Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 4, 150 - 162, 31.12.2023

Alaz Ozcelık Mehmet Erçek

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Abid, A., Gull, A. A., Hussain N. and Nguyen, D. K. (2021). Risk governance and bank risk-taking behavior: Evidence from Asian banks. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 75, 1-19.
  • Aebi, V., Sabato, G. and Schmid M. (2012). Risk management, corporate governance, and bank performance in the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(12), 3213-3226.
  • Agha, S. Compliance with Basel Norms by Banks of Turkey (2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2234657 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2234657
  • Alshirah, M. H., Rahman, A. A. and Mustapa, I. R. (2020). Board of directors’ characteristics and corporate risk disclosure: The moderating role of family ownership. EuroMed Journal of Business, 15(2), 219-252.
  • Ansari, S. M., Fiss, P. F. and Zajac, E. J. (2010). Made to Fit: How Practices Vary as They Diffuse. Academy of Management Review, 35(1), 67-92.
  • Bakir, C. and Öniş, Z. (2010). The regulatory state and Turkish banking reforms in the age of post‐Washington Consensus. Development and Change, 41(1), 77-106.
  • Beltratti, A. and Stulz, R. M. (2012). The credit crisis around the globe: Why did some banks perform better? Journal of Financial Economics, 105(1), 1-17.
  • Buchholz, L. (2016). What is a Global Field? Theorizing Fields beyond the Nation-State. The Sociological Review, 64(2), 31-60.
  • Busch, A. (2009). Banking regulation and globalization. USA: Oxford University Press.
  • Brancato, C., Tonello, M., Hexter, E. and Newman, K. R. (2006). The role of US corporate boards in enterprise risk management. (No. R-1390-06-RR.). The Conference Board Research Report, Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=941179
  • Cameron, A. and Trivedi, P. (2010). Microeconometrics Using Stata. Texas USA: Stata Press.
  • Chaney, P. Jeter, D. C. and Philipich, K. (2009). Financial Crisis: A Time to Reevaluate Risk Management. Commercial Landing Review, March-April, 3-7.
  • Chen, J., Cheng, C., Ku, C. Y. and Liao W. (2019). Are Banks Improving Risk Governance After the Financial Crisis? Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 36(3), 1-17.
  • Ciddi, S. (2021). Turkey and the West. In J. Jongerden (Ed). The Routledge Handbook on Contemporary Turkey. (pp. 11-15). Routledge, New York.
  • Corporate Governance Principals for Banks. (2015). Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Available at: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d328.pdf
  • Diamond, D. W. and Rajan, R. G. (2009). The credit crisis: conjectures about causes and remedies. American Economic Review, 99(2), 606–610.
  • Dimaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
  • Djelic, M.-L. and Quack, S. (2003). Governing globalization? Bringing institutions back in. In M.-L. Djelic & S. Quack (Eds.), Globalization and institutions: Redefining the rules of the economic game (pp.1-14). : Ed ward Elgar, Cheltenhan, UK.
  • Dupire, M. and Slagmulder, R. (2019). Risk governance of financial institutions: The effect of ownership structure and board independence. Financial Research Letters, 28, 227-237.
  • Ellul, A., and Yerramilli, V. (2013). Stronger Risk Controls, Lower Risk: Evidence from U.S. Bank Holding Companies. The Journal of Finance, 68(5), 1757–1803. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42002596
  • Erçek, M. (2014). Explaining adoption of management innovations in less advanced settings: evidence from Turkey. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 15(5), 994-1016.
  • Erkens, D. H., Hung, M. and Matos, P. (2012). Corporate governance in the 2007-2008 financial crisis: Evidence from financial institutions worldwide. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(2), 389-411.
  • Erin, O., Bamigboye, O. and Arumona, J. (2020). Risk governance and financial performance: an empirical analysis. Business: Theory and Practice, 21(2), 758-768.
  • Erol, C., Baklaci H. F., Aydoğan B. and Tunç G. (2014). Performance comparison of Islamic (participation) banks and commercial banks in Turkish banking sector. EuroMed Journal of Business, 9(2), 114-128.
  • Esen, B. (2021). Competitive authoritarianism in Turkey under the AKP rule. In J. Jongerden (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook on Contemporary Turkey. Routledge, New York.
  • Goldbach, R. (2015). Asymmetric influence in global banking regulation. Review of International Political Economy, 22(6), 1087-1127.
  • Gondo, M. B. and Amis, J. M. (2013). Variations in practice adoption: the roles of conscious reflection and discourse. Academy of Management Review, 38(2), 229-247.
  • Gontarek, W. (2016). Risk governance of financial institutions: The growing importance of risk appetite and culture. Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, 9(2), 120-129.
  • Goodhart, C. (2011). The Basel Commitee on Banking Supervision. Cambridge, UK.
  • Helleiner, E. (2010). What role for the new financial stability board? The politics of international standards after the crisis. Global Policy, 1(3), 282-290.
  • Kafidipe, A., Uwalomwa, U., Dahunsi, O. and Okeme, F. O. (2021). Corporate governance, risk management and financial performance of listed deposit money bank in Nigeria. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1-14.
  • Kamarudin, F., Sufian, F. and Nassir, A. M. (2016). Does country governance foster revenue efficiency of Islamic and conventional banks in GCC countries? EuroMed Journal of Business, 11(2), 181-211.
  • Karyani, E., Dewo, S. A., Santoso, W. and Frensidy, B. (2020). Risk governance and bank profitability in ASEAN-5: a comparative and empirical study. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 15(5), 949-969.
  • Kenis, P., and Knoke, D. (2002). How organizational field networks shape interorganizational tie-formation rates. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 275-293.
  • Kostova, T. (1999). Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: a contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24 (2), 308-324.
  • Kostova, T. and Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 215-233.
  • Marois, T. and Güngen, A. R. (2019). The Neoliberal Restructuring of Banking in Turkey Since 2001. In G. L. Yalman, T. Marois & A. R. Güngen (Eds). The Political Economy of Financial Transformation in Turkey. (pp. 135-161). Routledge, New York.
  • Minton, B.A., Taillard, J. and Williamson, R. (2014). Financial expertise of the board, risk taking, and performance: evidence from bank holding companies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 49(2), 351-380.
  • Nguyen, Q. K. (2022). Determinants of bank risk governance structure: A cross-country analysis. Research in International Business and Finance, 60, 1-20.
  • Nicolas, M. and Firzli, J. (2011). A Critique of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Paris: Revue Analyse Financière.
  • Öniş, Z. (2009). Beyond the 2001 Financial crisis: the political economy of the new phase of neo-liberal restructuring in Turkey. Review of International Political Economy, 16(3), 409-432.
  • Özen, Ş. and Önder, Ç. (2021). Diffusion of foreign management practices across Turkish business organizations: a contextualized theory. International Studies of Management & Organization, 21(1), 69-92.
  • Raouf, H. and Ahmed, H. (2022). Risk governance and financial stability: a comparative study of conventional and Islamic Banks in the GCC. Global Finance Journal, 52, 166-181.
  • Roman G. (2015). Asymmetric influence in global banking regulation. Review of International Political Economy, 22(6), 1087-1127.
  • Rovik, K. A. (2016). Knowledge transfer as translation: review and elements of an instrumental theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18, 290-310.
  • Sabato, G. (2010). Financial crisis: where did risk management fail? International Review of Applied Financial Issues and Economics, 2(2), 315-327.
  • Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Sheedy, E. and Griffin, B. (2017). Risk governance, structures, culture, and behavior: A view from the inside. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 26(4), 4-22.
  • Sheedy, E. (2016). Risk Governance and Culture. Governance Directions, (February), 19-22.
  • Thematic Review on Risk Governance (2013). Financial Stability Board. Available at: https://www.fsb.org/2013/02/r_130212/
  • Walter, A. (2008). Governing Finance: East Asia’s adoption of international standards. Cornell University Press, New York.
  • Zhang, X., Li, F. and Ortiz J. (2021). Internal risk governance and external capital regulation affecting bank risk-taking and performance: Evidence from P.R. China. International Review of Economics and Finance, 74, 276-292.Surname, Name, (Publication Year). Name of Book. Publishing, Place of Publication, ISBN.

EXPLORING THE ADOPTION OF RISK GOVERNANCE STRUCTURES WITHIN THE TURKISH BANKING FIELD: AN INSTITUTIONAL THEORY LENS, 2006-2019

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 4, 150 - 162, 31.12.2023

Alaz Ozcelık Mehmet Erçek

Öz

Purpose- The purpose of this study is to investigate the adoption patterns of transnationally imposed risk governance structures within the Turkish banking field employing an institutional theory perspective. Building on institutional complexity, which stems from the conflict between transnational and national institutional influences, our study examines two different periods where transnational and national institutional arrangements were in relative fit or misfit.
Methodology- The methodology of this study includes the analysis of the publicly available panel data of banks. The annual reports of all 15 banks are used to gather the banks’ risk governance, risk management and performance indicators. All the reports are reached from Public Disclosure Platform (www.kap.gov.tr) or the corporate web sites of the banks.
Findings- A risk governance index is constructed to measure the varying levels of adoption among the banks, covering the period from 2006 to 2019. According to the findings, the risk governance index may include the dimension of risk committee, the dimension of chief risk officer, the risk appetite framework of the institution, and corporate governance. However, the risk performance of the banks may vary on different indicators.
Conclusion- It is uncovered that banks displayed a relatively homogenous adoption pattern during the 2006-2012 period when transnational and national institutional arrangements were in harmony. However, the adoption patterns diverged among banks when national institutional arrangements began to differ from transnational standards starting from 2013. It is also found that the adoption of transnational templates about risk governance did not result in significant performance increases in risk or corporate performance metrics, indicating a ritual adoption behavior by the majority of the banks, which fail or intendedly decline to entrench corresponding practices associated with these templates.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Risk governance adoption institutional field transnational institutions banking

Kaynakça

  • Abid, A., Gull, A. A., Hussain N. and Nguyen, D. K. (2021). Risk governance and bank risk-taking behavior: Evidence from Asian banks. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 75, 1-19.
  • Aebi, V., Sabato, G. and Schmid M. (2012). Risk management, corporate governance, and bank performance in the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(12), 3213-3226.
  • Agha, S. Compliance with Basel Norms by Banks of Turkey (2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2234657 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2234657
  • Alshirah, M. H., Rahman, A. A. and Mustapa, I. R. (2020). Board of directors’ characteristics and corporate risk disclosure: The moderating role of family ownership. EuroMed Journal of Business, 15(2), 219-252.
  • Ansari, S. M., Fiss, P. F. and Zajac, E. J. (2010). Made to Fit: How Practices Vary as They Diffuse. Academy of Management Review, 35(1), 67-92.
  • Bakir, C. and Öniş, Z. (2010). The regulatory state and Turkish banking reforms in the age of post‐Washington Consensus. Development and Change, 41(1), 77-106.
  • Beltratti, A. and Stulz, R. M. (2012). The credit crisis around the globe: Why did some banks perform better? Journal of Financial Economics, 105(1), 1-17.
  • Buchholz, L. (2016). What is a Global Field? Theorizing Fields beyond the Nation-State. The Sociological Review, 64(2), 31-60.
  • Busch, A. (2009). Banking regulation and globalization. USA: Oxford University Press.
  • Brancato, C., Tonello, M., Hexter, E. and Newman, K. R. (2006). The role of US corporate boards in enterprise risk management. (No. R-1390-06-RR.). The Conference Board Research Report, Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=941179
  • Cameron, A. and Trivedi, P. (2010). Microeconometrics Using Stata. Texas USA: Stata Press.
  • Chaney, P. Jeter, D. C. and Philipich, K. (2009). Financial Crisis: A Time to Reevaluate Risk Management. Commercial Landing Review, March-April, 3-7.
  • Chen, J., Cheng, C., Ku, C. Y. and Liao W. (2019). Are Banks Improving Risk Governance After the Financial Crisis? Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 36(3), 1-17.
  • Ciddi, S. (2021). Turkey and the West. In J. Jongerden (Ed). The Routledge Handbook on Contemporary Turkey. (pp. 11-15). Routledge, New York.
  • Corporate Governance Principals for Banks. (2015). Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Available at: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d328.pdf
  • Diamond, D. W. and Rajan, R. G. (2009). The credit crisis: conjectures about causes and remedies. American Economic Review, 99(2), 606–610.
  • Dimaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
  • Djelic, M.-L. and Quack, S. (2003). Governing globalization? Bringing institutions back in. In M.-L. Djelic & S. Quack (Eds.), Globalization and institutions: Redefining the rules of the economic game (pp.1-14). : Ed ward Elgar, Cheltenhan, UK.
  • Dupire, M. and Slagmulder, R. (2019). Risk governance of financial institutions: The effect of ownership structure and board independence. Financial Research Letters, 28, 227-237.
  • Ellul, A., and Yerramilli, V. (2013). Stronger Risk Controls, Lower Risk: Evidence from U.S. Bank Holding Companies. The Journal of Finance, 68(5), 1757–1803. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42002596
  • Erçek, M. (2014). Explaining adoption of management innovations in less advanced settings: evidence from Turkey. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 15(5), 994-1016.
  • Erkens, D. H., Hung, M. and Matos, P. (2012). Corporate governance in the 2007-2008 financial crisis: Evidence from financial institutions worldwide. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(2), 389-411.
  • Erin, O., Bamigboye, O. and Arumona, J. (2020). Risk governance and financial performance: an empirical analysis. Business: Theory and Practice, 21(2), 758-768.
  • Erol, C., Baklaci H. F., Aydoğan B. and Tunç G. (2014). Performance comparison of Islamic (participation) banks and commercial banks in Turkish banking sector. EuroMed Journal of Business, 9(2), 114-128.
  • Esen, B. (2021). Competitive authoritarianism in Turkey under the AKP rule. In J. Jongerden (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook on Contemporary Turkey. Routledge, New York.
  • Goldbach, R. (2015). Asymmetric influence in global banking regulation. Review of International Political Economy, 22(6), 1087-1127.
  • Gondo, M. B. and Amis, J. M. (2013). Variations in practice adoption: the roles of conscious reflection and discourse. Academy of Management Review, 38(2), 229-247.
  • Gontarek, W. (2016). Risk governance of financial institutions: The growing importance of risk appetite and culture. Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, 9(2), 120-129.
  • Goodhart, C. (2011). The Basel Commitee on Banking Supervision. Cambridge, UK.
  • Helleiner, E. (2010). What role for the new financial stability board? The politics of international standards after the crisis. Global Policy, 1(3), 282-290.
  • Kafidipe, A., Uwalomwa, U., Dahunsi, O. and Okeme, F. O. (2021). Corporate governance, risk management and financial performance of listed deposit money bank in Nigeria. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1-14.
  • Kamarudin, F., Sufian, F. and Nassir, A. M. (2016). Does country governance foster revenue efficiency of Islamic and conventional banks in GCC countries? EuroMed Journal of Business, 11(2), 181-211.
  • Karyani, E., Dewo, S. A., Santoso, W. and Frensidy, B. (2020). Risk governance and bank profitability in ASEAN-5: a comparative and empirical study. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 15(5), 949-969.
  • Kenis, P., and Knoke, D. (2002). How organizational field networks shape interorganizational tie-formation rates. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 275-293.
  • Kostova, T. (1999). Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: a contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24 (2), 308-324.
  • Kostova, T. and Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 215-233.
  • Marois, T. and Güngen, A. R. (2019). The Neoliberal Restructuring of Banking in Turkey Since 2001. In G. L. Yalman, T. Marois & A. R. Güngen (Eds). The Political Economy of Financial Transformation in Turkey. (pp. 135-161). Routledge, New York.
  • Minton, B.A., Taillard, J. and Williamson, R. (2014). Financial expertise of the board, risk taking, and performance: evidence from bank holding companies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 49(2), 351-380.
  • Nguyen, Q. K. (2022). Determinants of bank risk governance structure: A cross-country analysis. Research in International Business and Finance, 60, 1-20.
  • Nicolas, M. and Firzli, J. (2011). A Critique of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Paris: Revue Analyse Financière.
  • Öniş, Z. (2009). Beyond the 2001 Financial crisis: the political economy of the new phase of neo-liberal restructuring in Turkey. Review of International Political Economy, 16(3), 409-432.
  • Özen, Ş. and Önder, Ç. (2021). Diffusion of foreign management practices across Turkish business organizations: a contextualized theory. International Studies of Management & Organization, 21(1), 69-92.
  • Raouf, H. and Ahmed, H. (2022). Risk governance and financial stability: a comparative study of conventional and Islamic Banks in the GCC. Global Finance Journal, 52, 166-181.
  • Roman G. (2015). Asymmetric influence in global banking regulation. Review of International Political Economy, 22(6), 1087-1127.
  • Rovik, K. A. (2016). Knowledge transfer as translation: review and elements of an instrumental theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18, 290-310.
  • Sabato, G. (2010). Financial crisis: where did risk management fail? International Review of Applied Financial Issues and Economics, 2(2), 315-327.
  • Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Sheedy, E. and Griffin, B. (2017). Risk governance, structures, culture, and behavior: A view from the inside. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 26(4), 4-22.
  • Sheedy, E. (2016). Risk Governance and Culture. Governance Directions, (February), 19-22.
  • Thematic Review on Risk Governance (2013). Financial Stability Board. Available at: https://www.fsb.org/2013/02/r_130212/
  • Walter, A. (2008). Governing Finance: East Asia’s adoption of international standards. Cornell University Press, New York.
  • Zhang, X., Li, F. and Ortiz J. (2021). Internal risk governance and external capital regulation affecting bank risk-taking and performance: Evidence from P.R. China. International Review of Economics and Finance, 74, 276-292.Surname, Name, (Publication Year). Name of Book. Publishing, Place of Publication, ISBN.
Toplam 52 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Finans, İşletme
Bölüm Articles
Yazarlar

Alaz Ozcelık Bu kişi benim 0000-0001-7388-7384

Mehmet Erçek 0000-0002-5212-7121

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA Ozcelık, A., & Erçek, M. (2023). EXPLORING THE ADOPTION OF RISK GOVERNANCE STRUCTURES WITHIN THE TURKISH BANKING FIELD: AN INSTITUTIONAL THEORY LENS, 2006-2019. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 12(4), 150-162.

Journal of Business, Economics and Finance (JBEF) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access journal. The publication language is English. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The journal aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers and researchers working in the areas of business, economics and finance. The Editor of JBEF invites all manuscripts that that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JBEF charges no submission or publication fee.



Ethics Policy - JBEF applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JBEF is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).


Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.