Tertiary Level EFL Learners’ Use of Complex Prepositions in KTUCLE, TICLE versus LOCNESS

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3, 32 - 41, 17.12.2017

Ali Şükrü Özbay , Sümeyye Bozkurt

Öz

The purpose of this study is to investigate the competence level of tertiary level Turkish EFL students in terms of using complex prepositions in their expository argumentative essays. Yet, another aim is to find out the extent of which they are successful in using these prepositions in their argumentative essays. Local learner corpus KTUCLE (Karadeniz Technical University Corpus of Learner English) data was used in this study in order to investigate the preposition use and the findings were compared with the findings of a native corpus LOCNESS (The Louvain Corpus of Native English Essays) in an attempt to contrast the usages and reveal overuse and underuse patterns in both corpora. This comparative interlanguage analysis of complex prepositions existing in the range of the corpus data mainly searched for overused and underused or misused prepositions. Prepositions in the semantic field of “reference” and “aboutness” in native English presented different colligational and collocational contexts and environments but the degree of this variety is further enhanced in learner corpora used in the study. Findings also suggested that overuse and underuse patterns of the prepositions in the scope of the study presented various levels of divergence when compared with the native corpus. Implications of this for English language teaching were also added to the end of the study. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

complex preposition, learner corpora, underuse, overuse

Kaynakça

• Abushihab, I. (2014). An analysis of grammatical errors in writing made by Turkish learners of English as a Foreign Language. International Journal of Linguistics (6)4, 213-223. [Google Scholar]
• Aijmer, K. (2009). Corpora and second-language acquisition. In K. Aijmer (Ed.), Corpora and language teaching (p. 13). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [Google Scholar] Anthony, L. (2012). AntConc (version 3.2.4) [Computer software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University [Google Scholar]
• Arjan et.al. (2013). A Corpus-Based Study on English Prepositions of Place, in and on. English Language Teaching; Vol. 6, No. 12 [Google Scholar]
• Aston, G., (2000). “Corpora and Language Teaching” in L. Burnard and T. McEnery (Eds.), Rethinking Language Pedagogy from a Corpus Perspective (7–17), Frankfurt: Lang [Google Scholar]
• Borjars, K. & Burridge, K. (2001).Introducing English Grammar. London: Arnold Publishers [Google Scholar]
• Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course. Boston: Heinle and Heinle. [Google Scholar]
• Elkılıç, G. (2012). “Mother tongue traces of Turkish university students on composition papers written in English”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 47, 656 – 664. [Google Scholar]
• Green, et al. (2000). “The incidence and effects on coherence of marked themes in interlanguage texts: a corpus-based enquiry”. English for Specific Purposes, 2000, 19, 99-113. [Google Scholar]
• Hermet, M., Désilets. A. (2009). Using First and Second Language Models to Correct Preposition Errors in Second Language Authoring. In proc. of the 4th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, Boulder, Co, USA, June 5, 2009. [Google Scholar]
• Jarvis, S. & Odlin., T. (2000). “Morphological type, spatial reference, and language transfer”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22 (4), 535–556. [Google Scholar]
• Kilimci, A., Can, C. (2009). TICLE: Uluslararası Türk Öğrenici İngilizcesi Derlemi. M. Sarıca, N. Sarıcave A. Karaca (Ed.), XXII. Ulusal Dilbilim Kurultayı Bildirileri,1- 11, Ankara: Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Yayınları. [Google Scholar]
• Koroglu, Z.C., (2014). An Analysis on Grammatical Errors of Turkish Efl Students’ Written Texts. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic. Volume 9/12 Fall 2014, p. 101-111, ANKARA-TURKE. [Google Scholar]
• Leech, G., (1998). ‘Preface’, in Granger, S. (ed.), Learner English on Computer. London and New York: Addison Wesley Longman. [Google Scholar]
• Mehdi, M.F. (1981). The Interference of Arabic in the Use of English Prepositions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin [Google Scholar]
• Quirk, et al., (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of English language. Harlow: Longman [Google Scholar]
• Rankin, T. and B. Schiftner. (2009). “Using learner corpora as a resource to inform tertiary language teaching”. Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice in English Language Teaching. Conference Proceedings. Centre for English Language Teaching, University of Vienna. 26-28 February 2009. Special online issue of VIEWS 18/3, 216-218.) [Google Scholar]
• Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation, Oxford University Press, Oxford. [Google Scholar]
• Sinclair, J. (1996), “The search for units of meaning”, Textus, 9, 75-106. [Google Scholar]
• Swan, M. (2001). Practical English Usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
• Yates, J. (1999). The ins and outs of prepositions: A guidebook for ESL students. New York: Barron's Educational Series. [Google Scholar]
• Yuan, H.C. (2014). A Corpus-based Study on the Influence of L1 on EFL Learners’ Use of Prepositions. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(12), 2513-2521. doi:10.4304/tpls.4.12.2513-2521 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]