Lisans ve Lisansüstü Düzeyde İstihbarat Eğitimi: Türkiye ve ABD Örneklerinin Karşılaştırılması

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 3, 98 - 134, 30.09.2021

Namık Çencen Serkan Kocamanoğlu Mehmet Burak Berk

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı lisans ve lisansüstü düzeyde Türkiye ve Amerika Birleşik Dev-letleri’nin istihbarat eğitim programlarını karşılaştırılmasıdır. Çalışma nitel araştır-ma deseninde tasarlanmış olup doküman incelemesi ve betimsel içerik analizi kulla-nılmıştır. Doküman analizi hem yazılı hem de elektronik materyalleri değerlendiren ve inceleyen sistematik bir yöntemdir. Araştırmada, lisans ve lisansüstü düzeyde Tür-kiye’de Milli Savunma Üniversitesi, Jandarma ve Sahil Güvenlik Akademisi, Polis Akademisi, İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi ve ABD’de Citadel Military Collage of South Carolina, American Military University, The Institute of World Politics, Mercyhurst University’nin istihbarat eğitim programları incelenmiştir. Yapılan çalışma sonucun-da elde edilen bulgular şunlardır: ABD’de lisans düzeyinde sadece istihbarat eğitimi veren birçok spesifik üniversite mevcut iken, Türkiye’de ise doğrudan lisans düzeyinde istihbarat eğitimi veren spesifik bir üniversite bulunmamakta ve lisans düzeyinde istihbarat eğitimi bir üniversitenin bünyesinde verilmektedir. İstihbarat eğitimi lisan-süstü düzeyde karşılaştırıldığında ABD’de birçok üniversitede verilirken, Türkiye’de ise sadece dört üniversitede verildiği görülmektedir. ABD’de lisans ve lisansüstü prog-ramlarda istihbarat eğitimi, ABD’nin dünya politikaları ve iç güvenlik tehditleri ile şekillenirken Türkiye’de ise lisans ve lisansüstü düzeyde istihbarat eğitimi Türkiye’nin iç güvenlik tehditleri doğrultusunda şekillenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Lisansüstü Eğitim, İstihbarat Eğitimi, Güvenlik, Politika

Intelligence Education at Graduate and Postgraduate Level: Comparison of Turkey and USA Samples

Öz

The aim of this research is to compare the intelligence training programs of Turkey and the United States at the undergraduate and graduate levels. This study was designed in a qualitative research pattern and used document review and descriptive content analysis. Document analysis is a systematic method of evaluating and examining both written and electronic materials. In this research, the undergraduate and graduate level intelligence education programs of Turkey’s; National Defense University, Gendarmerie and Coast Guard Academy, Police Academy, Istanbul Aydin University, and in United States; Citadel Military Collage of South Carolina, American Military University, The Institute of World Politics, and Mercyhurst University’s programs are studied. The findings obtained as a result of the study are as follows: While there are many specific universities in the United States that mainly focused on providing intelligence education including the undergraduate level, there are no specific universities in Turkey that mainly focused on providing intelligence education directly at the undergraduate level, and intelligence education at the undergraduate level is provided within the University. On the graduate level, universities that provides intelligence education is umpteen in the United States however, in Turkey, only four universities provide intelligence education on the graduate level. Apart from that United States’ undergraduate and graduate level intelligence education focuses on United States’ world politics and homeland security, in case of Turkey, undergraduate and graduate level intelligence education predominantly focused on homeland security threats.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Postgraduate Education, Intelligence Education, Security, Policy

Kaynakça

• Bowen, G. (2009). “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method”. Qualitative Research Journal, vol. 9, no. 2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240807798, doi.10.3316/QRJ0902027.
• Buzan, B., Weaver, O., & Wilde, J. (1998). Security: New Framework for Analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers: London.
• Campbell, S. H. (2011). A Survey of the U.S. Market for Intelligence Education. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 307-337.
• Corvaja, A. S., Jeraj, B., & Borghoff, U. M. (2016). The Rise of Intelligence Studies: A Model for Germany? Connections: The Quarterly Journal, 79-106.
• Coulthart, S., & Crosston, M. (2015). Terra Incognita: Mapping American Intelligence Education Curriculum. Journal of Strategic Security, 46-68.
• Gearon, L. (2015, Eylül). Education, Security and Intelligence Studies. British Journal of Educational Studies, s. 263-279.
• Landon-Murray, M. (2011). Social Science and Intelligence Analysis: The Role of Intelligence Education. Journal of Applied Security Research, 491-528.
• Landon-Murray, M. (2013). Moving U.S. Academic Intelligence Education Forward: A Literature Inventory and Agenda. International Journal of Intelligence, 744-776.
• Lowenthal, Mark M. (1987) The Intelligence Library: Quantity vs. Quality, Intelligence and National Security, 2:2, 368-373.
• Lowenthal, Mark M. Executive Director, IAFIE, “Teaching Intelligence: The Intellectual Challenges,” JMIC Occasional Paper No. 5, A Flourishing Craft: Teaching Intelligence Studies, June 1999).
• Marrin, S. (2011). Improving Intelligence Analysis: Bridging the gap between scholarship and practice. Routledge: London.
• Michael, K., & Kornbluth, A. (2019). The Academization of Intelligence: A Comparative Overview of Intelligence Studies in the West. Cyber, Intelligence, and Security, 117-140.
• Nolan, Cynthia M. (1999). Seymour Hersh’s Impact On The CIA, International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 12:1, 18-34.
• Phythian, M. (2017). Intelligence Analysis and Social Science Methods: Exploring the Potential for and Possible Limits of Mutual Learning. Intelligence and National Security, 600-612.
• Rudner, M. (2008). Intelligence Studies in Higher Education: Capacity-Building to Meet Societal Demand. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 110-130.
• Scott, L., & Jackson, P. (2004). The Study of Intelligence in Theory and Practice. Intelligence and National Security, 139-169.
• Spracher , W. C. (2009). National Security Intelligence Professional Education: A Map of U.S. Civilian University Programs and Competencies. The Faculty of The Graduate School of Education and Human Development of The George Washington University (Doktora Tezi).
• Thomas, S. T. (1988). Assessing current intelligence studies. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 214-244.
• Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara, Seçkin Yayınları 10. Baskı.
• Zegart, A. B. (2007). Cloaks, Daggers, and Ivory Towers: Why Academics Don’t Study U.S. Intelligence. L. K. Johnson içinde, Strategic Intelligence 1: Understanding The Hidden Side of Government (s. 21-35). Praeger Security International: London.