Abubakar, A. M., Rezapouraghdam, H., Behravesh, E. and Megeirhi, H. A. (2022). Burnout or boreout: a meta-analytic review and synthesis of burnout and boreout literature in hospitality and tourism. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 31(4), 458-503.
• Acosta Vergara, J., Plaza Gómez, M. T. and Hernández Riaño, H. (2021). Clima organizacional, boreout e innovación en la agroindustria. Dimensión Empresarial, 19(4), 65-86.
• Barmack, J. E. (1938). The effect of benzedrine sulfate (benzyl methyl carbinamine) upon the report of boredom and other factors. The Journal of Psychology, 5(1), 125-133.
• Baş, T. and Akturan, U. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde bilgisayar destekli nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Brühlmann, T. (2015). Müdigkeit bei burnout und boreout. Swiss Medical Forum, 15(17), 387-390.
• Creswell, J. W. (2018). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri. (M. Bütün and S. B. Demir, Trans.). Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
• Cürten, S. (2013). Boreout-syndrom und coaching. Organisationsberatung, Supervision, Coaching, 20(4), 473-478.
• Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). The landscape of qualitative research (C. 1). Sage.
• García-González, B. E., Villavicencio-Ayub, E. and García, M. (2018). Síndrome de boreout en trabajadores baby boomers, xy millennials de la ciudad de México. Psicología Iberoamericana, 26(2), 88-95.
• Guglielmi D., Simbula S., Mazzetti G., Tabanelli M. C. and Bonfiglioli, R. (2013). When the job is boring: the role of boredom in organizational contexts. Work, 45(3), 311-322.
• Hobfoll, St. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested‐self in the stress process: advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology, 50(3), 337-421.
• Hobfoll, St. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J.P., and Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: the reality of resources and their consequences. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 5(1), 103-128.
• Jordana, H. (2017). Management et «bore-out» dans le secteur médicosocial. Empan, 1(3), 78–80.
• Karadal, H. and Erdem, A. T. (2019). Boreout sendromunun kariyer uyumluluğu ve kariyer iyimserliği arasındaki ilişki bağlamında analizi üzerine bir uygulama. Journal of Academic Value Studies, 4(18), 30-38.
• Karadal, H., Abubakar, A. M. and Erdem, A. T. (2018). Boreout, kariyer uyumluluğu ve aile-iş zenginleştirme etkileşimi: Selçuk üniversitesi örneği. Sosyal Ekonomik Arastırmalar Dergisi, 18(35), 41-63.
• Karatepe, O. M. and Kim, T. T. (2020). Investigating the selected consequences of boreout among cabin crew. Journal of Air Transport Management, 82, 101739.
• LeCunff, A. (2020). Burnout vs boreout, https://nesslabs.com/burnout-vs-boreout, (Acces Date: 02.10.2003).
• Lyngdoh, T., Chefor, E., Hochstein, B., Britton, B. P. and Amyx, D. (2021). A systematic literature review of negative psychological states and behaviors in sales. Journal of Business Research, 122, 518-533.
• Maroto, S. H. (2019). El síndrome de boreout y la STC 56/2019 sobre mobbing en la administración pública. Diario La Ley. 2(9458).
• Maxwell, J. A. (2008). Designing a qualitative study. in The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods.
• Merdan, E., Erdem, A. T. and Gümüşsoy, Y. (2022). Boreout sendromunun üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışı üzerine etkisinde sanal kaytarmanın aracılık rolü. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 10(1), 176-191.
• Merriam, S. B. (2018). Nitel araştırma desen ve uygulama için bir rehber. (S. Turan, Trans.). Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayımcılık Eğitim Danışmanlık.
• Misun, J. and Hudakova, I. (2010). The bore out syndrome current knowledge. University of Economics Faculty of Business Management, Department of Management.
• Moris, H. and Nedosugova, A. B. (2019). Coaching as instrument to identity and remedy for boreout syndrome with employees. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 298(138-141).
• Özsungur, F. (2020). The effects of mobbing in the workplace on service ınnovation performance: the mediating role of boreout. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(1), 28-42.
• Poirier, C., Gelin, M. and Mikolajczak, M. (2021). Creation and validation of the first french scale for measuring bore-out in the workplace. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(697972).
• Prammer, E. (2012). Boreout-biografien der unterforderung und langeweile: Eine soziologische analyse. Springer-Verlag.
• Probst, M. (2012). Boreout- ursachen, auswirkungen, massnahmen. Dissertation Universität, Zürich.
• Radka, C. (2021). The relationship between burnout syndrome and boreout syndrome of secondary school teachers during COVID-19. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(2), 138-151.
• Ramírez Quiroz, K. R. and Villanueva Cueva, M. I. (2021). Evidencias de validezy confiabilidad de la escala del síndrome de boreout–esb en colaboradores del sector público de trujillo. Dissertation, Universidad César Vallejo.
• Reiche, J. (2019). Boreout ist wie burnout... nur anders! Ein erfahrungsbericht. Kindle Edition.
• Rothlin, P. and Werder, P. R. (2007). Diagnose boreout: warum unterforderung im job krank macht. Redline Wirtschaft.
• Rothlin, P. and Werder, P. R. (2008). Die boreout-falle: Wie unternehmen langeweile und leerlauf vermeiden. Redline Wirtschaft.
• Schneider, J. (2018). Boreout: auftauchen aus der langeweile. Kindle Edition.
• Snijders, M. (2009). Boreout: A promising concept? An explorative study on the boreout phenomenon. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
• Stock, R. M. (2015). Is boreout a threat to frontline employees’ innovative work behavior?. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2(4), 574-592.
• Stock, R. M. (2016). Understanding the relationship between frontline employee boreout and customer orientation. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4259-4268.
• Sürücü, L. and Yıkılmaz, İ. (2022). Boreout (iş yerinde sıkılma) ölçeğinin türkçe formu: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 72, 64-77.
• Tekindal, M. and Uğuz Arsu, Ş. (2020). Nitel araştırma yöntemi olarak fenomenolojik yaklaşımın kapsamı ve sürecine yönelik bir derleme. Ufkun Ötesi Bilim Dergisi, 20(1), 153-182.
• Van Hooff, M. L. and Van Hooft, E. A. (2017). Boredom at work: towards a dynamic spillover model of need satisfaction, work motivation, and work-related boredom. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(1), 133-148.
• Yıldırım, A. and Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Yıldırım, A. and Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.