Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Simülasyon ile Öğrenme İçin Tasarlanmış Web Tabanlı Yeni Bir Elektrik Ticareti Oyunu

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 38 Sayı: 1, 21 - 37, 30.04.2022

Öz

In many countries, the electricity industry went through a deregulation process that changed it from a regulated and monopolistic/oligopolistic system to a liberal one. The new system allows independent producers to join the electricity market and sell electricity through bidding. In some markets, consumers can also bid to demand electricity. The characteristics of the liberalized electricity market in addition to its never-ending evolution make it difficult for students and young professionals to comprehend its structure and functioning. This manuscript sets out to achieve two goals. First, we will present a new web-based electricity trading simulation program that simulates the dynamics of the electricity market including investment and trading. Secondly, we compare classical classroom teaching methods against the simulation game teaching method to demonstrate the superiority of the latter in explaining the workings of the complex liberalized electricity market. Questionnaire results show that student’s knowledge increased by approximately 94%. Test results exhibit an average success rate of 80% for the game-related questions. The average success rate for subjects taught by classical methods is approximately 70%. The results show that the simulation game proves to be a better teaching method for complex subjects such as the liberalized electricity market.

Kaynakça

  • [1] Parker, D., 1999. Regulation of privatised public utilities in the UK: performance and governance. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 12(1999), 213–235.
  • [2] Gencer, B., Larsen, E. R., & van Ackere, A. 2020. Understanding the coevolution of electricity markets and regulation. Energy Policy, 143(2020), 111585.
  • [3] Baumol, W. J. 1977. On the proper cost tests for natural monopoly in a multiproduct industry. The American economic review, 67(1977), 809-822.
  • [4] Armstrong, M., & Sappington, D. E. 2006. Regulation, competition and liberalization. Journal of economic literature, 44(2006), 325-366.
  • [5] Paşaoǧlu, G. 2011. Using the decentralized and liberalized electricity market microworld (LEMM) as an educational tool. Energy Policy, 39(2011), 187–199.
  • [6] Ku, A. 1995. Modeling Uncertainty in Electric Capacity Planning. London Business School, Doctoral dissertation, Ph. D. Thesis, 472s, London
  • [7] Delarue, E., Laga, E., Meeus, L., Belmans, R., & D’Haeseleer, W. 2011. Achieving learning potentials in an educational simulation game for trading and generating electrical energy. International Journal of Engineering Education, 27(2011), 703–712.
  • [8] Demsetz, H. 1968. Why regulate utilities?. The Journal of Law and Economics, 11(1968), 55-65.
  • [9] Winston, C. 1998. US industry adjustment to economic deregulation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(1998), 89-110.
  • [10] Posner, R. A. 1969. Natural monopoly and its regulation: a reply. 21 Stanford. Law. Review 548 (1968).
  • [11] Thatcher, M. 2004. Winners and losers in Europeanisation: Reforming the national regulation of telecommunications. West European Politics, 27(2004), 284-309.
  • [12] Watts, D., & Ariztía, R. 2002. The electricity crises of California, Brazil and Chile: lessons to the Chilean market. LESCOPE'02. 2002 Large Engineering Systems Conference on Power Engineering. Conference Proceedings, 26-28 June, Halifax, 7-12.
  • [13] Bye, T., & Hope, E. 2005. Deregulation of electricity markets: the Norwegian experience. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(2005), 5269-5278.
  • [14] Green, R., 1998. Electricity deregulation in England and Wales. Deregul. Electr. Util. Springer, 28(1998), 179–202.
  • [15] Jamasb, T., & Pollitt, M. 2005. Electricity market reform in the European Union: review of progress toward liberalization & integration. The Energy Journal, 26(2005), (special issue).
  • [16] Dyner, I., & Larsen, E. R. 2001. From planning to strategy in the electricity industry. Energy policy, 29(2001), 1145-1154.
  • [17] Joskow, P. L. 2008. Lessons learned from electricity market liberalization. The Energy Journal, 29(Special Issue# 2).
  • [18] Hunt, S. 2002. Making competition work in electricity. John Wiley & Sons, 467s
  • [19] Adenikinju, A. F. 2005. Analysis of the cost of infrastructure failures in a developing economy: The case of the electricity sector in Nigeria, 44s, Ibadan.
  • [20] Energy and manufacturing. Stat Norway, 2017. https://www.ssb.no/en/energi-og-industri. (Erişim Tarihi: 25. 11. 2020).
  • [21] Larsen, E. R., Dyner, I., Bedoya, L., & Franco, C. J. 2004. Lessons from deregulation in Colombia: successes, failures and the way ahead. Energy policy, 32(2004), 1767-1780.
  • [22] Green, R. J., & Newbery, D. M. 1992. Competition in the British electricity spot market. Journal of political economy, 100(1992), 929-953.
  • [23] Dnes, A. W., Kodwani, D. G., Seaton, J. S., & Wood, D. 1998. The regulation of the United Kingdom electricity industry: an event study of price-capping measures. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 13(1998), 207-226.
  • [24] Larsen, E. R., & Bunn, D. 1999. Deregulation in electricity: Understanding strategic and regulatory risk. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 50(1999), 337–344. [25] Kiili, K. 2005. Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. 8(2005), 13–24.
  • [26] Prensky, M. 2001. Digital game-based learning. USA7 McGraw-Hill 464s.
  • [27] Norman, D. A. 1993. Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Basic Books; Revised ed. Edition, 304s.
  • [28] Shahidehpour, M., & Alomoush, M. 2002. Restructured Electric Power Systems: Operation, Trading, and Volatility [Book Review]. IEEE Computer Applications in Power, 15(2002), 60-62.
  • [29] Stoft, S. 2002. Power system economics. Journal of Energy Literature, 8(2002), 94-99.
  • [30] Jennings, D. 2002. Strategic management: an evaluation of the use of three learning methods. Journal of Management Development, 21(2002), 655-665.
  • [31] Senge, P. M. 2006. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday, 445s.
  • [32] Hur, J., Kang, D. J., Kook, K. S., Kim, T. H., Lee, J. H., & Moon, Y. H. 2003. The framework design of an electricity market simulator. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 36(2003), 653-657.
Yıl 2022, Cilt: 38 Sayı: 1, 21 - 37, 30.04.2022

Öz

Kaynakça

  • [1] Parker, D., 1999. Regulation of privatised public utilities in the UK: performance and governance. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 12(1999), 213–235.
  • [2] Gencer, B., Larsen, E. R., & van Ackere, A. 2020. Understanding the coevolution of electricity markets and regulation. Energy Policy, 143(2020), 111585.
  • [3] Baumol, W. J. 1977. On the proper cost tests for natural monopoly in a multiproduct industry. The American economic review, 67(1977), 809-822.
  • [4] Armstrong, M., & Sappington, D. E. 2006. Regulation, competition and liberalization. Journal of economic literature, 44(2006), 325-366.
  • [5] Paşaoǧlu, G. 2011. Using the decentralized and liberalized electricity market microworld (LEMM) as an educational tool. Energy Policy, 39(2011), 187–199.
  • [6] Ku, A. 1995. Modeling Uncertainty in Electric Capacity Planning. London Business School, Doctoral dissertation, Ph. D. Thesis, 472s, London
  • [7] Delarue, E., Laga, E., Meeus, L., Belmans, R., & D’Haeseleer, W. 2011. Achieving learning potentials in an educational simulation game for trading and generating electrical energy. International Journal of Engineering Education, 27(2011), 703–712.
  • [8] Demsetz, H. 1968. Why regulate utilities?. The Journal of Law and Economics, 11(1968), 55-65.
  • [9] Winston, C. 1998. US industry adjustment to economic deregulation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(1998), 89-110.
  • [10] Posner, R. A. 1969. Natural monopoly and its regulation: a reply. 21 Stanford. Law. Review 548 (1968).
  • [11] Thatcher, M. 2004. Winners and losers in Europeanisation: Reforming the national regulation of telecommunications. West European Politics, 27(2004), 284-309.
  • [12] Watts, D., & Ariztía, R. 2002. The electricity crises of California, Brazil and Chile: lessons to the Chilean market. LESCOPE'02. 2002 Large Engineering Systems Conference on Power Engineering. Conference Proceedings, 26-28 June, Halifax, 7-12.
  • [13] Bye, T., & Hope, E. 2005. Deregulation of electricity markets: the Norwegian experience. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(2005), 5269-5278.
  • [14] Green, R., 1998. Electricity deregulation in England and Wales. Deregul. Electr. Util. Springer, 28(1998), 179–202.
  • [15] Jamasb, T., & Pollitt, M. 2005. Electricity market reform in the European Union: review of progress toward liberalization & integration. The Energy Journal, 26(2005), (special issue).
  • [16] Dyner, I., & Larsen, E. R. 2001. From planning to strategy in the electricity industry. Energy policy, 29(2001), 1145-1154.
  • [17] Joskow, P. L. 2008. Lessons learned from electricity market liberalization. The Energy Journal, 29(Special Issue# 2).
  • [18] Hunt, S. 2002. Making competition work in electricity. John Wiley & Sons, 467s
  • [19] Adenikinju, A. F. 2005. Analysis of the cost of infrastructure failures in a developing economy: The case of the electricity sector in Nigeria, 44s, Ibadan.
  • [20] Energy and manufacturing. Stat Norway, 2017. https://www.ssb.no/en/energi-og-industri. (Erişim Tarihi: 25. 11. 2020).
  • [21] Larsen, E. R., Dyner, I., Bedoya, L., & Franco, C. J. 2004. Lessons from deregulation in Colombia: successes, failures and the way ahead. Energy policy, 32(2004), 1767-1780.
  • [22] Green, R. J., & Newbery, D. M. 1992. Competition in the British electricity spot market. Journal of political economy, 100(1992), 929-953.
  • [23] Dnes, A. W., Kodwani, D. G., Seaton, J. S., & Wood, D. 1998. The regulation of the United Kingdom electricity industry: an event study of price-capping measures. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 13(1998), 207-226.
  • [24] Larsen, E. R., & Bunn, D. 1999. Deregulation in electricity: Understanding strategic and regulatory risk. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 50(1999), 337–344. [25] Kiili, K. 2005. Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. 8(2005), 13–24.
  • [26] Prensky, M. 2001. Digital game-based learning. USA7 McGraw-Hill 464s.
  • [27] Norman, D. A. 1993. Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Basic Books; Revised ed. Edition, 304s.
  • [28] Shahidehpour, M., & Alomoush, M. 2002. Restructured Electric Power Systems: Operation, Trading, and Volatility [Book Review]. IEEE Computer Applications in Power, 15(2002), 60-62.
  • [29] Stoft, S. 2002. Power system economics. Journal of Energy Literature, 8(2002), 94-99.
  • [30] Jennings, D. 2002. Strategic management: an evaluation of the use of three learning methods. Journal of Management Development, 21(2002), 655-665.
  • [31] Senge, P. M. 2006. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday, 445s.
  • [32] Hur, J., Kang, D. J., Kook, K. S., Kim, T. H., Lee, J. H., & Moon, Y. H. 2003. The framework design of an electricity market simulator. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 36(2003), 653-657.
Toplam 31 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Mühendislik
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Ishmael Coffie Abusah

Saltuk Buğra Selçuklu

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 30 Nisan 2022
Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Nisan 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022 Cilt: 38 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Abusah, I. C., & Selçuklu, S. B. (2022). Simülasyon ile Öğrenme İçin Tasarlanmış Web Tabanlı Yeni Bir Elektrik Ticareti Oyunu. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 38(1), 21-37.
AMA Abusah IC, Selçuklu SB. Simülasyon ile Öğrenme İçin Tasarlanmış Web Tabanlı Yeni Bir Elektrik Ticareti Oyunu. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. Nisan 2022;38(1):21-37.
Chicago Abusah, Ishmael Coffie, ve Saltuk Buğra Selçuklu. “Simülasyon Ile Öğrenme İçin Tasarlanmış Web Tabanlı Yeni Bir Elektrik Ticareti Oyunu”. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 38, sy. 1 (Nisan 2022): 21-37.
EndNote Abusah IC, Selçuklu SB (01 Nisan 2022) Simülasyon ile Öğrenme İçin Tasarlanmış Web Tabanlı Yeni Bir Elektrik Ticareti Oyunu. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 38 1 21–37.
IEEE I. C. Abusah ve S. B. Selçuklu, “Simülasyon ile Öğrenme İçin Tasarlanmış Web Tabanlı Yeni Bir Elektrik Ticareti Oyunu”, Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 38, sy. 1, ss. 21–37, 2022.
ISNAD Abusah, Ishmael Coffie - Selçuklu, Saltuk Buğra. “Simülasyon Ile Öğrenme İçin Tasarlanmış Web Tabanlı Yeni Bir Elektrik Ticareti Oyunu”. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 38/1 (Nisan 2022), 21-37.
JAMA Abusah IC, Selçuklu SB. Simülasyon ile Öğrenme İçin Tasarlanmış Web Tabanlı Yeni Bir Elektrik Ticareti Oyunu. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2022;38:21–37.
MLA Abusah, Ishmael Coffie ve Saltuk Buğra Selçuklu. “Simülasyon Ile Öğrenme İçin Tasarlanmış Web Tabanlı Yeni Bir Elektrik Ticareti Oyunu”. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 38, sy. 1, 2022, ss. 21-37.
Vancouver Abusah IC, Selçuklu SB. Simülasyon ile Öğrenme İçin Tasarlanmış Web Tabanlı Yeni Bir Elektrik Ticareti Oyunu. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2022;38(1):21-37.

✯ Etik kurul izni gerektiren, tüm bilim dallarında yapılan araştırmalar için etik kurul onayı alınmış olmalı, bu onay makalede belirtilmeli ve belgelendirilmelidir.
✯ Etik kurul izni gerektiren araştırmalarda, izinle ilgili bilgilere (kurul adı, tarih ve sayı no) yöntem bölümünde, ayrıca makalenin ilk/son sayfalarından birinde; olgu sunumlarında, bilgilendirilmiş gönüllü olur/onam formunun imzalatıldığına dair bilgiye makalede yer verilmelidir.
✯ Dergi web sayfasında, makalelerde Araştırma ve Yayın Etiğine uyulduğuna dair ifadeye yer verilmelidir.
✯ Dergi web sayfasında, hakem, yazar ve editör için ayrı başlıklar altında etik kurallarla ilgili bilgi verilmelidir.
✯ Dergide ve/veya web sayfasında, ulusal ve uluslararası standartlara atıf yaparak, dergide ve/veya web sayfasında etik ilkeler ayrı başlık altında belirtilmelidir. Örneğin; dergilere gönderilen bilimsel yazılarda, ICMJE (International Committee of Medical Journal Editors) tavsiyeleri ile COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics)’un Editör ve Yazarlar için Uluslararası Standartları dikkate alınmalıdır.
✯ Kullanılan fikir ve sanat eserleri için telif hakları düzenlemelerine riayet edilmesi gerekmektedir.