LEADERSHIP MODEL THAT MAKES WORK MEANINGFUL IN NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS: A SCALE DEVELOPMENT STUDY

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3, 1843 - 1873, 30.11.2023

Mehmet Ali Taş Ali Murat Alparslan

https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1218876

Öz

The aim of the study; to investigate the role of leaders' attitudes and behaviors in the meaningfulness of work. As a result, it is to develop the meaning-making leadership scale. In line with the purpose of the study, a mixed study consisting of three research was conducted on the volunteers of various NPOs (Non‐Profit Organizations). In the first study, which was conducted with a qualitative method, a phenomenological design was used. The sample of this research consists of 30 volunteers. The collected data were analyzed by content analysis. As a result of this research, an item pool with 10 factors and 53 items was created, consisting of the attitudes and behaviors of the leaders that support the meaningfulness of the work. In the second study, which was carried out with a quantitative method, data were collected from a sample of 245 people and the psychometric properties of the item pool were tested. Within the scope of the findings, a draft scale with 6 factors and 32 items was designed from an item pool consisting of 53 items. In the third and last study conducted with a quantitative method, data were collected from a sample of 492 people. With this research the construct validity, criterion validity and reliability of the scale were tried to be verified. As a result of the analyzes made, the structure of the meaning-making leadership scale, consisting of 6 factors and 32 items, was confirmed. Thus, the final form of the scale was obtained. In addition, it has been determined that meaning-making.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Leadership, Meaning-Making Leadership, Meaningful Work, Volunteers, Scale Development

SİVİL TOPLUM KURULUŞLARINDA İŞİ ANLAMLI KILAN LİDERLİK MODELİ: BİR ÖLÇEK GELİŞTİRME ÇALIŞMASI

Öz

Çalışmanın amacı; işin anlamlılığında liderlerin tutum ve davranışlarının rolünü araştırmaktır. Bunun sonucunda Anlamlandıran Liderlik Ölçeğini (ALÖ) geliştirmektir. Çalışmanın amacı doğrultusunda çeşitli STK (Sivil Toplum Kuruluşları) gönüllüleri üzerinde üç araştırmadan oluşan karma bir çalışma yürütülmüştür. Nitel bir yöntemle yürütülen birinci araştırmada, fenomenolojik bir desen kullanılarak çeşitli STK’ya mensup 30 kişilik bir çalışma grubundan veriler toplanmış ve içerik analizine tabi tutulmuştur. Bu araştırmanın sonucunda, liderlerin işin anlamlılığını besleyen tutum ve davranışlarından oluşan 10 faktörlü ve 53 ifadeli bir madde havuzu oluşturulmuştur. Nicel bir yöntemle yürütülen ikinci araştırmada, 245 kişilik örneklemden veri toplanarak madde havuzunun psikometrik özellikleri test edilmiştir. Bulgular kapsamında madde havuzundan 6 faktörlü ve 32 maddeli taslak bir ölçek geliştirilmiştir. Nicel bir yöntemle yürütülen üçüncü ve son araştırmada ise 492 kişilik örneklemden veri toplanarak ölçeğin yapı geçerliliği, kriter geçerliliği ve güvenirliği test edilmiştir. Yapılan analizler sonucunda anlamlandıran liderlik ölçeğinin 6 faktörden ve 32 maddeden oluşan yapısı doğrulanmıştır. Böylece ölçeğin son şekline ulaşılmış, anlamlandıran liderliğin işin anlamlılığı üzerinde anlamlı ve pozitif bir etkisinin olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bu sayede anlamlandıran liderlik ölçeğinin ölçüte dayalı yapı geçerliliği de doğrulanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Liderlik, Anlamlandıran Liderlik, İşin Anlamlılığı, Gönüllüler, Ölçek Geliştirme

Kaynakça

• Aksu, G., Eser, M. T. ve Güzeller, C. O. (2017). Açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile yapısal eşitlik modeli uygulamaları. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
• Alfes, K., Antunes, B. ve Shantz, A. D. (2017). The management of volunteers–what can human resources do? A review and research agenda. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(1), 62-97.
• Allen, S., Winston, B. E., Tatone, G. R. ve Crowson, H. M. (2018). Exploring a model of servant leadership, empowerment, and commitment in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 29(1), 123-140.
• Alparslan, A. M., Yastıoğlu, S. ve Özkul, A. S. (2021). Psikolojik/duygusal iyi oluşta geri bildirimin rolü: Araştırma görevlileri üzerinde bir araştırma. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 11(2), 485–494.
• Amabile, T. ve Kramer, S. (2012). How leaders kill meaning at work. McKinsey Quarterly, 1, 124-131.
• Arnold, K. A., Turner, N., Barling, J., Kelloway, E. K. ve McKee, M. C. (2007). Transformational leadership and psychological well-being: The mediating role of meaningful work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(3), 193-203.
• Ashfaq, F., Butt, M. ve Ilyas, S. (2020). Volunteering: What drives and retains it? An analysis of motivational needs together with organizational policies and practices. Qualitative Research Journal, 21(2), 189-205.
• Aydın, G. Ç. ve Başol, O. (2014). X ve Y kuşağı: Çalışmanın anlamında bir değişme var mı? Ejovoc (Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges), 4(4), 1-15.
• Bailey, C. ve Madden, A. (2016). What makes work meaningful-or meaningless?. MIT Sloan management review, 57(4), 52-62.
• Bakan, İ. ve Doğan, İ. F. (2013). Liderlik: Güncel konular ve yaklaşımlar. Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
• Bang, H., Ross, S. ve Thomas Jr, G. R. (2012). From motivation to organizational commitment of volunteers in non-profit sport organizations: The role of job satisfaction. The Journal of Management Development, 32(1), 96-112.
• Baumeister, R. F. (1991). Meanings of life. New York: Guilford press.
• Benevene, P., Buonomo, I. ve West, M. (2020). The relationship between leadership behaviors and volunteer commitment: The role of volunteer satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. 1-14.
• Bunderson, J. S. ve Thompson, J. A. (2009). The call of the wild: Zookeepers, callings, and the double-edged sword of deeply meaningful work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1), 32-57.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E. ve Demirel, F. (2013). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem akademi yayınları.
• Cai, W., Lysova, E. I., Khapova, S. N. ve Bossink, B. A. (2018). Servant leadership and innovative work behavior in Chinese high-tech firms: A moderated mediation model of meaningful work and job autonomy. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1-13.
• Chalofsky, N. (2003). An emerging construct for meaningful work. Human Resource Development International, 6(1), 69-83.
• Chan, S. C. (2020). Transformational leadership, self-efficacy and performance of volunteers in non-formal voluntary service education. Journal of Management Development, 39(7/8), 929-943.
• Chikazhe, L., ve Nyakunuwa, E. (2021). Promotion of perceived service quality through employee training and empowerment: The mediating role of employee motivation and ınternal communication. Services Marketing Quarterly, 1-18.
• Clark, V. L. P. (2019). Meaningful integration within mixed methods studies: Identifying why, what, when, and how. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 57, 106-111.
• Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R. D., Copeland, J., Stukas, A. A., Haugen, J. ve Miene, P. (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1516.
• Creswell, J. W. (2016). Araştırma deseni: nitel, nicel ve karma yöntem yaklaşımları. (Çev. Demir, S. B.). Ankara: Eğiten Kitap Yayınları.
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2017). Good business: Liderlik, akış ve anlam yaratma (2. baskı). (Çev. Tümay, N.). İstanbul: Okuyanus.
• Çelik, V. (2020). Gönüllülük, katılım ve yönetim kültürü ilişkisi. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15(25), 3819-3850.
• Di Fabio, A. ve Blustein, D. L. (2016). From meaning of working to meaningful lives: The challenges of expanding decent work. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1119, 1-2.
• Ege, R. (2011). Gönüllülük, din ve din eğitimi. Dini araştırmalar, 14(38), 5-16.
• Eliyana, A. ve Ma’arif, S. (2019). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment effect in the transformational leadership towards employee performance. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 25(3), 144-150.
• Eren, E. (2017). Örgütsel davranış ve yönetim psikolojisi (16. baskı). İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım.
• Fakhri, M., Syarifuddin, S., Winarno, A., Nurnida, I. ve Hanum, S. (2021). Democratic leadership practice to construct clan organizational culture in family companies. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8(1), 803-811.
• Frieder, R., Wang, G. ve Oh, I. S. (2018). Linking job-relevant personality traits, transformational leadership, and job performance via perceived meaningfulness at work: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(3), 324-333.
• Fry, L. W. (2003). Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 693-727.
• Fyffe, I. ve Wister, A. V. (2016). Age differences in olympic volunteering experiences: An examination of generativity and meaning in life. Leisure Studies, 35(5), 638-651.
• Garner, J. T. ve Garner, L. T. (2011). Volunteering an opinion: Organizational voice and volunteer retention in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 813-828.
• Geldenhuys, M., Laba, K. ve Venter, C. M. (2014). Meaningful work, work engagement and organisational commitment. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 40(1), 1-10.
• Gerlsbeck, F. ve Herzog, L. (2020). The epistemic potentials of workplace democracy. Review of Social Economy, 78(3), 307-330.
• Glesne, C. (2013). Nitel araştırmaya giriş. (Çev. Ersoy, A. ve Yalçınoğlu, P.). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
• Gordon, P. A. ve Gordon, B. A. (2017). The role of volunteer organizations in leadership skill development. Journal of Management Development, 36(5), 712-723.
• Grant, A. M. (2008). The significance of task significance: Job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 108-124.
• Güney, S. (2018). Davranış bilimleri (11. Baskı). Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Gürbüz, S. (2019). AMOS ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi temel ilkeler ve uygulamalı analizler (IBM AMOS uygulamalı, örnek veri setleri) (1. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Gürbüz, S. ve Şahin, F., (2015). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Hackman, J.R. ve Oldham, G.R. (1975). Development of job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159–170.
• Hansen, M. ve Keltner, D. (2019). İşte anlam bulmak, işiniz sıkıcı olsa bile. Amaç, anlam ve tutku içinde (ss. 7-18). İstanbul: Optimist yayınları.
• Hu, J. ve Hirsh, J. B. (2017). Accepting lower salaries for meaningful work. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 16-49.
• İslamoğlu, A. H. ve Alnıaçık, Ü. (2014). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım.
• Kara, D., Uysal, M., Sirgy, M. J. ve Lee, G. (2013). The effects of leadership style on employee well-being in hospitality. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 34, 9-18.
• Karakiraz, A. ve Özen Kutanis, R. (2013). Gönüllü kuruluşlarda liderlik. M. Sarıkaya ve S. Bayraktaroğlu (Ed.), Gönüllü Kuruluşlarda Yönetim ve Strateji içinde (221-247). Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
• Keskes, I., Sallan, J. M., Simo, P. ve Fernandez, V. (2018). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment. Journal of Management Development, 37(3), 271-284.
• Koçel, T. (2014). İşletme Yöneticiliği (15, baskı). İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
• Lau, Y., Fang, L., Cheng, L. J. ve Kwong, H. K. D. (2019). Volunteer motivation, social problem solving, self-efficacy, and mental health: A structural equation model approach. Educational Psychology, 39(1), 112-132.
• Lee, Y. J. ve Brudney, J. L. (2015). Work‐to‐society spillover? Volunteering by employees of nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 26(1), 105-119.
• Lepisto, D. A. ve Pratt, M. G. (2017). Meaningful work as realization and justification: Toward a dual conceptualization. Organizational Psychology Review, 7(2), 99-121.
• Lester, J. N., Cho, Y. ve Lochmiller, C. R. (2020). Learning to do qualitative data analysis: A starting point. Human Resource Development Review, 19(1), 94-106.
• Matsuo, M., Arai, K. ve Matsuo, T. (2019). Empowering leadership and meaningful work: The mediating role of learning goal orientation. International Journal of Training and Development, 23(4), 328-338.
• Meier, S. ve Stutzer, A. (2008). Is volunteering rewarding in itself? Economica, 75(297), 39-59.
• Merchant, A., Ford, J. B. ve Sargeant, A. (2010). ‘Don't forget to say thank you’: The effect of an acknowledgement on donor relationships. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(7-8), 593-611.
• Meydan, C. H. ve Şeşen, H. (2015). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi AMOS uygulamaları. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
• Molloy, K. A. ve Foust, C. R. (2016). Work calling: Exploring the communicative intersections of meaningful work and organizational spirituality. Communication Studies, 67(3), 339-358.
• Mutua, J. N. ve Kiruhi, T. M. (2021). Volunteer public leaders’ values-driven leadership: The case of village elders in Kenya. Heliyon, 7(3), 1-6.
• Navarro, D. J. ve Foxcroft DR (2019). Learning statistics with jamovi: A tutorial for psychology students and other beginners. (Version 0,70). [Available from url: http://learnstatswithjamovi.com]. (03.11.2021).
• Nerstad, C. G., Dysvik, A., Kuvaas, B. ve Buch, R. (2018). Negative and positive synergies: On employee development practices, motivational climate, and employee outcomes. Human Resource Management, 57(5), 1285-1302.
• Özcan, Ş. (2018). Dünya dinlerinde altın kural: Diğerkâmlık. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(1), 285-308.
• Özkan, C. (2017). İşin anlamlılığının iş performansı ve sapma davranışına etkisi: Mersin ilinde yapılan bir araştırma. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Mersin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Mersin.
• Pavlish, C. ve Hunt, R. (2012). An exploratory study about meaningful work in acute care nursing. In Nursing Forum, 47(2), 113-122.
• Podolny, J. M., Khurana, R. ve Hill-Popper, M. (2004). Revisiting the meaning of leadership. Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 1-36.
• Pradhan, S. ve Jena, L. K. (2017). Effect of abusive supervision on employee’s intention to quit and the neutralizing role of meaningful work in Indian IT organizations. Organizational Analysis, 25(5), 825-838.
• Pradhan, S. ve Pradhan, R. K. (2016). Transformational leadership and job outcomes: The mediating role of meaningful work. Global Business Review, 17(3), 173-185.
• Restauri, N., Nyberg, E. ve Clark, T. (2019). Cultivating meaningful work in healthcare: A paradigm and practice. Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology, 48(3), 193-195.
• Romaioli, D., Nencini, A. ve Meneghini, A. M. (2016). How to foster commitment among volunteers: A social constructionist study in Italian nonprofit organizations. Journal of Social Service Research, 42(5), 718-728.
• Rosso, B. D., Dekas, K. H. ve Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 91–127.
• Rozelle, K. L. (2004). Women who make it work: Experiencing authenticity, connectedness, and meaningful work in corporate America. (Doctoral Dissertation). Fielding Graduate Institute.
• Schreiner, E., Trent, S. B., Prange, K. A. ve Allen, J. A. (2018). Leading volunteers: Investigating volunteers' perceptions of leaders' behavior and gender. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 29(2), 241-260.
• Seçer, İ. (2015). Psikolojik test geliştirme ve uyarlama süreci. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
• Seçkin, Ş. N. (2018). Yapılan işin anlamlılığı ve işe tutkunluk ilişkisi: Akademisyenler üzerine bir araştırma. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 143-160.
• Seligman, M. E. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Simon and Schuster.
• Shamir, B., House, R. J. ve Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization science, 4(4), 577-594.
• Sheldon, K. M., Turban, D. B., Brown, K. G., Barrick, M. R. ve Judge, T. A. (2003). Applying self-determination theory to organizational research. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 22, 357-394.
• Shuck, B. ve Rose, K. (2013). Reframing employee engagement within the context of meaning and purpose: Implications for HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 15(4), 341-355.
• Steger, M. F. ve Dik, B. J. (2010). Work as meaning: Individual and organizational benefits of engaging in meaningful work. P. A. Linley, S. Harrington ve N. Page (ed.), In Oxford handbook of positive psychology and work (pp. 131-142). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Steger, M. F., Dik, B. J. ve Duffy, R. D. (2012). Measuring meaningful work: The work and meaning inventory (WAMI). Journal of career Assessment, 20(3), 322-337.
• Steger, M. F., Littman-Ovadia, H., Miller, M., Menger, L. ve Rothmann, S. (2013). Engaging in work even when it is meaningless: Positive affective disposition and meaningful work interact in relation to work engagement. Journal of Career Assessment, 21(2), 348-361.
• Steimel, S. (2013). Connecting with volunteers: Memorable messages and volunteer identification. Communication Research Reports, 30(1), 12-21.
• Sun, J., Lee, J. W. ve Sohn, Y. W. (2019). Work context and turnover intention in social enterprises: the mediating role of meaning of work. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34(1), 46-60.
• Sunney, S. ve Brian, H. K. (2003). How to manage unpaid volunteers in organisations. Management Research News, 26(2-4), 63-71.
• Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş: Temel ilkeler ve lisrel uygulamaları. İstanbul: Ekinoks Yayınları.
• Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Australia: Pearson.
• Tabak, A., ve Sığrı, Ü. (2014). Liderlik. Ü. Sığrı ve S. Gürbüz (Ed.), Örgütsel davranış (2. baskı) içinde (ss. 374-429). İstanbul: Beta Yayınevi.
• Tashakkori, A. ve Teddlie, C. (2003). Issues and dilemmas in teaching research methods courses in social and behavioural sciences: US perspective. International Journal Of Social Research Methodology, 6(1), 61-77.
• Taylor, T., Darcy, S., Hoye, R. ve Cuskelly, G. (2006). Using psychological contract theory to explore issues in effective volunteer management. European Sport Management Quarterly, 6(2), 123-147.
• Thomson, S.B. (2011). Sample size and grounded theory. JOAAG. 5(1), 45-52.
• Tiltay, M. A. ve Islek, M. S. (2020). Volunteer management of local and national nonprofit organisations: an exploratory study from Turkey. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 17(2), 183-201.
• Tsai, T. T. H. ve Lin, A. J. (2014). Do psychological contract and organizational citizenship behavior affect organizational performance in non-profit organizations? Chinese Management Studies, 8(3), 397-417.
• Tummers, L. G. ve Knies, E. (2013). Leadership and meaningful work in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 859-868.
• Van Schie, S., Güntert, S. T., Oostlander, J. ve Wehner, T. (2015). How the organizational context impacts volunteers: A differentiated perspective on self-determined motivation. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(4), 1570-1590.
• Varney, J. (2009). Leadership as meaning-making. Human Resource Management International Digest, 17(5), 3-5.
• Varoğlu, D. (2019). İş özellikleri kuramı. S. Yürür (ed.), Örgütsel davranış kuramları. İstanbul: Beta Yayınevi.
• Veres, J. C., Eva, N. ve Cavanagh, A. (2019). “Dark” student volunteers: commitment, motivation, and leadership. Personnel Review, 49(5), 1176-1193.
• Von Essen, J. (2016). On the meaning of volunteering: A study of worldviews in everyday life. Foundations of Science, 21(2), 315-333.
• Von Essen, J. (2016). On the meaning of volunteering: A study of worldviews in everyday life. Foundations of Science, 21(2), 315-333.
• Ward, S. J. ve King, L. A. (2017). Work and the good life: How work contributes to meaning in life. Research in Organizational Behavior, 37, 59-82.
• Wilson, J. (2012). Volunteerism research: A review essay. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 41(2), 176-212.
• Wisner, P. S., Stringfellow, A., Youngdahl, W. E. ve Parker, L. (2005). The service volunteer–loyalty chain: an exploratory study of charitable not-for-profit service organizations. Journal of Operations Management, 23(2), 143-161.
• Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.