BİLİMSEL YÖNETİM PARADİGMASININ GÖRÜNMEYEN YÜZÜ: KADIN TEORİSYENLER VE SOSYAL & ENTELEKTÜEL AĞLARI ÜZERİNE ELEŞTİREL BİR OKUMA

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 25 - 54, 30.04.2022

Emine Şener Özlem Bulut Selma Baran

https://doi.org/10.32705/yorumyonetim.1090862

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, bilimsel yönetim paradigmasının “görünmeyen yüzü” kadın teorisyenlerin yönetim alanına katkılarını ve sosyal/entelektüel ilişkilerini ortaya çıkarmaktır. Bu çalışmada, bilimsel yönetim paradigmasında rol oynayan kadın teorisyenler (Lillian Gilbreth, Mary Van Kleeck, Katherine H.M. Blackford, Mary Barnett Gilson) hakkında literatür taraması yapılarak ilgili paradigmaya karşı tutumları sunulmuş ve ortak bağlantıları çözümlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Araştırmanın temel amacı esas alınarak bilimsel yönetim paradigmasının görünmeyen yüzü kadın teorisyenlerin tanımlayıcı nitelikleri sosyal ağ analizi ile sosyal varlıkları arasındaki ilişki ve bu ilişki modelleri oluşturulmuştur. Teorisyenlerin birbirleriyle ve Taylorizm, Sosyal Darwinizm, Sosyal İlerlemecilik ve Feminizm ile bağlantıları NodeXL Graph Uygulaması ile sosyal ağ ve matrisle ortaya konulmuştur. Kadın teorisyenlerin birbirleriyle ve Taylor ile ilişkili olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Sosyal Darwinizm ile doğrudan ilişkili olan üç teorisyen (Lillian Gilbreth, Mary V. Kleeck, Katherine H. M. Blackford) belirlenmiştir. Araştırma sonucu doğrultusunda, bilimsel yönetim paradigmasının ve içinde bulunulan çağın sosyal, ekonomik, siyasal koşullarının Sosyal İlerlemecilik ve Sosyal Darwinizm etkisi altında olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bilimsel Yönetim Paradigması, Kadın Teorisyenler, Yönetim Tarihi, Yönetim Felsefesi, Sosyal Ağ

Destekleyen Kurum

Yok

THE INVISIBLE SIDE OF THE SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT PARADIGM: A CRITICAL READING ON WOMEN THEORISTS AND THEIR SOCIAL & INTELLECTUAL NETWORKS

Öz

The aim of this study is to reveal the “invisible face” of the scientific management paradigm, the contributions of women theorists in management and their social/intellectual relations. With a literature review about women theorists (Lillian Gilbreth, Mary Van Kleeck, Katherine H.M. Blackford, Mary Barnett Gilson), who play a role in the scientific management paradigm, their attitudes towards the relevant paradigm have been presented, and their common connections have been tried to be analyzed. Based on the main purpose of the research, the invisible face of the scientific management paradigm, the defining qualities of women theorists, the relationship between social network analysis and social assets and these relationship models were created. The connections of theorists with Taylorism, Social Darwinism, Social Progressionism and Feminism were revealed with the NodeXL Graph Application, with social networks and matrices. It seems that the female theorists are related to each other and Taylor. Three theorists (Lillian Gilbreth, Mary V. Kleeck, Katherine H. M. Blackford) who were directly interested in Social Darwinism were identified. As a result of the research, it has been determined that the scientific management paradigm or the social, economic and political conditions of the current age are under the influence of Social Progressism and Social Darwinism.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Scientific Management Paradigm, Women Theorists, Management History, Management Philosophy, Social Network

Kaynakça

• Alchon, G. (1991). Mary van Kleeck and social-economic planning. journal of Policy History, 3(1), 1-23.
• Alchon, G. (1992). Mary Van Kleeck and Scientific Management. In D. Nelson (Ed.), A mental revolution: Scientific management since Taylor (pp. 109-129). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
• Bedeian, A. G., & Taylor, S. G. (2009). The ubermensch meets the ‘one best way’: Barbara S. Burks, the Gilbreth family, and the eugenics movement. Journal of Management History, 15, 216-221.
• Blackford, K. (1912). Employers' manual : instructions to employment supervisors and other executives in the use of the Blackford employment plan. 10-35. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=KXapCk5VkAcC
• Blackford, K. (1916). Employment plan. New York: Efficiency Society Inc.
• Blackford, K., & Newcomb, A. (1917). Blondes and Brunets. New York: Henry Alden Inc.
• Blackford, K., & Newcomb, A. (1918). Reading character at sight. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=cNM6UNCiT-8C
• Blackford, K., & Newcomb, A. (2018). The job, the man, the boss. Retrieved from http://online.canadiana.ca/view/oocihm.98737
• Blackford, K., & Newcomb, A. (1916). Analyzing Character: The New Science of Judging Men; Misfits in Business, the Home, and Social Life. New York: Review of Reviews.
• Boddewyn, J. (1961). Frederick Winslow Taylor revisited. Academy of Management Journal, 4(2), 100-107.
• Bott, E. (1957). Family and social networks. London: Tavistock.
• Brahimaj, X. (2019). Mary Van Kleeck, management al femminile. 1-30.
• Brown, P. (1925). The work and aims of the Taylor Society. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 119(1), 134-139
• Carlson, B. (2006). Hesselgren, van Kleeck och IRI–från industri till planekonomi. Historisk tidskrift, 126(2), 2-22.
• Carlson, B. (2007). The IRI and Its Swedish Connection. American Studies in Scandinavia, 39(1), 13-32.
• Carrell, K. (1979). The Industrial Revolution comes to the home: Kitchen design reform and middle-class women. Journal of American Culture, 2(3), 488-499.
• Christiansen, N., & Tett, R. (2013). Handbook of Personality at Work: Brunner-Routledge.
• Collier, I. (2019). Archival Artifacts From The History of Economics: Chicago. Mary Barnett Gilson Upon Retirement, 1941. Retrieved from https://www.irwincollier.com/chicago-mary-barnett-gilson-upon-retirement-1941/
• Cooke, M. L. (1913). The spirit and social significance of scientific management. Journal of Political Economy, 21(6), 481-493.
• Cowan, R. (1980). Lillian Evelyn Moller Gilbreth. In B. Sieheman & C. Green (Eds.), Notable American Women: The Modern Period (pp. 271-273). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Dennis, R. M. (1995). Social Darwinism, scientific racism, and the metaphysics of race. Journal of Negro Education, 243-252.
• DesJardins, J. (2010). The Madame Curie Complex. New York NY: Feminist Press.
• Drucker, P. F. (1976). Paper presented at the The Coming Rediscovery of Scientific Management, Conference Board Record.
• Dunlap, K. (1923). Fact and Fable in Character Analysis. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 110, 74-80.
• Ebert, R., & Monschein, S. (2011). Paternalism,Industrial Democracy, and Unionizatıon in the Cleveland Garment Industry: 1900–1935: The Case of the Printz-Biederman and Joseph and Feiss Companies. Metropolitan-rural voting patterns in US legislative elections, 19, 18-34.
• Ellis, H. (1912). The Task of Social Hygiene. Boston: Hougton Mifflin.
• Fouché, R., & Vostral, S. (2011). Selling women: Lillian Gilbreth, gender translation, and intellectual property. Am. UJ Gender Soc. Pol'y & L., 19, 825.
• Freeman, L. C. (2011). The development of social network analysis a study in the sociology of science. Vancouver, B.C: Empirical Press.
• Gilbreth, F. (1908). Concrete System. New York, NY: The Engineering News Publishing Company.
• Gilbreth, F. (1909). Bricklaying System. New York, NY: M.C. Clark Publishing.
• Gilbreth, F. (1911). Motion Study: A Method for Increasing the Efficiency of the Workman. New York, NY: D. Van Nostrand Company.
• Gilbreth, L. (1914). The Psychology of Management: The Function of the Mind in Determining, Teaching and Installign Methods of Least Waste. New York, NY: Sturgis & Walton.
• Gilbreth, L. (1928). Why women succeed in business. North American Review, 17(1), 55-68.
• Gilbreth, L. (1929). Efficiency of women workers. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 143(1), 61-64.
• Gilbreth, L. M. (1998). As I remember: An Authobiography. Norcross, GA: Engineering & Management Press.
• Gillespie, D. F. G. C. (1992). Quantitative methods in social work : state of the art. New York: Haworth Press.
• Gilson, M. (1916). The Relation of Home Conditions To Indus Trial Efficiency. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 65(1), 277-289.
• Goldin, C. (1994). Understanding the gender gap: an economic history of American women. In P. Burstein (Ed.), Equal employment opportunity : labor market discrimination and public policy (pp. 17-26). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
• Goldstein, C. (1994). Mediating Consumption: Home Economics and American Consumers, 1900-1940, PhD. dissertation,. In (pp. 351-364): University of Delaware.
• Graham, L. (1997). Beyond Manipulation: Lillian Gilbreth's Industrial Psychology and the Governmentality of Women Consumers. The Sociological Quarterly, 38(4), 539-565. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4121079
• Graham, L. (1999). Domesticating efficiency: Lillian Gilbreth's scientific management of homemakers. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 24, 633-675.
• Graham, L. D. (1998). Managing on Her Own: Dr Lillian Gilbreth and Women’s Work in the Interwar Era. Norcross, GA: Engineering & Management Press.
• Greenwood, R. G., Greenwood, R. A., & Severance, J. A. (1978). Lillian M. Gilbreth, first lady of management. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 2-6.
• Gürsakal, N. (2009). Sosyal ağ analizi Pajek, Ucinet ve Gmine uygulamalı. Bursa: Dora Yayınları.
• Haake, A. (1921). Measurement of Movies. In J. Commons (Ed.), Industrial government (pp. 71-89). New York: Macmillan Co.
• Haber, S. (1964). Efficiency and uplift; scientific management in the progressive era, 1890-1920. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Howland, K. (1918). Introduction. In M. H. B. Katherine (Ed.), Reading Character at Sight (pp. 5-8). New York: Independent Corporation.
• https://digital.janeaddams.ramapo.edu, Retrieved from https://digital.janeaddams.ramapo.edu/items/show/664
• Hubbard, C. W. (1904). Some Practical Principles of Welfare Work. Journal of Social Science, 83-94.
• Ise, J. (1941). Reviewed Work: What's Past Is Prologue: Reflections on My Industrial Experience by Mary Barnett Gilson. Bulletin of The American Assocition of University Professors, 27, 92-93. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/40219185?refreqid=excelsior%3A65fb7f2d1a830cd60821e3a4dec5e08e&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
• Jennissen, T., & Lundy, C. (2018). Theoretical research: Radical women in social work: A historical perspective from North America. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 30(3), 45-56.
• Kanigel, R. (1998). The One Best Way : Frederick Winslow Taylor and the Enigma of Efficiency. New York: Penguin Books.
• Kelly, R. M., & Kelly, V. P. (1990). Lillian Moller Gilbreth. In Women in Psychology: A Bio-Bibliographic Sourcebook (pp. 117-124). New York: Greenwood Press.
• Kendall, H. P. (1976). A decade's developmant in management trends and results of scientific management. In D. Delmar & R. D. Collins (Eds.), Classif in scientific management (pp. 118-133). University Ala.: University of Alabama Press.
• Kevles, D. (2007). In the name of eugenics : genetics and the uses of human heredity. [Cambridge]: [International Society for Science and Religion].
• Kleeck, M. (1913). Artificial flower makers. New York: Survey Associates.
• Kneeland, H. (1929). Abolishing the Inefficient Kitchen. Journal of Home Economics, 21(7), 475-481.
• Kott, S. (2020). The Social Engineering Project Exportation of Capitalist Management Culture to Eastern Europe (1950–1980). In M. Christian & K. S. (Eds.), Planning in Cold War Europe Competition, Cooperation, Circulations (pp. 123-141): De Gruyter Oldenbourg.
• Krenn, M. (2011). From scientific management to homemaking: Lillian M. Gilbreth's contributions to teh development of management thought. Management & Organizational History, 6(2), 145-161.
• Kuhn, T. (2021). Çevirmenin Sunuşu (N. Kuyaş, Trans.): Kırmızı Yayınları.
• Lancaster, J. (2004). Making Time: Lillian Moller Gilbreth - A Life Beyond "Cheaper by the Dozen". Boston: Northeastern University Press.
• Latham, G. P., & Dossett, D. L. (1978). Designing incentive plans for unionized employees: A comparison of continuous and variable ratio reinforcement schedules 1. Personnel Psychology, 31(1), 47-61.
• Lee, M. (1992). A Study Investigating te Impact Women Have on The Bindery. Rochester Institute of Techonogy, Retrieved from https://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses/3931
• Leonard, T. (2009). American economic reform in the Progressive Era: its foundational beliefs and their relation to eugenics. History of Political Economy, 41(1), 109-141.
• Locke, E. A. (1982). The Ideas of Frederick W. Taylor: An Evaluation. The Academy of Management Review, 7(1), 14-24. doi:10.2307/257244
• MacFarlane, L. (1991). The New England Kitchen Goes Uptown: Domestic Displacements in Harriet Beecher Stowe's New York. New England Quarterly, 64(2), 272-292.
• Magat, R. (1999). Unlikely partners: Philanthropic foundations and the labor movement: Cornell University Press.
• Mees, B. (2013). "Mind, method, and motion: Frank and Lillian Gilbreth". In The Oxford Handbook of Management Theorists (pp. 32-49). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Miller, T. R., & Lemons, M. A. (1998). Breaking the glass ceiling: lessons from a management pioneer. Advanced Management Journal, 63(1), 4-9.
• Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
• Mousa, F. T., & Lemak, D. J. (2009). The Gilbreths' quality system stands the test of time. Journal of Management History, 15(2), 198/215.
• Nyland, C., Bruce, K., & Burns, P. (2014). Taylorism, the International Labour Organization, and the genesis and diffusion of codetermination. Organization Studies, 35(8), 1149-1169.
• Perloff, R., & Naman, J. L. (1996). Lillian Gilbreth: tireless advocate for a general psycology. Portraits of Pioneers in Psychology, 2(1), 107-116.
• Phipps, S., & Prieto, L. (2016). A discovery of early labor organizations and the women who advocated work–life balance: An ethical perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(2), 249-261.
• Quigel, J. P. (1992). "The Business of Selling Efficiency: Harrington Emerson and the Emerson Efficiency Engineers, 1900-1930" Ph.D. dissertation. Pennsylvania State University,
• Rose, N. (1988). Calculable minds and manageable individuals. History of the human sciences, 1(2), 179-200. doi:10.1177/095269518800100202
• Scott, J. (1988). Social Network Analysis. Sociology, 22(1), 109-127. doi:10.1177/0038038588022001007
• Scott, J. (2020). Social Network Analysis: A Handbook (Second ed.): Sage Publication.
• Scott, J. W. (1988). Gender and the Politics of History: Columbia University Press.
• Sheldon, O. (1976). Taylor, the creative leader. In D. C. R. D. DelMar (Ed.), Classics in scientific management a book of readings (pp. 35-51). [Tuscaloosa, Ala.: University of Alabama Press.
• Sicherman, B. (1975). American history. Signs, 1(2), 461-485.
• Silverberg, H. (1998). Gender and American social science : the formative years. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
• Sklar, K., Schüler, A., & Strasser, S. (1998). Social justice feminists in the United States and Germany: a dialogue in documents, 1885-1933: Cornell University Press.
• Spiro, J. P. (2009). Defending the Master Race: Conservation, Eugenics, and the Legacy of Madison Grant. Vermont: University of Vermont Press
• Şimşek, H. (1977). 21. Yüzyılın Eşiğinde Paradigmalar Savaşı: Kaostaki Türkiye. İstanbul: Sistem Yayıncılık, 177.
• Taylor, F. W. (1927). What do Your Hands Tell. Popular Mechanics, 47(1), 20.
• Taylor, F. W. (1967). The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper.
• Taylor, F. W. (1970b). What is scientific management? In H. F. Merrill (Ed.), Classics in management (pp. 67-71). New York: American Management Association.
• Taylor , F. W ve Akın, H. B. (2007) Bilimsel yönetimin ilkeleri. Çizgi Kitabevi.
• Van Kleeck, M. (1924). The social meaning of good management. Bulletin of the Taylor Society & the Society of Industrial Engineers, 11(6), 242.
• Vasquez, M. J. T. (2007). "Lillian Evelyn Moller Gilbreth: the woman who 'had it all'". In Women of Vision: Their Psychology, Circumstances, and Success (pp. 45-60). New York: Springer.
• Wacławik, Ł. (2016). Mary Barnett Gilson (1877–1959)—Prekursor Zarzadzania Zasobami Ludskimi. Przegląd Organizacji(8), 28-33.
• Walton, R. E. (1977). Work innovations at Topeka: After six years. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 13(3), 422-433.
• Wasserman, S. G. J. (1994). Advances in social network analysis : research in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
• Webb, S. (1912). The economic theory of a legal minimum wage. Journal of Political Economy, 20(10), 973-998.
• Wolf, H. (1941). What's Past Is Prologue. By Mary Barnett Gilson. . New York: The University of North Carolina Press.
• Wrege, C., & Greenwood, R. (1982). Mary B. Gilson—A historical study of the neglected accomplishments of a woman who pioneered in personnel management. Business and Economic History, 35-42.
• Wren, D. A. (1980). Scientific Management in the U.S.S.R., with Particular Reference to the Contribution of Walter N. Polakov. The Academy of Management Review, 5(1), 1-11. doi:10.2307/257800
• Wren, D. A. (2005). The History of Management Thought. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
• Wren, D. A., & A.G., B. (2009). The evolution of management thought. Hoboken, N.J.; [Chichester, England]: Wiley ; [Wiley, distributor].
• Wren, D. A., & Hay, R. D. (1977). Management historians and business historians: differing perceptions of pioneer contributors. Academy of Management Journal, 20, 470-476.
• Wright, G. (1980). Moralism and the Model Home: Domestic Architecture and Cultural Conflict in Chicago, 1873-1913. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.