INTERACTION OF NITROGEN AND PLANT DENSITY ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF TWO QUINOAS (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) CULTIVARS IN FARS PROVINCE, IRAN

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2, 279 - 290, 24.12.2023

Asghr Zare Hamidreza Miri Barmak Haghighijafari Alireza Bagheri Abdolreaza Jafari

https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.1262098

Öz

As a field crop, quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) has great potential in improving food for humans and animals even under marginal lands. Experiments were carried out at Marvdasht, Iran, in 2017 and 2018 main crop growing season to evaluate the effect of 4 levels of nitrogen (0, 75, 150, and 225 kg/ ha), three levels of density (20, 30, and 40 plants /m2), and two cultivars of quinoa (Titicaca and Sajema). The factorial experiment was performed based on a randomized complete block design with three replications. The results showed that nitrogen fertilizer significantly affected all measured traits. By increasing the nitrogen and plant density, the plant height, grain yield, and biological yield increased. The highest harvest index and nitrogen use efficiency was obtained from the highest density level. In all studied traits, Titicaca cultivar had greater than Sajema. Due to the superiority of 225 kg /ha-1 of nitrogen and the density of 40 plants/m2 in terms of grain yield, it seems that this amount of nitrogen fertilizer and planting density to achieve good yields in the test and similar areas is also recommended. Also, the higher seed yield in Titicaca cultivar than Sajema is recommended for planting in the studied areas.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Density, Harvest index, Nitrogen, Quinoa, Yield

Kaynakça

• Afzal, I., S.M.A. Basra, H.U. Rehman and S. Iqbal. 2022. Trends and Limits for Quinoa Production and Promotion in Pakistan. Plants. 11(12):1603.
• Ali Ahyaei, M. and A.A. Behbahanizadeh. 2012. Methods of chemical analysis of soil and water (Volume 1). Ministry of Jihad Agriculture, Soil and Water Research Institute. Publication No. 89 (In Persian)
• Angadi, S.V., H.W. Cut Forth, B.G. McConkey and Y. Gan. 2003. Yield adjustment by canola grown at different plant populations under semiarid conditions. Crop Sci. 43(4):1358.
• Asher, A., R. Dagan, S. Galili and L. Rubinovich. 2022. Effect of Row Spacing on Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) Growth, Yield, and Grain Quality under a Mediterranean Climate. Agriculture. 12:1298.
• Bertero, H.D., R.W. King and A.J. Hall. 1998. Photoperiodsensitive development phases in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Field Crops Res. 60(3):231–243.
• Cárdenas-Castillo, J.E., J. Delatorre-Herrera, L. Bascuñán-Godoy and J.P. Rodriguez. 2021. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Wild.) Seed Yield and Efficiency in Soils Deficient of Nitrogen in the Bolivian Altiplano: An Analytical Review. Plants. 10(11): 2479-2488.
• Dehghani, F. and H. Rezaei. 2019. Nitrogen fertilizer management under the influence of heat stress during the pollination period of quinoa. Production of agricultural plants (Electronic magazine of production of agricultural plants), 13(3): 159-178. (in Persian)
• Delbert, E.J. and R.A. Ulter. 1989. Sunflower growth and nutrient uptake: Response of tillage system, hybrid maturity and weed control method. Soil Sci. J. 53:133-138.
• Eisa, S., E.H. El-Samad, S. Hussin, E. Ali, M. Ebrahim, J. Gonzalez Sanchez, M. Ordano, L. Erazz, N. El-Bordeny and A. Abdel-Ati. 2018. Quinoa in Egypt -Plant density effects on seed yield and nutritional quality in marginal regions. Middle East J. Appl. Sci. 8(2):515-522.
• Elizabeth, G.B. and D.R. Da. 2016. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd), from nutritional value to potential health benefits: An integrative review. J. Nutr. Food Sci. 6(3):152-168.
• Erley, G., M. Kruse and W. Aufhammer. 2005. Yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency of the pseudocereals amaranth, quinoa, and buckwheat under differing nitrogen fertilization. Eur. J. Agron. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2003.11.002
• Fawy, H.A., M.F. Attia, and R.H. Hegab. 2017. Effect of nitrogen fertilization and organic acids on grains productivity and biochemical contents of quinoa plant grown under soil conditions of Ras Sader-Sinai. Egypt. J. Desert Res. 67(1):169-185.
• Geren, H. 2015. Effects of different nitrogen levels on the grain yield and some yield components of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.) under Mediterranean climatic conditions. Turkish J. Field Crop. 20:59-64.
• Gimplinger, D.M., G. Schulte Erley, G. Dobos and H.P. Kaul. 2008. Optimum crop densities for potential yield and harvestable yield of grain amaranth are conflicting. Eur. J. Agron. 28:119-125.
• Hinojosa, L., J. Matanguihan and K.M. Murphy. 2019. Effect of high temperature on pollen morphology, plant growth, and seed yield in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). J Agron Crop Sci. 205(1):33-45.
• Kakabouki, D., A. Bilalis, G. Karakanis, E. Zervas and D. Hela. 2014. Effect of fertilization and tillage system on growth and crude protein content of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): An alternative forage crop. J. Sci. Food Agric. 26(1):18-24.
• Kansomjet, P., P. Thobunluepop, S. Lermongkol, E. Sarobol, P. Keawsuwan, P. Junhaeng, P. Junhaeng, N. Pipttanawong and M.T. Ivan. 2017. Response of physiological characteristics, seed yield, and seed quality of quinoa under the difference of nitrogen fertilizer management. Am. J. Plant Physiol. 12(1):20-27.
• Mahmoud, A. and S. Sallam. 2017. Response of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) plant to nitrogen fertilization and irrigation by saline water. Alex. Sci. Exch. 38(2):326-334.
• Maliro, M., V. Guwela, J. Nyaika and K.M. Murphy. 2017. Preliminary studies of the performance of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Genotypes under irrigated and rain-fed conditions of central Malawi. Front. Plant Sci. 8:227.
• Martinez, E.A., E. Veas, C. Jorquera, R. San Martin and P. Jara. 2009. Re-Introduction of quinoa into Arid Chile: Cultivation of two lowland races under extremely low irrigation. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 195(1):1-10.
• Miranda, M., A. Vega-Glvez, I. Quispe-Fuentes, M.J. Rodrguez, H. Maureira and E.A. Martinez. 2012. Nutritional aspects of six Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Ecotypes from three geographical areas of Chile. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 72(2):175-181.
• Modhej, A. and Gh. Fathi. 2008. Wheat physiology. Islamic Azad University Press, Tehran, Iran.
• Navruz-Varli, S. and N. Sanlier. 2016. Nutritional and health benefits of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). J. Cereal Sci. 69:371-376.
• Papastylianou, P., I. Kakabouki, E. Tsiplakou, D. Bilalis, D. Hela, D. Chachalis, G. Anogiatis and G. Zervas. 2014. Effect of fertilization on yield and quality of biomass of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) and Green Amaranth (Amaranthus retroflexus L). Bull. UASVM Hort. 71(2):288- 292.
• Rehman, H.U., H.F. Alharby, H.S. Al-Zahrani and A.A. Bamagoos. 2022. Enriching Urea with Nitrogen Inhibitors Improves Growth, N Uptake and Seed Yield in Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) Affecting Photochemical Efficiency and Nitrate Reductase Activity. Plants (Basel) 29:11(3):371-385.
• Sandhu, N., M. Sethi, A. Kumar, D. Dang, J. Singh and P. Chhuneja. 2021. Biochemical and Genetic Approaches Improving Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Cereal Crops: A Review. Front. Plant Sci. 4(12):629-657.
• Shahmansouri, R. 2015. Reaction of quinoa cultivars to nitrogen levels. MSc Thesis, Agricultural Sciences and the Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Iran. (In Persian)
• Shajaripour, S. and M. Mojaddam. 2022. Evaluation Impact of Amount and Distribution of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Barley Crop Production and Qualitative Characteristics. J. Crop. Nutr. Sci. 8(1): 26-36.
• Shoman, H.A. 2018. Effect of sowing dates and nitrogen on the productivity of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) at desert areas. Int. J. Plant Prod. 9:327-332.
• Siavoshi, M., A. Nasiri and S. Lawre. 2010. Effect of organic fertilizer on growth and yield components in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Agric. Sci. 3:15-28.
• Sief, A., H. El-Deepah, A. Kamel and J. Ibrahim. 2015. Effect of various inter and intra spaces on the yield and quality of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd). J. Plant Product. 6(3):371-383.
• Sosa-Zuniga, V., V. Brito, F. Fuentes and U. Steinfort. 2017. Phonological growth stages of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) based on the BBCH scale. Ann. Appl. Biol. 171:117- 124.
• Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGaw-Hill Book Company, Inc. N.Y.
• Subramanian K.S. and C. Charest 1997. Nutritional, growth, and reproductive responses of maize (Zea mays L.) to arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation during and after drought stress at tasselling. Mycorrhiza 7:25-32.
• Taghizadeh, R. and R. Seyed Sharifi. 2011. The effect of nitrogen fertilizer on fertilizer use efficiency and yield components in maize cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology and Natural Resources, Soil Water Sci. 15(57):209-217. (In Persian)
• Wang, N., F. Wang, C.C. Shock, Ch. Meng and L. Qiao. 2020. Effects of management practices on quinoa growth, seed yield, and quality. J. Agron. 10(3):445-454.
• Yang, H., B. Dong and Y. Wang. 2020. Photosynthetic base of reduced grain yield by shading stress during the early reproductive stage of two wheat cultivars. Sci. Rep. 10(2):143-153.