Recreational Fisheries In Rural Regions of the South-Western Iberian Peninsula: A Case Study

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1, - , 07.07.2014

José L. Pérez-bote * Rafael Roso

https://doi.org/10.4194/1303-2712-v14_1_15

Öz

The human dimension of recreational fishing has gained interest worldwide during the last decade for proper management of the natural resources. However, in many rural regions in Southern Europe, the social and economical aspects of recreational fishing remains poorly studied. In this study we conducted a survey to cover this gap of knowledge and draw potential management recommendations for proper exploitation. A survey of recreational fishing was conducted during the 2008-2009 fishing seasons. Data were collected following creel survey procedures and responses to 171 interviews were analyzed for 27 variables. To associate these variables a categorical principal components analysis (CATPCA) was performed. On the first CATPCA axis (44.24% of variance), the correlations among variables showed an "economic" dimension. The most influential variables in this dimension were expenditure, the season, and number of fishing days per year, together with the distance travelled to fishing sites. The second dimension (24.47% of variance) was related to the preferred species, the gear necessary to catch them, and with facility off access to sites where these species are found. The data showed some differences between both young and old fishermen with respect to the variables analysed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Recreational fisheries, anglers, attitudes, sociological characteristics

Kaynakça

• Aas, O. and Ditton, R.B. 1998. Human dimension perspective on recreational fisheries management. In: P. Hinkley and H. Tompkins (Eds.), Recreational Fisheries: Social, Economic and Management Aspects. Fishing New Books, Oxford: 153-164.
• Arlinghaus, R. and Mehner, T. 2003. Socio-economic characterization of specialized common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) anglers in Germany, and implications for inland fisheries management and eutrophication control. Fisheries Research, 61: 19–33. Arlinghaus R. and Mehner, T. 2004. A managementorientated comparative analysis of urban and rural anglers living in a metropolis (Berlin, Germany). Environmental Management, 33: 331–344. doi: 1007/s00267-004-0025-x.
• Arlinghaus, R., Cooke, S.J., Lyman, J., Policansky, D., Schwab, A., Suski, C.D., Sutton, S.G. and Thorstad, E.B. 2007. Understanding the complexity of catchand-release in recreational fishing: an integrative synthesis of global knowledge from historical, philosophical, social, and biological perspectives. Reviews in Fisheries Sciences, 15: 175–167. doi: 1080/10641260601149432.
• Arlinghaus, R., Bork, M. and Fladung, F. 2008. Understanding the heterogeneity of recreational anglers across an urban–rural gradient in a metropolitan area (Berlin, Germany), with implications for fisheries management. Fisheries Research, 92: 53–62. doi:1016/j.fishres.2007.12.012.
• Asensio, R. 2001. Efectos de la pesca deportiva sobre las poblaciones de peces. In: I. Doadrio (Ed.), Atlas y libro rojo de los peces de España. MMA-CSIC, Madrid: 274-285.
• Berkes, F., Mahon, R., McConney, P., Pollnac, R. and Pomeroy, R. 2001. Managing small-scale fisheries. Alternative directions and methods. International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 309 pp.
• Bogelius, A. 1998. National survey of recreational fisheries in Sweden. In: P. Hinckley and H. Tompkins (Eds.), Recreational fisheries: social, economic and management decisions. In: D. Guthrie, J.M. Hoenig, M. Holliday, C.M. Jones, M.J. Mills, S.A. Moberly, K.H. Pollock and D.R. Talhelm (Eds.), Creel and Angler Surveys in Fisheries Management. Proceedings of the American Fisheries Society Symposium, vol. 12, Bethesda, MD: 380-389.
• Heiser, W.J. and Meulman, J.J. 1994. Homogeneity analysis: exploring the distribution of variables and their nonlinear relationships. In: M. Greenacre, J. Blasius (Eds.), Correspondence analysis in the social science. Recent developments and applications. Academic Press, London: 179-209.
• Hinckley, P. and Tompkins, H. (Eds.) 1998. Recreational Fisheries: Social, Economic and Management Aspects. Fishing New Books, Oxford, 310 pp.
• Junta de Extremadura 2005. Anuario estadístico. Consejería de Agricultura y Medio Ambiente. Mérida, 220 pp.
• Kellert, S.R. 1984. Assessing wildlife and environmental values in cost ‑ benefit analysis. Journal of Environmental Management 18: 355–363.
• Lloret, J., Zaragoza, N., Caballero, D. and Riera, V. 2008. Biological and socioeconomic implications of recreational boatfishing for the management of fishery resources in the marinereserve of Cap de Creus (NW Mediterranean). Fisheries Research, 91: 252-259.
• Malvestuto, S.P. 1983. Sampling the recreational fishery. In: L. Nielsen and D.R. Johnson (Eds.), Fisheries Techniques Manual. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD: 397-430. doi: 1016/j.fishres.2007.12.002
• Malvestuto, S.P., Kendall, W., Davies, W.D. and Shelton W.L. 1978. An evaluation of the roving creel survey with non-uniform probability sampling. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 107: 255-262. doi: 1577/1548-8659(1978)107%3C255:AEOTRC%3 E0.CO;2.
• Marta, P., Bochechas, J. and Collares-Pereira, M.J. 2001. Importance of recreational fisheries in the Guadiana River basin in Portugal. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 8: 345-354. doi: 1111/j.1365-2400.2001.00262.x.
• Munn, I.A., Hussain, A., Spurlok, S. and Henderson, J.E. 20 Economic Impact of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation Expenditures on the Southeast U.S. Regional Economy: An Input–Output Analysis. Human dimension of Wildlife: An international Journal, 15: 433-4 doi: 1080/10871209.2010.508193.
• Peixer, J. and Petrere, M. 2009. Sport fishing in Cachoeira de Emas in Mogi-Guaçu River, state of São Paulo, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 69: 1081-1090. doi: 1590/S1519-69842009000500011.
• Pérez-Bote, J.L., Roso, R. and Pula H.J. 2004. Los hábitos