YENİ NORMALİN KARMAŞIK SORUNLARINI ÇÖZMEDE MEVCUT HÜKÜMET MODELLERİNİN BAŞARISI BAĞLAMINDA SEÇİLMİŞ ÜLKELER ÜZERİNE BİR ANALİZ

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 90, 449 - 467, 16.04.2024

Harun Semercioğlu

Öz

The Covid 19 pandemic, which started to spread at the beginning of 2020, has led to a new paradigm that has been defined as the 'new normal' in the world with its ongoing effects until today. With this study, it is aimed to determine which of the existing forms of government achieves more success in solving the problems which have deepened with the effect of the pandemic and are getting more and more complex with each passing day as we experience as a result of global environmental problems, wars and the unfavorable international political economy. In this context, the 'new normal' has been defined by drawing the conceptual framework of politics and forms of government that have been implemented until today. Then, today's complex problems are analyzed in global security and economy, income distribution, social security, education, environment socio-cultural and other dimensions. In the following section, the selected government models were compared within the framework of the determined parameters, and the success of the problems in the solution was determined. As a result, the contribution of government models to this success was questioned, a general evaluation was made and solution proposals were stated.

Anahtar Kelimeler

politics, the new normal, government, political economy, pandemic

AN ANALYSIS ON THE SELECTED COUNTRIES IN THE CONTEXT OF CURRENT FORMS OF GOVERNMENTS’ SUCCESS IN SOLVING THE NEW NORMAL’S COMPLEX PROBLEMS

Öz

Kaynakça

• Ankara Ticaret Odası (ATO). (2022). Ülke Raporları, İtalya Cumhuriyeti, https://www.atonet.org.tr/Uploads/Birimler/Internet/Alt%20Tan%C4%B1t%C4%B1m/2020-08-20-%C3%9Clke%20Raporlar%C4%B1/%C4%B0talya.pdf , (Access Date: 18.08.2022).
• Becker, P.& Raveloson, J. (2008). What is Democracy?, https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/madagaskar/05860.pdf , (Access Date: 14.06.2022).
• Baehr, P. (2005). Totalitarianism, In M. C. Horowitz (Ed.), New Dictionary of The History of İdeas, 6, New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
• Britanicca, https://www.britannica.com/topic/monarchy , (Access Date: 13.06.2022).
• Bulmer, Elliot. (2017). Constitutional monarchs in parliamentary democracies, International Institute For Democracy and Electoral Assistance, Stocholm, www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/constitutional-monarchs-in-parliamentary-democracies-primer.pdf , (Access Date: 13.06.2022).
• CIA, Mali, The World Factbook, https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/mali/summaries, (Access Date: 18.08.2022).
• Çam, T.& Kayaoğlu, M. (2015). Marx’s distinction between socialism and communism, International Journal of Human Sciences, 12 (1), pp.385-391.
• Dictatorship Countries 2022, https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/dictatorship-countries , (Access Date: 14.06.2022).
• Eijk, C.V.D. (2018). The Essence of Politics, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press B.V.
• Engels, F. (1969). The Principles of Communism, Selected Works, 1, Progress Publishers, Moscow, pp. 81-97.
• Fortune. (2022). https://fortune.com/longform/global-gdp-growth-100-trillion-2022-inflation-china-worlds-largest-economy-2030/, (Access Date: 14.06.2022).
• Fukuyama, F. (1992). The End of History and The Last Man. New York: Free Press.
• Heywood, A. (2019). Politics. 5th Edition, London: Red Globe Press.
• Hobbes, T. (2017). Leviathan, London: Penguin Classics.
• Hoogerwerf, A. (1979). Politicologie, Begrippen En Problemen, Samsom: Alphen Aan Den Rijn.
• Kainzbauer, M. (2022). The U.S. Government, https://www.grin.com/document/109347 , (Access Date: 14.08.2022).
• Künkler, M. (2012). Theocracy, The Princeton Encyclopedia of Islamic Political Thought, Princeton University Press, pp. 547-548.
• Lidén, G. (2014). Theories of Dictatorships: Sub-Types and Explanations, Studies of Transition States and Societies, 6 (1), pp.50-67.
• Locke, J. (1824). Two Treatises of Government, London: C. Baldwin.
• Macchievelli, N. (2014). The Prince, London: Penguin Classics.
• Marx, K. & Engels, F. (1955). The Communist Manifesto, New York: Appleton Century Croffs.
• Marsicano, C.R. (2022). The political system of the United Kingdom, https://my.vanderbilt.edu/chrismarsicano/files/2016/02/UKPolitics1.pdf , (Access Date: 14.08.2022).
• Munch, G. L. (2016). What is Democracy? A reconceptualization of the Quality of Democracy? Democratization, 23 (1), pp.1-24.
• Rose, R.& Kavanagh, D. (1976). The Monarchy in Contemproray Political Culture, Comparative Politics, 8 (4), pp.548-576.
• Ridgewell, C. A. (1970). The Popular Concept of Totalitarianism, Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Burnaby: Simon Fraser University.
• Robinson, D. (2022). 13 Biggest Environmental Problems of 2022, https://earth.org/the-biggest-environmental-problems-of-our-lifetime/ , (Access Date: 14.08.2022).
• Semercioğlu, H. (2020). Uluslararası İlişkilerde Yeni Normal: Küreselleşmeden Neo-Orta Çağ’a mı?, International Journal of Social Sciences Academy, 3, pp.1015-1036.
• Semercioğlu, H. (2022). Turkey-Russia Federation Relations During the Last Pandemic İn The Scope Of Global And Regional Developments, 4th International Congress of Multidisciplinary Social Sciences, Ankara.
• T.C. Ticaret Bakanlığı. (2022). Çin ülke profili, https://ticaret.gov.tr/data/5f3b925713b876ea88e4c9c4/Cin%20_Ulke_Profili_2022.pdf , (Access Date: 14.08.2022).
• UN. (2022). https://www.un.org/en/un75/inequality-bridging-divide , (Access Date: 14.08.2022).
• UN, Quality Education. (2022). https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/education/ , (A.D.16.08.2022).
• Verdery, K. (1996). What was Socialism, and What Comes Next, New Jersey: Princton University Press.
• World Atlas (2022). 7 Countries With a Theocratic Government Today, https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/countries-with-theocratic-governments-today.html, (Access Date: 14.06.2022).
• World Inequality Report. (2022). https://wir2022.wid.world/executive-summary/, (Access Date: 14.08.2022).