İlk Okuma Yazma Becerileri Boyutunda Akıllı Telefon ve Tablet Uygulamaları

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 35 - 84, 29.03.2024

Sayım Aktay Seçkin Gök

https://doi.org/10.46778/goputeb.1305857

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı okuma yazma öğretimine ilişkin akıllı telefon ve tablet uygulamalarına yönelik öğretmen görüşlerini ortaya koymaktır. Çalışma nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden olgubilim yöntemi bağlamında desenlenmiş ve yürütülmüştür. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu 2022- 2023 eğitim öğretim yılında Aydın ili Köşk ilçesinde görev yapan sınıf öğretmenlerinden gönüllü 15 kişi oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada veriler yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler yoluyla elde edilmiştir. Görüşmeler sonucu elde edilen veriler “Nvivo for Windows” yazılımı kullanılarak çözümlenmiş ve içerik analizi yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Bu çalışmada öğretmenler, tablet ve akıllı telefon için tasarlanmış ilk okuma yazma öğretimi uygulamalarının öğretmenler açısından destekleyici ve kolaylaştırıcı bulmuştur. Ek olarak uygulamaların öğrencinin dikkatini çekmede katkı sağladığı, öğrenciye öğrendiklerini tekrar etmelerine imkân sağladığı, öğrencilerin motivasyonunu arttırdığı ve öğrenme sürecini kısalttığı sonuçlarına da ulaşmıştır. Ayrıca öğretmenlerin bu tür uygulamaları sesi hissettirme yoğunluklu her aşamada kullandıkları görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Mobil Öğrenme, Mobil Destekli Dil Öğrenimi, İlk Okuma Yazma Öğretimi, Eğitsel Yazılımlar

The Use of Smartphone and Tablet Applications for Early Reading and Writing Skills

Öz

The aim of this study is to reveal teachers' views on smartphone and tablet applications for teaching reading and writing skills. The study was designed and conducted in the context of the phenomenology method, one of the qualitative research methods. The study group consisted of 15 volunteer primary school teachers who worked in Köşk district of Aydın province in the 2022-2023 academic year. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews. The data obtained from the interviews were analyzed using the "Nvivo for Windows" software and content analysis method. In this study, teachers found the reading and writing instruction applications designed for tablets and smartphones to be supportive and facilitative. Additionally, it was found that the applications contributed to capturing students' attention, provided opportunities for students to review what they learned, increased students' motivation, and shortened the learning process. Moreover, teachers were observed to use such applications at every stage, emphasizing the importance of auditory stimulation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Mobile Learning, Mobile Assisted Language Learning, Literacy Teaching, Educational Software

Kaynakça

• Altunhan, Y., Kırnık, D., & Özkul, R. (2022). Teachers' views on the effects of multimedia materials on the primary reading and writing process. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(2), 929-950. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.1080867
• Altunkaynak, M., & Çağımlar, Z. (2020). Elementary school teachers’ use of educational technologies in teaching first reading and writing and their teaching benefits. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 49(226), 93-122.
• Atalay, N., & Anagün, Ş. (2014). The views of classroom teachers working in rural areas about using information and communication technologies. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2(3), 19. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.2c3s1m
• Aykar, A. N., & Yurdakul, İ. H. (2021). Early childhood teachers views on emergency remote teaching (ERT). Temel Eğitim, 3(2), 6-14. https://doi.org/10.52105/temelegitim.3.2.1
• Başaran, M., & Kılınçarslan, R. (2021). Effectiveness of games designed with Web 2.0 tools in the process of ınitial literacy teaching in distance education. Türkiye Eğitim Dergisi , 6(1), 186-199.
• Beers, C. S., Beers, J. W., & Smith, J. O. (2010). A principal’s guide to literacy instruction. Guilford Publications
• Birgül, K. (2014). An investigation about the views and attitudes of classroom teachers in computer-assisted literacy teaching [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Uludağ University.
• Bui, Y. N., Schumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (2006). The effects of a strategic writing program for students with and without learning disabilities in inclusive fifth-grade classes. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 21(4), 244-260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2006.00221.x
• Camacho, M. A. (2002). The effects of Waterford early reading program on reading achievement of first-grade students. Masters Abstracts International, 40(5), 1114.
• Creswell, J. W. (2021). Nitel araştirma yöntemleri. Beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni. [Qualitative research methods: Qualitative research and research design according to five approaches]. (M. Bütün ve S. B. Demir, Trans.). Siyasal Yayıncılık. (Original work published 2013).
• Değirmenci, H. (2014). The ideas of teachers about the first reading and writing materials, which have been prepared by power point presentation program [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Gazi Univesity.
• Değirmenci, H., & Ertem, İ.S. (2014). The impact of the educational software on first grade students’ reading skills: Morpa Kampüs application. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 4(4), 1-6.
• Gingold, C. (2000). A comparison of the impact of a computer-based program with the impact of traditional instructional methods on emergent reading skills of prekindergartners. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(3), 874A.
• Graham, S., & Perrin, D. (2006). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescent in middle and high school. Carnegie Corporation of New York. https://education.illinoisstate.edu/downloads/casei/5-15-WritingNext.pdf
• Güneş, A. M., & Özerbaş, M. A. (2015). The views of primary school teachers concerning the use of educational technologies in teaching in the initial reading and writing process. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi , 23(4) , 1775-1788.
• Gürol, A., & Yıldız, E. (2015). The effects of computer based education on initial literacy skills of first grade students. International Journal of Field Education, 1(1), 1-18.
• Haugland, S. (1992). The effect of computer software on preschool children’s developmental gains. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 3(1), 15-30.
• Judge, S. (2005). The impact of computer technology on academic achievement of young African American children. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 20(2),91–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568540509594554
• Kablan, Z. (2001). The Ideas of teachers about the first reading and writing materials, which have been prepared by power point presentation program [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Yıldız Teknik University.
• Kartal, H., Göktalay, Ş. B., & Sungurtekin, Ş. (2017). The multidimensional evaluation of educational software for teaching of reading and writing. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(4), 1938-1956. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2017.17.32772-363977
• Kaymaz, E., & Yeşılyurt, M. (2020). The effect of computer-assisted education on primary reading and writing success of primary school 1st grade students. USE 5th Internatıonal Congress of Socıology and Economıcs, Ankara, 37-57.
• Kılınç, M., Afacan, P., & Uzunpınar, U. (2021, May 21-24). Problems experienced by teachers teaching in primary school 1st grades with distance education during the pandemic period [Conference session]. International Eurasian Social Science Congress, Sivas, Türkiye.
• Larison, I. (2009, July 6-8). Mechanical mom/digital dad/technological teacher: Sucessful educational software reading programs in early elementary grades [Paper presentation]. 1st International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, Barcelona, Spain.
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage
• McKenna, M., & Watkins, J. (1996). The effects of computer. In mediated trade books on sight word acquisition and the development of phonics ability. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(2), 219-235.
• Mitchell, M. J., & Fox, B. J. (2001). The effects of computer software for developing phonological awareness in low-progress readers. Reading Research and Instruction, 40(4), 315-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070109558353
• Orhan Karsak, H. G. (2014). The effect of computer assisted instruction on elementary reading and writing achievement . Journal of Theoretical Educational Science , 7(1) , 114-134.
• Orhan, H. G. (2007, May 16-18). Examination of teachers' views on computer-assisted primary literacy teaching [Paper presentation]. 1st International Computer and Instructional Technologies Symposium, Çanakkale, Türkiye.
• Patton, M. Q. (2018). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri [Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods] (M. Butun & S.B. Demir, Trans Eds.). Pegem Akademi. (Original work published in 2014).
• Ponce, H. R., Mayer, R. E., & Lopez, M. J. (2013). A computer-based spatial learning strategy approach that improves reading comprehension and writing. Education Technology Research and Development, (61), 819- 840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9310-9
• Ringenberg, M. L. (2005). Developing reading fluency with computer-assisted reading practice [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The Catholic University of America.
• Sahin, A., & Özenç, E. G. (2021). The Use of Educational Software in Teaching Initial Reading and Writing. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(4), 373-389.
• Saldaña, J. (2019). Nitel araştırmalar için kodlama el kitabı. [Coding Handbook for Qualitative Research] (A. Tufekci & N. Sad, Trans Eds.). Pegem Akademi. (Original work published in 2015).
• Şahin, A. (2019). Examination of the use of educational softwares in primary reading and writing teaching in terms of teacher opinions [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University
• Tavşancıl, E., & Aslan, E. (2001). İçerik analizi ve uygulama örnekleri [Content analysis and application examples]. Epsilon Yayınevi.
• Teale, W. H., Leu, D. J., Labbo, L. D., & Kinzer, C. (2002). The CTELL Project: New ways technology can help educate tomorrow’s reading teachers. Reading Teacher, 55(7), 654-59. http://www.readingonline.org/electronic/RT/4-02_Column/
• Tenekeci, M. (2020). Web applications and mobile applications in Turkish teaching and their awareness of teachers. Milli Eğitim Dergisi , 49 (227) , 429-445.
• Turunen, I. (2019). Computer-assisted use of reading-through-writing method in relation to technical literacy and reading motivation. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 2(1), 42-59.
• Van Daal, H. P., & Reitsima, P. (2000). Computer-assisted learning to read and spell: Result from two pilot studies. Journal of Research in Reading, 23, 181-193 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.00113
• Vilaseca Momplet, R. M., Basil, C., & Reyes, S. (2013). Exploring the effects of computer software for teaching reading and writing skills in young children. Wyno Academic Journal of Educational Research and Essays, 1(2), 18-31. http://hdl.handle.net/2445/105049
• Wise, B. W., Olson, R. K., & Treiman, R. (1990). Subsyllabic units as aids in beginning readers word learning onset-rime versus post-vowel segmentation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 1-19.
• Yalçın, N. (2006). Developing a software for teaching initial reading writing to class student of primary education using speech recognition technology [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Gazi Üniversitesi.
• Yazıcı, E. B., & Özerbaş, M. A. (2022). Examining classroom teachers' usage of digital education platforms. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22 (1) , 1-14 .
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. Seçkin Kitapevi.