Öz
Kaynakça
- ‘Abd al-Qadir, M. al-‘Arusi. (1410). al-Masa’il al-mushtarak bayna usul al-fiqh wa-usual al-din. Jeddah.
- Abduh, M. (2009). The theology of unity = Risālat al-tauḥīd. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Book Trust.
- al-Hanafi, I. N. (1999). Al-Ashbah wal-Nazair (Vol. 1). Beirut: Dar al-Kotob al-Ilmiyya.
- Al-Maturidi, A. M. (2010). Kitab al-Tawhid. (B. Topaloğlu & M. Aruçi, Eds.). Beirut: Dar Sader.
- Althusser, L. (1977). Lenin and philosophy and other essays (2. ed). London: New Left Book.
- Asad, T. (1993). Genealogies of religion: discipline and reasons of power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Ashkar, U. S. (2002/1423). Tarikh al-fıqh al-İslâmî. Amman: Dâru al-Nefâis.
- Ayengin, T. (2005). Hukûkî Dinamizm ve İçtihatta İsabet Tartışmaları. Marife 13(3), 139-158
- Başdemir, H., Y. (2005). İskoç Aydınlanma Etiği: Hutcheson, Hume ve Smith. Liberal Düşünce, 37: 27–44.
- Buti, M. S. R. (1966). Dawabit al-maslahah fi al-shari`ah al-Islamiyah. Dimashq: Matba`ah al-`Ilm.
- Callinicos, A. (Ed.). (1989). Marxist theory. Oxford, England ; New York: Oxford University Press.
Öz
Ideology and Discourse represent concepts used in studies of society to understand how political order and structure is formed and maintained. The two concepts, however, are based on epistemological and metaphysical foundations antithetical to Islamic creed. It is the aim of this paper to survey these conflicts and assess how radical they are. In this context, the formulations of the concept of ideology proposed by Marx, and to a lesser extent, Althusser and Žižek, will be studied alongside the concept of discourse as framed by Foucault. The two main issues identified for discussion are truth and the human subject. This paper concludes that the philosophical framework for truth utilised by ideology and discourse is problematic not just theologically but also theoretically and must be clearly limited in its range of application. Similarly, the individual must be approached as a subject independent of ideology and discourse, again in support of Islamic teaching, if it is to be made a theoretically coherent unit of analysis.
Kaynakça
- ‘Abd al-Qadir, M. al-‘Arusi. (1410). al-Masa’il al-mushtarak bayna usul al-fiqh wa-usual al-din. Jeddah.
- Abduh, M. (2009). The theology of unity = Risālat al-tauḥīd. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Book Trust.
- al-Hanafi, I. N. (1999). Al-Ashbah wal-Nazair (Vol. 1). Beirut: Dar al-Kotob al-Ilmiyya.
- Al-Maturidi, A. M. (2010). Kitab al-Tawhid. (B. Topaloğlu & M. Aruçi, Eds.). Beirut: Dar Sader.
- Althusser, L. (1977). Lenin and philosophy and other essays (2. ed). London: New Left Book.
- Asad, T. (1993). Genealogies of religion: discipline and reasons of power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Ashkar, U. S. (2002/1423). Tarikh al-fıqh al-İslâmî. Amman: Dâru al-Nefâis.
- Ayengin, T. (2005). Hukûkî Dinamizm ve İçtihatta İsabet Tartışmaları. Marife 13(3), 139-158
- Başdemir, H., Y. (2005). İskoç Aydınlanma Etiği: Hutcheson, Hume ve Smith. Liberal Düşünce, 37: 27–44.
- Buti, M. S. R. (1966). Dawabit al-maslahah fi al-shari`ah al-Islamiyah. Dimashq: Matba`ah al-`Ilm.
- Callinicos, A. (Ed.). (1989). Marxist theory. Oxford, England ; New York: Oxford University Press.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Felsefe |
| Bölüm | Araştırma Makaleleri |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 15 Aralık 2017 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2017 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2 |
