INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS STUDIES IN CHINA: FROM IDEOLOGY-FOREIGN POLICY-BASED APPROACHES TO KNOWLEDGE-BASED HOMEGROWN THEORIZING

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3, 2072 - 2092, 30.11.2023

Ümit Alperen Timuçin Kodaman

https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1281630

Öz

This paper explores the historical relationship between homegrown theorization in the discipline of international relations in China and its changing position in the international system. Since China's opening reforms in 1978, the country has increasingly integrated into the Western-centered international system, resulting in significant economic, political, and military growth. As a consequence, the international system's center of gravity has shifted from the Atlantic to the Pacific. This has led to a growing interest among international relations scholars in analyzing China using theories that are shaped by Chinese ideology, history, and tradition. This study argues that the motivation for studying non-ideological international relations and homegrown theorization in China is a result of the country's process of integrating with the world and repositioning itself within the global system. Overall, this study contributes to the ongoing debate in international relations about the diversity of theoretical perspectives and the need to recognize the intellectual contributions of non-Western countries. By focusing on China's homegrown theorization in international relations, this study provides insights into the evolution of the discipline and highlights the challenges associated with incorporating non-Western perspectives into the mainstream.

Anahtar Kelimeler

International relations, China, Homegrown theory, Rising power, Chinese Characteristics

ÇİN’DE ULUSLARARASI İLİŞKİLER ÇALIŞMALARI: İDEOLOJİK-DIŞ POLİTİKA TEMELLİ YAKLAŞIMLARDAN BİLGİ TEMELLİ YEREL TEORİLEŞMEYE

Öz

Bu makale, Çin’de uluslararası ilişkiler ve yerel teori çalışmalarını Çin’in uluslararası sistemdeki değişen konumu arasındaki ilişkiyi tarihsel bağlamda tartışmaktadır. Çin’in 1978’de başlattığı Açılım Reformları ile Çin, Batı-merkezli uluslararası sisteme daha fazla entegre olmaya başlamıştır. Aynı zamanda bu reformlar Çin’in ekonomik, politik, askeri olarak güçlenmesine ve bu gelişmelerin bir çıktısı olarak da uluslararası sistemin merkezinin Atlantik’ten Pasifik’e kaymasında etkili olmuştur. Dolayısıyla Çin’in uluslararası sistemle artan angajmanı, Çinli karar alıcıların da teşvikiyle uluslararası ilişkiler uzmanlarını, kendi düşünce sistemleri, tarihleri ve geleneklerinden üretilmiş uluslararası ilişkiler teorileri ile açıklamaya sevketmektedir. Bu çalışma, de ideoloji-dışı uluslararası ilişkiler ve yerel teori çalışmalarında motive edici faktörün Çin’in dünya ile entegre süreci ve kendisini küresel sistem içinde yeniden konumlandırmasının bir neticesi olduğunu savunmaktadır. Genel olarak, bu çalışma uluslararası ilişkilerde teorik bakış açılarının çeşitliliği ve Batı-dışı ülkelerin entelektüel katkılarını tanıma ihtiyacı hakkında süregelen tartışmalara katkıda bulunmaya çalışmaktadır. Ayrıca, Çin-merkezli uluslararası ilişkilerde yerel teorileştirme çalışmalarına odaklanarak, disiplinin evrimine dair bir gözlem sağlamakta ve Batı-dışı bakış açılarını ana akıma dahil etmenin getirdiği zorlukları incelemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Uluslararası ilişkiler, Çin, Yerel teori, Yükselen güç, Çin karakteristiği

Kaynakça

• President Hu elaborates the theory of harmonious world, People’s Daily, 26 Kasım 2009, http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90780/91342/6824821.html.
• Acharya, A. ve Buzan, B. (2007). Why is there no non-Western international relations theory? An introduction. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. 7(3), 287-312.
• Acharya, A. (2019). From Heaven to Earth: ‘Cultural Idealism’ and ‘Moral Realism’ as Chinese Contributions to Global International Relations. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 12(4), 467-494.
• Alagappa, M. (2011). International Relations Studies in Asia: Distinctive Trajectories. Inter- national Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 11(2), 193-230.
• Chan, G. (1997). International Studies in China: Origins and Development. Issues &Studies, 33(2), 40-64.
• Chan, G. (1998). International Studies in China: An Annotated Bibliography. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
• Cox, R. (1981). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millenium: Journl of International Studies, 10(2), 126-155.
• Deng, X. (1982). “Selected works of Deng Xiaoping.” September 1, 1982. http://en.people.cn/ dengxp/vol3/text/c1010.html.
• Dirlik, A. (2014). Mao Zedong Thought and the Third World/Global South. Interventions, 16(2), 176-196.
• Fairbank, J. (ed.). (1968). World Order: China’s Foreign Relations. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
• Geeraerts, G. ve Men J. (2001). International Relations Theory in China. Global Society. 15(3), 251-266.
• Hoffman, Stanley. (1977). An American Social Sciences: International Relations”. Daedalus, 106(3), 41-60.
• Jin, Y. (2020). Weishenme yao Changdao “Gongsheng Yiyulun. Guoji Guancha, 1, 18-46.
• Kwong, L. (1993). The T'i-Yung Dichotomy and the Search for Talent in Late-Ch'ing Chi- na. Modern Asian Studies, 27(2), 253-279. Lu, P. (2006). Chuangjian Zhongguo Guojiguanxi Lilun Sizhong Tujing de Fenxi yu Pingjia. Shijie Jingji yu Zhengzhi, 6, 52-61.
• Mearsheimer, J. (2014). Can China Rise Peacefully?. National Interest. October 25,2014. https://nationalinterest.org/commentary/can-china-rise-peacefully-10204.
• Meng, W. (2020). Is China's IR Academic Community Becoming More Anti- American?. Asian Perspective, 44(1), 139-161.
• Noesselt, N. (2012). Is There a “Chinese School” of IR?. GIGA Working Papers,188, 1-27.
• Pang, Z. (2003). Kaifangshi de Zizhu Fazhan: dui Yingguo Guoji Guanxi Lilun de Yixiang Guancha—Sikao Zhongguo Guoji Guanxi Lilun de Fangxiang”. Shijie Jingji yu Zhengzhi, 6, 20-25.
• Qin, Y. ve Astrid N. (2019). Relationality and rationality in Confucian and Western traditions of thought. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32(5), 601-614.
• Qin, Y. (2016). A relational theory of world politics”. International Studies Review, 18(1), 33-47.
• Qin, Y. (2009). Development of International Relations Theory in China”. International Studies, 4(185), 185-201.
• Qin, Y. (2006). Guoji Guanxi Lilun Zhongguo Xuepai Shengcheng de Keneng he Biran. Shijie Jingji yu Zhengzhi, 3, 7-13.
• Qin, Y. (2005). Theoretical Problematic of International Relationship Theory and Construction of a Chinese School. Social Sciences in China, 3, 165-176.
• Qin, Y. (2007). Why is there no Chinese international relations theory?. International Relati-ons of the Asia-Pacific, 7(3), 313-340.
• Qin, Y. (2018). A relational theory of world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Ren, X. (2020). Grown from within: Building a Chinese School of International Relations. The Pacific Review, 33(3-4), 386-412.
• Ren, X. (2010). Traditional Chinese Theory and Practice of Foreign Relations: A Reassessment (Ed.). China and International Relations: The Chinese View and the Contribution of Wang Gungwu içinde (102-117). Londra ve New York: Routledge.
• Ren, X. (2009). Zou Zizhu Fazhan Zhilu: Zhenglun Zhong de “Zhongguo Xuepai. Guoji Zhengzhi Yanjiu, 46(2), 15-28.
• Shih, C. ve Huan, C. (2020). China and International Theory: The Balance of Relationships. New York: Routledge.
• Song, X. (2001). Building Internationaş Relations Theory with Chinese Characteristics. Journal of Contemporary China, 10(26), 61-74. Tang, S. (2013). The social evolution of international politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Tin-bor Hui, V. (2012). History and Thought in China’s Traditions. Chinese Journal of Political Science, 17(2), 125-141.
• Wang, J. ve Buzan, B. (2014). The English and Chinese Schools of International Relations: Comparisons and Lessons. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 7(1), 1-46.
• Wang, J. ve Dang, X. (2008). Zhongguo Guoji Guanxi Yanjiu Sishi Nian. Beijing: Zhongyang Bianyi Chubanshe.
• Wang, Y. (2009). China: Between Copying and Constructing. (Ed.). International Relations Scholarship Around the World içinde (103-120). London ve New York: Routledge.
• Wang, Y. (2002). Zai Kexue-Yu Zhiyi Guoji yi Guanxi Li Shulun Zhijian. Shijie yu Zhengzhi, 9, 4-10.
• Yan, X. (2011a). A Comparative Study of Pre-Qin Interstate Political Philosophy. (Ed.). Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power içinde (21-70). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Yan, X. (2014). Daoyi Xianshi Zhuyi de Guoji Guanxi Lilun. Guoji Wenti Yanjiu, 5, 102-128.
• Yan, X. (2006). Guoji Guanxi Lilun shi Pushixingde. Shijie Jingji yu Zhengzhi, 2.
• Yan, X. (2001). The Rise of China in Chinese View”. Journal of Contemporary China, 10(26), 33-39.
• Yan, X. (2008). Xun Zi’s Thought on International Politics and Their Implications”. Chinese Journal of International Politics, 2(1), 135-165.
• Yan, X. (2011b). Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Yan, X. (2018). Leadership and the Rise of Great Powers, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Zhang, F. (2012a). Debating the “ChineseTheory of International Relations”: Toward a New Stage in China’s International Studies. (Ed.). Contemporary Chinese Political Thought: Debates and Perspectives içinde (67-91). KY: University Press of Kentucky.
• Zhang, F. (2012b). The Tsinghua approach and the inception of Chinese theories of international relations. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 5(1), 73-102.
• Zhang, M. (1991). Guoji guanxi lilun Yanjiu de Mudi, Duixiang zhi Tantao. (Ed.). Guoji Guanxi Lilun Chutan içinde (68-80). Shanghai: Shanghai Waiyu Jiaoyu Chubanshe.
• Zhang, Y. (2003). The ‘English School’ in China: a Travelogue of Ideas and their Diffusion”. European Journal of International Relations, 9(1), 87-114.
• Zhao, T. (2006). Re-thinking Empire from a Chinese Concept ‘All-under-heaven (Tian- xia, 天下). Social Identities, 22(1), 29-41.
• Zhao, T. (2005). Tian-xia Tixi: Shijie Zhidu Zhixue Daolun. Jiangsu: Jiangsu Jiaoyu Chubanshe.
• Zhao, Y. ve Xiaochun, Z. (1987). Guanyu jianli you Zhongguo Tese de Guoji Guanxixue Tixi: Shanghai Guoji Guanxi Lilun Taolunhui Jiyao. Xiandai Guoji Guanxi, 4, 3-6.
• Zheng, B. (2005). China's "Peaceful Rise" to Great-Power Status. Foreign Affairs, 84(5), 18-24.