The Effect of Empowering Leadership Characteristics of School Principals According to Teachers' Perceptions on Teachers' Psychological Ownership and Work Engagement

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3, 165 - 183, 02.05.2024

Esra Töre Burak Uzun

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.40.11.3

Öz

This study examines the effect of school principals' empowering leadership according to teachers' perceptions of teachers' psychological ownership and work engagement. The study sample consists of 463 teachers. The relational survey model, one of the quantitative research methods, was used in the study. Empowering Leadership Scale, Psychological Ownership Scale and Work Engagement Scale were used to collect the data. As a result of the research, according to teachers' perceptions, the empowering leadership levels of school principals and teachers' psychological ownership and work engagement levels were found to be high. Teachers' psychological ownership and work engagement levels show significant differences according to age, seniority, and education level variables. A significant positive relationship was found between the empowering leadership of school principals and teachers' psychological ownership. A medium-level positive significant relationship was found between the empowering leadership of school principals and teachers' work engagement. Empowering leadership characteristics of school principals significantly positively affect teachers' psychological ownership and work engagement. The study emphasized the role of empowering leadership in understanding teachers' work engagement and psychological ownership. Based on the results, school principals are recommended to demonstrate empowerment leadership behaviors to build an understanding of teachers' work engagement and psychological ownership.

Anahtar Kelimeler

empowering leadership, work engagement, psychological ownership, school principal, teacher

Kaynakça

• Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J., & Rapp, A. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology. 90(5), 945–955. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.945
• Akçin, K. (2018). Çalışanların örgütsel destek algısı ve psikolojik sahiplenmelerinin, sessizlik davranışlarına ve görev performansına etkisi: Eğitim sektöründe bir araştırma [Effect of employees’ perceived organizational support and psychological ownership on silence behaviors and task performance. A research in the education sector] (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Uludağ University, Bursa. http://hdl.handle.net/11452/1485
• Alotaibi, S. M., Amin, M., & Winterton, J. (2020). Does emotional intelligence and empowering leadership affect psychological empowerment and work engagement? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(8),971-991. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2020-0313
• Amor, A. M., Xanthopoulou, D., Calvo, N., & Vázquez, J. P. A. (2021). Structural empowerment, psychological empowerment, and work engagement: A cross-country study. European Management Journal, 39(6), 779-789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.01.005
• Anwar, F. F., Luddin, M. R., & Akbar, M. (2021). Empowering leadership's effect to employee task performance: A mediating role of work engagement. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 12(5).
• Aras, G. (2013). Personel güçlendirme yönetiminde güçlendirici liderlik davranışları uygulaması: Kemer bölgesi beş yıldızlı otel işletmeleri örneği [The application of empowering leadership behaviors in employee empowerment strategy: Sample from five star hotel managements in Kemer district] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Gümüşhane University, Gümüşhane.
• Asmadili, İ. (2020). Turist rehberlerinin iş değerlerinin işe adanmışlık üzerine etkisinin belirlenmesi [Determination of the effect of tourist guides’ work values on work engagement] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Balıkesir University, Balıkesir.
• Atalık, B. (2021). Çalışanların esnek çalışma düzenlemelerine karşı tutumlarının işe adanmışlıklarına etkisinde örgütsel adalet algısının aracılık rolü: Ankara’da İHA alanında faaliyet gösteren işletmelerde bir araştırma [Organizational justice in the effect of employees' attitudes towards flexible work arrangements on their engagement to work: A research on businesses operating in the field of UAV in Ankara] (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Defence University. Ankara.
• Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Crossley, C. D., & Luthans, F. (2009). Psychological ownership: theoretical extensions, measurement and relation to work outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(2), 173-191. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.583
• Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career
• Development International, 13(3), 209-223. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430810870476
• Bhatnagar, J. (2005). The power of psychological empowerment as an antecedent to
• organizational commitment in Indian managers. Human Resource Development International, 8(4), 419–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860500356101
• Bhatnagar, J. (2012). Management of innovation: Role of psychological empowerment,
• work engagement and turnover intention in the Indian context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(5), 928-951. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.651313
• Bilal, H., Khan, A. A., Ahmad K., & Shah, S. N. U. (2018). The impact of employee
• engagement on task performance. Journal of Business and Tourism, 4(2), 135-142. https://doi.org/10.34260/jbt.v4i2.166
• Bilgin, N., Gülşen, M., Kutlu, A., & Çınar Pakyüz, S. (2019). Çalışan sessizlik ve
• seslilik davranışları ölçeğinin öğretim elemanları üzerinde Türkçe'ye uyarlanması [The Turkish adaptation of employee silence and voice behaviour scale on academicians]. EGE HFD., 35(3), 103-114.
• Bostancı, H., & Ekiyor, A. (2015). Çalışanların işe adanmasının örgüt içi girişimciliğe etkisinin incelenmesi: Sağlik sektöründe bir uygulama [The impact of job engagement on organizational entrepreneurship: An application in the health sector]. International Journal of Health Management and Strategies Research, 1(1), 37-51.
• Büyükbeşe, T., & Gökaslan, M. O. (2018). İşe gömülmüşlük, işe adanmışlık ve işten ayrılma niyeti ilişkisi: Bir alan çalışması [The relationship between job embeddedness, job engagement, and intention to quit: A field study]. Mukaddime, 9(2), 135-153. https://doi.org/10.19059/mukaddime.376745
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2020). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods in education]. Ankara: Pegem Publ.
• Cai D, Cai Y, Sun Y and Ma J (2018) Linking empowering leadership and employee work engagement: The effects of person-job fit, person-group fit, and proactive personality. Front. Psychol. 9:1304. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01304
• Cheng, Z., Liu, W., Zhou, K., Che, Y., & Han, Y. (2021). Promoting employees’ pro-environmental behaviour through empowering leadership: The roles of psychological ownership, empowerment role identity, and environmental self-identity. Business Ethics, The Enviroment & Responsibility, 1–15. https://www.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.756570
• Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471-482. https://doi.org/10.2307/258093
• Cziraki, K., & Laschinger, H. (2015). Leader empowering behaviours and work engagement: the mediating role of structural empowerment. Nursing leadership (Toronto, Ont.), 28(3), 10-22. https://doi.org/10.12927/cjnl.2006.18599
• Dawkins, S., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Martin, A. (2015). Psychological ownership: A review and research agenda. Journal of Organization Behavior, 38(2), 163-183. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2057
• De Klerk, S., & Stander, M. W. (2014). Leadership empowerment behaviour, work engagement and turnover intention: The role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Positive Management, 5(3), 28-45. https://doi.org/10.12775/JPM.2014.018
• Demirkaya, H., & Şimşek Kandemir, A. (2014). 21. yüzyılın anahtar rekabet faktörü olan psikolojik sahiplenme üzerine bir işletme incelemesi [A plant analysis on psychological ownership which is the key factor of competition in the 21st century]. ÇSGB Journal of the Working World, 2(3), 7-21.
• Dirgen, N. (2019). Örgütsel Nepotizm ve psikolojik sahiplenme arasındaki ilişkide
• örgütsel güvenin aracılık rolü: Bankacılık sektöründe bir araştırma [Mediatory role of organizational trust in relationship between organizational Nepotism and psychological ownership: A case study in banking sector] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Sakarya University, Sakarya. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12619/69154
• Ekinci, S. (2018). Profesyonel öğrenme topluluğu, psikolojik sahiplenme ve bağlamsal performans arasındaki ilişki [The correlation among professional learning community, psychological ownership and contextual performance] (Unbuplished doctoral thesis). Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University, Bolu.
• Ekber, Ş., & Memmedova, M. (2017). Azerbaycan’da bankacılık sektörü çalışanlarının sahiplik duygusu analizine yönelik bir çalışma [A study of the ownership sense of banking sector employees in Azerbaijan]. MANAS Journal of Social Studies, 6 (2), 97-114.
• Empowerment, W. E., Yassine, O., & Masa’deh, R. (2018). A review of literature on the associations among employee empowerment, work engagement and employee performance. Modern Applied Science, 12(11), 313-329. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v12n11p313
• Epli, H., Vural Batık, M., Doğru Çabuker, N., & Balcı Çelik, S. (2021). The relationship between perceived parental rejection and dating anxiety: The mediating role of interpersonal cognitive distortions. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(3), 70-85. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2021.346.5
• Erkutlu, Hakan and Jamel Chafra. (2016). Empowering leadership and work engagement: the roles of selfefficacy and identification with leader. Research Gate Publication, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3311.1125
• Gökaslan, M. O. (2018). Öğretmenlerde örgütsel bağlılık, işe gömülmüşlük, işe adanmışlık, ve işten ayrılma niyeti ilişkisi: Bir alan çalışması [The relationship between teachers’ organizational commitment, job embeddesness, work engagement and turnover intention: A field study]. Journal of Turkish Social Sciences Research, 3(2), 25-46.
• Güneş, H. N. (2022). Kariyer tatmini ile işe adanmışlık ilişkisi: Manisa ilindeki kamu çalışanları üzerine bir araştırma [The relationship between career satisfaction and work engagement: A research on public employees in Manisa province] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Manisa Celal Bayar University, Manisa.
• Hao, Po., Wei He, Li-Rong Long. (2017). Why and when empowering leadership has different effects on employee work performance: The pivotal roles of passion for work and role breadth self-efficacy. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051817707517
• Helland, E., et al. (2020). The relationship between empowering leadership, work characteristics, and work engagement among academics: A sem mediation analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1): 11, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.84
• Jiang, M., Wang, H., & Li, M. (2019). Linking empowering leadership and organizational citizenship behavior toward environment: The role of psychological ownership and future time perspective. Frontier in Psychology. 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02612
• Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management, 33(4), 692-724. https://doi.org/10.2307/256287
• Kaplanseren, S., & Örücü, E. (2018). İşe tutkunluğun örgütsel vatandaşlığa etkisi: Otel çalışanlari üzerine bir araştırma [Effect of job attention to organizational citizenship: A research on hotel employees]. Journal of Trakya University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 7(1), 1-19.
• Kara, E., & Kaya, A. (2020). Yönetici desteğinin işe adanmışlık üzerindeki etkisinde psikolojik sahiplenmenin aracı rolü [The mediating role of psychological adoption in the influence of executive’s support on dedication to work]. Manas Journal of Social Studies, 9(4), 2364-2375.
• Khan, A. K. (2018). Impact of empowering leadership and work engagement on employees adaptive behaviors (Unpublished master's thesis). Kadir Has University, İstanbul.
• Kim, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2017). Self-efficacy and psychological ownership mediate the effects of empowering leadership on both good and bad employee behaviors. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 24(4), 466-478. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051817702078
• Koçak, S. (2016). Ortaöğretim kurumlarındaki psikolojik sözleşme üzerinde güçlendirici liderlik davranışlarının rolü [The role of empowering leadership behaviours on psychological contract in upper secondary schools] (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Hacettepe University, Ankara.
• Konan, N., & Çelik, O. T. (2018). Okul müdürlerinin güçlendirici liderliğine ilişkin öğretmen algısı [Teacher perception on the empowering leadership of school principals]. Bartin University Journal of Faculty of Education, 6(1), 322-335. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.274186
• Konczak, L. J., Stelly, D. J., & Trusty, M. L. (2000). Defining and measuring empowering leader behaviors: Development of an upward feedbak instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(2), 301-313. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970420
• Laschinger, H. K. S., Finegan, J., Shamian, J., & Wilk, P. (2001). Impact of structural and psychological empowerment on job strain in nursing work settings: Expanding Kanter’s model. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 31(5), 260-272. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005110-200105000-00006
• Lee, M. C. C., Idris, M. A., & Delfabbro, P. H. (2017). The linkages between hierarchical culture and empowering leadership and their effects on employees’ work engagement: Work meaningfulness as a mediator. International Journal of Stress Management, 24(4), 392–415. https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000043
• Macsinga, I., Sulea, C., Sarbescu, P., Fischmann, G., & Dumitru, C. (2015). Engaged, committed and helpful employees: The role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Psychology, 149(3), 263-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2013.874323
• Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Pscychology, 52(1), 397-422. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397
• Mayhew, M. G., Ashkanasy, N. M., Bramble, T., & Gardner, J. (2007). A study of the antecedents and consequences of psychological ownership in organizational settings. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147(5), 477–500. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.147.5.477-500
• Mendes, F., Stander, M.W. (2011). Positive organisation: The role of leader behaviour in work engagement and retention. South African Journal Of Industrial Psychology, 37(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v37i1.900
• Meriç, E., Öztürk Çiftçi, D., & Yurtal, F. (2019). Algılanan örgütsel destek ve işe adanmışlık arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [An analysis of the relationship between perceived organizational support and work engagement]. Kastamonu Journal of Education, 27(1), 65-74.
• Morewedge, C. K. (2020). Psychological ownership: Implicit and explicit. Current Opinion In Psychology, 39, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.10.003
• Nykodym, N., Ariss, S. S., Simonetti, J. L., & Plotner, J. (1995). Empowerment for the year 2000 and beyond. Empowerment in Organisations, 3(4), 36–42.
• O’driscoll, M. P., Pierce, J. L., and Coghlan, A. M. (2006). The psychology of ownership: Work environment structure, organizational commitment, and citizenship behaviors. Group & Organization. Management. 31(3), 388–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601104273066
• Olckers, C., & Plesis, Y. d. (2012). Psychological ownership: A managerial construct for talent retention and organisational effectiveness. African Journal of Business Management, 6(7), 2585-2596. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM11.1018
• Olckers, C. (2013). Psychological ownership: Development of an instrument. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 39(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v39i2.1105
• Ötken, A. B. (2015). Algilanan örgütsel destek ve psikolojik sahiplenme arasındaki ilişki ve bu ilişkide örgütsel adaletin rolü [The relationship between perceived organizational support and psychological ownership the role of organizational justice]. Hacettepe University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 33(2), 113-140.
• Özkalp, E., & Meydan, B. (2015). Schaufeli ve Bakker tarafindan geliştirilmiş olan işe angaje olma ölçeğinin Türkçe'de güvenilirlik ve geçerliliğinin analizi [Analysis of the reliability and validity of the work engagement scale developed by Schaufeli and Bakker in Turkish]. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources, 17(3), 4-19.
• Öztürk Çiftçi, D. (2019). Lider üye etkileşiminin işe adanmışlık üzerindeki etkisinde psikolojik güçlendirmenin aracı rolü [The mediating role of psychological empowerment in the effect of leader-member exchange on work engagement]. Business and Economics Research Journal, 10(1), 167-186.
• Öztürk Çiftçi, D., & Erkanlı, H. (2020). Dört ve beş yıldızlı otel işletmeleri çalışanlarının işe adanmışlık düzeylerinin demografik değişkenlere göre incelenmesi: Orta ve Doğu Karadeniz Bölgesi Örneği [Examination of work engagement levels of four and five star hotels employees according to demographic variables: The example of Middle and East Black Sea region]. Gümüşhane University Institute of Social Sciences Electronic Journal, 11(2), 336-347.
• Pearce, C. L., & Sims, H. P. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, And Practice, 6(2), 172–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.6.2.172
• Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management, 26(2), 298-310. https://doi.org/10.2307/259124
• Russ, D. E. (1995). Empowerment: A matter of degree-executive commentary. Academy Of Management Executive, 9(3), 21-31.
• Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 84-107. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.84
• Saks, A. M., & Gruman, J. A. (2014). What do we really know about employee engagement? Human Resource Development Quarterly, 25(2), 155-182. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21187
• Salmela-Aro, K., & Upadyaya, K. (2018). Role of demands-resources in work engagement and burnout in different career stages. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 108, 190-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.08.002
• Schaufeli, W. B., Martínez, I. M., Pinto, A. M., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 464-481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033005003
• Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V., & Baker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
• Sharma, P. N., & Kirkman, B. L. (2015). Leveraging leaders: A literature review and future lines of inquiry for empowering leadership research. Group & Organization Management, 40(2), 193-237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115574906
• Stander, M. W., & Rothmann, S. (2009). Psychological empowerment of employees in selected organisations in South Africa. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 35(1), 196–203. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v35i1.466
• Stander, M.W., Rothmann, S. (2010). Psychological empowerment, job insecurity and employee engagement. South African Journal Of Industrial Psychology, 36(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v36i1.849
• Stander, M. W., & Coxen, L. (2017). A review of the relationship between positive leadership styles and psychological ownership. Theoretical Orientations And Practical Applications of Psychological Ownership, 37-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70247-6_3
• Şen, N. (2019). Liderlik özelliklerinin işe tutkunluk üzerindeki etkisine yönelik bir araştırma [A study on the effect of leader features on work engagement]. Bitlis Eren University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Journal of Academic Projection, 4(2), 264-282.
• Şenol, L., & Üzüm, B. (2020). Demografik özellikler ve psikolojik sahiplenme: Havacılık sektöründe bir araştırma [Demographic features and psychological ownership: A research in the aviation sector]. Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Social Sciences, 22(3), 760-770.
• Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An "interpretive" model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666-681. https://doi.org/10.2307/258687
• Tiganj, M. (2019). Kişilik özellikleri ile işe adanmışlık arasındaki ilişki ve bu ilişkide güçlendirici liderlik teorisinin rolü: Sağlık sektöründe uygulama [Relationship between personality traits and employee’s engagement, and role of the empowering leadership theory in this relationship: With application in the healthcare industry] (Unpublished master's thesis). İstanbul University, İstanbul.
• Tokmak, M. (2019). Algılanan üst yönetim desteğinin işe adanmışlık üzerine etkisi: Bir araştırma [The effect on dedication for work of being perceived senior management support: A research]. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 36, 273-290.
• Tuckey, M. R., Bakker, A. B., & Dollard, M. F. (2012). Empowering leaders optimize working conditions for engagement: A multilevel study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17, 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025942
• Turgut, T. (2011). Çalışmaya Tutkunluk: İş yükü, esnek çalışma saatleri, yönetici desteği ve iş-aile çatışması ile ilişkileri [Passion for work: Workload, flexible working hours, managerial support and relationships with work-family conflict]. Ataturk University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 25(3-4), 155-179.
• Uçar, Z. (2018). Psikolojik sahiplenme olgusunu örgütsel düzlemde ölçmek için ölçek geliştirme çalışması [Measurement device development study for measuring in organizational plane of psychological ownership phenomenon]. Journal of Business Research-Turk, 10(3), 640-654.
• Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74, 235-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.11.003
• Yavan, Ö. (2016). Örgütsel davranış düzleminde adanmışlık [Engagement in organizational behaviour plane]. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, (25), 278-296.
• Yavuz, A. (2021). Birey-örgüt uyumu, psikolojik sahiplenme, işgören sesliliği ve motivasyon araçları ilişkisi üzerine ampirik bir çalışma [An empirical study on the relationship between person-organization fit, psychological ownership, employee voice and motivational tools] (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Selçuk University, Konya.
• Yeşil, Ü., Bancar, A., & Budak, G. (2015). Psikolojik sahiplik kavramına ilişkin bir literatür incelemesi [A literature review on the concept of psychological ownership]. Eskişehir Osmangazi University Journal of Social Sciences, 16(2), 59-82.
• Zhang, X. M., and Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. The Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107-128. https://doi.org/10.5465/Amj.2010.48037118
• Zhang, X., & Zhou, J. (2014). Empowering leadership, uncertainty avoidance, trust and employee creativity: Interaction effects and a mediating mechanism. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124(2), 150-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.02.002