The Effect of Different Sintering Methods and Block Color on Bond Strength between Monolithic Zirconia and Resin Cement

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3, 497 - 502, 25.12.2023

Cansu Yeşildaş Burcu Kanat

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1203772

Öz

Background: The aim of the study is to examine the effects of different sintering methods and block color on shear bond strength between monolithic zirconia and adhesive resin cement.
Methods: Self-colored (InCoris TZI C A2, Sirona) (CZ) and colorless (InCoris TZI, Sirona) (Z) monolithic zirconia blocks were cut into cubes of 4mm×4mm×4mm after sintering (n=40). Colored and colorless samples were divided into 2 subgroups as conventional sintering (CS) and speed sintering (SS) (n=10). Primer was applied after sandblasting the samples fixed in acrylic. The adhesive resin cement (diameter: 2mm, height: 2mm) was shaped and polymerized. Data, obtained from the application of the shear bond test (SBS), was statistically analyzed (SPSS 26, 2-way ANOVA, independent t-test) (p=0.05). Fracture types were classified.
Results: The highest SBS value was observed in the CS-Z group (25.13±8.47), and the lowest SBS value was observed in the SS-Z group (14.89±7.08). While sintering methods had a statistically significant effect on SBS values (p=0.006), the color feature of monolithic zirconia did not have a significant effect (p>0.05). Statistically higher values were found in the colorless blocks compared to the SS group (14.89±7.08) in the CS group (25.13±8.47) (p=0.009). However, the difference between SS (17.99±5.21) and RS (20.89±7.31) in the colored blocks was not significant (p>0.05). There was no significant difference between Z and CZ groups in both speed and conventional sintering (p>0.05).
Conclusion: It was concluded that different sintering methods affect the shear bond strength between colorless monolithic zirconia blocks and adhesive cement, but not the shear bond strength between colored monolithic zirconia blocks and adhesive resin cement. Whether the blocks were pre-colored or colorless did not affect the shear bond strength between monolithic zirconia and adhesive cement.
Keywords: Monolithic zirconia, conventional sintering, speed sintering, colored block, shear bond strength

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hızlı sinterizasyon, konvansiyonel sinterizasyon, makaslama bağ dayanımı, monolitik zirkonya, renklendirilmiş blok

Farklı Sinterizasyon Yöntemlerinin ve Blok Renginin Monolitik Zirkonya ile Adeziv Rezin Siman Arasındaki Bağ Dayanımına Etkisi

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı; farklı sinterizasyon yöntemlerinin ve blok renginin monolitik zirkonya ile adeziv rezin siman arasındaki makaslama bağ dayanımı üzerindeki etkilerinin incelenmesidir.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Kendinden renkli (InCoris TZI C A2, Sirona) (CZ) ve renksiz (InCoris TZI, Sirona) (Z) monolitik zirkonya blokları, sinterizasyon sonrası 4mm×4mm×4mm boyutlarında olacak şekilde küpler halinde kesildi (N=40). Renkli ve renksiz örnekler, konvansiyonel sinterizasyon (KS) ve hızlı sinterizasyon (HS) olmak üzere 2 alt gruba ayrıldı (n=10). Akrilik içerisinde sabitlenen örnekler kumlandıktan sonra primer uygulandı. Adeziv rezin siman (çap:2mm, yükseklik:2mm) şekillendirildi ve polimerize edildi. Makaslama bağ dayanım (SBS) testinin (Bisco, ABD, 0.5 mm/dk) uygulanması ile elde edilen verilerin istatistiksel analizi (SPSS 26, 2-yönlü ANOVA, bağımsız t-testi) gerçekleştirildi (p=0.05). Kırık tipleri sınıflandırıldı.
Bulgular: En yüksek SBS değeri KS-Z (25.13±8.47) grubunda, en düşük SBS değeri ise HS-Z (14.89±7.08) grubunda gözlendi. SBS değerleri üzerinde sinterizasyon yöntemlerinin istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı etkisi bulunurken (p=0.006) monolitik zirkonyanın renkli olma özelliğinin anlamlı etkisi görülmedi (p>0.05). Renksiz bloklarda, KS (25.13±8.47) grubunda HS (14.89±7.08) grubuna göre istatistiksel olarak yüksek değerler bulundu (p=0.009). Renkli bloklarda ise HS (17.99±5.21) ve KS (20.89±7.31) grupları arasındaki farkın istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı olmadığı görüldü (p>0.05). Hem hızlı hem de konvansiyonel sinterizasyonda ise Z ve RZ grupları arasında anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmadı (p>0.05).
Sonuç: Farklı sinterizasyon yöntemlerinin, renksiz monolitik zirkonya bloklar ile adeziv siman arasındaki makaslama bağ dayanımını etkilerken renkli monolitik zirkonya bloklar ile adeziv rezin siman arasındaki makaslama bağ dayanımını etkilemediği bulundu. Blokların önceden renklendirilmiş veya renklendirilmemiş olması, monolitik zirkonya ile adeziv siman arasındaki makaslama bağ dayanımını etkilemedi.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Hızlı sinterizasyon, konvansiyonel sinterizasyon, makaslama bağ dayanımı, monolitik zirkonya, renklendirilmiş blok

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hızlı sinterizasyon, konvansiyonel sinterizasyon, makaslama bağ dayanımı, monolitik zirkonya, renklendirilmiş blok

Destekleyen Kurum

Kocaeli Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi

Kaynakça

• 1. Abd El-Ghany OS, Sherief AH. Zirconia based ceramics, some clinical and biological aspects. Future Dent J. 2016;2(2):55-64.
• 2. Kim HK, Kim SH. Optical properties of pre-colored dental monolithic zirconia ceramics. J Dent. 2016;55:75-81.
• 3. Sulaiman TA, Abdulmajeed AA, Donovan TE, Ritter AV, Vallittu PK, Närhi TO, vd. Optical properties and light irradiance of monolithic zirconia at variable thicknesses. Dent Mater. 2015;31(10):1180-7.
• 4. Roumanas ED. The clinical reliability of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses appears acceptable but further research is necessary. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2013;13(1):14-5.
• 5. Nam JY, Park MG. Effects of aqueous and acid-based coloring liquids on the hardness of zirconia restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(5):662-8.
• 6. Güngör MB, Nemli SK. Fracture resistance of CAD-CAM monolithic ceramic and veneered zirconia molar crowns after aging in a mastication simulator. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(3):473-80.
• 7. Sulaiman TA, Abdulmajeed AA, Donovan TE, Vallittu PK, Närhi TO, Lassila LV. The effect of staining and vacuum sintering on optical and mechanical properties of partially and fully stabilized monolithic zirconia. Dent Mater J. 2015;34(5):605-10.
• 8. Sen N, Sermet IB, Cinar S. Effect of coloring and sintering on the translucency and biaxial strength of monolithic zirconia. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(2):308-e1.
• 9. Camposilvan E, Leone R, Gremillard L, Sorrentino R, Zarone F, Ferrari M, vd. Aging resistance, mechanical properties and translucency of different yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramics for monolithic dental crown applications. Dent Mater. 2018;34(6):879-90.
• 10. Kolakarnprasert N, Kaizer MR, Kim DK, Zhang Y. New multi-layered zirconias: Composition, microstructure and translucency. Dent Mater. 2019;35(5):797-806.
• 11. Yu NK, Park MG. Effect of different coloring liquids on the flexural strength of multilayered zirconia. J Adv Prosthodont. 2019;11(4):209-14.
• 12. Aboushelib MN, De Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater. 2005;21(10):984-91.
• 13. Chevalier J, Deville S, Münch E, Jullian R, Lair F. Critical effect of cubic phase on aging in 3mol% yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramics for hip replacement prosthesis. Biomaterials. Kasım 2004;25(24):5539-45.
• 14. Ardlin BI. Transformation-toughened zirconia for dental inlays, crowns and bridges: chemical stability and effect of low-temperature aging on flexural strength and surface structure. Dent Mater. 2002;18(8):590-5.
• 15. Chen PL, Chen IW. Grain boundary mobility in Y2O3: defect mechanism and dopant effects. J Am Ceram Soc. 1996;79(7):1801-9.
• 16. Ozkurt Z, Kazazoglu E, Unal A. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strength of veneering ceramics to zirconia. Dent Mater J. Mart 2010;29(2):138-46.
• 17. Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Zirkonya tipinin farklı kaplama seramikleri ile bağlanma mukavemetine etkisi. J Prosthodont. 2008;(17):401-8.
• 18. Mosharraf R, Rismanchian M, Savabi O, Ashtiani AH. Farklı zirkonya çekirdekleri ve kaplama seramikleri arasındaki kesme bağ mukavemeti üzerine yüzey modifikasyon tekniklerinin etkisi. JAd Prostodonti. 2011;(3):221-8.
• 19. Hjerppe J, Närhi T, Fröberg K, Vallittu PK, Lassila LVJ. Effect of shading the zirconia framework on biaxial strength and surface microhardness. Acta Odontol Scand. Ekim 2008;66(5):262-7.
• 20. Shah K, Holloway JA, Denry IL. Effect of coloring with various metal oxides on the microstructure, color, and flexural strength of 3Y-TZP. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. Kasım 2008;87(2):329-37.
• 21. Mahshid M, Berijani N, Sadr SJ, Tabatabaian F, Homayoon SS. Effect of coloring–by-dipping on microtensile bond strength of zirconia to resin cement. J Dent Tehran Iran. 2015;12(6):414.
• 22. Tuncel İ, Turp I. Effects of coloring procedures on shear bond strength between resin cement and colored zirconia. Eur Oral Res. Eylül 2018;52(3):122-6.
• 23. Hallmann L, Ulmer P, Reusser E, Louvel M, Hämmerle CH. Effect of dopants and sintering temperature on microstructure and low temperature degradation of dental Y-TZP-zirconia. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2012;32(16):4091-104.
• 24. Hjerppe J, Vallittu PK, Fröberg K, Lassila LV. Effect of sintering time on biaxial strength of zirconium dioxide. Dent Mater. 2009;25(2):166-71.
• 25. Jiang L, Liao Y, Wan Q, Li W. Effects of sintering temperature and particle size on the translucency of zirconium dioxide dental ceramic. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2011;22(11):2429-35.
• 26. Stawarczyk B, Özcan M, Hallmann L, Ender A, Mehl A, Hämmerlet CH. The effect of zirconia sintering temperature on flexural strength, grain size, and contrast ratio. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(1):269-74.
• 27. Ebeid K, Wille S, Hamdy A, Salah T, El-Etreby A, Kern M. Effect of changes in sintering parameters on monolithic translucent zirconia. Dent Mater. 2014;30(12):e419-24.
• 28. Sirona Dental Cad/Cam System İncoris TZI. [İnternet]. Erişim adresi: https://www.dentsplysirona.com/content/dam/master/product-procedure-brand-categories/lab/product-categories/cad-cam-materials/zirconium-oxide/incoris-blocks/ifu/LAB-IFU-inCoris-TZI-US-EN-6347376-2016-09-07.pdf
• 29. Luthy H, Loeffel O, Hammerle CH. Effect of thermocycling on bond strength of luting cements to zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater. 2006;22(2):195-200.